Abstract
Caatinga is the largest continuous Seasonally Tropical Dry Forests (STDF) in America, with a wide variety of vegetation physiognomies. Understanding how biodiversity is structured in each ecosystem allows to define what set of species and species attributes thrives under different vegetation physiognomies. We compared dung beetle diversity and functional groups in three physiognomies (Caatinga sensu strictu, Grota and Cerrado) within a mosaic of Caatinga during the rainy season. A total of 1073 dung beetles from 14 species were collected. Cerrado had a higher species richness than the other physiognomies. Alpha, gamma and beta diversities were statistically higher in Cerrado and Grota, while Caatinga sensu strictu was the least diverse physiognomy. Dung beetle expected species richness, abundance, and body size were similar among the physiognomies. In Cerrado and s. strictu diet-generalist dung beetles had a clearly higher species richness and abundance than the coprophagous and necrophagous dung beetles. This may indicate that diet generalists may be more successful than diet specific species in this ecosystem. Our study provides cues supporting that each physiognomy harbors distinct dung beetle communities, which this may be related to different microhabitat conditions and food availability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade-Lima D (1981) The Caatingas dominium. Rev. Bras Bot 4:149–163
Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Ávila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Hoogmoed MS, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Miranda-Santos R, Nunes-Gutjahr AL, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters SL, Ribeiro-Junior MA, Silva MNF, Silva Motta C, Peres CA (2007) Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 20:18555–18560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703333104
Besualdo CV (2011) Choosing the best non-parametric richness estimator for benthic macroinvertebrates databases. Rev. Soc Entomol Arge 70:27–38
Brown S, Lugo AE (1982) The storage and production of organic matter in tropical forests and their role in the global carbon cycle. Biotropica 14:161–187
Carvalho-Neto FG, Silva JR, Santos N, Rohde C, Garcia ACL, Montes MA (2016) The heterogeneity of Caatinga biome: an overview of the bat fauna. Mammalia 81:257–264. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2015-0046
Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) Primer v6: user manual/tutorial. Primer-e, Plymouth
Colwell RK (2013) Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates. Accessed 10 May 2018.
Costa FC, Pessoa KKT, Liberal CN, Filgueiras BKC, Salomão RP, Iannuzzi L (2013) What is the importance of open habitat in a predominantly closed forest area to the dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeinae) assemblage? Rev. Bras Entomol 57:329–334 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262013000300012
Crawley MJ (2013) The R book, 2nd edn. Aptara Inc., New Delhi
Dattaraja HS, Pulla S, Suresh HS, Nagaraja MS, Srinivasa Murthy CA, Sukumar R (2018) Woody plant diversity in relation to environmental factors in a seasonally dry tropical forest landscape. J Veg Sci 29:704–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12652
Dirzo R, Young HS, Mooney HA, Ceballos G (2011) Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests ecology and conservation. Island Press, Washington
Gardner TA, Barlow J, Chazdon R, Ewers RM, Harvey CA, Peres CA, Sodhi NS (2009) Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. Ecol Lett 12:561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248200901294.x
Génier F (2009) Le genre Eurysternus Dalman, 1824 (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Oniticellini), révision taxonomique et clés de détermination illustrées. Pensoft, Moscow
Halffter G (1991) Historical and ecological factors determining the geographical distribution of beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Biogeographia 15:11–40. https://doi.org/10.21426/B615110376
Halffter G, Edmonds WD (1982) The nesting behavior of Dung Beetles (Scarabaeinae) - An Ecological and evolutive approach. México DF, Instituto de Ecología
Halffter G, Favila ME (1993) The Scarabaeinae (Insecta: Coleoptera) an animal group for analyzing, inventorying and monitoring biodiversity in tropical rainforest and modified landscapes. Biol Int 27:15–21
Halffter G, Matthews EG (1966) The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomol Mex 12–14:1–312
Hanski I, Cambefort Y (1991) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton, Princeton University Press
Hernández MIM (2005) Artrópodes: Besouros Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera) do Curimataú, Paraíba. In: Araújo FS, Rodal MJN, Barbosa MRV (eds) Análise das variações da biodiversidade do bioma Caatinga para suporte a estratégias regionais de conservação. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, pp 369–380
Hernández MIM (2007) Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) of the Paraiba Caatinga ecosystem, Brazil. Oecolog Bras 11:356–364. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2007.1103.06
Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934352
ICMBIO (2018) Unidades de Conservação – Caatinga Parna Boqueirão da Onça. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/unidadesdeconservacao/biomas-brasileiros/caatinga/unidades-de-conservacao-caatinga/9578-parna-do-boqueirao-da-onca. Accessed 26 June 2018.
Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
Krell FT, Krell-Westerwalbesloh S, Weib I, Eggleton P, Linsenmair KE (2003) Spatial separation of Afrotropical dung beetle guilds: a trade - off between competitive superiority and energetic constraints (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecography 26:210–222. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03278.x
Larsen TH, Lopera A, Forsyth A (2008) Understanding trait-dependent community disassembly: dung beetles, density functions, and forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol 22:1288–1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00969.x
Leal IR, Tabarelli M, Silva JC (2003) Ecologia e conservação da Caatinga. Editora Universitária da UFPE, Recife
Liberal CN, Farias AMI, Meiado MV, Filgueiras BKC, Iannuzzi L (2011) How habitat change and rainfall affect dung beetle diversity in Caatinga, a Brazilian semi-arid ecosystem. J Insect Sci 11:114. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.011.11401
Lumaret JP, Kirk A (1987) Ecology of dung beetles in the French Mediterranean region (Col. Scarabaeinae). Acta Zool Mex 24:1–55
Marcon E, Hérault B (2015) Entropart: An R Package to Measure and Partition Diversity. J Stat Softw 67:1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i08
Medina AM, Lopes PP (2014a) Seasonality in the dung beetle community in a Brazilian tropical dry forest: Do small changes make a difference? J Insect Sci 14:123. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/14.1.123
Medina AM, Lopes PP (2014b) Resource utilization and temporal segregation of Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) community in a Caatinga fragment. Neotrop Entomol 43:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-014-0198-9
Nichols E, Larsen T, Spector S, Davis AL, Escobar F, Favila M, Vulinec K (2007) Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 137:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.023
Numa C, Verdú JR, Sánchez A, Galante E (2009) Effect of landscape structure on the spatial distribution of Mediterranean dung beetle diversity. Divers Distrib 15:489–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00559.x
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Heisterkamp S, Van Willigen B (2016) Package “nlme”. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/nlme.pdf. Accessed August 2016.
Puker A, Correa CM, Korasaki V (2014) Deltochilini and Phanaeini dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in introduced and native ecosystems of Brazil. J Nat Hist 48:2105–2116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2014.908969
R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Salas-Morales SH, González EJ, Meave JA (2018) Canopy height variation and environmental heterogeneity in the tropical dry forests of coastal Oaxaca, Mexico. Biotropica 50:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12491
Salomão RPS, Iannuzzi L (2017) How do regeneration stages of Caatinga forests influence the structure of dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) community? Coleopt Bull 71:578–588. https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-71.3.578
Salomão RPS, Maia ACD, Bezerra BM, Iannuzzi L (2017) Attractiveness of different food resources to dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) of a dry tropical area. Neotrop Entomol 47:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-017-0515-1
Santos JC, Leal IR, Cortez JS, Fernandes GW, Tabarelli M (2011) Caatinga: the scientific negligence experienced by a dry tropical forest. Trop Conserv Sci 4:276–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291100400306
Scholtz CH, Davis ALV, Kryger U (2009) Evolutionary biology and conservation of dung beetles. Sofia-Moscow, Pensoft
Silva RJ, Coletti F, Costa DA, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2014) Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of forests and pastures of southwestern Brazilian Amazon: Survey of species and feeding guilds. Acta Amazon 44:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201304472
Silva JMC, Leal IR, Tabarelli M (2018) Caatinga the largest Tropical Dry Forest region in South America. Springer, Berlim
Velloso AL, Sampaio EVSB, Pareyn FGC (2002) Ecorregiões propostas para o Bioma Caatinga. Instituto de Conservação Ambiental The Nature Conservancy do Brasil, Recife
Verdú JR, Arellano L, Numa C (2006) Thermoregulation in endothermic dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): effect of body size and ecophysiological constraints in flight. J Insect Physiol 52:854–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.05.005
Williams SE, Marsh H, Winter J (2002) Spatial scale, species diversity, and habitat structure: small mammals in australian tropical rain forest. Ecology 83:1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1317:SSSDAH]2.0.CO;2
Williams NW, Crone EE, Roulston TH, Minckley RL, Packer L, Potts SG (2010) Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biol Conserv 143:2280–2291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the people from the “Parque Nacional Boqueirão da Onça” for the logistical support help during the fieldwork. We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) for a scholarship granted to JB and RPS over the course of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The experimentation was no invasive and complied with Brazilian law. At the end of the experiment, the specimens were deposited in the Entomological Collection of Federal University of Pernambuco and in the Federal University of Mato Grosso following standard procedures and there are no conflicts of interest (financial and non-financial). There were no humans participants on the study and thus, no ‘informed consent’ was required.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barretto, J., Salomão, R.P. & Iannuzzi, L. Diversity of dung beetles in three vegetation physiognomies of the Caatinga dry forest. Int J Trop Insect Sci 40, 385–392 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-019-00089-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-019-00089-4