Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Neutral syndrome

Nature Human Behaviour volume 4, pages 780–790 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Neutral models of evolution assume the absence of natural selection. Formerly confined to ecology and evolutionary biology, neutral models are spreading. In recent years they’ve been applied to explaining the diversity of baby names, scientific citations, cryptocurrencies, pot decorations, literary lexica, tumour variants and much more besides. Here, we survey important neutral models and highlight their similarities. We investigate the most widely used tests of neutrality, show that they are weak and suggest more powerful methods. We conclude by discussing the role of neutral models in the explanation of diversity. We suggest that the ability of neutral models to fit low-information distributions should not be taken as evidence for the absence of selection. Nevertheless, many studies, in increasingly diverse fields, make just such claims. We call this tendency ‘neutral syndrome’.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: How mutation, drift and selection maintain variation.
Fig. 2: Variant abundance distribution-based tests of neutrality are weak.
Fig. 3: Testing neutrality with time series data.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darwin, C.R. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (John Murray, 1859).

  2. Macarthur, R. H. On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 43, 293–295 (1957).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutchinson, G. E. Homage to Santa Rosalia, or, why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 153, 145–159 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Community Structure and the Niche (ed. Giller, P.) (Chapman and Hall, 1984).

  5. Chase, J.M. & Leibold, M. Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches (University of Chicago Press, 2003).

  6. Price, T. D. et al. Niche filling slows the diversification of Himalayan songbirds. Nature 509, 222–225 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dobzhansky, T. Genetics and the Origin of Species (Columbia University Press; 1951., 1951).

  8. Levene, H. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87, 331–333 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke, B. C. The evolution of genetic diversity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 205, 453–474 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delph, L. F. & Kelly, J. K. On the importance of balancing selection in plants. New Phytol. 201, 45–56 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merlo, L. M., Pepper, J. W., Reid, B. J. & Maley, C. C. Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 924–935 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Plaks, V., Kong, N. & Werb, Z. The cancer stem cell niche: how essential is the niche in regulating stemness of tumor cells? Cell Stem Cell 16, 225–238 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chamberlin, E. H. The product as an economic variable. Q. J. Econ. 67, 1–29 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hotelling, H. Stability in competition. Econ. J. (Lond.) 153, 41–57 (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lancaster, K. The economics of product variety: a survey. Mark. Sci. 9, 189–206 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saviotti, P.P. Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy (Edward Elgar, 1996).

  17. Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. The population ecology of organizations. Am. J. Sociol. 82, 929–964 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carroll, G. R. Concentration and specialization: dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations. Am. J. Sociol. 90, 1262–1283 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh, J. V. & Lumsden, C. J. Theory and research in organizational ecology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 16, 161–195 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M. & Sinkinson, M. Competition and ideological diversity: historical evidence from US newspapers. Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 3073–3114 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fosfuri, A., Giarratana, M.S. & Sebrek, S.S. Resource partitioning and strategies in markets for technology. Strateg. Organ. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018791329 (2018).

  22. Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49, 725–738 (1964).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Crow, J. & Kimura, M. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. (Harper and Row, 1970).

  24. Hubbell, S.P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (Princeton University Press, 2001).

  25. Bell, G. Neutral macroecology. Science 293, 2413–2418 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Neiman, F. Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective–inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois woodland ceramic assemblages. American Antiquity 60, 7–36 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shennan, S. & Wilkinson, J. Ceramic style change and neutral evolution: a case study from Neolithic Europe. Am. Antiq. 66, 577–593 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hahn, M. W. & Bentley, R. A. Drift as a mechanism for cultural change: an example from baby names. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270(Suppl 1), S120–S123 (2003).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bentley, R. A., Hahn, M. W. & Shennan, S. J. Random drift and culture change. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271, 1443–1450 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bentley, R. A., Lipo, C. P., Herzog, H. A. & Hahn, M. W. Regular rates of popular culture change reflect random copying. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28, 151–158 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lycett, S. J. Acheulean variation and selection: does handaxe symmetry fit neutral expectations? J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 2640–2648 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schauer, P. Cultural Evolution in the Age of Athens: Drift and Selection in Greek Figure-Painted Pottery. PhD thesis (University College London, 2008).

  33. Bentley, R. A., Ormerod, P. & Shennan, S. Population-level neutral model already explains linguistic patterns. Proc. Bio.Sci. 278, 1770–1772 (2011). discussion 1773–1776.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Acerbi, A. & Bentley, R. A. Biases in cultural transmission shape the turnover of popular traits. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35, 228–236 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. ElBahrawy, A., Alessandretti, L., Kandler, A., Pastor-Satorras, R. & Baronchelli, A. Evolutionary dynamics of the cryptocurrency market. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170623–170623 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Newberry, M. G., Ahern, C. A., Clark, R. & Plotkin, J. B. Detecting evolutionary forces in language change. Nature 551, 223–226 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Simon, H. A. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 42, 425–440 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Price, D. J. Networks of scientific papers. Science 149, 510–515 (1965).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Barabási, A.-L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mitzenmacher, M. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math. 1, 226–251 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Newman, M. E. J. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics 46, 323–351 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Redner, S. Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review. Phys. Today 58, 49–54 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ohta, T. & Gillespie, J. H. Development of neutral and nearly neutral theories. Theor. Popul. Biol. 49, 128–142 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kreitman, M. The neutral theory is dead. Long live the neutral theory. BioEssays 18, 678–683 (1996). discussion 683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hey, J. The neutralist, the fly and the selectionist. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 35–38 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Proulx, S. R. & Adler, F. R. The standard of neutrality: still flapping in the breeze? J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1339–1350 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kern, A. D. & Hahn, M. W. The Neutral Theory in light of natural selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1366–1371 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Jensen, J. D. et al. The importance of the Neutral Theory in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 73, 111–114 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ricklefs, R. E. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? Ecology 87, 1424–1431 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Leigh, E. G. Jr. Neutral theory: a historical perspective. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 2075–2091 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Clark, J. S. Beyond neutral science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 8–15 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wennekes, P. L., Rosindell, J. & Etienne, R. S. The neutral-niche debate: a philosophical perspective. Acta Biotheor. 60, 257–271 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Rosindell, J., Hubbell, S. P., He, F., Harmon, L. J. & Etienne, R. S. The case for ecological neutral theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 203–208 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Clark, J. S. The coherence problem with the Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 198–202 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Williams, M. J., Werner, B., Barnes, C. P., Graham, T. A. & Sottoriva, A. Identification of neutral tumor evolution across cancer types. Nat. Genet. 48, 238–244 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Tarabichi, M. et al. Neutral tumor evolution? Nat. Genet. 50, 1630–1633 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Heide, T. et al. Reply to ‘Neutral tumor evolution?’. Nat. Genet. 50, 1633–1637 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. McDonald, T. O., Chakrabarti, S. & Michor, F. Currently available bulk sequencing data do not necessarily support a model of neutral tumor evolution. Nat. Genet. 50, 1620–1623 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Werner, B., Williams, M. J., Barnes, C. P., Graham, T. A. & Sottoriva, A. Reply to ‘Currently available bulk sequencing data do not necessarily support a model of neutral tumor evolution’. Nat. Genet. 50, 1624–1626 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Balaparya, A. & De, S. Revisiting signatures of neutral tumor evolution in the light of complexity of cancer genomic data. Nat. Genet. 50, 1626–1628 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Williams, M. J. et al. Reply to ‘Revisiting signatures of neutral tumor evolution in the light of complexity of cancer genomic data’. Nat. Genet. 50, 1628–1630 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ayala, F. J. & Campbell, C. A. Frequency-dependent selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5, 115–138 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Nosil, P. Frequency-dependent selection: when being different makes you not stand out. Curr. Biol. 16, R806–R808 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Volkov, I., Banavar, J. R., He, F., Hubbell, S. P. & Maritan, A. Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests. Nature 438, 658–661 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Adler, P. B., Hillerislambers, J. & Levine, J. M. A niche for neutrality. Ecol. Lett. 10, 95–104 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P.J. Culture and the Evolutionary Process (University of Chicago Press, 1985).

  67. Richerson, P.J. & Boyd, R. Not by Genes Alone (University of Chicago Press, 2005).

  68. Morgan, T. J. H. & Laland, K. N. The biological bases of conformity. Front. Neurosci. 6, 87 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Ohta, T. Population size and rate of evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 1, 305–314 (1972).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Akashi, H., Osada, N. & Ohta, T. Weak selection and protein evolution. Genetics 192, 15–31 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Willis, J.C. Age and Area: a Study in Geographical Distribution and Origin of Species (Cambridge University Press, 1922).

  72. Willis, J.C. The Course of Evolution by Differentiation or Divergent Mutation Rather Than by Selection (Cambridge University Press, 1940).

  73. Volkov, I., Banavar, J. R., Hubbell, S. P. & Maritan, A. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 424, 1035–1037 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bentley, R. A. & Shennan, S. J. Cultural Transmission and Stochastic Network Growth. Am. Antiq. 68, 459–485 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Herzog, H. A., Bentley, R. A. & Hahn, M. W. Random drift and large shifts in popularity of dog breeds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271(Suppl 5), S353–S356 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Bentley, R. A. Random drift versus selection in academic vocabulary: an evolutionary analysis of published keywords. PLoS One 3, e3057 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Tomasových, A. & Kidwell, S. M. Predicting the effects of increasing temporal scale on species composition, diversity, and rank-abundance distributions. Paleobiology 36, 672–695 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Premo, L. S. & Scholnick, J. B. The spatial scale of social learning affects cultural diversity. American Antiquity 76, 163–176 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Premo, L. S. Cultural transmission and diversity in time-averaged assemblages. Curr. Anthropol. 55, 105–114 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Porcic, M. Exploring the effects of assemblage accumulation on diversity and innovation rate estimates in neutral, conformist, and anti-conformist models of cultural transmission. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 22, 1071–1092 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Albert, R., Jeong, H. & Barabási, A.-L. Diameter of the world-wide web. Nature 401, 130–131 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Lima-Mendez, G. & van Helden, J. The powerful law of the power law and other myths in network biology. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 1482–1493 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. & Newman, M. E. J. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51, 661–703 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Al Hammal, O., Alonso, D., Etienne, R. S. & Cornell, S. J. When can species abundance data reveal non-neutrality? PLOS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004134 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Takeuchi, Y. & Innan, H. Evaluating the performance of neutrality tests of a local community using a niche-structured simulation model. Oikos 124, 1203–1214 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Brzezinski, M. Power laws in citation distributions: evidence from Scopus. Scientometrics 103, 213–228 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. McGill, B. J. A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 422, 881–885 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Etienne, R. & Olff, H. A novel genealogical approach to neutral biodiversity theory. Ecol. Lett. 7, 170–175 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. McGill, B. J., Maurer, B. A. & Weiser, M. D. Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology 87, 1411–1423 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Connolly, S. R. et al. Commonness and rarity in the marine biosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8524–8529 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Broido, A. D. & Clauset, A. Scale-free networks are rare. Nat. Commun. 10, 1017 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Gillespie, J. The Causes of Molecular Evolution (Oxford University Press, 1991).

  93. Bell, G. The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. Am. Nat. 155, 606–617 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Magurran, A. E. Species abundance distributions: pattern or process? Funct. Ecol. 19, 177–181 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. McGill, B. J. et al. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol. Lett. 10, 995–1015 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Purves, D. & Pacala, S. in Biotic Interactions in the Tropics (eds Burslem, D.F.R.P., Pinard, M.A. & Hartley, S.E.) 107–138 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).

  97. Matthews, T. J. & Whittaker, R. J. Neutral theory and the species abundance distribution: recent developments and prospects for unifying niche and neutral perspectives. Ecol. Evol. 4, 2263–2277 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Tokeshi, M. Species abundance patterns and community structure. Adv. Ecol. Res. 24, 111–186 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Rosindell, J., Cornell, S. J., Hubbell, S. P. & Etienne, R. S. Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 13, 716–727 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Williams, M. J. et al. Quantification of subclonal selection in cancer from bulk sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 50, 895–903 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Ewens, W. J. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 3, 87–112 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Ewens, W. Mathematical Population Genetics. 1. Theoretical Introduction (Springer, 2004).

  103. Slatkin, M. An exact test for neutrality based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genet. Res. 64, 71–74 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Slatkin, M. A correction to the exact test based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genet. Res. 68, 259–260 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Watterson, G. A. Heterosis or neutrality? Genetics 85, 789–814 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Watterson, G. A. The homozygosity test of neutrality. Genetics 88, 405–417 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Garrigan, D. & Hedrick, P. W. Perspective: detecting adaptive molecular polymorphism: lessons from the MHC. Evolution 57, 1707–1722 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Lansing, J. S. et al. Male dominance rarely skews the frequency distribution of Y chromosome haplotypes in human populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11645–11650 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Etienne, R. S. A neutral sampling formula for multiple samples and an ‘exact’ test of neutrality. Ecol. Lett. 10, 608–618 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Jabot, F. & Chave, J. Analyzing tropical forest tree species abundance distributions using a nonneutral model and through approximate Bayesian inference. Am. Nat. 178, E37–E47 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Steele, J., Glatz, C. & Kandler, A. Ceramic diversity, random copying, and tests for selectivity in ceramic production. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 1348–1358 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Fama, E. F. The behaviour of stock-market prices. J. Bus. 38, 34–105 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Fama, E. F. Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Finance 25, 383–417 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Poterba, J. M. & Summers, L. H. Mean reversion in stock prices: evidence and implications. J. Financ. Econ. 22, 27–59 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Bollback, J. P., York, T. L. & Nielsen, R. Estimation of 2Nes from temporal allele frequency data. Genetics 179, 497–502 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Mathieson, I. & McVean, G. Estimating selection coefficients in spatially structured populations from time series data of allele frequencies. Genetics 193, 973–984 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Feder, A. F., Kryazhimskiy, S. & Plotkin, J. B. Identifying signatures of selection in genetic time series. Genetics 196, 509–522 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Malaspinas, A.-S., Malaspinas, O., Evans, S. N. & Slatkin, M. Estimating allele age and selection coefficient from time-serial data. Genetics 192, 599–607 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Schraiber, J. G., Evans, S. N. & Slatkin, M. Bayesian inference of natural selection from allele frequency time series. Genetics 203, 493–511 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Khatri, B. S. Quantifying evolutionary dynamics from variant-frequency time series. Sci. Rep. 6, 32497 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Ferrer-Admetlla, A., Leuenberger, C., Jensen, J. D. & Wegmann, D. An approximate Markov model for the Wright-Fisher diffusion and its application to time series data. Genetics 203, 831–846 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Tataru, P., Simonsen, M., Bataillon, T. & Hobolth, A. Statistical inference in the Wright-Fisher model using allele frequency data. Syst. Biol. 66, e30–e46 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Good, B. H., McDonald, M. J., Barrick, J. E., Lenski, R. E. & Desai, M. M. The dynamics of molecular evolution over 60,000 generations. Nature 551, 45–50 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Crema, E., Edinborough, K., Kerig, T. & Shennan, S. An approximate Bayesian computation approach for inferring patterns of cultural evolutionary change. J. Archaeol. Sci. 50, 160–170 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Crema, E. R., Kandler, A. & Shennan, S. Revealing patterns of cultural transmission from frequency data: equilibrium and non-equilibrium assumptions. Sci. Rep. 6, 39122 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Kandler, A. & Shennan, S. A generative inference framework for analysing patterns of cultural change in sparse population data with evidence for fashion trends in LBK culture. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20150905 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Foll, M., Shim, H. & Jensen, J. D. WFABC: a Wright-Fisher ABC-based approach for inferring effective population sizes and selection coefficients from time-sampled data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 87–98 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Shim, H., Laurent, S., Matuszewski, S., Foll, M. & Jensen, J. D. Detecting and quantifying changing selection intensities from time-sampled polymorphism data. G3 (Bethesda) 6, 893–904 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Chisholm, R. A. et al. Temporal variability of forest communities: empirical estimates of population change in 4000 tree species. Ecol. Lett. 17, 855–865 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Clark, J. S. & McLachlan, J. S. Stability of forest biodiversity. Nature 423, 635–638 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Gillespie, J. H. A randomized SAS-CFF model of natural selection in a random environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21, 219–237 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Pham, T., Sheridan, P. & Shimodaira, H. Joint estimation of preferential attachment and node fitness in growing complex networks. Sci. Rep. 6, 32558 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Golosovsky, M. Mechanisms of complex network growth: Synthesis of the preferential attachment and fitness models. Phys. Rev. E 97, 062310 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Bailey, M. H. et al. Comprehensive characterization of cancer driver genes and mutations. Cell 173, 371–385.e18 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Haegeman, B. & Loreau, M. A mathematical synthesis of niche and neutral theories in community ecology. J. Theor. Biol. 269, 150–165 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Chisholm, R. A. & Pacala, S. W. Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15821–15825 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Shmueli, G. To explain or to predict? Stat. Sci. 25, 289–310 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Chisholm, R. A. et al. Species-area relationships and biodiversity loss in fragmented landscapes. Ecol. Lett. 21, 804–813 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Bell, G. Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 365, 87–97 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Condit, R., Chisholm, R. A. & Hubbell, S. P. Thirty years of forest census at Barro Colorado and the importance of immigration in maintaining diversity. PLoS One 7, e49826 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Leigh, E. G., Wright, S. J., Herre, E. A. & Putz, F. E. The decline of tree diversity on newly isolated tropical islands: A test of a null hypothesis and some implications. Evol. Ecol. 7, 76–102 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Chave, J. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7, 241–253 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Hu, X.-S., He, F. & Hubbell, S. P. Neutral theory in macroecology and population genetics. Oikos 113, 548–556 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Alonso, D., Etienne, R. S. & McKane, A. J. The merits of neutral theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 451–457 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Yule, G. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 213, 21–87 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  146. Wright, S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97–159 (1931).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1930).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  148. Moran, P. A. Random processes in genetics. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 54, 60–71 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Edwards, A. W. F. Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19, 233–257 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Harding, E. F. The probabilities of rooted tree- shapes generated by random bifurcation. Adv. Appl. Probab. 3, 44–77 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Mooers, A. & Heard, S. B. Inferring evolutionary process from the phylogenetic tree shape. Q. Rev. Biol. 72, 31–54 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Nee, S. Birth-death models in macroevolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 200, 1–17 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Zipf, G.K. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology (Addison-Wesley, 1949).

  154. Perc, M. The Matthew effect in empirical data. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140378 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Bianconi, G. & Barabási, A.-L. Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks. Europhys. Lett. 54, 436 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Kong, J. S., Sarshar, N. & Roychowdhury, V. P. Experience versus talent shapes the structure of the Web. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13724–13729 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Vallade, M. & Houchmandzadeh, B. Analytical solution of a neutral model of biodiversity. Phys. Rev. E 68, 061902 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Alonso, D. & McKane, A. Sampling Hubbell’s neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 7, 901–910 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Armand M. Leroi

  2. Data Science Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Armand M. Leroi & Xiangyu Zhang

  3. MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Ben Lambert

  4. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK

    James Rosindell

  5. Department of Marine Sciences, University of the Aegean, Mytilene, Greece

    Giorgos D. Kokkoris

Authors
  1. Armand M. Leroi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ben Lambert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Rosindell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiangyu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giorgos D. Kokkoris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armand M. Leroi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Primary Handling Editor: Aisha Bradshaw

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leroi, A.M., Lambert, B., Rosindell, J. et al. Neutral syndrome. Nat Hum Behav 4, 780–790 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0844-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0844-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene