Abstract
Brand serves as a useful tool in the management of protected areas, and widely applied in World Natural Heritage (WNH) protection around the world. Usually assigned with multiple brands, it is dim that whether or not the branding strategy is effective in the protection and management of a WNH site. Therefore, Wulingyuan as a representative WNH site with multiple brands was selected to explore the effectiveness of branding strategy of a WNH site with an established evaluation model. Based on the interview with 257 visitors, it was found that international brands had a higher exposure and effectiveness than domestic brands, and the effectiveness of brands was ranked as WH (World Heritage) > GGP (Global Geopark) > NFP (National Forest Park) > 5A (National 5A Level Scenic Spot) > NKSA (National Key Scenic Area). WNH worked as the most effective brand among multiple brands, while NKSA is the reverse with the least visitors’ awareness. Even though the multiple-brand strategy is effective in attracting visitors, brand equity was rarely bestowed as a beneficial tool in the protection of a WNH site. A uniform and consistent brand would be more effective than a complicated brand system in attracting visitors and preserving heritage values. Besides, the study revealed that education level and occupation had a significant influence on their attitude towards the support for the brand system of protected areas, and environmental education and publicity of protected areas are critical. The study would be good for the brand strategy of Chinese protected areas, guiding the tourism promotion of WNH.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Retrieved 5 June, 2018, from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/640.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260675_eng#page=4, accessed at 20 Feb, 2020
References
Baral N, Hazen H, Thapa B (2017) Visitor perceptions of world heritage value at Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. J Sustain Tour:1–19
China State Forestry Administration (2011) National forest park management regulation. Retrieved 5 October, 2017, from http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2011-08/02/content_1918095.htm
Eagles PFJ, McCool SF, Haynes CD (2002) Sustainable tourism in protected areas, guidelines for planning and management. IUCN Gland, Switzerland, pp 145–150
Frey BS, Pamini P, Steiner L (2013) Explaining the world heritage list: an empirical study. Int Rev Econ 60(1):1–19 http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/fgjs/xzfg/200611/t20061101_158970.html
Huang Y, Deng J, Li J, Zhong Y (2008) Visitors’ attitudes towards China’s National Forest Park policy, roles and functions, and appropriate use. J Sustain Tour 16:63–84
Jha S (2005) Can natural World Heritage Sites promote development and social harmony? Biodivers Conserv 14(4):981–991
Jim CY, Xu SS (2004) Recent protected-area designation in China: an evaluation of administrative and statutory procedures. Geogr J 170(1):39–50
Jimura T (2011) The impact of World Heritage Site designation on local communities – a case study of Ogimachi, Shirakawa-mura, Japan. Tour Manag 32(2):288–296
King L, Halpenny E (2014) Communicating the World Heritage brand: visitor awareness of UNESCO's world heritage symbol and the implications for sites, stakeholders and sustainable management. J Sustain Tour 22(5):768–786
King L, McCool S, Fredman P, Halpenny E (2012) Protected area branding strategies to increase stewardship among park constituencies. Parks 18(2):54–63
Nicholas L, Thapa B (2010) Visitor perspectives on sustainable tourism development in the Pitons Management Area World Heritage Site, St. Lucia. Environ Dev Sustain 12(5):839–857
Perera P, Senevirathna MC, Vlosky RP (2015) Recreationist perspectives, attitudes, and perceptions towards national park management in Sri Lanka. Turizam 63(4):497–514
Poria Y, Reichel A, Cohen R (2011) World heritage site—is it an effective brand name? A case study of a religious heritage site. J Travel Res 50(5):482–495
Poria Y, Reichel A, Cohen R (2013) Tourists perceptions of World Heritage Site and its designation. Tour Manag 35:272–274
Price MF (2017) Managing MIDAs: Harmonising the Management of Multi-Internationally Designated Areas-Ramsar Sites, world heritage sites, biosphere reserves and UNESCO Global Geoparks. Mt Res Dev 37(3):384
Priskin J, McCool S (2006) The visitor experience: an essential component of protected area stewardship. Parks 16(2):1–2
Rao KS, Maikhuri RK, Nautiyal S, Saxena KG (2002) Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife: a case study from Nanda Devi biosphere reserve, India. J Environ Manag 66:317–327
Ryan J, Silvanto S (2009) The world heritage list: the making and management of a brand. Place Brand Public Dipl 5(4):290–300
Schaaf T, Clamote Rodrigues D (2016) Managing MIDAs: harmonising the management of multiinternationally designated areas: Ramsar sites, World Heritage sites, biosphere reserves and UNESCO global geoparks. IUCN, Gland xvi + 140 pp
Shackley M (ed) (1998) Visitor management: case studies from World Heritage Sites. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 46–65
Shoji Y, Yamaki K (2004) Visitor perceptions of the inscription on the World Heritage List: the use of stated choice methods. In policies, methods and tools for visitor management: proceedings of the second international conference on monitoring and management of visitor flows in recreational and protected areas Finnish Forest Research Institute, Rovaniemi, Finland, June 16–20, (p. 313)
Su YW, Lin HL (2014) Analysis of international tourist arrivals worldwide: the role of world heritage sites. Tour Manag 40:46–58
UNESCO (2017) The operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris. Available from http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/. Accessed 05.05.19
Ung A, Vong TN (2010) Tourist experience of heritage tourism in Macau SAR, China. J Herit Tour 5(2):157–168
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (2003) Poverty alleviation through sustainable tourism development. United Nations, New York
Wang L (2007) Multi-designated geoparks face challenges in China’s heritage conservation. J Geogr Sci 17(2):187–196
Wang Y, Bramwell B (2011) Heritage protection and tourism development priorities in Hangzhou, China: a political economy and governance perspective. Tour Manag 33(4):988–998
Wang G, Innes JL, Wu SW, Krzyzanowski J, Yin Y, Dai S, Zhang X, Liu S (2012) National park development in China: conservation or commercialization? Ambio 41(3):247–261
Wang Z, Yang Z, Wall G, Xu X, Han F, Du X, Liu Q (2015) Is it better for a tourist destination to be a world heritage site? Visitors’ perspectives on the inscription of kanas on the world heritage list in China. J Nat Conserv 23:19–26
West P, Igoe J, Dan B (2006) Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annu Rev Anthropol 35(1):251–277
Wuepper D, Patry M (2017) The World Heritage list: which sites promote the brand? A big data spatial econometrics approach. J Cult Econ 41(1):1–21
Yan C, Morrison AM (2008) The influence of visitors’ awareness of world heritage listings: a case study of Huangshan, Xidi and Hongcun in Southern Anhui, China. J Herit Tour 2(3):184–195
Yang CH, Lin HL, Han CC (2010) Analysis of international tourist arrivals in China: the role of World Heritage Sites. Tour Manag 31(6):827–837
Zhang C, Xiao H (2014) Destination development in China: towards an effective model of explanation. J Sustain Tour 22(2):214–233
Zhang CZ, Xu HG, Su BT, Ryan C (2009) Visitors’ perceptions of the use of cable cars and lifts in Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, China. J Sustain Tour 17(5):551–566
Zhong LS, Deng JY, Xiang BH (2008) Tourism development and the tourism area life-cycle model: a case study of Zhangjiajie national forest park, China. Tour Manag 29(5):841–856
State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2006) Scenic area management regulation. Retrieved 5 October, 2017, from http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/fgjs/xzfg/200611/t20061101_158970.html
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank the assistance by students of the school of tourism management of Sun Yat-sen University, the reviewers, and editors. We also thank the cooperation of our anonymous respondents.
Funding
The research was funded by the research project of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of China (18TACG020),
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Yuan, B. Harmonizing the Branding Strategy of World Natural Heritage in China: Visitors’ Awareness of the Multiple Brands of Wulingyuan, Zhangjiajie. Geoheritage 12, 41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00462-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00462-7