Skip to main content
Log in

Survival and Reproductive Effects in the Aquatic Invertebrate Ceriodaphnia dubia Exposed to Uranium Spiked Site Water Collected from Two Creeks in the Yukon, Canada

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluates aqueous uranium (U) toxicity in Ceriodaphnia dubia exposed to surface water collected from two creeks located in U-rich areas of Yukon, Canada. Water for toxicity testing was collected at two times of the year to represent water quality characteristics generally observed during open-water (high flows) and winter baseflow water (low flows) seasons. Collected water was transferred to the toxicological laboratory and spiked with U to achieve nominal concentrations of 50, 150, 350, 500, 650, 800, and 1000 µg U/L. Toxicity endpoints included lethal concentrations (LC50) for survival, in addition to no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) for reproduction. All derived toxicity endpoints were significantly higher than applicable Canadian water-quality guidelines for U (15 μg/L [Chronic] and 33 μg/L [Acute]). No effects on C. dubia survival were observed at LC50 concentrations > 799 μg U/L. Derived NOEC (381 μg U/L) and LOEC (524 μg U/L) values also were significantly above chronic water quality guidelines. The differences noted in the toxicity response between seasons were mainly due to the presence of toxicity ameliorating factors for U (i.e., dissolved organic carbon). These results highlight the high conservatism in applicable water-quality guidelines and the crucial need to consider site-specific water characteristics when deriving environmentally relevant, yet protective thresholds for uranium in aquatic environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves LC, Borgmann U, Dixon DG (2008) Water-sediment interactions for Hyalella azteca exposed to uranium-spiked sediment. Aquat Toxicol 87:187–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann U, Couillard Y, Doyle P, Dixon DG (2005) Toxicity of sixty-three metals and metalloids to Hyalella azteca at two levels of water hardness. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:641–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett-Seidel C, Liber K (2012) Evaluation of sediment quality guidelines derived using the screening-level concentration approach for application at uranium operations in Saskatchewan, Canada. Environ Monit Assess 184:1593–1602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bywater JF, Banaczkowski R, Bailey M (1991) Sensitivity to uranium of six species of tropical freshwater fishes and four species of cladocerans from northern Australia. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:1449–1458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) (2011a) Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: uranium. In: Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg

  • CCME (2011b) Canadian water quality guidelines: uranium. Scientific criteria document. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg

  • Crawford SE, Lofts S, Liber K (2017) The role of sediment properties and solution pH in the adsorption of uranium (VI) to freshwater sediments. Environ Pollut 220:873–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2007) Biological test method: test of reproduction and survival using the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia. Environmental protection series. Report EPS 1/RM/21, 2nd edn, February 2007. Environment Canada, method development and application section. Environmental Science and Technology Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Ottawa, ON, p 74

  • Goulet R, Thompson PA, Serben K, Eickhoff C (2015) Impact of environmentally based chemical hardness on uranium speciation and toxicity in six aquatic species. Environ Toxicol Chem 34:562–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holdway DA (1992) Uranium toxicity to two species of Australian tropical fish. Sci Total Environ 125:137–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hyne RV, Padovan A, Parry DL, Renaud SM (1993a) Increased fecundity of the cladoceran Moinodaphnia macleayi on a diet supplement with a green algae and its uses in uranium toxicity test. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 44:389–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hyne RV, Rippon GD, Ellender G (1993b) Investigation of uranium induced toxicity in freshwater hydra. In: Dallinger R, Rainbow PS (eds) Ecotoxicology of metals in invertebrates. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 149–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Khangarot BS (1991) Toxicity of metals to a freshwater tubificid worm, Tubifex (Muller). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 46:906–912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markich SJ (2002) Uranium speciation and bioavailability in aquatic systems: an overview. Sci World J 2:707–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muscatello J, Flather D (2020) Evaluation of the sensitivity of Ceriodaphnia dubia and Hyallela azteca to uranium exposure (Manuscript in Preparation)

  • Muscatello JR, Liber K (2009) Accumulation and chronic toxicity of uranium over different life stages of the aquatic invertebrate Chironomus tentans. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 57:531–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muscatello J, Eickhoff C, Tran T, Flather D (2020) Use of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Ceriodpahnia dubia and rainbow trout exposed to a mixture of metals and nutrients to derived site-specific water quality objectives for uranium (Manuscript in Preparation)

  • Pickett JB, Specht WL, JL Keyes (1993) Acute and chronic toxicity of uranium compounds to Ceriodaphnia dubia. Savannah River, Aiken, South Carolina, Westinghouse Savannah River Co. WSRC-RP-92-995

  • Poston TM, Hanf RW Jr, Simmons MA (1984) Toxicity of uranium to Daphnia magna. Water Air Soil Pollut 22:289–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riethmuller N, Markich SJ, van Dam RA, Parry D (2001) Effects of water hardness and alkalinity on the toxicity of uranium to a tropical freshwater hydra (Hydra viridissima). Biomarkers 6:45–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard SC, Sheppard MI, Gallerand MO, Sanipelli B (2005) Derivation of ecotoxicity thresholds for uranium. J Environ Radioact 79:55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidepool Scientific Software (2013) CETIS comprehensive environmental toxicity information system, version 1.8.7.16. Tidepool Scientific Software, McKinleyville, p 222

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenfield MA, Ng J, Noller BN, Markich S, van Dam RA (2011) Dissolved organic carbon reduces uranium bioavailability and toxicity. 2. Uranium [VI] speciation and toxicity to three tropical freshwater organisms. Environ Sci Technol 45:3082–3089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Dam RA, Trenfield MA, Markich SJ, Harford AJ, Humphrey CL, Hogan AC, Stauber JL (2012) Reanalysis of uranium toxicity data for selected freshwater organisms and the influence of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2606–2614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Newmont/Goldcorp and Nautilus Laboratories personnel for their support and technical assistance, in particular Mimi Tran and Curtis Eickhoff.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorgelina Muscatello.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muscatello, J., Flather, D. & Gjertsen, J. Survival and Reproductive Effects in the Aquatic Invertebrate Ceriodaphnia dubia Exposed to Uranium Spiked Site Water Collected from Two Creeks in the Yukon, Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 79, 80–88 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00740-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00740-z

Navigation