Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tectonic Features and Stages of Evolution of the Baltic–Mezen Shear Zone in the Phanerozoic, Northwestern Russia

  • Published:
Geotectonics Aims and scope

Abstract—

The general tectonic features of the Baltic-Mezen zone developed along the border of the Fennoscandian shield and the Russian Plate in the north of the East European platform, are considered. The geophysical remote methods and structural analysis were used. It has been established that the zone has a length of more than 1000 km with a width of 10–40 km and can be traced from the Gulf of Finland in the sub-latitudinal direction along the southern shores of the Lake Ladoga and the Lake Onega in the valley of the River Onega.The Baltic-Mezen zone is represented by a system of folds and faults, fracture zones and brecciation, complicating the complexes of the Archean–Paleoproterozoic basement and the Vendian–Phanerozoic cover. Throughout the zone, changes in the configuration and displacement of the axes of the magnetic anomalies are noted; on seismic sections, the systems of discontinuities penetrating the basement and cover complexes are decrypted. On the surface, the discontinuous structures of the zone are expressed in the various forms of relief, often violate and displace glacial morphostructures. Based on the analysis of materials on the nature of the paleoseismites distribution and surfaces of unconformity in the sediments of the cover, as well as the structural features of various rock complexes, a long period of development of the Baltic-Mezen zone was established during the Caledonian, Hercynian and the latest stages of deformation. The Caledonian stage was associated with the formation of paleoseismites horizons of Kukruz phase (~ 460 Ma), as well as the folded-fault structures formed in the Late Silurian–Early Devonian. The Hercynian stage was manifested by several seismic and tectonic events in the Late Devonian (Frasnian age), in the Early (Visean age) and Late (Kasimovian century) Carboniferous. The newest stage was associated with Neopleistocene glaciodynamic processes and two stages of seismic events in the late and post-glacial period, which were accompanied by activation of ancient faults and local development of folded structures. The developed scale of paleoseismic and deformation events of the Baltic-Mezen zone can be used for tectono-dynamic reconstructions based on additional analysis of materials of structural-kinematic research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. B. A. Assinovskaya, V. L. Gorshkov, N. V. Shcherbakova, and N. M. Panas, “Active faults revealed from geodynamic observations in the Baltic Sea,” Inzh. Izyskaniya, No. 2, 50–55 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. N. Afanasov, “Neotectonics and Holocene occurrences of gold, native mercury, and other endogenous minerals in Leningrad oblast,” Otechestvennaya Geol., No. 2, 55–59 (2011).

  3. M. N. Afanasov and A. P. Kazak, “Manifestation of tectonomagmatic activation in the northwestern East European Plate and perspectives of searching for mineral resources (Pskov, Leningrad, and Novgorod oblasts),” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., Ser. 7: Geol., Geogr., No. 4, 20–31 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. S. Biske, G. Ts. Lak, A. D. Lukashov, N. N. Goryunova, and V. A. Il’in, Structure and Evolution of the Lake Onego Basin (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Akad. Nauk SSSR, Petrozavodsk, 1971) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu. S. Biske, I. V. Sumareva, and M. V. Shitov, “The Late Holocene seismic event in the southeastern Ladoga region. I. Study principles and deformation signatures,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., Ser. 7: Geol., Geogr., No. 1, 3–25 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu. S. Biske, I. V. Sumareva, and M. V. Shitov, “The Late Holocene seismic event in the southeastern Ladoga region. II. Parameters,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., Ser. 7: Geol., Geogr., No. 3, 18–28 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. R. Verbitskii, I. V. Verbitskii, O. V. Vasil’eva, V. V. Savanin, et al., Explanatory Note to the State Geological Map of Russian Federation, Scale 1 : 1 000 000 (Third Generation), Central European Series, Sheets O-35 (Pskov), (N-35), O-36 (St. Petersburg) (VSEGEI, St. Petersburg, 2012) [in Russian].

  8. N. N. Verzilin and D. V. Sevast’yanov, “Traces of earthquakes in Holocene deposits of the Lake Ladoga region,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 381, 1002–1004 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. O. Gavrilov, “Reflection of seismic paleoevents in Mesozoic–Cenozoic terrigenous sequences of the northern Caucasus,” Lithol. Miner. Resour. 52, 1–16 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. G. Garetskii, “Tectonic and geodynamic peculiarities of the East European Platform,” Litasfera 27 (2), 3–13 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Geology of the USSR, Vol. 1: Leningrad, Pskov, and Novgorod Oblasts, Ed. by A. V. Sidorenko (Nedra, Moscow, 1971) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deep Structure and Seismicity of the Karelian Region and Its Framing, Ed. by N. V. Sharov (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Petrozavodsk, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deep Structure, Evolution and Mineral Resources of the Early Precambrian Basement of the East European Craton: Interpretation of the Data from the 1-EV Reference Profile and from the 4V and TATSEIS Profiles, Ed. by A. F. Morozov (GEOKART, Moscow, 2010), Vol. 1 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Explanatory Note to the State Geological Map of Russian Federation, Scale 1 : 1 000 000 (New Series), Sheet P-(35)-37 (Petrozavodsk) (VSEGEI, St. Petersburg, 2000) [in Russian].

  15. S. Yu. Engalychev, “Geological structure and genesis of dislocations at the Mt Andoma,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., Ser. 7: Geol., Geogr., No. 1, 32–39 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Yu. Engalychev, “Ascending fluid discharge and metallogeny of plate complexes of the East European Platform,” Vestn. Voronezh. Gos. Univ., Ser. Geol., No. 2, 16–25 (2011).

  17. V. A. Zhamoida, D. V. Ryabchuk, M. A. Spiridonov, A. G. Grigor’ev, N. V. Pimenov, A. V. Amantov, Yu. P. Kropachev, and I. A. Neevin, “Geological and geomorphologic conditions of pock-mark formation in the eastern Gulf of Finland,” Reg. Geol. Metallog., No. 54, 25–37 (2013).

  18. Earthquakes and Microseismicity in Problems of Modern Geodynamics of the East European Platform, Vol. 1: Earthquakes, Ed. by N. V. Sharov, A. A. Malovichko, and Yu. K. Shchukin (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Petrozavodsk, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. A. Kirichenko, “Tectonic evolution of the Baltic Shield in the Paleozoic,” in Vol. 6 of New Data on Geology and Stratigraphy of the Northwest RSFSR, Ed. by E. A. Kozlovskii (Minist. Geol. RSFSR, Moscow, 1977), pp. 5–18.

  20. S. Yu. Kolodyazhnyi, Structural-Kinematic Evolution of the Southeastern Baltic Shield in the Paleoproterozoic (GEOS, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Yu. Kolodyazhnyi, “Structural-kinematic conditions of the Dudergof structure formation (southeastern margin of the Baltic Shield),” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Geol. Razved., No. 5, 8–17 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. L. Kopp, Arc-Shaped Extension Structures in Regional and Global Tectonic Environments: A Kinematic Analysis (GEOS, Moscow, 2017) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Yu. Korneev, A. I. Svechnikov, A. E. Rybalko, M. A. Nikitin, and O. V. Nazarova, “Revealing geological hazards using a high-frequency seismoacoustic profiling and side-scan sonars for the state monitoring of the offshore geological medium,” Razved. Okhr. Nedr, No. 10, 48–53 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. B. Krapivner, Doctoral Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy (Moscow, 1990).

  25. A. D. Lukashov, Recent Tectonics of Karelia (Nauka, Leningrad, 1976) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. B. Malakhovskii and A. V. Amantov, “Geological-geomorphic anomalies in northern Europe,” Geomorfologiya, No. 1, 85–95 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. B. Malakhovskii and E. Yu. Sammet, “Glacial erratics and glacial dislaocation in the northwestern East European Plain,” Mater. Glyatsiol. Issled., No. 44, 121–128 (1982).

  28. B. N. Mozhaev, Recent Tectonics of the Northwestern East European Plain (Nedra, Mosocw, 1973) [in Russian].

  29. M. Yu. Nikitin, Doctoral Dissertation in Geography (St. Petersburg, 2014).

  30. A. A. Nikonov and A. M. Miidel, “Discovery of seismogenic deformations in the postglacial deposits at the southern coast of the Gulf of Finland,” Dokl. Earth. Sci. 390, 641–646 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. A. Nikonov, A. V. Poleshchuk, and D. S. Zykov, “Recent fractures and paleoseismodislocations in the Paleoproterozoic Onega structure, Baltic Shield (East European Platform),” in Vol. 11 of Tr. Karel. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk (2017), pp. 3–18.

  32. A. A. Polkanov, Geology of Hoglandian–Iotnian of the Baltic Shield (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1956) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. V. A. Puura, K. A. Mene, R. M. Myannikov, and E. A. Pirrus, “Paleotectonics and fauna of the Baltic Basin in the Cambrian and during the epoch of Ordovician phosphorite- and kukersite-accumulation,” in Tectonics, Fauna, and Formations of the Western East European Platform (Nauka i tekhnika, Minsk, 1987), pp. 74–86.

  34. A. P. Svetov and L. P. Sviridenko, Magmatism of Suture Zones of the Baltic Shield (Nauka, Leningrad, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. P. Svetov and L. P. Sviridenko, Centers of Endogenous Magmatic Activity and Mineralization in the Fennoscandian Shield (Karelian Region) (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Petrozavodsk, 2005) [in Russian].

  36. N. F. Skopenko, A. I. Ivanov, S. A. Skorospelkin, M. F. Kornilov, and V. I. Tkachenko, “Diamond-bearing perspectives for the junction zone between the Baltic Shield and East European Plate,” Razved. Okhr. Nedr, Nos. 7–8, 31–32 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yu. I. Systra, “Phaenrozoic tectonic movements of the junction zone between the Baltic Shield and East European Plate,” in Proceedings of the XIV International Conference “Relationship between Surface and Deep Structures of the Earth’s Crust,” Petrozavodsk, Russia, 2008 (Karel. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Petrozavodsk, 2008), pp. 242–245.

  38. T. N. Kheraskova, Yu. A. Volozh, M. P. Antipov, V. A. Bykadorov, and R. B. Sapozhnikov, “Correlation of Late Precambrian and Paleozoic events in the East European platform and the adjacent paleooceanic domains,” Geotectonics 49, 27–52 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. T. N. Kheraskova, Yu. A. Volozh, N. G. Zamozhnyaya, S. A Kaplan, and A. K. Suleimanov, “Structure and evolution of the western East European Platform in the Riphean–Paleozoic inferred from the EV-1 Transect (Lodeinoe Pole–Voronezh),” Litosfera, No. 2, 65–94 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. V. G. Chuvardinskii, The Quaternary Period: A New Geological Concept (Kol’sk. Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, Apatity, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  41. F. N. Yudakhin, Yu. K. Shchukin, and V. I. Makarov, Deep Structure and Modern Geodynamic Processes in the Lithosphere of the East European Platform (Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Yekaterinburg, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. Assinovskaya and M. K. Ovsov, “Seismotectonic zoning of the Finnish–Bothnia region based on the structural analysis method,” Russ. J. Earth Sci. 14, 1–12 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. B. Assinovskaya, J. Shchukin, V. Gorshkov, and N. Shcherbakova, “On recent geodynamics of the Eastern Baltic Sea region,” Baltica 24, 61–70 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  44. S. G. Bergh, K. H. Liland, G. D. Corner, T. Henningsen, and P. A. Lundekvam, “Fault-controlled asymmetric landscapes and low-relief surfaces on Vestvagoya, Lofoten, North Norway: Inherited Mesozoic rift-margin structures?,” Norw. J. Geol. 98, 379–403 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. S. Y. Kolodyazhny, A. S. Baluev, and E. N. Terekhov, “Andoma segment of south-eastern margin of Fennoscandian shield: Structure and evolution,” Geotectonics 50, 389–406 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Yu. Kolodyazhny, D. S. Zykov, and M. G. Leonov, “Structural–kinematic parageneses of the basement and cover at the southeastern margin of the Baltic Shield,” Geotectonics 41, 423–439 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu. A. Morozov, “The role of transpression in the structural evolution of the Svecokarelides in the Baltic Shield,” Geotectonics 33, 302–313 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  48. S. F. Obermeier, “Use of liquefaction-induced features for paleoseismic analysis—An overview of how seismic liquefaction features can be distinguished from other features and how their regional distribution and properties of source sediment can be used to infer the location and strength of Holocene paleo-earthquakes,” Eng. Geol. 44, 1–76 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. V. Puura and R. Vaher, “Cover structure,” in Geology and Mineral Resources of Estonia, Ed. by A. Raukas and A. Teedumae (Est. Acad. Publ., Tallinn, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. Seilacher, “Fault-graded beds interpreted as seismites,” Sedimentology 13, 155–159 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. A. Seilacher, “Sedimentary structures tentatively attributed to seismic events,” Mar. Geol. 55, 1–12 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. K. Sokman, V. Kattai, R. Vaher, and Y. J. Systra, “Influence of tectonic dislocations on oil shale mining in the Estonia deposit,” Oil Shale 25, 175–187 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. J. D. Sims, “Determining earthquake recurrence intervals from deformational structures in young lacustrine sediments,” Tectonophysics 29, 141–152 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are sincerely grateful to Yu.A. Morozov for helpful comments and recommendations.

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-05-00485), State Budget (project no. 0135-2016-0012), and the RAS Presidium (program no. 8, project no. 0135-2018-0040).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119017, Moscow, Russia

    S. Yu. Kolodyazhny, E. N. Terekhov, A. S. Baluev, A. V. Poleshchuk & D. S. Zykov

Authors
  1. S. Yu. Kolodyazhny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. N. Terekhov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. S. Baluev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. V. Poleshchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. S. Zykov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Yu. Kolodyazhny.

Additional information

Reviewer: Yu.A. Morozov

Translated by E. Murashova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolodyazhny, S.Y., Terekhov, E.N., Baluev, A.S. et al. Tectonic Features and Stages of Evolution of the Baltic–Mezen Shear Zone in the Phanerozoic, Northwestern Russia. Geotecton. 54, 1–18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852120010057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852120010057

Keywords:

Search

Navigation