Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the importance of floral resources and functional trait compatibility for maintaining bee fauna in tropical agricultural landscapes

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loss of semi-natural habitats has been identified as a major driver for pollinator loss in agricultural landscapes. The challenge has been addressed in developed countries by creating flower strips and pollinator habitats in agricultural areas, but this approach has largely been overlooked in developing countries. However, even in countries that adopted pollinator-friendly measures, the complementarities between functional traits of plants and bees are not generally used as selection criteria for candidate species in floral strips. Furthermore, the combined effect of habitat variables that are likely to maximize bee visitation are also overlooked. In tropical developing countries, even the basic information to inform decision making is missing. This paper attempts to bridge this critical gap and reports how assemblages of different non-crop plants could be used to attract bees in tropical small landholdings by investigating non-crop plant identity, non-crop floral traits, bee traits and influential habitat variables at patch scale. Results showed that a combination of both non-crop flower density and diversity increased bee visitation at patch scale. Moreover, trait-based analyses revealed that bees with a larger inter-tegular distance, longer tongue frequently visited flowers with a longer corolla. This study demonstrates that both characteristics of non-crop flower patches and floral traits are important for effective management of non-crops in tropical farmland to attract pollinators with complementary functional traits. We have explored a range of non-crop plants that could be effectively sown to attract bees but recognise that more research is necessary in order to standardise their propagation, establishment and management techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akinwande MO, Dikko HG, Samson A (2015) Variance inflation factor: as a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable (s) in regression analysis. Open J Stat 5:754

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronne G, Giovanetti M, De Micco V (2012) Morphofunctional traits and pollination mechanisms of Coronilla emerus L. flowers (Fabaceae). Sci World J 2012:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailes EJ, Pattrick JG, Glover BJ (2018) An analysis of the energetic reward offered by field bean (Vicia faba) flowers: nectar, pollen, and operative force. Ecol Evol 8:3161–3171

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barth OM, de Freitas ADS, Vanderborght B (2020) Pollen preference of stingless bees (Melipona rufiventris and M. quadrifasciata anthidioides) inside an urban tropical forest at Rio de Janeiro city. J Apic Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2020.1714863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2017) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R Package Version 1.42.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/. Accessed 20 Aug 2018

  • Basu P, Bhattacharya R, Ianetta PA (2011) Decline in pollinator dependent vegetable crop productivity in India indicates pollination limitation and consequent agro-economic crises. Nat Preced. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2011.6044.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu P, Parui AK, Chatterjee S, Dutta A, Chakraborty P, Roberts S, Smith B (2016) Scale dependent drivers of wild bee diversity in tropical heterogeneous agricultural landscapes. Ecol Evol 6:6983–6992

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer AA, Clayton MK, Brunet J (2017) Floral traits influencing plant attractiveness to three bee species: consequences for plant reproductive success. Am J Bot 104:772–781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benitez-Vieyra S, Medina AM, Glinos E, Cocucci AA (2006) Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits and size of floral display in Cyclopogon elatus, a sweat bee-pollinated orchid. Funct Ecol 20:948–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesmeijer JC, Richter JAP, Smeets MAJP, Sommeijer MJ (1999) Niche differentiation in nectar-collecting stingless bees: the influence of morphology, floral choice and interference competition. Ecol Entomol 24:380–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommarco R, Lundin O, Smith HG, Rundlöf M (2012) Drastic historic shifts in bumble-bee community composition in Sweden. Proc R Soc B 279:309–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2003) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell AJ, Biesmeijer JC, Varma V, Wäckers FL (2012) Realising multiple ecosystem services based on the response of three beneficial insect groups to floral traits and trait diversity. Basic Appl Ecol 13:363–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell AJ, Wilby A, Sutton P, Wäckers FL (2017) Do sown flower strips boost wild pollinator abundance and pollination services in a spring flowering crop? A case study from UK cider apple orchards. Agric Ecosyst Environ 239:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty A (2011) Scope of tourism development in a socio-economically backward area: a case study of Shyamsundarpur mouza, Baleshwar, Odisha. Geo-Analyst 1:78–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty P, Smith B, Basu P (2018) Pollen transport in the dark: hawkmoths prefer non crop plants to crop plants in an agricultural landscape. Proc Zool Soc 71:299–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet SA (2003) Nectar sugar content: estimating standing crop and secretion rate in the field. Apidologie 34:1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba SA, Cocucci AA (2017) Does hardness make flower love less promiscuous? Effect of biomechanical floral traits on visitation rates and pollination assemblages. Arthropod Plant Interact 11:299–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Craney TA, Surles JG (2002) Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Qual Eng 14:391–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusser S, Grando C, Zucchi MI, López-Uribe MM, Pope NS, Ballare K, Luna-Lucena D, Almeida EA, Neff JL, Young K, Jha S (2019) Small but critical: semi-natural habitat fragments promote bee abundance in cotton agroecosystems across both Brazil and the United States. Landsc Ecol 34:1825–1836

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A, Lehrer M, Kevan P (1997) Spatial flower parameters and insect spatial vision. Biol Rev 72:239–282

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries R, Rosenzweig C (2010) Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:19627–19632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM (1991) The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evol Ecol 5:370–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott SE, Irwin RE (2009) Effects of flowering plant density on pollinator visitation, pollen receipt, and seed production in Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae). Am J Bot 96:912–919

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elpel TJ (2000) Botany in a day: Thomas J. Elpel's Herbal Field guide to plant families. HOPS Press, Montana

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel EC, Irwin RE (2003) Linking pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt. Am J Bot 90:1612–1618

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi LA, Bartomeus I, Bommarco R, Klein AM, Cunningham SA, Aizen MA, Boreux V, Garratt MPD, Carvalheiro LG, Kremen C, Morales CL, Schüepp C, Chacoff NP, Freitas BM, Gagic V, Holzschuh A, Klatt BK, Krewenka KM, Krishnan S, Mayfield MM, Motzke I, Otieno M, Petersen J, Potts SG, Ricketts TH, Rundlöf M, Sciligo A, Sinu PA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Taki H, Tscharntke T, Vergara CH, Viana BF, Woyciechowski M (2015) Trait matching of flower visitors and crops predicts fruit set better than trait diversity. J Appl Ecol 52:1436–1444

    Google Scholar 

  • Geslin B, Aizen MA, Garcia N, Pereira AJ, Vaissière BE, Garibaldi LA (2017) The impact of honey bee colony quality on crop yield and farmers’ profit in apples and pears. Agric Ecosyst Environ 248:153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes LGL, Oostra V, Nijman V, Cleef AM, Kappelle M (2008) Tolerance of frugivorous birds to habitat disturbance in a tropical cloud forest. Biol Conserv 141:860–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM, Bosch J, Perfectti F, Fernández JD, Abdelaziz M, Camacho JPM (2008) Association between floral traits and rewards in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae). Ann Bot 101:1413–1420

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guenat S, Kunin WE, Dougill AJ, Dallimer M (2019) Effects of urbanisation and management practices on pollinators in tropical Africa. J Appl Ecol 56:214–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullan PJ, Cranston PS (2014) The insects: an outline of entomology. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbert A (2000) Color choices by bumble bees (Bombus terrestris): innate preferences and generalization after learning. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin AL, Youngsteadt E, Frank SD (2018) Wild bee abundance declines with urban warming, regardless of floral density. Urban Ecosyst 21:419–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanh TTM, Sharma SK, Rana MK (2014) Pollination efficiency of native bee pollinators of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in India. J Apic 29:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley RM, Atkins S, Budantsev AL, Cantino PD, Conn BJ, Grayer R, Harley MM, De Kok RD, Krestovskaja TD, Morales R, Paton AJ (2004) Labiatae. In: Kadereit JW (ed) Flowering plants dicotyledons. The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 7. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 167–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegland SJ, Boeke L (2006) Relationships between the density and diversity of floral resources and flower visitor activity in a temperate grassland community. Ecol Entomol 31:532–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1996) Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil’s advocate approach. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH (eds) Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 65–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipólito J, Boscolo D, Viana BF (2018) Landscape and crop management strategies to conserve pollination services and increase yields in tropical coffee farms. Agric Ecosyst Environ 256:218–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Warren PS, Adler LS (2018) Phenotypic selection on floral traits in an urban landscape. Proc R Soc B 285:20181239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jauker F, Speckmann M, Wolters V (2016) Intra-specific body size determines pollination effectiveness. Basic Appl Ecol 17:714–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Klumpers SGT, Stang M, Klinkhamer PGL (2019) Foraging efficiency and size matching in a plant-pollinator community: the importance of sugar content and tongue length. Ecol Lett 22:469–479

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, Williams NM, Bugg RL, Fay JP, Thorp RW (2004) The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecol Lett 7:1109–1119

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna S, Keasar T (2018) Morphological complexity as a floral signal: from perception by insect pollinators to co-evolutionary implications. Int J Mol Sci 19:1681–1695

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maad J, Alexandersson R (2004) Variable selection in Platanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae): phenotypic selection differed between sex functions in a drought year. J Evol Biol 17:642–650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra N, Marai N, Dhal K, Nayak RN, Panigrahi BK, Mallick G, Ranjit M, Kar SK, Kerketta AS (2012) Malaria outbreak in a non endemic tribal block of Balasore district, Orissa, India during summer season. Trop Biomed 29:277–285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinger RE, Prasifka JR (2017) Bee visitation rates to cultivated sunflowers increase with the amount and accessibility of nectar sugars. J Appl Entomol 141:561–573

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masierowska M, Stawiarz E, Rozwałka R (2018) Perennial ground cover plants as floral resources for urban pollinators: A case of Geranium species. Urban For Urban Green 32:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle MJ (2017) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodal inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.1–1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AICcmodavg. Accessed 20 Aug 2018

  • Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM (2004) The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Funct Ecol 18(1):116–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandin LA, Kremen C (2013) Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields. Ecol Appl 23:829–839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakazawa M (2017) fmsb: functions for Medical Statistics Book with some Demographic Data. R package version 0.6.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fmsb. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.

  • Nicolson SW (2011) Bee food: the chemistry and nutritional value of nectar, pollen and mixtures of the two. Afr Zool 46:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauw A, Kahnt B, Kuhlmann M, Michez D, Montgomery GA, Murray E, Danforth BN (2017) Long-legged bees make adaptive leaps: linking adaptation to coevolution in a plant–pollinator network. Proc R Soc B 284:20171707

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips BB, Shaw RF, Holland MJ, Fry EL, Bardgett RD, Bullock JM, Osborne JL (2018) Drought reduces floral resources for pollinators. Glob Chang Biol 24:3226–3235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pontin DR, Wade MR, Kehrli P, Wratten SD (2006) Attractiveness of single and multiple species flower patches to beneficial insects in agroecosystems. Ann Appl Biol 148:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca V, Ngo HT, Aizen MA, Biesmeijer JC, Breeze TD, Dicks LV, Garibaldi LA, Hill R, Settele J, Vanbergen AJ (2016) Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature 540:220–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasifka JR, Mallinger RE, Portlas ZM, Hulke BS, Fugate KK, Paradis T, Hampton ME, Carter CJ (2018) Using nectar-related traits to enhance crop-pollinator interactions. Front Plant Sci 9:812–819

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Warman EA, Carvell C, Sparks TH, Dicks LV, Bennett D, Wright A, Critchley CNR, Sherwood A (2005) Providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes. Biol Conserv 121:479–494

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/

  • Riojas-López ME, Díaz-Herrera IA, Fierros-López HE, Mellink E (2019) The effect of adjacent habitat on native bee assemblages in a perennial low-input agroecosystem in a semiarid anthropized landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 272:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin O, Pérez-Méndez N, Bretagnolle V, Henry M (2019) Preserving habitat quality at local and landscape scales increases wild bee diversity in intensive farming systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 275:73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW, Buchmann SL (1984) Nectar selection by Melipona and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest. Oecologia 61:1–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russo L, Debarros N, Yang S, Shea K, Mortensen D (2013) Supporting crop pollinators with floral resources: network-based phenological matching. Ecol Evol 3:3125–3140

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sahli HF, Conner JK (2007) Visitation, effectiveness, and efficiency of 15 genera of visitors to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 94:203–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders ME, Rader R (2019) Network modularity influences plant reproduction in a mosaic tropical agroecosystem. Proc R Soc Lond B 286:20190296

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick EE, Loper GM, Sadwick SE (1981) Nectar production, composition, energetics and pollinator attractiveness in spring flowers of Western New York. Am J Bot 68:994–1002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tangtorwongsakul P, Warrit N, Gale GA (2018) Effects of landscape cover and local habitat characteristics on visiting bees in tropical orchards. Agric Ecosyst Environ 20:28–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuell JK, Fiedler AK, Landis D, Isaacs R (2008) Visitation by wild and managed bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) to eastern U.S. native plants for use in conservation programs. Environ Entomol 37:707–718

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanbergen AJ, Initiative TIP (2013) Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators. Front Ecol Environ 11:251–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu DH, Muttaqi KM, Agalgaonkar AP (2015) A variance inflation factor and backward elimination based robust regression model for forecasting monthly electricity demand using climatic variables. Appl Energy 140:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller GD (1972) Evaluating responses of honey bees to sugar solutions using an artificial-flower feeder. Ann Entomol Soc Am 65:857–862

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams NM, Kremen C (2007) Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. Ecol Appl 17:910–921

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams NM, Winfree R (2013) Local habitat characteristics but not landscape urbanization drive pollinator visitation and native plant pollination in forest remnants. Biol Conserv 160:10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Woźniak NJ, Sicard A (2018) Evolvability of flower geometry: convergence in pollinator-driven morphological evolution of flowers. Semin Cell Dev Biol 79:3–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wykes GR (1952) The preferences of honeybees for solutions of various sugars which occur in nectar. J Exp Biol 29:511–518

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Lee M-B, Goodale E (2018) The relationship between crop cover, crop heterogeneity and the diversity of herbaceous plants in uncultivated areas of a tropical agricultural landscape of southern China. Glob Ecol Conserv 14:e00399

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to the farmers and other villagers for providing access to their lands and hospitality at times of need. We also thank Dr. Debabrata Maity, Department of Botany, University of Calcutta and Aditi Dutta for helping in the identification of plant specimens and morphometry of bees, respectively. This project was funded by the Darwin Initiative (project 19-024) and Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (sanction no. 09/028(0882)/2012-EMR-I, date 21.08.2012). We also thank the reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Pollination Studies, University of Calcutta, 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata, 700019, India

    Supratim Laha, Soumik Chatterjee, Barbara Smith & Parthiba Basu

  2. Entomology, Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta, 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata, 700019, India

    Amlan Das

  3. Centre for Agroecology Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Wolston Lane, Coventry, CV8 3LG, UK

    Barbara Smith

Authors
  1. Supratim Laha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soumik Chatterjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amlan Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Barbara Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Parthiba Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parthiba Basu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laha, S., Chatterjee, S., Das, A. et al. Exploring the importance of floral resources and functional trait compatibility for maintaining bee fauna in tropical agricultural landscapes. J Insect Conserv 24, 431–443 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00225-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00225-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation