Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Critical Review of Blast Wave Parameters and Approaches for Blast Load Mitigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Casualty analysis of major terrorist attacks in recent decades shows an enormous increase in fatalities and economic losses. Due to frequent terrorist attacks and failure of engineering structures under blast load, this issue has gained the attention of scientists and structural engineers. Recently, threat due to explosions is considerably raised owing to the availability of small size explosive devices with powerful and high range explosive materials. Thus, there is an immediate need for the structures, vulnerable to such tragic events, to be analysed and designed to resist these extreme loading conditions. To predict the behavior of structure under explosion loads, blast load analysis needs to be done. The effective blast parameters such as standoff distance, angle of incidence, explosive type and charge weight with its damaging effects discussed by various researchers have been overviewed in the present work. Further, it is uneconomical to harden the structure to resist the blast load. Therefore, certain strategies which can be adapted to mitigate the effect of blast pressure have also been analysed, and discussed different analytical models for prediction of blast loads. The paper present basics of blast for beginner researchers and structural engineers to understand such complex loading scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soto OA, Baum JD, Togashi F, Löhner R, Frank R, Amini A (2016) The simulation of dust effects from fragmenting charges. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 26:999–1026

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ding Y, Chen Y, Shi Y (2016) Progressive collapse analysis of a steel frame subjected to confined explosion and post-explosion fire. Adv Struct Eng 19(11):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eskew EL, Jang S (2014) Damage assessment of a building subjected to a terrorist attack. Adv Struct Eng 17(11):1693–1704

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh AK, Ditkofsky NG, York JD, Abujudeh HH, Avery LA, Brunner JF, Sodickson AD, Lev MH (2016) Blast injuries: from improvised explosive device blasts to the Boston Marathon bombing. Radio Graph 36:295–307

    Google Scholar 

  5. Larcher M, Valsamos G, Karlos V (2018) Access control points: reducing a possible blast impact by meandering. Adv Civ Eng 2018:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith PD, Hetherington JG (1994) Blast and ballistic loading of structures. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cullis IG (2001) Blast waves and how they interact with the structures. J R Army Med Corps 147:16–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neff M (1998) A visual model for blast waves and fracture. Master’s dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto

  9. Remennikov AM (2002) Blast resistant consulting: a new challenge for structural engineers. Aust J Struct Eng 4:121–135

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baum JD, Soto OA, Togashi F, Löhner R, Giltrud ME, Bell J (2017) An investigation of stationary and moving cased charge detonations in stone lined pipes. In: 31st international symposium on shock waves, vol 1, pp 117–126

  11. Togashi F, Baum JD, Soto OA, Löhner R, Zhang F (2012) Numerical simulation of TNT-Al explosives in explosion chamber. In: Seventh international conference on computational fluid dynamics (ICCFD7), Big Island, Hawaii, July 9–13, 2012

  12. Department of the Army, Navy, and Air Force (1990) Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions (with addenda). Army Technical Manual (TM 5-1300) Washington, DC

  13. Hao H, Hao Y, Li J, Chen W (2016) Review of the current practices in blast-resistant analysis and design of concrete structures. Adv Struct Eng 19(8):1–31

    Google Scholar 

  14. Department of Defense (2008) Unified facilities criteria: structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. UFC 3-340-02. Washington, DC

  15. Remennikov A, Carolan D (2005) Building vulnerability design against terrorist attacks. In: Proceedings of the Australian structural engineering conference, pp 1–10

  16. Ullah A, Ahmad F, Jang HW, Kim SW, Hong JW (2016) Review of analytical and empirical estimations for incident blast pressure. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(6):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ngo T, Mendis P, Gupta A, Ramsay J (2007) Blast loading and blast effects on structures—an overview. EJSE Spec Issue 7:76–91

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jeremic R, Bajic Z (2006) An approach to determining the TNT equivalent of high explosives. Sci Tech Rev L VI 1:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eichinger WE (1985) Mach stem modeling with spherical shock waves. M.S. Thesis Airforce Institute of Technology, US army

  20. Karzova MM, Khokhlova VA (2015) Mach stem formation in reflection and focusing of weak shock acoustic pulses. J Acoust Soc Am 136:436–442

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rigby SE, Fay SD, Tyas A, Warren JA, Clarke SD (2015) Angle of incidence effects on far-field positive and negative phase blast parameters. Int J Prot Struct 6(1):23–43

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lofquist C (2016) Response of buildings exposed to blast load. Master’s Dissertation, Structural Mechanics, Lund University, ISSN 0281-6679:1-88

  23. FEMA (2003) Risk management series: reference manual to mitigate potential terrorist attacks against buildings, 426, Washington, DC

  24. Verma S, Choudhury M, Saha P (2015) Blast resistant design of structure. IJRET 4:64–70

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shadhar HM, Lakshmi S (2017) Study of response of RC tall buildings subjected to blast loads. Int J Eng Sci Comput 7:11137–11143

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goel MD, Matsagar VA (2014) Blast-resistant design of structures. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 19(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shukla PJ, Desai AK, Chentankumar MD (2018) The current practices of analysis of reinforced concrete panels subjected to blast loading. Int J Struct Constr Eng 12:935–943

    Google Scholar 

  28. Koccaz Z, Sutcu F, Torunbalci N (2008) Architectural and structural design for blast resistant buildings. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering at Beijing, China

  29. Draganic H, Sigmund V (2012) Blast loading on structures. Tech Gazette 19(3):643–652

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baumgart CM (2014) The effect of advanced structural materials to mitigate explosive and impact threats. Masters Theses, Missouri University of Science and Technology, p 7320

  31. Alsubaei FCF (2015) Performance of protective perimeter walls subjected to explosions in reducing the blast resultants on buildings. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, p 2976

  32. Vannucci P, Masi F, Stefanou I (2017) A study on the simulation of blast actions on a monumental structure. HAL-01447783v3

  33. Chock JMK (1999) Review of methods for calculating pressure profiles of explosive air blast and its sample application. Masters theses, Blacksburg, Virginia

  34. Baker WE (1973) Explosions in air. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  35. Taylor GI (1950) The formation of a blast wave by a very intensive explosion I. Theoretical discussion. Proc R Soc A 201(1065):159–174

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor GI (1950) The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. II. The atomic explosion of 1945. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 201(1065):175–186

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Neumann JV (1963) The point source solution. In: Collected works, vol. VI. Pergamon, London, p 218

  38. Sedov L (1946) Propagation of strong shock waves (translated from Russian). J Appl Math 10:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  39. Barbier M, Villamaina D, Trizac E (2016) Microscopic origin of self-similarity in granular blast waves. Phys Fluids 28(8):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  40. Barbier M, Villamaina D, Trizac E (2015) Blast dynamics in a dissipative gas. Phys Rev Lett 115(21):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  41. Goel MD, Matsagar VA, Gupta AK, Marburg S (2012) An abridged review of blast wave parameters. Def Sci J 62:300–306

    Google Scholar 

  42. Karlos V, Solomos G (2013) Calculation of blast loads for application to structural components. JRC Technical Reports European Union 1-50

  43. Krauthammer T, Altenberg A (2000) Negative phase effects on glass panels. Int J Imp Eng 24(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kingery CN, Bulmash G (1984) Air blast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical burst. Technical report ARBRL-TR-02555. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis

  45. Brode HL (1955) Numerical solution of spherical blast waves. Jpn J Appl Phys 26(6):766–775

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Kinney GF, Graham KJ (1985) Explosive shocks in air. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  47. Newmark NM, Hansen RJ (1961) Design of blast resistant structures. In: Harris, Crede (eds) Shock and vibration handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  48. Henrych J (1979) The dynamics of explosion and its use. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sadovskiy MA (2004) Mechanical effects of air shockwaves from explosions according to experiments. In: Sadovskiy MA (ed) Selected works: geophysics and physics of explosion. Nauka Press, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  50. Larcher M (2008) Pressure-time functions for the description of air blast wave. European commission

  51. Teich M, Gebbeken N (2010) The Influence of the under pressure phase on the dynamic response of structures subjected to blast loads. Int J Prot Struct 1(2):219–234

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zárate F, Gonzalez JM, Miquel J, Löhner R, Oñate E (2018) A coupled fluid FEM-DEM technique for predicting blasting operations in tunnels. Undergr Space 3(4):310–316

    Google Scholar 

  53. Baum JD, Luo HJ, Löhner R (1993) Numerical simulation of a blast within a multi-room shelter. In: Proceedings of the MABS-13 conference. The Hague, pp 451–463

  54. Löhner R, Camelli F, Baum JD, Togashi F, Soto OA (2014) On mesh-particle techniques. Comp Part Mech 1:199–209

    Google Scholar 

  55. Löhner R, Baum JD, Mestreau EL, Rice D (2007) Comparison of body-fitted, embedded and immersed 3-D euler predictions for blast loads on columns. Collect. Tech. Pap.—45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, p 1133

  56. Tabatabaei ZS, Volz SA (2012) Comparison between three different methods in LS-DYNA: LBE, MM-ALE, coupling of LBE and MM ALE. In: 12th International LS DYNA users conference, pp 1–10

  57. Schewer L (2010) A brief introduction to coupling load blast enhanced with multi material ALE: the best of both worlds for air blast simulation. LS-DYNA Forum, Bamberg, pp 1–12

  58. Miller D, Pan H, Nance R, Shirley A, Cogar J (2010) A coupled Eulerian/Lagrangian simulation of blast dynamics. In: Proceedings of the IMPLAST conference, Rhode Island 12–14 October, 2010

  59. Soulie Y, Bouamoul A, Nguyen-Dang TV (2012) ALE formulation with explosive mass scaling for blast loading: experimental and numerical investigation. Comp Model Eng (CMES) 86(5):462–486

    Google Scholar 

  60. Slavik TP (2009) A coupling of empirical explosive blast loads to ALE air domains in LS-DYNA®. In: 7th European LS-Dyna conference

  61. Slavik TP (2012) Blast loading in LS-DYNA. University of California – San Diego, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  62. Toussaint G (2010) Comparison of ALE and SPH methods for simulating mine blast effects on structures. Defence R&D Canada—Valcartier, Technical Report, TR 2010-326

  63. Aryal A (2014) A coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian extended finite element formulation for moving interface problems and damage transport in hyper-elastic media. Dissertation, graduate school of Vanderbilt University

  64. Hilding D (2016) Methods for modelling air blast on structures in LS-DYNA. In: 14th German LS-DYNA forum Bamberg

  65. Trajkoski J (2017) Comparison of MM-ALE and SPH methods for modelling blast wave reflections of flat and shaped surfaces. In: 11th European LS-DYNA conference, Austria

  66. Lacome JL (2000) Smooth particle hydrodynamic (SPH): a new feature in LS-DYNA. In: 6th International LS-DYNA users, vol 7, pp 29–34

  67. Schimizze B, Son S, Goel R, Vechart AP, Young L (2013) An experimental and numerical study of blast induced shock wave mitigation in sandwich structures. Appl Acoust 74(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gebbeken N, Doge T (2010) Explosion protection—architectural design, urban planning and landscape planning. Int J Prot Struct 1(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  69. Badshah E, Naseer A, Ashraf M, Shah F, Akhtar K (2017) Review of blast loading models, masonry response, and mitigation. Shock Vib 2017:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  70. Langdon GS, Nurick GN, Balden VH, Timmis RB (2008) Perforated plates as passive mitigation systems. Def Sci J 58:238–247

    Google Scholar 

  71. Mostert FJ (2018) Challenges in blast protection research. DST Def Technol 14(5):426–432

    Google Scholar 

  72. Rahimzadeh T, Arruda EM, Thouless MD (2015) Design of armor for protection against blast and impact. J Mech Phys 85:98–111

    Google Scholar 

  73. Guruprasad S, Mukherjee A (2000) Layered sacrificial claddings under blast loading part I analytical studies. Int J Imp Eng 24:957–973

    Google Scholar 

  74. Goel MD, Matsagar VA, Gupta AK (2014) Blast resistance of stiffened sandwich panels with closed-cell aluminium foam. Lat Am J Solids Struct 11:2497–2515

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ding Y, Wang S, Zhao K, Yang L, Yu J (2016) Blast alleviation of cellular sacrificial cladding: a nonlinear plastic shock model. Int J Appl Mech 8(4):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mondal DP, Goel MD, Das S (2009) Compressive deformation and energy absorption characteristics of closed cell aluminum-fly ash particle composite foam. Mater Sci Eng A 507(1–2):102–109

    Google Scholar 

  77. Goel MD, Matsagar VA, Marburg S, Gupta AK (2013) Comparative performance of stiffened sandwich foam panels under impulsive loading. J Perform Constr Facil ASCE 27(5):540–549

    Google Scholar 

  78. Goel MD, Altenhöfer P, Matsagar VA, Gupta AK, Mundt C, Marburg S (2015) Interaction of shock wave with closed cell aluminum metal foam. Combust Explos Shock 51(3):373–380

    Google Scholar 

  79. Codina R, Ambrosini D, Bordon FD (2017) New sacrificial cladding system for the reduction of blast damage in reinforced concrete structures. Int J Prot Struct 8(2):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  80. Smith PD (2009) Blast walls for structural protection against high explosive threats: a review. Int J Prot Struct 1(1):67–84

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zhao XQ, Hao H (2008) Prediction of airblast loads on structures behind a protective barrier. Int J Prot Struct 35(5):363–375

    Google Scholar 

  82. Palla S, Goel MD (2017) Performance assessment of curved steel wall under blast loading. Int J Eng Res Mech Civ Eng 2(3):406–411

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, 440 010, India

    P. A. Shirbhate & M. D. Goel

Authors
  1. P. A. Shirbhate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. D. Goel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Shirbhate.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shirbhate, P.A., Goel, M.D. A Critical Review of Blast Wave Parameters and Approaches for Blast Load Mitigation. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 1713–1730 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09436-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09436-y

Search

Navigation