Skip to main content
Log in

Governing offshore fish aggregating devices in the Eastern Caribbean: Exploring trade-offs using a qualitative network model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of moored Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) in small-scale fisheries is a potential solution to food security concerns, economic development needs, and the overexploitation of nearshore coastal fisheries in the Eastern Caribbean. However, moored FADs also generate novel and largely unstudied governance challenges involving (1) the provisioning of FADs, (2) fisheries resource appropriation, (3) human wellbeing, and (4) food web impacts. We examine the relative performance of three governance scenarios to address these challenges: private-individual, community-based, and top-down governance. We construct a qualitative network model (QNM) of the fishery based on semi-structured interviews (n = 60) with fishers and fisheries managers, established food web and economic models, and expert knowledge. We simulate the social-ecological impacts of the three governance scenarios. The models suggest that community-based and top-down governance scenarios result in low levels of conflict, but provide limited incentives to develop and maintain moored FADs. The private-individual governance scenario tends to increase conflict and incentives for monitoring FADs, but has no impact on incentives for maintaining and deploying FADs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson, J.M. 2006. Institutional failure in resource management. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agard, J., A. Cropper, P. Aquing, M. Attzs, F. Arias, J. Beltran, E. Bennett, R. Carnegie, et al. 2007. Caribbean sea ecosystem assessment. Caribbean Marine Studies 8: 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam, P., K. Andersson, M. Annerstedt, R. Axelsson, M. Elbakidze, P. Garrido, P. Grahn, K.I. Jönsson, et al. 2013. Solving problems in social-ecological systems: Definition, practice and barriers of transdisciplinary research. Ambio 42: 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0372-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. 2008. Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. International Journal of the Commons 2: 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D.R., R. Plummer, F. Berkes, R.I. Arthur, A.T. Charles, I.J. Davidson-Hunt, A.P. Diduck, N.C. Doubleday, et al. 2009. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1890/070089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ban, S.S., R.L. Pressey, and N.A.J. Graham. 2014. Assessing interactions of multiple stressors when data are limited: A Bayesian belief network applied to coral reefs. Global Environmental Change 27: 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ban, S.S., R.L. Pressey, and N.A.J. Graham. 2015. Assessing the effectiveness of local management of coral reefs using expert opinion and spatial Bayesian modeling. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basurto, X., and E. Ostrom. 2009. The core challenges of moving beyond Garrett Hardin. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 1: 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390450903040447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bene, C. 2003. When fishery rhymes with poverty: A first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Development 31: 949–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N.J. 2016. Use of perceptions to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 30: 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., M.M. Betsill, J. Gupta, N. Kanie, L. Lebel, D. Liverman, H. Schroeder, and B. Siebenhüner. 2009. Earth system governance: People, places and the planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203419-101-en.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P.M. 2006. Is small really beautiful? Community-based Natural Resource Management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34: 1942–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, A., R. Chuenpagdee, J.L. Boldt, M. de Fatima Borges, M.L. Camara, M. Coll, I. Diallo, C. Fox, et al. 2017. Strong fisheries management and governance positively impact ecosystem status. Fish and Fisheries 18: 412–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, R., P. Aline, and M. Lim. 2014. Modelling the impacts of fish aggregating devices (FADs) and fish enhancing devices (FEDs) and their implications for managing small-scale fisher. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 71: 1750–1759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhatre, A., and A. Agrawal. 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 17667–17670.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cinner, J.E., T.M. Daw, T.R. McClanahan, N. Muthiga, C. Abunge, S. Hamed, B. Mwaka, A. Rabearisoa, et al. 2012. Transitions toward co-management: The process of marine resource management devolution in three east African countries. Global Environmental Change 22: 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M., G. Arnold, and S.V. Tomás. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society 15: 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRFM. 2013. Report of the CRFM/JICA fish aggregating devices (FAD) management workshop for OECS countries. Roseau: CRFM.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRFM. 2015. Draft sub-regional management plan for FAD fisheries in the Eastern Caribbean. Roseau: CRFM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dambacher, J.M., D.J. Gaughan, M.J. Rochet, P.A. Rossignol, and V.M. Trenkel. 2009. Qualitative modelling and indicators of exploited ecosystems. Fish and Fisheries 10: 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00323.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T.K., C.C. Mees, and E.J. Milner-Gulland. 2014. The past, present and future use of drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Indian Ocean. Marine Policy 45: 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePiper, G.S., S.K. Gaichas, S.M. Lucey, P. Pinto da Silva, M.R. Anderson, H. Breeze, A. Bundy, P.M. Clay, et al. 2017. Operationalizing integrated ecosystem assessments within a multidisciplinary team: Lessons learned from a worked example. ICES Journal of Marine Science 74: 2076–2086. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, M., and O. Renn. 2011. Participatory approaches to modelling for improved learning and decision-making in natural resource governance: An editorial. Environmental Policy and Governance 21: 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, G., J. Pittman, S.M. Alexander, S. Berdej, T. Dyck, U. Kreitmair, K.J. Raithwell, S. Villamayor-Tomas, et al. 2015. Institutional fit and the sustainability of social–ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabinyi, M., S. Foale, and M. Macintyre. 2015. Managing inequality or managing stocks? An ethnographic perspective on the governance of small-scale fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 16: 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, E.A., A.D.M. Smith, D.C. Smith, and P. Johnson. 2014. An integrated approach is needed for ecosystem based fisheries management: Insights from ecosystem-level management strategy evaluation. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen, P. 1998. Co-operative environmental governance; public-private agreements as a policy strategy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, C., R. Mahon, W. Hunte, and S. Singh-Renton. 1998. The role of drifting objects in pelagic fisheries in the Southeastern Caribbean. Fisheries Research 34: 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(97)00079-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarderas, A.P., S.D. Hacker, and J. Lubchenco. 2008. Current status of marine protected areas in Latin America and the Caribbean. Conservation Biology 22: 1630–1640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01023.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, N.L., R. Hilborn, and O. Defeo. 2011. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470: 386–389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haapasaari, P., C.G.J. Michielsens, T.P. Karjalainen, K. Reinikainen, and S. Kuikka. 2007. Management measures and fishers’ commitmentto sustainable exploitation: A case study of Atlantic salmonfisheries in the Baltic Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64: 825–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, T.W., and C. Glass. 2010. Science-to-management pathways in US Atlantic herring management: Using governance network structure and function to track information flow and potential influence. ICES Journal of Marine Science 67: 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsq019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C.J., J.C.P. Reum, M.R. Poe, G.D. Williams, and S.J. Kim. 2016. Using conceptual models and qualitative network models to advance integrative assessments of marine ecosystems. Coastal Management 44: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, I. 2000. Qualitative research methods in human geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heileman, S., E. Mohammed, and F. Fanning. 2008. Derivations of diet compositions in the Lesser Antilles Pelagic ecosystem, vol. 8. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, J.P. 2014. Is fisheries governance possible? Fish and Fisheries 15: 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. 2008. Exploring the concept of governability. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 10: 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802028107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, M.C., and A. Agrawal. 2006. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. 1974. The qualitative analysis of partially specified systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 231: 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, J.S., and H.I. Browman. 2017. Operationalizing and implementing ecosystem-based management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 74: 379–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, H., L. Reynal, A. Magloire, and O. Guyader. 2013. Does FAD deployment have a real effect on fishing redeployment towards offshore resources? Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute 66: 511–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavrommati, G., M.M. Baustian, and E.A. Dreelin. 2014. Coupling socioeconomic and lake systems for sustainability: A conceptual analysis using Lake St. Clair region as a case study. Ambio 43: 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0432-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConney, P., L. Fanning, R. Mahon, and B. Simmons. 2016. A first look at the science-policy interface for ocean governance in the wider caribbean region. Frontiers in Marine Science 2: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne-Thomas, J., S. Witherspoon, B. Raymond, and A.J. Constable. 2012. Comprehensive evaluation of model uncertainty in qualitative network analyses. Ecological Monographs 82: 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, S.J., M.B. Pember, and L.M. Bellchambers. 2011. Identifying indicators of the effects of fishing using alternative models, uncertainty, and aggregation error. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68: 1417–1425. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsr050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., and M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, E., M. Vasconcellos, S. Mackinson, P. Fanning, S. Heileman, and F. Carocci. 2008. A trophic model of the Lesser Antilles pelagic ecosystem. Barbados: Bridgetown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montes, N., C. Sidman, K. Lorenzen, M. Honda, M. Tamura, and M. Ishida. 2017. Co-management of FAD fisheries.

  • Nedelciu, C.-E., K.V. Ragnarsdóttir, and I. Stjernquist. 2018. From waste to resource: A systems dynamics and stakeholder analysis of phosphorus recycling from municipal wastewater in Europe. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1097-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., M.A. Janssen, and J.M. Anderies. 2007. Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 15176–15178. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701886104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, W.S., and J.S. Link. 2015. Myths that continue to impede progress in ecosystem-based fisheries management. Fisheries 40: 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2015.1024308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, J., D. Armitage, S. Alexander, and D. Campbell. 2015. Governance fit for climate change in a Caribbean coastal-marine context. Marine Policy 51: 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, R.S., and F. Berkes. 1997. Two to tango: The role of government in fisheries co-management. Marine Policy 21: 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Core Team.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravera, F., K. Hubacek, M. Reed, and D. Tarrasón. 2011. Learning from experiences in adaptive action research: A critical comparison of two case studies applying participatory scenario development and modelling approaches. Environmental Policy and Governance 21: 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reum, J.C.P., P.S. Mcdonald, B.E. Ferriss, D.M. Farrell, C.J. Harvey, P.S. Levin, and W.S. Grant. 2015. Qualitative network models in support of ecosystem approaches to bivalve aquaculture. ICES Journal of Marine Science 72: 2278–2288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, J.C. 2003. Democratic decentralisation of natural resources: Institutional choice and discretionary power transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Public Administration and Development 23: 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, S., R. Chuenpagdee, A. Charles, and J. Carlos Seijo. 2011. Coastal fisheries of Latin America and the Caribbean Aquaculture, vol. 544. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. 2010. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobie, M. 2016. Policy coherence in climate governance in Caribbean Small Island Developing States. Environmental Science & Policy 58: 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, C., K. Lorenzen, R. Sebastien, A. Magloire, J. Cruikshank-Howard, J. Hazell, and J. Masters. 2014. Toward a sustainable caribbean FAD fishery: An analysis of use, profitability and shared governance, pp. 1–20.

  • Sumaila, U.R., and M. Domínguez-Torreiro. 2010. Discount factors and the performance of alternative fisheries governance systems. Fish and Fisheries 11: 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00377.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taquet, M. 2013. Fish aggregating devices (FADs): good or bad fishing tools? A question of scale and knowledge. Aquatic Living Resources 26: 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2013043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildermuth, R.P., G. Fay, and S. Gaichas. 2018. Structural uncertainty in qualitative models for ecosystem-based. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1643: 1635–1643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zador, S.G., K.K. Holsman, K.Y. Aydin, and S.K. Gaichas. 2016. Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: The value of qualitative assessments. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 74: 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zador, S.G., S.K. Gaichas, S. Kasperski, C.L. Ward, R.E. Blake, N.C. Ban, A. Himes-Cornell, and J. Zachary Koehn. 2017. Linking ecosystem processes to communities of practice through commercially fished species in the Gulf of Alaska. ICES Journal of Marine Science 74: 2024–2033. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Pittman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 873 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pittman, J., Tam, J.C., Epstein, G. et al. Governing offshore fish aggregating devices in the Eastern Caribbean: Exploring trade-offs using a qualitative network model. Ambio 49, 2038–2051 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01327-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01327-7

Keywords

Navigation