Elsevier

Coastal Engineering

Volume 160, September 2020, 103704
Coastal Engineering

The importance of explicitly modelling sea-swell waves for runup on reef-lined coasts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103704Get rights and content

Highlights

  • 2D XBeach model of Roi-Namur Island was tested against field observations.

  • Both XB-SB and XB-NH modes reproduce key reef hydrodynamics with good skill.

  • XB-NH gives a better prediction of the wave runup because it resolves SS waves.

  • More extreme conditions and SLR increases difference in XB-SB and XB-NH runup.

  • For flooding, XB-SB may suffice and requiring 4–5 times less computational effort.

Abstract

The importance of explicitly modelling sea-swell waves for runup was examined using a 2D XBeach short wave-averaged (surfbeat, “XB-SB”) and a wave-resolving (non-hydrostatic, “XB-NH”) model of Roi-Namur Island on Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of Marshall Islands. Field observations on water levels, wave heights, and wave runup were used to drive and evaluate both models, which were subsequently used to determine the effect of sea-level rise and extreme wave conditions on wave runup and its components. Results show that specifically modelling the sea-swell component (using XB-NH) provides a better approximation of the observed runup than XB-SB (which only models the time-variation of the sea-swell wave height), despite good model performance of both models on reef flat water levels and wave heights. XB-SB has a bias of −0.108 – 0.057 m and scatter index of 0.083–0.639, whereas XB-NH has bias of −0.132 – 0.055 m and 0.122–0.490, respectively. However, both models under-predict runup peaks. The difference between XB-SB and XB-NH increases for more extreme wave events and higher sea levels, as XB-NH resolves individual waves and therefore captures SS-wave motions in runup. However, for even larger forcing conditions with offshore wave heights of 6 m, the island is flooded in both XB-SB and XB-NH computations, regardless the sea-swell wave energy contribution. In such cases XB-SB would be adequate to model flooding depths and extents on the island while requiring 4–5 times less computational effort.

Introduction

Low-lying coral reef-lined islands are vulnerable to wave-driven overwash and flooding. These flooding events will become more frequent as sea level rises due to climate-change (Vitousek et al., 2017), and will threaten freshwater resources and infrastructure (Shimozono et al., 2015; Albert et al., 2016; Storlazzi et al., 2018). When taking into account the non-linear effects of sea-level rise (SLR) on wave-driven overwash, some low-lying islands may become uninhabitable in a few decades time (Storlazzi et al., 2015; Storlazzi et al., 2018).

Coral reef-lined atoll islands are typically fronted by a wide, shallow reef flat and a steep fore reef that dissipates open-ocean incoming wave energy through wave breaking and bottom friction (Monismith et al., 2013; Lowe et al., 2005). Wave breaking on the steep fore reef induces high radiation stress gradients, which results in significant wave-induced setup on the reef flat (Becker et al., 2014). Some of the dissipated sea-swell frequency-band (‘SS”, >0.04 Hz) wave energy is transferred to infragravity-band (‘IG’, 0.004–0.04 Hz) and very low frequency-band waves (‘VLF’, 0.001–0.004 Hz) through breakpoint forcing (Symonds et al., 1982) on the steep fore reef (Péquignet et al., 2009, 2014; Pomeroy et al., 2012). Resonant amplification of IG and/or VLF waves can occur when their energy is concentrated at the natural frequency of the reef flat, which is most likely to occur on smooth reefs, with increasing water depth, high SS wave periods and specific reef dimensions (Péquignet et al., 2009, 2014; Gawehn et al., 2016).

The complex interaction between tides, surge, wave-induced setup, SS waves, IG waves, and VLF waves drive runup and subsequent island flooding. To date, few runup field observations have been collected on coral reef-lined beaches (Rueda et al., 2019), as opposed to the more frequently documented measurements of water levels and wave transformation across the reef at the toe of the beach. Similarly, wave runup on a reef profile has been measured in relatively few laboratory flume experiments (e.g. Nwogu and Demirbilek, 2010; Buckley et al., 2015, 2018).

The combination of numerical models with field or laboratory experiments can improve understanding of the effects of sea level rise and extreme events on coral reef hydrodynamics. Recent research has been mainly focused on modelling one-dimensional (1D) wave and water level transformation along a cross-shore transect (Pomeroy et al., 2012; Van Dongeren et al., 2013; Quataert et al., 2015; Beetham et al., 2016), wave runup (Nwogu and Demirbilek, 2010; Yao et al., 2012;Shimozono et al., 2015; Beetham et al., 2016; Pearson et al., 2017; Lashley et al., 2018) and overtopping (Beetham and Kench, 2018). Application of a two-dimensional horizontal (2DH) model on coral-reef lined coasts has been limited (Van Dongeren et al., 2013; Roeber and Bricker, 2015; Torres-Freyermuth et al., 2012; Beetham et al., 2018), despite the additional information it provides on the alongshore variation of nearshore hydrodynamics, flooding depths and extents in the coastal area. In 1D (cross-shore profile) models, the assumption of alongshore-uniform hydrodynamics limits the ability of the model to describe wave directional spreading, with implications for the transfer of energy to the IG-band (e.g., Guza and Fedderson, 2012). The implication of this is that the generation of IG wave energy is mostly overestimated in 1D models relative to 2D models and needs to be balanced by higher frictional dissipation (Van Dongeren et al., 2013).

The objective of this study is to study the importance of directionally spread SS wave motions on wave runup at reef-lined coasts typically characterized by steep beaches, using a short wave-averaged model (XB-SB, which does not include sea-swell motions) and a wave-resolving model (XB-NH which includes sea-swell motions) in 2D mode. Our study uses field observations of water levels, wave heights, and wave runup to drive and evaluate both models, which are subsequently used to determine the effect SLR and extreme wave conditions on wave runup and its components in coral reef environments.

Section snippets

Site description and observations

The study site is Roi-Namur Island located on the northern side of Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of Marshall Islands (Fig. 1). Roi Namur has a fringing reef that is characterized by a relatively smooth platform that ranges from 250 to 350 m wide. A narrow, steep, sandy beach (~1:6 slope) borders the island. The reef crest is emergent at spring low tides; offshore of it the steep (~1:20 slope) fore reef extends down to 25 m water depth and is characterized by a rough surface due to high coral

Field data for model calibration and validation

Wave and water-level data came from a series of tide/wave gauges deployed along two shore-normal profiles; see Cheriton et al. (2016) for a description of the sensors, data sampling, and data processing. Observations of maximum wave runup were collected by two shore-based digital time-lapse cameras located on the berm onshore of the NW and NE transects, taking photos every 31 min. On the beach, five rocks at fixed locations were marked (Fig. 2) and surveyed relative to mean sea level (‘MSL’) as

Runup observations

The observed zmax time series for the NW (Fig. 4c) and NE (Fig. 4d) transects include contributions from mean water levels (by tide and wave-induced setup) and contributions from SS, IG and VLF waves. The camera captured an instance of anomalously high runup at the NW transect on 17 November 2013 (Cheriton et al., 2016) at 16:17 GMT (Fig. 4a), during relatively mild offshore wave forcing (Hm0 = 1.9 m and Tp = 14 s). This event coincided with an instance of resonance (Gawehn et al., 2016),

Discussion

The results presented here indicate that explicitly modelling the sea-swell waves (with XB-NH) gives a better prediction of wave runup (Fig. 7) and that the difference between XB-SB and XB-NH increases for more extreme wave events and higher sea levels (Fig. 9). XB-NH captures SS-wave motions by utilizing a grid resolution high enough to completely resolve individual waves, but this comes at greater computational expense. However, the Roi-Namur case study shows that for even more extreme

Conclusions

Two modes of the XBeach model - which either explicitly model the sea-swell waves (XB-NH) or not (XB-SB) - are able to reproduce key reef hydrodynamics on an atoll reef and island with good skill, XB-SB with bias = −0.108 – 0.057 m, SCI = 0.083–0.639 and XB-NH with bias = −0.132 – 0.055 m, SCI = 0.122–0.490, but under-predict runup peaks. XB-NH was found to give a better prediction of the wave runup because it fully resolves SS wave motions. The observed extreme runup event was not reproduced

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ellen Quataert: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Software. Curt Storlazzi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Ap van Dongeren: Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Robert McCall: Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Software.

Declaration of competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided by the U.S. Department of Defense’s Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program under Project RC-2334 (“The Impact of Sea-Level Rise and Climate Change on Department of Defense Installations on Atolls in the Pacific Ocean”), the U.S. Geological Survey’s Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, and through Deltares Strategic Research in the “Quantifying Flood Hazards and Impacts” program (11203750). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is

References (41)

  • E. Beetham et al.

    Wave transformation and shoreline water level on Funafuti Atoll

    Tuvalu. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans

    (2016)
  • E. Beetham et al.

    Model skill and sensitivity for simulating wave processes on coral reefs using a shock-capturing Green-Naghdi solver

    J. Coast Res.

    (2018)
  • M.L. Buckley et al.

    Dynamics of wave setup over a steeply sloping fringing reef

    J. Phys. Oceanogr.

    (2015)
  • M.L. Buckley et al.

    Mechanisms of wave-driven water level variability on reef-fringed coastlines

    J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans

    (2018)
  • O.M. Cheriton et al.

    Observations of wave transformation over a fringing coral reef and the importance of low frequency waves and offshore water levels to runup, overwash, and coastal flooding

    J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans

    (2016)
  • De Beer, A.F., R.T. McCall, J.W. Long, M.F.S. Tissier and A.J.H.M. Reniers (in press). Simulating Wave Runup on an...
  • Z. Demirbilek et al.

    Laboratory study of wind effect on runup over fringing reefs

    Report 1. Data Report

    (2007)
  • M. Gawehn et al.

    Identification and classification of very low frequency waves on a coral reef flat

    J. Geophys. Res. Oceans

    (2016)
  • R. Guza et al.

    Effect of wave frequency and directional spread on shoreline runup

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2012)
  • R.J. Lowe et al.

    Spectral wave dissipation over a barrier reef

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (26)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text