Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Forecast of Convective Events and Its Verification against Atmospheric Electricity Observations

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

A regional system of a short-term forecast of hazardous convective phenomena within WRF-ARW is described. It is shown that major maxima of errors in prognostic temperature and vertical velocity correlate with intense convective events, which indicates the need for additional verification procedures. A new method is proposed for forecasting hazardous convective events based on analyzing the simulated spatiotemporal distributions of the radar reflectivity of an event and comparing them with characteristic parameters (the duration, area, and maximum radar reflectivity) of intense convective events. Threshold values of the area and duration of the event are selected using field observations of powerful convective clouds, while the threshold of the maximum radar reflectivity in the vertical column is tailored for regional features. The method is verified against World-Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) data and ground-based field measurements of the quasi-static electric field. It is shown that, for selected thresholds of duration (20 min) and area (50 km2), the optimal threshold of maximum radar reflectivity for Nizhny Novgorod oblast is 55 dBZ, in which case the Pierce skill score and the Heidke skill score take values of 0.61 and 0.62, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. Chernokulsky, F. Kozlov, O. Zolina, et al., “Observed changes in convective and stratiform precipitation in Northern Eurasia over the last five decades,” Environ. Res. Lett. 14 (4), 045001 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Chernokulsky, M. V. Kurgansky, and I. I. Mokhov, “Analysis of changes in tornadogenesis conditions over Northern Eurasia based on a simple index of atmospheric convective instability,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 477 (2), 1504–1509 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. I. Bychkova, V. L. Perov, and G. K. Rubinshtein, “Numerical simulation of snowstorm emergence and development with the WRF-ARW model,” Tr. Gidromettsentra Rossii, 353, 46–62 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Weather Research and Forecasting Model. www. mmm.ucar.edu/weather-research-and-forecasting-model

  5. N. F. Vel’tishchev and V. D. Zhupanov, “Experiments on numerical modeling of intense convection,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 33 (9), 560–569 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. F. Vel’tishchev and V. D. Zhupanov, “Numerical weather forecasting based on WRF-ARW and WRF-NMM non-hydrostatic models for common-use,” in 80th Anniversary of the Hydrometcenter of Russia (Triada Ltd, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian], pp. 94–135.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. F. Vel’tishchev, V. D. Zhupanov, and Yu. B. Pavlyukov, “Short-range forecast of heavy precipitation and strong wind using the convection-allowing WRF models,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 36 (1), 1–10 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. I. Kizhner, D. P. Nakhtigalova, and A. A. Bart, “The use of the prognostic WRF model for weather forecasting in the Tomsk region,” Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ., No. 358, 219–224 (2012).

  9. Yu. V. Martynova, R. B. Zaripov, V. N. Krupchatnikov, and A. P. Petrov, “Estimation of the quality of atmospheric dynamics forecasting in the Siberian region using the WRF-ARW mesoscale model,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., No. 7, 39 (2014).

  10. I. M. Gubenko and K. G. Rubinshtein, “Analysis of the results of thunderstorm forecasting based on atmospheric instability indices using the WRF-ARW numerical model data,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 40 (1), 16–24 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. O. Dementyeva, N. V. Ilin, and E. A. Mareev, “Calculation of the Lightning Potential Index and electric field in numerical weather prediction models”, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 51 (2), 186–192 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. O. Fierro, E. R. Mansell, D. R. MacGorman, et al., “The implementation of an explicit charging and discharge lightning scheme within the WRF-ARW model: benchmark simulations of a continental squall line, a tropical cyclone, and a winter storm,” Mon. Weather. Rev. 141, 2390–2415 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Zhao, Y. Yin, and H. Xiao, “The effects of aerosol on development of thunderstorm electrification: a numerical study,” Atmos. Res. 153 (398), 376–391 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. A. Toropov and A. A. Shestakova, “Quality assessment of Novorossiysk bora simulation by the WRF-ARW model,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 39 (7), 458–467 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. B. Zaripov, I. B. Konovalov, and A. A. Glazkova, “Modeling the concentration of pollutants using the WRF-ARW atmospheric model and CHIMERE chemistry transport model,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., No. 12, 38 (2013).

  16. A. V. Bykov, A. L. Vetrov, and N. A. Kalinin, “Use of global prediction models to predict the hazardous convective phenomena in Perm krai,” Tr. Gidromettsentra Rossii, 363, 101–119 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. V. Shatalina, S. O. Dementyeva, and E. A. Mareev, “Monitoring and simulation of thunderstorm events in the Nizhny Novgorod region: The strong thunderstorm of June 1–2, 2015,” Meteorol. Gidrol., No. 11, 81–87 (2016).

  18. I. M. Gubenko and K. G. Rubinshtein, “An example of the comparison of middle troposphere instability indices in the prognostic model with the thunderstorm activity data,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., 39 (5), 308–318 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. V. Eliseev, A. N. Ploskov, A. V. Chernokulsky, et al., “A correlation between lightning flash frequencies and the statistical characteristics of convective activity in the atmosphere,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 485, 273–278 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. J. Haklander and A. Van Delden, “Thunderstorm predictors and their forecast skill for the Netherlands,” Atmos. Res. 67–68, 273–299 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. B. J. Mason, “A critical examination of theories of charge generation in thunderstorms,” Tellus 5 (4), 446–460 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Mason, “The generation of electric charges and fields in thunderstorms,” Proc. R. Soc. A 415 (1849), 303–315 (1988).

  23. N. P. Shakina and A. R. Ivanova, Forecasting Meteorological Conditions for Aviation (Triada Ltd., Moscow, 2016) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. V. Klimenko, E. A. Mareev, M. V. Shatalina, et al., “On statistical characteristics of electric fields of the thunderstorm clouds in the atmosphere,” Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 56 (11–12), 778–787 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. V. Shatalina, E. A. Mareev, V. V. Klimenko, et al., “Experimental study of diurnal and seasonal variation of the atmospheric electric field,” Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 62, 183–191 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. P. R. Krehbiel, “The electrical structure of thunderstorms,” in The Earth’s Electrical Environment, ed. by E. P. Krider and R. G. Roble (Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, 1986), pp. 90–113.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. B. Brylev, S. B. Gashina, and G. L. Nizdoiminoga, Radar Characteristics of Clouds and Precipitation (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  28. I. P. Mazin, A. Kh. Khrgian, and I. M. Imyanitov, Clouds and Cloudy Atmosphere. A Reference Book (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 18-45-520003 (development of the forecasting method), no. 18-35-00673 (numerical modeling), and no. 18-05-80077 (collection and analysis of experimental data).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

    S. O. Dementyeva, N. V. Ilin, M. V. Shatalina & E. A. Mareev

Authors
  1. S. O. Dementyeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. V. Ilin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. V. Shatalina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. A. Mareev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. O. Dementyeva.

Additional information

Translated by N. Tret’yakova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dementyeva, S.O., Ilin, N.V., Shatalina, M.V. et al. Forecast of Convective Events and Its Verification against Atmospheric Electricity Observations. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 56, 123–129 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433820020036

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433820020036

Keywords:

Search

Navigation