Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Erosion characteristics and mechanism of the self-resonating cavitating jet impacting aluminum specimens under the confining pressure conditions

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to study the effects of the confining pressure on the erosion characteristics of the self-resonating cavitating jet under wellbore and deep-water conditions, experiments are conducted on aluminum specimens impinged by the organ pipe cavitation nozzle and the conical nozzle with the confining pressure in the range 0 MPa–10.0 MPa. Meanwhile, through the numerical simulation of the collapsing process of the cavitation bubble and the noise test, the cavitation erosion mechanism is analyzed. The experimental results show that the optimal standoff distance and the confining pressure can be obtained for the maximum erosion quantities, and the optimal standoff distance is 5 to 7 times greater than the equivalent nozzle outlet diameter and the confining pressure is about 2.0 MPa. Under the same conditions, the erosion caused by the cavitation nozzle is up to 2 times larger than that caused by the conical nozzle. According to the numerical simulation and the noise test, the cavitation erosion on the aluminum specimens is mostly caused by mechanical forces due to the high-frequency pressure pulse generated during the collapse of cavitation bubbles, while just a small part is caused by micro-jets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson V. E., Conn A. F., Lindenmuth W. T. Self-resonating cavitating jets [C]. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA, Cranfield, UK, 1982, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bardin C., Cholet H., Lecoffre Y. Assistance for deep drilling by cavitation damage [C]. Proceeding of the 7th International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, Sendai, Japan, 1988, 611–628.

  3. Liu H., Shao Q. M., Kang C. et al. Impingement capability of high-pressure submerged water jet: Numerical prediction and experimental verification [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(10): 3712–3721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen Z., Xu Y., Li G. et al. New jet theory and prospects of its application in drilling engineering [J]. Physical Status Solidi, 1991, 150(2): 567–574.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lu Y., Huang F., Liu X. C. et al. On the failure pattern of sandstone impacted by high-velocity water jet [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 76: 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li G., Zhang D., Huang Z. et al. Self-excited oscillating water injection: mechanisms and experiments [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science Technology, 2007, 21(1–2): 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang Z., Li G., Shi H. et al. Abrasive water jet perforating experiments under ambient pressures [J]. Atomization and Sprays, 2015, 25(7): 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shimizu S., Tanioka K. Ikegami N. Influence of ambient pressure on erosive properties of high speed cavitating jets [C]. Proceeding of 5th Pacific International Conference on Water Jet Technology, New Delhi, India, 1998.

  9. Lu Y. Y., Wang J. H., Huang H. et al. Improvement of sonic vibration simulation device for gas desorption and seepage under cavitation water jets [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(9): 1604–1610.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Long X. P., Wang Q. Q., Xiao L. Z. et al. Numerical analysis of bubble dynamics in the diffuser of a jet pump under variable ambient pressure [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29(3): 510–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peng K. W., Tian S. C., Li G. S. et al. Bubble dynamics characteristics and influencing factors on the cavitation collapse intensity for self-resonating cavitating jets [J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(2): 326–332.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dular M., Stoffel B., Sirok B. Development of a cavitation erosion model [J]. Wear, 2006, 261(5–6): 642–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hattori S., Hirose T., Sugiyama K. Prediction method for cavitation erosion based on measurement of bubble collapse impact loads [J]. Wear, 2010, 269 (7–8): 507–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nobel A. J., Talmon A. M. Measurements of the stagnation pressure in the center of a cavitating jet [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2012, 52(2): 403–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Soyama H. Effect of nozzle geometry on a standard cavitation erosion test using a cavitating jet [J]. Wear, 2013, 297(1–2): 895–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li G., Shen Z., Zhou C. et al. Investigation and application of self-resonating cavitating water jet in petroleum engineering [J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2005, 23(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li D., Kang Y., Ding X. et al. Experimental study on the effects of feeding pipe diameter on the cavitation erosion performance of self-resonating cavitating water jet [J]. Experiment Thermal and Fluid Science, 2017, 82: 314–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng K., Tian S., Li G. et al. Cavitation in water jet under high ambient pressure conditions [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2017, 89: 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pan Y., Cai T. F., Ma F. et al. Self-excited frequency estimation model of organ-pipe waterjet under confining pressure [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(18): 220–225(in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hutli E., Nedeljkovic M. S., Radovic N. A. et al. The relation between the high speed submerged cavitating jet behavior and the cavitation erosion process [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2016, 83: 27–38.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Yi C., Li G. S., Zhang D. G. Experimental study on enhancing cavitation effect with self-resonating nozzle [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2005, 16(21): 1945–1949.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liao H., Chen R., Wang L. et al. Effect of impacting distance and confining pressure on cavitation bubble collapse characteristics [J]. Atomization and Sprays, 2013, 23(3): 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Samiei E., Shams M., Ebrahimi R. A novel numerical scheme for the investigation of surface tension effects on growth and collapse stages of cavitation bubbles [J]. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2011, 30(1): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Theodorakakos A., Bergles G. Simulation of sharp gasliquid interface using VOF method and adaptive grid local refinement around the interface [J]. International. Journal Numerical Methods Fluids, 2004, 45(4): 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gong Y. J., Zhan J. M., Li T. Z. Numerical investigation of the effect of rotation on cavitating flows over axisymmetric cavitations [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(3): 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Malan L. C., Ling Y., Scardovelli R. et al. Detailed numerical simulations of pore competition in idealized micro-spall using the VOF method [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2019 189: 60–72.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua-lin Liao.

Additional information

Project supported by the Open Foundation of China State Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil Exploitation (Grant No. CCL2015RCPS0229RNN), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51274235), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. ZR2019MEE120) and the Major project of CNPC (Grant No. ZD2019-183-005).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, Hl., Zhao, Sl., Cao, Yf. et al. Erosion characteristics and mechanism of the self-resonating cavitating jet impacting aluminum specimens under the confining pressure conditions. J Hydrodyn 32, 375–384 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0024-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0024-2

Key words

Navigation