Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of machine learning algorithms for detecting missing radioactive material

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The detection of missing radioactive material is an important capability for safeguards measurements. Gamma ray signatures provide sample information, but interpretation is complicated by measurement environments. To determine if machine learning is a viable analysis option, three algorithms are applied to gamma ray detection data to assess their success at identifying missing sources. Preliminary results demonstrate that these algorithms can predict the number and location of missing sources on simple models of spent fuel assemblies. In addition to simulated experiments, a study to investigate if the algorithms can be trained with simulated data and tested on measured data is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (2019) Establishing a system for control of nuclear material for nuclear security purposes at a facility during use, storage and movement. IAEA

  2. International Atomic Energy Agency (2015) Use of nuclear material accounting and control for nuclear security purposes at facilities. IAEA

  3. Sarnoski S, Fast J, Fulsom B et al (2017) Measurement of the 235 U induced fission gamma-ray spectrum as an active non-destructive assay of fresh nuclear fuel. In: Institute of Nuclear Materials Management: annual meeting proceedings. Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, pp 1–10

  4. Nawaz S, Hussain M, Watson S, et al (2013) An underwater robotic network for monitoring nuclear waste storage pools. In: Lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social-informatics and telecommunications engineering

  5. International Atomic Energy Agency (2011) Safegaurds techniques and equipment, 2011 edition. IAEA

  6. International Atomic Energy Agency Department of Safeguards (2018) Research and development plan: enhancing capabilities for nuclear verification. IAEA

  7. Carchon R, Moeslinger M, Bourva L et al (2007) Gamma radiation detectors for safeguards applications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip 579:380–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.04.086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chichester DL, Seabury EH (2009) Addressing different active neutron interrogation signatures from fissionable material. In: IEEE nuclear science symposium, conference record, pp 956–960. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2009.5402466

  9. Shoman N, Cipiti BB (2018) Unsupervised machine learning for nuclear safeguards. In: Institute of Nuclear Materials Management: annual meeting proceedings

  10. Goorley T, James M, Booth T et al (2012) Initial MCNP6 release overview. Nucl Technol 180:298–315. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT11-135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamarsh J, Baratta A (2001) Introduction to nuclear engineering, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vaccaro S, Tobin SJ, Favalli A et al (2016) PWR and BWR spent fuel assembly gamma spectra measurements. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.07.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Favalli A, Vo D, Grogan B et al (2016) Determining initial enrichment, burnup, and cooling time of pressurized-water-reactor spent fuel assemblies by analyzing passive gamma spectra measured at the Clab interim-fuel storage facility in Sweden. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.02.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedregosa F, Gael V, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldberger J, Roweis S, Hinton G, Salakhutdinov R (2005) Neighbourhood components analysis. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 17:513–520. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2013.2242640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Quinlan JR (1986) Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn 1:81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00116251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40031-014-0099-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi R, Tuo X, Zheng H et al (2018) Step-approximation SNIP background-elimination algorithm for HPGe gamma spectra. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip 885:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2017.12.064

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Nuclear Education Program Fellowship Grant Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Durbin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durbin, M., Lintereur, A. Implementation of machine learning algorithms for detecting missing radioactive material. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 324, 1455–1461 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07188-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07188-4

Keywords

Navigation