Skip to main content
Log in

TOPSIS-2NE’s Proposal

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This document presents a proposal of structuring the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) twice normalized. Instead of using Euclidean distances, TOPSIS was reckoned by the ellipse length because it was necessary to observe a distance without the basic assumption about to know the way where the “pulse” might go it. The dataset was observed by other works without grouping, as it was possible to observe the distances towards the decision occurred and also the concentration of alternatives at same ranked place, forming a kind of “group” at this proposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sahin, R.: Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making method based on the improved accuracy function for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft. Comput. 20, 2557–2563 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Souza, L.P., Gomes, C.F., De Barros, A.P.: Implementation of new hybrid AHP-TOPSIS-2N method in sorting and prioritizing of an IT CAPEX project portfolio. Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decis. Mak. 17(4), 977–1005 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622018500207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Franceschini, F., Maisano, D.: Checking the consistency of the solution in ordinal semi-democratic decision-making problems. Omega 57(Part B), 188–195 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rebai, A., Aouni, B., Martel, J.-M.: A multi-attribute method for choosing among potential alternatives with ordinal evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174, 360–373 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.P.: Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications survey. Springer-Verlag, New York (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhutia, P.W., Phipon, R.: Application of AHP and TOPSIS method for supplier selection problem. IOSR J. Eng. 2(10), 43–50 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva, M.C., Gavião, L.O., Gomes, C.F., Lima, G.B.: A proposal for the application of multicriteria analysis to rank countries according to innovation using the indicators provided by the world intellectual property organization. Innov. Manage. Rev. 14(3), 188–198 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pudenz, S., Brüggemann, R., Voigt, K., et al.: Nachhaltige Entwicklung von Managementstrategien Multikriterielle Bewertungs - und Entscheidungshilfe - Instrumente. Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung - Z Umweltchem Ökotox 14(1), 52–57 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03038659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. CORNELL University, INSEAD, and WIPO.: The Global Innovation Index 2015: effective innovation policies for development. Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva (2015)

  10. Silva, M.D., Gomes, C.F., Junior, C., Da, C.L.: A hybrid multicriteria methodology TOPSIS-MACBETH-2N applied in the ordering of Technology Transfer Offices. Pesquisa Operacional 38(3), 413–439 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-7438.2018.038.03.0413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vanderpooten, D.: Introduction à l’aide multicritère à la decisión. Chap. 12. In: Précis de recherche opérationnelle, 6th Ed. Dunod, Paris (2008)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcela do Carmo Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, M.C., Gomes, C.F.S. & Souza, R.C. TOPSIS-2NE’s Proposal. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 22, 1118–1122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00871-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00871-4

Keywords

Navigation