Abstract
Silicon (Si) applied via foliar on pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings is a practical alternative for supplying Si, however, it is necessary to use an adequate Si source and optimal concentration, but this information is unknown. This study evaluates the effect of alternative Si sources applied via foliar spraying at lower concentrations in relation to potassium silicate, on Si accumulation and the beneficial effects on pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings and initial growth. Two experiments were carried out in a greenhouse, one in the production phase of pre-sprouted seedlings and the other in the initial growth phase of sugarcane grown in pots. Both experimental designs were randomized blocks with treatments arranged in a 4 × 5 factorial scheme, with four Si sources: nanosilica (Si-nano), monosilicic acid stabilized with PEG-400 (Si-acid), sodium and potassium silicate stabilized with sorbitol (Si-alkali) and potassium silicate (Si-K) in five concentrations (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 mmol L−1), and 4 repetitions. The Si syrup pH was adjusted to 5.5 ± 0.2. The foliar spraying of Si on pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings is feasible since it increased Si accumulation, and benefited seedling production and plant initial growth. Soluble Si sources with stabilizers increased Si accumulation more efficiently compared to potassium silicate (Si-K) and nanosilica (Si-nano). Plants that have been sprayed with the PEG-400-stabilized monosilicic acid (Si-acid) and the sorbitol-stabilized sodium and potassium silicate (Si-alkali) at 0.5 and 0.6 mmol L−1 concentrations, respectively, promote had greater Si accumulation and beneficial effects in the growth of pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings in production phase. In the initial growth of sugarcane, the sources Si-acid and S-alkali also increase the buildup and beneficial effects, but both sources at 0.6 mmol L−1 concentrations.
References
Babiker, A.G.T., and H.J. Duncan. 1974. Penetration of bracken fronds by asulam as influenced by the addition of surfactant to the spray solution and by pH. Weed Research 14: 375–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01078.x.
Birchall, J.D. 1995. The essentiality of silicon in biology. Chemical Society Reviews 24: 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1039/CS9952400351.
Camargo, M.S., B.K.L. Bezerra, L.A. Holanda, A.L. Oliveira, A.C. Vitti, and M.A. Silva. 2019. Silicon fertilization improves physiological responses in sugarcane cultivars grown under water deficit. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 19: 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-0012-1.
Cavalcante, V.S., R.M. Prado, R.L. Vasconcelos, and C.N.S. Campos. 2016. Iron concentrations in sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) cultivated in nutrient solution. Agrociencia 50: 867–875.
D’Souza, A.A., and R. Shegokar. 2016. Polyethylene glycol (PEG): a versatile polymer for pharmaceutical applications. Expert opinion on drug delivery 13: 1257–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2016.1182485.
Daros, E., R.A. Oliveira, and G.V.S. Barbosa. 2015. 45 anos de variedades RB de cana de açucar. 1a. Curitiba: Graciosa.
Epstein, E. 1994. The anomaly of silicon in plant biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.1.11.
Hermann, E.R., and G.M.S. Câmara. 1999. Um método simples para estimar a área foliar da cana-de-açúcar. Revista da Sociedade dos Técnicos Açucareiros e Alcooliros do Brasil (STAB) 17: 32–34.
Hoagland, D.R., and D.I. Arnon. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Berkeley: The College of Agriculture University of California.
Jain, R., S.P. Singh, A. Singh, S. Singh, P. Tripathi, R. Kishor, A. Gaur, et al. 2017. Changes in growth, yield, juice quality and biochemical attributes of sugarcane in response to orthosilicic acid granules. Sugar Tech 19: 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0469-3.
Keeping, M.G. 2017. Uptake of silicon by sugarcane from applied sources may not reflect plant-available soil silicon and total silicon content of sources. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00760.
Korndörfer, G.H., H.S. Pereira, and A. Nolla. 2004. Análise de silício no solo, planta e fertilizantes, 2nd ed. Uberlândia: UFU.
Kudryavtsev, P.G., and O.L. Figovsky. 2016. Nanocomposite organomineral hybrid materials. Part I. Nanotechnologies in Construction: A Scientific Internet-Journal 8: 16–49. https://doi.org/10.15828/2075-8545-2016-8-3-16-56.
Laane, H.M. 2017. The effects of the application of foliar sprays with stabilized silicic acid: an overview of the results from 2003-2014. Silicon 9: 803–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-016-9466-0.
Laane, H.M. 2018. The effects of foliar sprays with different silicon compounds. Plants 7: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7020045.
Landell, M.G.A., M.P. Campana, P. Figueiredo, M.A. Xavier, I.A. Anjos, L.L. Dinardo-Miranda, M.S. Scarpari, et al. 2012. Sistema de multiplicação de cana-de-açúcar com uso de mudas pré-brotadas (MPB), oriundas de gemas individualizadas. Campinas: IAC.
Marin, F.R. 2020. Árvore do conhecimento: cana-de-açúcar—variedades. Embrapa. http://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/gestor/cana-de-acucar/arvore/CONTAG01_42_1110200717570.html. Accessed 06 April 2020.
Matsuoka, S. 2017. Free fiber level drives resilience and hybrid vigor in energy cane. Journal of Scientific Achievements 2: 1–35.
McKeague, J.A., and M.G. Cline. 1963. Silica in soils. Advances in Agronomy 15: 339–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60403-4.
Mitani, N., N. Yamaji, and J.F. Ma. 2009. Identification of maize silicon influx transporters. Plant and Cell Physiology 50: 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcn110.
Neeru, J., C. Shaliesh, T. Vaishali, S. Purav, and R. Manoherlal. 2019. Role of orthosilicic acid (OSA) based formulation in improving plant growth and development. Silicon 11: 2407–2411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-015-9380-x.
Oliveira, R.L.L., R.M. Prado, G. Felisberto, and F.J.R. Cruz. 2019. Different sources of silicon by foliar spraying on the growth and gas exchange in sorghum. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 19: 948–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-00092-1.
Pei, Z.F., D.F. Ming, D. Liu, G.L. Wan, X.X. Geng, H.J. Gong, and W.J. Zhou. 2010. Silicon improves the tolerance to water-deficit stress induced by polyethylene glycol in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 29: 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-009-9120-9.
Raven, J.A. 1983. The transport and function of silicon in plants. Biological Reviews 58: 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1983.tb00385.x.
Rohanipoor, A., M. Norouzi, A. Moezzi, and P. Hassibi. 2013. Effect of silicon on some physiological properties of maize (Zea mays) under salt stress. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 7: 71–79.
Shen, X.F., Z.H. Zhao, and Y. Chen. 2019. Effects of intercropping with peanut and silicon application on sugarcane growth, yield and quality. Sugar Tech 21: 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0667-2.
Streit, N.M., L.P. Canterle, M.W. Canto, and L.H.H. Hecktheuer. 2005. As clorofilas. Ciência Rural 35: 748–755. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-84782005000300043.
Zanão Júnior, L.A., R.L.F. Fontes, and V.T. Ávila. 2009. Aplicação do silício para aumentar a resistência do arroz à mancha-parda. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 44: 203–206. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2009000200013.
Acknowledgements
The support of the São Paulo State University (UNESP) and Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—Brazil (CAPES) are recognized with gratitude.
Funding
This study was funded by Coordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil, Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author Contributions
The authors contributed equally to the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
dos Santos, L.C.N., Teixeira, G.C.M., Prado, R.M. et al. Response of Pre-sprouted Sugarcane Seedlings to Foliar Spraying of Potassium Silicate, Sodium and Potassium Silicate, Nanosilica and Monosilicic Acid. Sugar Tech 22, 773–781 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00833-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00833-y