Skip to main content
Log in

Elucidating the drivers of residential mobility and housing choice behaviour in a suburban township via push–pull–mooring framework

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study applies the “push-pull-mooring” model of migration to explain home purchase intention in a suburban township. “Push” effects include dissatisfaction and high housing costs in one’s current neighbourhood (“the origin”). “Pull” effects were consumers’ perceived value of the suburban township (“the destination”), which encompassed price, functional, emotional, social, symbolic, and Feng Shui aspects. Relocation costs and alternative township’s attractiveness were hypothesized as “mooring” effects that negatively impact purchase intention as well as moderate the push and pull effects. 179 valid responses from prospective home buyers were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Pull effects were found to exert a positive influence while mooring and push effects exert a negative influence on purchase intention. Moderation effects of the mooring factors were found to be not significant in this context. This study offers several interesting implications for researchers and marketing practitioners in the real estate industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Research Management Unit, Faculty of Business and Accountancy, University of Malaya (Grant No. GPF017I-2018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezlika M. Ghazali.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Measurement instrument

Appendix: Measurement instrument

Constructs

No. of items

Items

Measurement items

Sources

Push effects: dissatisfaction with current housing situation

Housing attributes

8

HA1

Type of property

Ibem et al. (2015)

Clark and Onaka (1983)

HA2

Built up area

HA3

Internal layout

HA4

External appearance/design

HA5

Number of bedrooms

HA6

Number of bathrooms

HA7

Natural lighting and ventilation

HA8

Level of privacy

HA9

Overall housing unit attributes

Neighbourhood attributes

5

NA1

Crime situation

Mohit et al. (2010)

Duque-Calvache et al. (2017)

NA2

Security services

NA3

Noise level

NA4

Community relations

NA5

Cleanliness/general appearance

NA6

Overall neighbourhood environment

Price perception

6

PP1

The price of houses in my current neighbourhood is reasonable

Chang et al. (2017)

Jung et al. (2017b)

Voss et al. (1998)

PP2

The price of houses in my current neighbourhood is expensive*

PP3

I would be pleased to pay the price for houses in my current neighbourhood

PP4

I am satisfied with the price of houses in my current neighbourhood

PP5

The houses in my current neighbourhood are fairly priced

PP6

The houses in my current neighbourhood are overpriced*

Pull effects: attractiveness of City of Elmina

Price value

7

PV1

The homes in the City of Elmina are reasonably priced

Sweeney and Soutar (2001)

Herrmann et al. (2007)

Voss et al. (1998)

PV2

The homes in the City of Elmina offer value for money

PV3

The homes in the City of Elmina are good products for the price

PV4

The price of homes in the City of Elmina is appropriate relative to its value

PV5

The price of homes in the City of Elmina meets my expectations

PV6

The homes in the City of Elmina are expensive*

PV7

I would be pleased to pay the price for homes in the City of Elmina

Functional value

5

FV1

The homes in the City of Elmina have consistent quality

Sweeney and Soutar (2001)

FV2

The homes in the City of Elmina are well designed

FV3

The homes in the City of Elmina have an acceptable standard of quality

FV4

The homes in the City of Elmina have good workmanship

FV5

The homes in the City of Elmina would last a long time

Emotional value

5

EV1

The neighbourhood environment in the City of Elmina is one that I would enjoy

Sweeney and Soutar (2001)

EV2

The neighbourhood environment in the City of Elmina would make me want to stay here

EV3

The neighbourhood environment in the City of Elmina is one that I would feel relaxed to stay in

EV4

The neighbourhood environment in the City of Elmina makes me feel good

EV5

The neighbourhood environment in the City of Elmina would give me pleasure

Pull effects: attractiveness of City of Elmina

Social value

4

SV1

Buying a home in the City of Elmina would help me to feel acceptable

Sweeney and Soutar (2001)

SV2

Buying a home in the City of Elmina would improve the way I am perceived socially

SV3

Buying a home in the City of Elmina would make a good impression on other people

SV4

Buying a home in the City of Elmina would give me social approval

Symbolic value

5

SCV1

Staying in the City of Elmina is consistent with how I see myself

Sirgy et al. (1997)

SCV2

The City of Elmina reflects who I am

SCV3

People similar to me are staying in the City of Elmina

SCV4

The kind of person who typically stays in the City of Elmina are very much like me

SCV5

The City of Elmina mirrors my lifestyle

Feng Shui value

7

FSV1

Properties in the City of Elmina are backed by taller buildings or a mountain behind

Wu et al. (2012)

FSV2

Properties in the City of Elmina have an open space in front

FSV3

Properties in the City of Elmina have a good view in front

FSV4

Properties in the City of Elmina have good sitting/facing directions

FSV5

Properties in the City of Elmina have appropriate internal layout

FSV6

Properties in the City of Elmina have been designed to avoid harmful objects e.g. does not directly face junctions, sharp edges of other buildings, or electric wires/viaduct

FSV7

Properties in the City of Elmina are associated with lucky numbers, e.g., address numbers and list price

FSV8

Overall, properties in the City of Elmina have good Feng Shui

Mooring effects

    

Relocation costs

5

RC1

I would need to spend a lot of time and money to relocate from my current home/neighbourhood to the City of Elmina

Bansal et al. (2004)

Sharma and Patterson (2000)

RC2

Overall, I would spend and lose a lot if I move from my current home/neighbourhood to the City of Elmina

RC3

Generally speaking, the costs in time, money and effort to move from my current home/neighbourhood to the City of Elmina would be high

RC4

I would feel frustrated to move out of my current home/neighbourhood to the City of Elmina

RC5

Considering everything, the costs to move out of my current home/neighbourhood and shift into the City of Elmina would be high

Alternative attractiveness

5

AA1

Purchasing a home in the above-mentioned development will be less costly than in the City of Elmina

Bansal et al. (2004)

Sharma and Patterson (2000)

AA2

Overall, purchasing a home in the above-mentioned development would benefit me more than in the City of Elmina

 

AA3

I would be much more satisfied with purchasing a home in the above-mentioned development compared to the City of Elmina

AA4

In general, I would be much more satisfied with the above-mentioned development than with the City of Elmina

AA5

Overall, the above-mentioned development would be a better purchase than the City of Elmina

Dependent variable

No. of items

items

Measurement items

Sources

Purchase Intention

4

PI1

The likelihood of me purchasing a home in the City of Elmina is…

Very Unlikely…..Very Likely

Oliver and Swan (1989)

PI2

The probability of me purchasing a home in the City of Elmina is…

Very Improbable…..Very Probable

PI3

Chances I would purchase a home in the City of Elmina are…

Not at all Certain…..Completely Certain

PI4

The possibility of me purchasing a home in the City of Elmina is…

Very Impossible…..Very Possible

Marker variable

    

 Social desirability

7

SD1

I like to gossip at times

Fischer and Fick (1993)

SD2

There have been occasions when I took advantage of someone

SD3

I sometimes try to get even rather than forgive and forget

SD4

I’m always willing to admit it when I make a mistake

SD5

At times I have really insisted on having things my own way

SD6

I have never been irked when people expressed ideas very different from my own

SD7

I have never deliberately said something that hurt someone’s feelings

  1. *These items are reversely coded

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghazali, E.M., Ngiam, E.YL. & Mutum, D.S. Elucidating the drivers of residential mobility and housing choice behaviour in a suburban township via push–pull–mooring framework. J Hous and the Built Environ 35, 633–659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09705-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09705-8

Keywords

Navigation