Skip to main content
Log in

Follow-up non-contrast MRA after treatment of intracranial aneurysms using microcoils with prominent metallic artifact: a comparative study of TOF-MRA and Silent MRA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Some of the detachable microcoils are associated with the prominent metallic artifact. We have applied Silent MRA to reduce the artifact. In this study, we present a retrospective study in which Silent MRA is used for cases showing prominent metallic artifact on conventional TOF-MRA due to a detachable bare platinum microcoil (Barricade coil).

Materials and methods

Fifteen patients, who had undergone endosaccular embolization using Barricade coil and other detachable microcoils up to 3 days previously, were scanned with TOF-MRA and silent MRA at the same time. The treatment DSA and follow-up MRA images were graded by two experienced neuroradiologists, focusing on the visibility of residual aneurysm and parent arterial lumen.

Results

DSA images showed residual aneurysm (RA) in four, residual neck (RN) in six, and complete occlusion (CO) in five patients. TOF-MRA images showed RN in five, CO in four, mild defect (MD) in one, severe defect (SD) in three, and complete defect in two. In contrast, on Silent MRA, the grades were RA in two, RN in five, CO in five, and MD in three.

Conclusion

Barricade coils are associated with prominent metallic artifact on TOF-MRA. Silent MRA is useful for follow-up MRA after embolization using Barricade coils.

Secondary abstract

The metallic artifacts were compared between TOF-MRA and Silent MRA in patients treated by using Barricade coils. Barricade coils are associated with more metallic artifact on TOF-MRA than Silent MRA. Silent MRA is useful for follow-up MRA after embolization using Barricade coils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akkaya S, Akca O, Arat A, Peker A, Balci S. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced and TOF MR angiography for follow-up after low-profile stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018;24(6):655–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van Amerongen MJ, Boogaarts HD, de Vries J, Verbeek AL, Meijer FJ, Prokop M, Bartels RH. MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(9):1655–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Majoie CB, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, Lavini C, Sluzewski M, van Rijn JC, den Heeten GJ. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(6):1349–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cottier JP, Bleuzen-Couthon A, Gallas S, Vinikoff-Sonier CB, Bertrand P, Domengie F, Barantin L, Herbreteau D. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of plain radiographs, 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology. 2003;45(11):818–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamada N, Hayashi K, Murao K, Higashi M, Iihara K. Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(7):1154–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Buhk JH, Kallenberg K, Mohr A, Dechent P, Knauth M. No advantage of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla compared to 1.5 Tesla in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2008;50:855–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gontu V, McConachie N. MR susceptibility artefact associated with the use of Barricade coils for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015;21(2):188–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001;32(9):1998–2004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallas S, Pasco A, Cottier JP, Gabrillargues J, Drouineau J, Cognard C, Herbreteau D. A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(7):1723–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, Summers PE, Kerr RS, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Rischmiller J, Byrne JV. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke. 2007;38(5):1538–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahara VJ, Seppanen SK, Ryymin PS, Mattila P, Kuurne T, Laasonen EM. MR angiography with three-dimensional time-of-flight and targeted maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:1391–2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anzalone N, Righi C, Simionato F, Scomazzoni F, Pagani G, Calori G, Santino P, Scotti G. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:746–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber W, Yousry TA, Felber SR, Henkes H, Nahser HC, Roer N, Kühne D. Noninvasive follow-up of GDC-treated saccular aneurysms by MR angiography. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1792–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Okahara M, Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Yamashita M, Nagatomi H, Mori H. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms after endosaccular packing with Guglielmi detachable coils: comparison with 3D digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1162–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Takayama K, Taoka T, Nakagawa H, Myouchin K, Wada T, Sakamoto M, Fukusumi A, Iwasaki S, Kurokawa S, Kichikawa K. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with the enterprise stent for cerebral aneurysms. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011;35(5):568–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fushimi Y, Fujimoto K, Okada T, Yamamoto A, Tanaka T, Kikuchi T, Miyamoto S, Togashi K. Compressed sensing 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms: optimization and evaluation. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(4):228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shang S, Ye J, Luo X, Qu J, Zhen Y, Wu J. Follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms using zTE MRA as compared with TOF MRA: a preliminary image quality study. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(10):4271–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Takano N, Suzuki M, Irie R, Yamamoto M, Hamasaki N, Kamagata K, Kumamaru K, Hori M, Oishi H, Aoki S. Usefulness of non-contrast-enhanced mr angiography using a silent scan for follow-up after Y-configuration stent-assisted coil embolization for basilar tip aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(3):577–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Irie R, Suzuki M, Yamamoto M, Takano N, Suga Y, Hori M, Kamagata K, Takayama M, Yoshida M, Sato S, Hamasaki N, Oishi H, Aoki S. Assessing blood flow in an intracranial stent: a feasibility study of MR angiography using a silent scan after stent-assisted coil embolization for anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(5):967–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuichi Tanoue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanoue, S., Uchiyama, Y., Hirohata, M. et al. Follow-up non-contrast MRA after treatment of intracranial aneurysms using microcoils with prominent metallic artifact: a comparative study of TOF-MRA and Silent MRA. Jpn J Radiol 38, 853–859 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00981-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00981-x

Keywords

Navigation