Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomical region identification in medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans: development and comparison of alternative data analysis and vision-based methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many medical image processing applications rely on targeted regions of interest within a larger volumetric image. Whole-body scans represent an extreme case in which large volumes must be broken into smaller sub-volumes for regional analysis. In this work, we sought automatic solutions to divide medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) images into six main anatomical regions: head, neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis and legs. We implemented and compared three methods: (1) an analytical approach which does not require training and solely relies on utilizing critical points in image intensity profiles to derive cut-planes that divide the scan into the mentioned regions, (2) a classical convolutional neural network (CNN) approach, which classifies each transaxial 2D plane independently and then concatenates classification results, and (3) CNN followed by a context-based correction algorithm (CBCA) which improves the CNN classification using positional relationships between all CT slices. The analytical approach achieved acceptable accuracy for anatomical region segmentation without the need for explicit data labeling and was effective for batch labeling whole-body CTs, greatly reducing manual labeling efforts. CNNs achieved superior accuracy and allowed for rapid development and training, but required labeled data and were susceptible to produce discontinuous anatomical regions and therefore ambiguous anatomical boundaries. Post hoc correction of CNN results using CBCA overcame these limitations, achieving nearly perfect CT slice labeling and anatomical region segmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klein R, Renaud JM, Ziadi MC, Thorn SL, Adler A, Beanlands RS, DeKemp RA (2010) Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program. J Nucl Cardiol 17(4):600–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou X, Takayama R, Wang S, Hara T, Fujita H (2017) Deep learning of the sectional appearances of 3D CT images for anatomical structure segmentation based on an FCN voting method. Med Phys 44(10):5221–5233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vania M, Mureja D, Lee D (2019) Automatic spine segmentation from CT images using convolutional neural network via redundant generation of class labels. J Comput Des Eng 6(2):224–232

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cordier N, Delingette H, Ayache N (2015) A patch-based approach for the segmentation of pathologies: application to glioma labelling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(4):11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sun J, Chen W, Peng S, Liu B (2019) DRRNet: dense residual refine networks for automatic brain tumor segmentation. J Med Syst 43(7):221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goo HW (2012) CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Seoulm 13(1):1–11

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho J, Lee K, Shin E, Choy G, Do S (2015) Medical image deep learning with hospital PACS dataset. arXiv:1511.06348

  8. Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H (2014) How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In: Advances in neural information processing Systems, vol 27 (NIPS ’14). NIPS Foundation, pp 3320–3328

  9. Razavian AS, Azizpour H, Sullivan J, Carlsson S (2014) CNN features off-the-shelf: an astounding baseline for recognition. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops

  10. Donahue J, Yangqing J, Vinyals O, Hoffman J, Zhang N, Tzeng E, Darrel T (2013) DeCAF: a deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. UC Berkeley & ICSI, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Gasulla D, Vilalta A, Parés F, Moreno J, Ayguadé E, Labarta J, Cortés U, Suzumura T (2018) An out-of-the-box full-network embedding for convolutional neural networks. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on big knowledge (ICBK). IEEE, pp 168–175

  12. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–9

  13. Roth H, Lee C, Shin H, Seff A, Kim L, Yao J, Lu L, Summers R (2015) Anatomy-specific classification of medical images using deep convolutional nets. In: IEEE 12th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI). IEEE

  14. Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Andersen HK, Jensen K, Berstad AE, Aaløkken TM, Kristiansen J, von Gohren EB, Hagen G, Martinsen AC (2014) Choosing the best reconstruction technique in abdominal computed tomography: a systematic approach. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38(6):853–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patrick S, Birur NP, Gurushanth K, Raghavan AS, Gurudath S (2017) Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 28(1):66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuntz E, Kuntz HD (2006) Hepatology, principles and practice: history, morphology, biochemistry, diagnostics, clinic, therapy. Springer, New York

  18. Lepor H (2000) Prostatic diseases. W.B. Saunders Company, New York, p 83

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marsaglia G, Tsang W, Wang J (2003) Evaluating Kolmogorov’s distribution. J Stat Softw 8(18):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Massey FJ (1951) The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc 46(253):68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller LH (1956) Table of percentage points of Kolmogorov statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 51(273):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McDonald J (2008) Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Spencer Manwell for proofreading the manuscript and providing insightful feedback. This work was supported in part by The Division of Nuclear Medicine and also by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Engage Grant 516276-17 with in-kind support from Hermes Medical Solutions of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Odai S. Salman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This research has no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salman, O.S., Klein, R. Anatomical region identification in medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans: development and comparison of alternative data analysis and vision-based methods. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 17519–17531 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04923-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04923-6

Keywords

Navigation