Abstract
The complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus paracasei DTA93, isolated from healthy infant feces is reported, along with in silico genetic analyses of its main features. The 3.02 Mb sequenced genome possesses 2990 protein-coding sequences distributed on 341 SEED subsystems. In previous in vitro studies, this strain demonstrated interesting probiotic properties, anti-cancer activity, and anti-bacterial activity. The whole-genome sequencing allowed to identify DTA93 as L. paracasei and to precisely place it within the L. casei group, since it shows the highest number of orthologous genes/proteins in common with the type strain L. paracasei ATCC 25302T. In silico analyses revealed the absence of potentially negative traits, such as presence of prophages, transmissible antibiotic resistance and virulence factors. The results provided here considerably increased the amount of information available on DTA93 in favor of its possible use in food products as health-promoting culture. The complete genome data have been deposited in GenBank under the accession number VTYT00000000.
References
Ågren J, Sundström A, Håfström T, Segerman B (2012) Gegenees: fragmented alignment of multiple genomes for determining phylogenomic distances and genetic signatures unique for specified target groups. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039107
Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A et al (2016) PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw387
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA et al (2008) The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom 9:75
Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP et al (2017) IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx343
Campanaro S, Treu L, Vendramin V et al (2014) Metagenomic analysis of the microbial community in fermented grape marc reveals that Lactobacillus fabifermentans is one of the dominant species: insights into its genome structure. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:6015–6037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5795-3
De Vrese M, Schrezenmeir J (2008) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Food biotechnology. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–66
Di Zhang D, Zhang S, Guidesi E, Zonenschain D, Sagheddu V, Lee S, Lim CY, Elli M (2018) Isolation and characterization of new probiotic strains from Chinese babies. J Clin Gastroenterol 52:S27–S34. https://doi.org/10.1097/mcg.0000000000001113
Grant JR, Stothard P (2008) The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 36:181–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn179
Guerra AF, Lemos Junior WJF, dos Santos GO et al (2018) Lactobacillus paracasei probiotic properties and survivability under stress-induced by processing and storage of ice cream bar or ice-lolly. Ciê Rural. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170601
He Y, Wang M, Liu M et al (2018) Cas1 and Cas2 from the type II-C CRISPR-Cas system of Riemerella anatipestifer are required for spacer acquisition. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:195
Hill D, Sugrue I, Tobin C et al (2018) The Lactobacillus casei group: history and health related applications. Front Microbiol 9:20
Kim H-J, Lee HJ, Lim B et al (2018) Lactobacillus terrae sp. nov., a novel species isolated from soil samples in the Republic of Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:2906–2911. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002918
Kloepper TH, Huson DH (2008) Drawing explicit phylogenetic networks and their integration into SplitsTree. BMC Evol Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-22
Koryszewska-Bagińska A, Gawor J, Nowak A et al (2019) Comparative genomics and functional analysis of a highly adhesive dairy Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei IBB3423 strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:7617–7634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10010-1
Pogačić T, Samaržija D, Corich V et al (2010) Microbiota of Karakačanski skakutanac, an artisanal fresh sheep cheese studied by culture-independent PCR-ARDRA and PCR-DGGE. Dairy Sci Technol 90:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1051/dst/2010004
Reid G, Gadir AA, Dhir R (2019) Probiotics: reiterating what they are and what they are not. Front Microbiol 10:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00424
Singh N, Singh J, Singh K (2018) Small at size, big at impact: microorganisms for sustainable development. In: Singh J, Sharma D, Kumar G, Sharma NR (eds) Microbial bioprospecting for sustainable development. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 3–28
Steuernagel B, Periyannan SK, Hernández-Pinzón I et al (2016) Rapid cloning of disease-resistance genes in plants using mutagenesis and sequence capture. Nat Biotechnol 34:652
Tarrah A, da Silva DV, de Castilhos J et al (2019) Probiotic potential and biofilm inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus casei group strains isolated from infant feces. J Funct Foods 54:489–497
Tarrah A, da Silva DV, Pakroo S et al (2020) Genomic and phenotypic assessments of safety and probiotic properties of Streptococcus macedonicus strains of dairy origin. Food Res Int 130:108931
Wang Y, Coleman-Derr D, Chen G, Gu YQ (2015) OrthoVenn: a web server for genome wide comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W78–W84
Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S et al (2012) Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644
Acknowledgements
This work has been funded in part by the Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica (MIUR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tarrah, A., Pakroo, S., Corich, V. et al. Whole-genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of Lactobacillus paracasei DTA93, a promising probiotic lactic acid bacterium. Arch Microbiol 202, 1997–2003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-01883-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-01883-2