Skip to main content
Log in

Self-directed learning with knowledge management model to enhance digital literacy abilities

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-Directed Learning (SDL) is a process in which adult learners initiate their inner motivation to learn by themselves to increase their knowledge, skills and experiences from resources and evaluating learning outcomes. Knowledge Management (KM) is the process of creating, sharing, using and managing the knowledge and resources of an organization. Learners use KM to gain their knowledge. To access to these resources, the learners must know Digital Literacy Abilities (DLA). We developed a model for SDL with KM to enhance DLA: The model was synthesized from related works and verified by five experts in various fields. Data instrument was derived from focus group discussion including a five-level Likert scale of the appropriateness of the model, and experts’ opinions and recommendations. Then, collected data were analyzed with content analysis; mean (\(\bar {x}\)), standard deviation (S.D.). After discussion, the model was adjusted according to the experts’ recommendations. It contained three circles from inner to outer: SDL, KM, and DLA, respectively. SDL had four steps: readiness triggers, setting goal and planning, learning activities, and learning’s evaluation. KM contained five steps: knowledge discovery, knowledge capture and storage, knowledge application and distribution, knowledge evaluation, and knowledge creation. DLA had four aspects: operation literacy, analysis and evaluation literacy, value and creation literacy, and social-culture-organization cooperation literacy. Overall, the results of analyzed data from the experts towards on appropriateness of the model were at high level (\(\bar {x}\) = 4.4, S.D. = 0.6). This model will be continued to implement for adult learners’ activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., & Norman, M.K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-based Principles for Smart Teaching. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. (2019). Self-directed learning: A four-step process. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/tips-students/self-directed-learning/self-directed-learning-four-step-process.

  • Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2014). Knowledge management: Systems and processes. Evanston: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belshaw, D. (2011). What is digital literacy. A Pragmatic Investigation Doctorate in Education. Durham: University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdrow, I., & Lane, H.W. (2003). International joint ventures: creating value through successful knowledge management. Journal of world business, 38(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boondee, B. (2005). Knowledge Management from theory to practice. The National Productivity Institute.

  • Brockett, R.G. (2018). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research and practice. Evanston: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council NR, & et al. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition, National Academies Press.

  • Davenport, T.H. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.

  • Egbu, C.O. (2004). Managing knowledge and intellectual capital for improved organizational innovations in the construction industry: an examination of critical success factors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(5), 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppler, M.J., Seifried, P., & Röpnack, A. (2008). Improving knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium (1999). In Kommunikationsmanagement im Wandel (pp. 371–389). New York: Springer.

  • Faust, B. (2007). Implementation of tacit knowledge preservation and transfer methods. In International Conference on Knowledge Management in Nuclear Facilities (pp. 18–21).

  • Gao, T., Chai, Y., & Liu, Y. (2018). A review of knowledge management about theoretical conception and designing approaches. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2(1), 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R.V.D., & Martins, M.F. (2017). Knowledge management process: a theoretical-conceptual research. Gestã,o & Produċão, 24(2), 248–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helen, J. (2019). Digital literacy in the workplace: Deciphering the gobbledygook. https://www.jaluch.co.uk/hr-blast/digital-literacy-in-the-workplace-deciphering-the-goobledygook/.

  • Hiemstra, R., & et al. (1994). Self-directed learning. The sourcebook for self-directed learning 9–20.

  • Of Information, M., & Technology, C. (2015). Thailand Digital Economy and Society Development Plan. Digital Development for National Economic and Social Development.

  • Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). Focus groups: strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics, and research practice. Handbook of qualitative research 875–895.

  • Kapur, S. (2015). Andragogy: The adult learning theory. Indian Journal of Adult Education, 76(2), 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khlaisang, J., & Koraneekij, P. (2019). Open online assessment management system platform and instrument to enhance the information, media, and ict literacy skills of 21 st century learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7).

  • Kianto, A., Vanhala, M., & Heilmann, P. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), 621–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kianto, A., Shujahat, M., & Hussain, S. (2019). The impact of knowledge management on knowledge worker productivity. Baltic Journal of Management, Ali M.

  • Knowles, M.S. (1970). The modem practice of adult education: Andragogy vs. pedagogy.

  • Knowles, M.S. (2012). The adult learner. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M.S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers, vol 2. Association Press New York.

  • Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), 193–212.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R.A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.

  • Liebowitz, J. (2001). Knowledge management: Learning from knowledge engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, E. (2018). Understanding the effect of digital literacy on employees’ digital workplace continuance intentions and individual performance. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), 9(2), 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. London: Oxford university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic books.

  • Piatip, P., Chantana, V, & Paitoon, P. (2015). Elements of digital literacy skill. The 13th International Conference on Developing Real-Life Learning Experiences: Lifelong Learning Skills in the 21st Century pp P12–1–P12–8.

  • Sawatsky, A.P., Ratelle, J.T., Bonnes, S.L., Egginton, J.S., & Beckman, T.J. (2017). A model of self-directed learning in internal medicine residency: a qualitative study using grounded theory. BMC medical education, 17(1), 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, L., & Hill, J.R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Techataweewan, W., & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thida, S., & Narong, S. (2019). The development of web based instruction model by using problem based learning to enhance digital literacy for undergraduate students. Journal of Information Science, 37(2), 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vichan, P. (2016). New horizon in knowledge management. Foundation for the Promotion of Knowledge Management for Society.

  • Yang, B., Zheng, W., & Viere, C. (2009). Holistic views of knowledge management models. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(3), 273–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H., Easterday M.W., Gerber E.M., Rees Lewis D., & Maliakal L. (2017). Agile research studios: Orchestrating communities of practice to advance research training. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 220–232).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sirirat Petsangsri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Items

Level of appropriateness

 

5

4

3

2

1

Part 1: Components of the model based on theoretical frameworks

1. Self-Directed Learning (SDL) contains 5 components

 

1.1 Readiness trigger

 

1.2 Setting goals

 

1.3 Planning

 

1.4 Learning activities

 

1.5 Learning evaluation

 

2. Knowledge Management (KM) contains 5 components

 

2.1 Knowledge discovery

 

2.2 Knowledge capture and storage

 

2.3 Knowledge evaluation

 

2.4 Knowledge application and distribution

 

2.5 Knowledge creation

 

Part 2: Steps of the model

Step 1. Readiness trigger

 

Step 2. Setting goals

 

Step 3. Planning

 

Step 4. Learning activities

 

4.1 Knowledge discovery

 

4.2 Knowledge capture and storage

 

4.3 Knowledge application and distribution

 

Step 5. Learning evaluation

 

5.1 Knowledge evaluation

 

5.2 Knowledge creation

 

Part 3: Implementing technology supporting the model

1. Readiness trigger: Learners are triggered to learn from information, media online, posters, emails

 

2. Setting goal: Learners set their goal of learning by themselves or instructors provide the learners learning objectives

 

3. Planning: Learners arrange their learning schedules by themselves or instructors arrange learning schedules and inform learners about the learning plans via emails and/or schedule’s notifications

 

4. Learning activities: During learning activities, learners can

 

4.1 Discover their knowledge using content management system (CMS)

 

4.2 Capture and keep knowledge in their brains and/or database systems

 

4.3 Apply and share their knowledge to each other via online systems

 

5. Learning evaluation: After learning activities, learners can

 

5.1 Evaluate their knowledge by tests via evaluation systems and know the results

 

5.2 Create new knowledge using production software such as Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, etc

 

Part 4: Learning activities with instructors based on the model

1. Readiness trigger

 

Out-of-class learning activities

 

1.1 Learners are triggered from brochures, media online, etc

 

1.2 Learners have questions by themselves to find desired answers

 

1.3 Learners are invited from their friends or colleagues

 

1.4 Learners expect to learn for better job positions or are assigned new tasks

 

In-class learning activities

 

1.5 Instructors share knowledge to the learners

 

1.6 Learners or classmates help each other set questions for finding answers

 

1.7 Learners are interested in and encourage to learn

 

2. Setting goals

 

Out-of-class learning activities

 

2.1 Learners discover their knowledge by themselves via websites or online

 

In-class learning activities

 

2.2 Learners are trained by instructors or experts

 

3. Planning

 

3.1 Learners arrange learning plans by themselves

 

3.2 Instructors plan learning activities for learners and notify them via emails or calendars

 

4. Learning activities

 

4.1 Knowledge discovery

 

Out-of-class learning activities

 

4.1.1 Learners discover their knowledge by themselves via websites or online or synthesize their previous knowledge

 

4.1.2 Learners discover their knowledge from experts’ researches or related papers

 

4.1.3 Learners are advised from experts via emails or online chats

 

In-class learning activities

 

4.1.4 Learners receive their knowledge directly from instructors classmates and/or experts

 

4.2 knowledge capture and storage

 

Out-of-class learning activities

 

4.2.1 Learners gain their knowledge from experts and/or instructors by asking questions via emails or online chats

 

4.2.2 Learners capture knowledge and information that is of interest from websites

 

4.2.3 Learners keep their knowledge in their knowledge archives and/or on their computers for later use

 

In-class learning activities

 

4.2.4 Learners capture specific knowledge related to their tasks from instructors or their classmates

 

4.2.5 Learners keep knowledge in their knowledge archives and/or their computer

 

4.3 knowledge application and distribution

 

4.3.1 Learners apply the knowledge gained from self-directed learning to improve their work and to share it with others

 

5. Learning evaluation

 

5.1 knowledge evaluation

 

5.1.1 Knowledge that learners receive after the end of the learning process from the instructors, during learning activities and outside learning activities. Regarding the assessment of digital literacy abilities is an assessment form of the operation literacy, analysis and evaluation literacy, value and creation literacy, valuation creation and social-culture- organization cooperation literacy

 

5.1.2 Knowledge that learners receive after the end of the learning process from the instructor. During learning activities and outside learning activities. The exercise is the test of knowledge and understanding about the content of the lesson before and after, in terms of knowledge, ideas, abilities and attitudes

 

5.2 knowledge creation

 

5.2.1 The learners use the knowledge they have learned to research further into new ideas to improve their work efficiency

 

5.2.2 The learners use the knowledge they have learned to improve the organization

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silamut, Aa., Petsangsri, S. Self-directed learning with knowledge management model to enhance digital literacy abilities. Educ Inf Technol 25, 4797–4815 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10187-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10187-3

Keywords

Navigation