Skip to main content
Log in

HFACS-based FAHP implementation to identify critical factors influencing human error occurrence in nuclear plant control room

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human factor is an inevitable element of safety-critical control room operations in nuclear power plants. Identifying human factors influencing operator error occurrence in such critical application is important to mitigate human errors. Conventional methods employed for human factor identification are often static, unable to deal with data and model uncertainty, and to consider independencies among failure modes. This study employs the integration of the soft computing technique, viz. fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), into the human factors analysis and classifying system (HFACS) framework to identify the critical human factors that contribute to human errors in the nuclear control room application. Integration of FAHP improves the HFACS framework by providing an analytical foundation and group decision-making ability in order to ensure quantitative assessment of nuclear accidents. The proposed model has two phases. The first phase is study of 18 human performance-related events that occurred in Indian nuclear power plants, utilizing HFACS to analyze and determine the human and organizational factors (HOFs) responsible for such events. Existing HFACS can only be used to detect a wide range of human factors. The proposed model further explores the underlying causes of such a wide range of factors. The hierarchy of HOFs identified as adverse mental states and organizational process factors that contributed most failures causing accident in the first phase provides inputs for the critical human factor identification to the second phase, which is a quantitative analysis using FAHP. In the second phase, more than 40 adverse mental state and organizational process factors are identified from literature survey and ten subfactors are screened and selected by human reliability assessment and control room operation experts. The study was conducted by administering a questionnaire that is comprised of the screened factors. Data have been collected from 88 senior reactor operators in an operating nuclear power plant. The critical factors contributing to human errors identified from FAHP are attention, perception and memory under cognitive factor and decision making, training and communications under organizational factor. The study results reveal that the implementation of HFACS-based FAHP methodology enabled in determining intrinsic human factors that contribute to nuclear power plant control room operator performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Janabi S (2017) Pragmatic miner to risk analysis for intrusion detection (PMRA-ID). In: Mohamed A, Berry M, Yap B (eds) Soft Computing in Data Science. SCDS 2017. Communications in computer and information science, vol 788. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Janabi S, Alkaim AF (2019) A nifty collaborative analysis to predicting a novel tool (DRFLLS) for missing values estimation. J Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03972-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Janabi S, Al-Shourbaji I (2016) A study of cyber security awareness in educational environment in the middle east. J Inf Knowl Manag 15(01):1650007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Janabi S, Rawat S, Patel A, Al-Shourbaji I (2015) Design and evaluation of a hybrid system for detection and prediction of faults in electrical transformers. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 67(2015):324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarenga MAB, Frutuoso e Melo PF, Fonseca RA (2014) A critical review of methods and models for evaluating organizational factors in Human Reliability Analysis. Prog Nucl Energy 75:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki M, Rothwell G (2013) A comparative institutional analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: lessons and policy implications. Energy Policy 53:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie ER (2012) The practice of social research, thirteenth edn. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Celik M, Cebi S (2009) Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. Accid Anal Prev 41(1):66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čepin M (2008) Importance of human contribution within the human reliability analysis (IJS-HRA). J Loss Prev Process Ind 21(3):268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):649–655

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chou SW, Chang YC (2008) The implementation factors that influence the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) benefits. Decis Support Syst 46(1):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csutora R, Buckley JJ (2001) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method. Fuzzy Sets Syst 120:181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00155-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • French S, Bedford T, Pollard SJT, Soane E (2011) Human reliability analysis: a critique and review for managers. Saf Sci 49(6):753–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embrey DE (ed) (1986) SHERPA: a systematic human error reduction and prediction approach. In: Proceedings of the international topical meeting on advances in human factors in nuclear power systems, pp 184–193

  • Havle CA, Kılıç B (2019) A hybrid approach based on the fuzzy AHP and HFACS framework for identifying and analyzing gross navigation errors during transatlantic flights. J Air Transp Manag 76:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh MC, Wang EMY, Lee WC, Li LW, Hsieh CY, Tsai W, Wang CP, Huang JL, Liu TC (2018) Application of HFACS, fuzzy TOPSIS, and AHP for identifying important human error factors in emergency departments in Taiwan. Int J Ind Ergon 67:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2014) Human and organizational factors in nuclear safety in light of accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. IAEA Report. 978-92-0-144610-7

  • Jang I, Kim AR, Jung W, Seong PH (2016) Study on a new framework of human reliability analysis to evaluate soft control execution error in advanced MCRs of NPPs. Ann Nucl Energy 91:92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jou YT, Yenn TC, Lin CJ, Yang CW, Chiang CC (2009) Evaluation of operator's mental workload of human–system interface automation in the advanced nuclear power plants. Nucl Eng Des 239(11):2437–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaghed NH, Abbas TA, Ali SH (2006) Design and implementation of classification system for satellite images based on soft computing techniques. In: IEEE, 2006 2nd international conference on information & communication technologies, Damascus, pp 430–436. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTTA.2006.1684408

  • Karthick M, Senthil Kumar C, Paul Robert T (2017) BAYES-HEP: Bayesian belief networks for estimation of human error probability. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 6(3):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karthick M, Senthil Kumar C, Paul Robert T (2020) Investigation of human factors using HFACS framework—a case study for unintended reactor trip events in NPP. In: Varde P, Prakash R, Vinod G (eds) Reliability, safety and hazard assessment for risk-based technologies. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JW, Jung W (2003) Taxonomy of performance influencing factors for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks. J Loss Prev Process Ind 16(6):479–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SK, Lee YH, Jang TI, Oh YJ, Shin KW (2014) An Investigation on unintended reactor trip events in terms of human error hazards of Korean nuclear power plants. Ann Nucl Energy 65:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortov V, Ustyantsev Y (2013) Chernobyl accident: causes, consequences and problems of radiation measurements. Radiat Meas 55:12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HC, Seong PH (2009) A computational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(11):1796–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Lyu X, Qiu Y, He J, Tong J, Zhao J, Li Z (2017) Identifying key performance shaping factors in digital main control rooms of nuclear power plants: a risk-based approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 167:264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Cheng W, Yu Y, Xu Q (2018) Human factors analysis of major coal mine accidents in China based on the HFACS-CM model and AHP method. Int J Ind Ergon 68:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov L (2000) A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in analytic hierarchy process. J Oper Res Soc 51:341–349. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600899

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Patel A, Al-Janabi S, AlShourbaji I, Pedersen J (2015) A novel methodology towards a trusted environment in mashup web applications. Comput Secur 49:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter C, Liu JK-H (2002) Note on consistency ratio. Math Comput Model 35:1077–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1983) Priority setting in complex problems. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 30(3):140–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos IJALD, Grecco CHDS, Mol ACA, Carvalho PVR (2009) The use of questionnaire and virtual reality in the verification of the human factors issues in the design of nuclear control desk. Int J Ind Ergon 39(1):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugam A, Paul Robert T (2015) Ranking of aircraft maintenance organization based on human factor performance. Comput Ind Eng 88:410–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shappell SA, Wiegmann DA (2000) The human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS). U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Aviation Medicine, Washington, DC

  • Sharma SK (2008) Human reliability analysis: a compendium of methods, data and event studies for nuclear power plants (2008) (TEC. DOC. NO. AERB/NPP/TD/O-2). Atomic Energy Regulatory Board Niyamak Bhavan Anushaktinagar, Mumbai

  • Shaygan A, Testik ÖM (2019) A fuzzy AHP-based methodology for project prioritization and selection. Soft Comput 23:1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2851-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam K, Saraf RK, Venkatraj VVS (2014) A perspective on human reliability analysis and studies on the application of HRA to Indian pressurised heavy water reactors (2000). Report BARC/2000/E-013

  • Theophilus SC, Esenowo VN, Arewa AO, Ifelebuegu AO, Nnadi EO, Mbanaso FU (2017) Human factors analysis and classification system for the oil and gas industry (HFACS-OGI). Reliab Eng Syst Saf 167:68–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi S, Chambers T, Yang K (2018) Enhanced fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process. Soft Comput 22:4431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2639-y

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:229–241

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YJ (2018) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making on combining fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with representative utility functions under fuzzy environment. Soft Comput 22:1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2428-z

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JM, Chin K-S (2006) An eigenvector method for generalizing normalized interval and fuzzy weights. Appl Math Comput 181:1257–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.026

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YF, Faghih Roohi S, Hu XM, Xie M (2010) A new methodology to integrate human factors analysis and classification system with Bayesian Network. In: IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, Macao, pp 1776–1780

  • Zhan Q, Zheng W, Zhao B (2017) A hybrid human and organizational analysis method for railway accidents based on HFACS-Railway Accidents (HFACS-RAs). Saf Sci 91:232–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported and funded by Safety Research Institute, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, India (Grant number not available).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Karthick.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Data collection for the study involving human participants was in accordance with the institutional ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karthick, M., Robert, T.P. & Kumar, C.S. HFACS-based FAHP implementation to identify critical factors influencing human error occurrence in nuclear plant control room. Soft Comput 24, 16577–16591 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04961-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04961-1

Keywords

Navigation