Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:35:12.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning from the Wood Samples in ICS, TIRI, FIRI, VIRI, and SIRI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

E M Scott Open the ORCID record for E M Scott [Opens in a new window] ,
G T Cook ,
P Naysmith  and
R A Staff
E M Scott*
Affiliation:
School of Maths and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G128QQ Scotland, UK
G T Cook
Affiliation:
SUERC Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire, Scotland, UK
P Naysmith
Affiliation:
SUERC Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire, Scotland, UK
R A Staff
Affiliation:
SUERC Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire, Scotland, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: marian.scott@glasgow.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Each of the laboratory intercomparisons (from ICS onwards) has included wood samples, many of them dendrochronologically dated. In the early years, as a result of the majority of laboratories being radiometric, these samples were typically blocks of 20–40 rings, but more recently (SIRI), they have been single ring samples. The sample ages have spanned background through to modern. In some intercomparisons, we have examined different wood pretreatment effects, in others the focus has been on background samples. In this paper, we illustrate what we have learned from these extensive intercomparisons involving wood samples and how the results contribute to the global IntCal effort.

Keywords

dendro-dated woodintercomparison
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 61 , Issue 5: Radiocarbon 2018 Conference Proceedings Trondheim, Norway, June 17–22, 2018 Part 1 of 2 , October 2019 , pp. 1293 - 1304
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 23rd International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim, Norway, 17–22 June, 2018

References

REFERENCES

Aitchison, TC, Scott, EM, Harkness, DD, Baxter, MS, Cook, GT. 1990. Report on Stage 3 of the international collaborative program. Radiocarbon 32(3):271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Analytical Methods Committee, AMCTB No. 74. 2016. z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testing—their meanings, and some common misconceptions. Analytical Methods 8:5553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk, Ramsey C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, GT, Harkness, DD, Miller, BF, Scott, EM, Baxter, MS, Aitchison, TC. 1990. International collaborative study: structuring and sample preparation. Radiocarbon 32(3):267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, E, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P, Tripney, BG, Xu, S. 2016. AMS 14C dating at the Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC) Radiocarbon Laboratory. Radiocarbon 58(1):9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, DD, Cook, GT, Miller, BF, Scott, EM, Baxter, MS. 1989. Design and preparation of samples for the international collaborative study. Radiocarbon 31(3):407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A, Kalin, RM. 1990. A suggested quality assurance protocol for radiocarbon dating laboratories. Radiocarbon 32(3):329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, C, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatteé, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50, 000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, editor. 2003. The Third International Radiocarbon Inter-Comparison (TIRI) and the Fourth International Radiocarbon Inter-Comparison (FIRI) 1990–2002: results, analyses, and conclusions. Radiocarbon 45(2):135–408.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Aitchison, TC, Harkness, DD, Baxter, MS, Cook, GT. 1989. An interim progress report on stages 1 and 2 of the international collaborative programs. Radiocarbon 31(3):414–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Aitchison, TC, Harkness, DD, Cook, GT, Baxter, MS. 1990. An overview of all three stages of the international radiocarbon intercomparison. Radiocarbon 32(3):309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Harkness, DD, Cook, GT, Aitchison, TC, Baxter, MS. 1991. Future quality assurance in 14C dating. Quaternary Proceedings 1:1–4.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Harkness, DD, Miller, BF, Cook, GT, Baxter, MS. 1992. Announcement of a further international intercomparison exercise. Radiocarbon 34(3):528–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P. 2010. Top of form The Fifth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (VIRI): an assessment of laboratory performance in stage 3. Radiocarbon 52(3):859–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Naysmith, P, Cook, GT. 2017. Should archaeologists care about 14C intercomparisons? A summary report on SIRI. Radiocarbon 59(1):1589–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Naysmith, P, Cook, GT. 2018. Why do we need 14C inter-comparisons? The Glasgow 14C inter-comparison series, a reflection over 30 years. Quaternary Geochronology 43:72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Pearson, GW. 1986. High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon timescale AD 1950–500 BC. Radiocarbon 28(2B):805–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Braziunas, TF. 1998. High-precision radiocarbon age calibration for terrestrial and marine samples. Radiocarbon 40(3):1127–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M, Ellison, SR, Wood, R. 2006. The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories. Pure and Applied Chemistry 78(1):145–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar