Skip to main content
Log in

On the importance of the bullet jacket during the penetration process: Reversed-ballistic experimental and numerical study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behaviour of exposed and copper-jacketed 12.7 mm En8 steel cores impacting against 5 and 9 mm Armox Advance plates was investigated to determine the significance of the jacket during the penetration. The target plates were accelerated into stationary projectiles (a reversed-ballistic configuration) and the impact was monitored using a multichannel flash X-ray system to gain insight into the interaction of the core target. Numerical simulations were also carried out to compare result with the experimental testing. Explicit numerical software LS-DYNA was used to model the behaviour of the target and the projectile during the impact collision. Fragments of the core and target plate were collected post-shot for analysis. A similar penetration behaviour was observed for both plates, although the post-shot core was shorter after impacting against the 9 mm plate, consistent with enhanced erosion behaviour. The copper jacket protected the core, resulting in greater surface defeat and dwell compared to the unjacketed core. Numerical studies agreed on the cases of projectile impacting the 5 mm and 9 mm target. However, the target fracture cannot be captured. This could be caused by the input of material data and strain rate parameter modelling in LS-DYNA was limited, while the impact phenomenon was high velocity impact that the material exhibits a highstrain rate effect. Overall, the ductile jacket appeared to serve two functions: (1) Absorbing reflected energy during impact, hence cushioning the impact and thereby preserving the core, and (2) constraining or confining the core. In this study, the steel core design and copper jacket has a more complex geometry compared to the simplified steel core designs often applied in several earlier ballistic studies. The captured flash X-rays revealed significantly less erosion in the jacketed cores, agreeing with the post-impact core length measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Feng et al., An armour-piercing projectile penetration in a double-layered target of ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete and armour steel: Experimental and numerical analyses, Mater. Des., 102 (2016) 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. H. Atapek, Development of a new armor steel and its ballistic performance, Def. Sci. J., 63 (2013) 271–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. J. Worsham, S. K. Treadway and A. D. Shirley, Defeat of high velocity projectiles by a novel spaced armor system, Procedia Eng., 58 (2013) 338–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Liu et al., Design and ballistic penetration of the ceramic composite armor, Compos. Part B: Eng., 84 (2016) 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. G. Crouch, G. Appleby-Thomas and P. J. Hazell, A study of the penetration behaviour of mild-steel-cored ammunition against boron carbide ceramic armours, Int. J. Impact Eng., 80 (2015) 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Q. M. Li and E. A. Flores-Johnson, Hard projectile penetration and trajectory stability, Int. J. Impact Eng., 38 (2011) 815–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. J. Hazell et al., The effect of gilding jacket material on the penetration mechanics of a 7.62 mm armour-piercing projectile, Int. J. Impact Eng., 54 (2013) 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Kiliç and B. Ekici, Ballistic resistance of high hardness armor steels against 7.62 mm armor piercing ammunition, Mater. Des., 44 (2013) 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Forrestal, T. Børvik and T. L. Warren, Perforation of 7075-T651 aluminum armor plates with 7.62 mm APM2 bullets, Exp. Mech., 50 (2010) 1245–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. J. Forrestal et al., Perforation of 6082-T651 aluminum plates with 7.62 mm APM2 bullets at normal and oblique impacts, Conf. Proc. Soc. Exp. Mech. Ser., 65 (2015) 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. B. Brown et al., Computational and Split-Hopkinson pressure-bar studies on the effect of the jacket during penetration of an AK47 bullet into ceramic armour, Mater. Des., 119 (2017) 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Kiliç et al., Ballistic behavior of high hardness perforated armor plates against 7.62 mm armor piercing projectile, Mater. Des., 63 (2014) 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. D. Showalter et al., Development and ballistic testing of a new class of high hardness armour steel, The AMMTIAC Quaterly, 4 (4) (2008) 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. M. Diederen, J. P. F. Broos and S. N. Van Trigt, Ballistic protection against armour piercing projectiles using titanium base armour, Cost Eff. Appl. Titan. Alloy Mil. Platforms, 99 (2001) 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Ryan et al., The ballistic performance of an ultra-high hardness armour steel: An experimental investigation, Int. J. Impact Eng., 94 (2016) 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. OTAI Special Steel, EN8 Carbon Steel, 080M40 BS 970 Specification, Otai Special Steel, Co. Ltd. (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. D. Showater et al., Ballistic Testing of SSAB Ultra-high-hardness Steel for Armor Applications, Army Research Laboratory, No. ARL-TR-4632 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smiths Metal, C101 (CW1004A) Copper, Smiths Metal Centres Limited (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Engineers Edge, Yield Strength–Strength (Mechanics) of Materials, Engineers Edge, LLC (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. AZO Materials, Aluminum 7075 Alloy (UNS A97075), AzoM.com Limited (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. PROTEQ, Determination of Poisson’s Ration and the Modulus of Elasticity by Measuring with P- and S-wave Transducers (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. G. Baek and J. Y. Jeong,A basic study on static and dynamic crushing behavior of a stiffened tube, Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers (KSAE), 7 (1) (1999) 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Karl Norris, Adrian Mustey, David Wood and Andrew Roberts for help in preparing the targets and supporting the ballistic testing in of the Dynamic Response Group at Cranfield University’s Shrivenham Campus. The authors also acknowledge the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) which supported both the experiments and the M.Sc. by Research programme. Thanks are due to LSTC for providing academic license on LS-DYNA computational software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denny Lesmana.

Additional information

Denny Lesmana received his B.Sc. degree (Chemistry) at Brawijaya University, Indonesia in 2010 and his M.Sc. degree (Defence and Security) at Cran-field University, UK in 2018. He is currently working as an expert in Ammunition Process and Product Development at PT. Pindad (Persero). His research interests are ammuntion design, warhead system, engineering simulation (CFD and structural analysis), fragmentation, and defeat mechanism.

Faizal Arifurrahman received his B.Sc. degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics at Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Indonesia in 2015 and his M.Sc. degree in Military Vehicle Technology at Cranfield University, United Kingdom in 2017. He is currently working as a junior staff in Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (FTMD), ITB Indonesia. His research interests are mechanics of material, material dynamics, lightweight structures, and vehicle armour protection system.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lesmana, D., Arifurrahman, F., Hameed, A. et al. On the importance of the bullet jacket during the penetration process: Reversed-ballistic experimental and numerical study. J Mech Sci Technol 34, 1871–1877 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0408-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0408-9

Keywords

Navigation