Skip to main content
Log in

Likelihood-based qualitative flexible approach to ranking of Z-numbers in decision problems

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information reliability has a remarkable effect on decision-making outcome. Zadeh’s Z-number considers information fuzziness and reliability, and can, therefore, help the decision-maker to manage complicated problems. However, due to its complex construct, several issues concerning the computation of Z-numbers require further research. This study develops a novel likelihood-based method of comparing two Z-numbers to solve multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. Four main parts can be outlined. First, the likelihood of fuzzy restriction of Z-numbers is defined based on the conversion method of Z-number. Second, the likelihood of underlying probability distributions of Z-numbers is also proposed to compare the difference of randomness of Z-information. Third, by adding to a risk preference parameter, this study constructs a comprehensive weighted likelihood of Z-numbers. Finally, a likelihood-based qualitative flexible approach is extended to address the MCDM problems under Z-evaluation. In addition, a numerical example of the selection of ERP systems for ABC enterprise is placed to illustrate the applicability, validity, and effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aliev RA, Alizadeh AV, Huseynov OH (2015) The arithmetic of discrete Z-numbers. Inf Sci 290(C):134–155

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aliev RA, Huseynov OH, Zeinalova LM (2016) The arithmetic of continuous Z-numbers. Inf Sci 373(C):441–460

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyev RR (2016) Multi-attribute decision making based on Z-valuation. Procedia Comput Sci 102(C):218–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1988) Possibilistic linear programming with triangular fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 26(1):135–138

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S-H (1985) Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(2):113–129

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y-H, Wang T-C, Wu C-Y (2011) Strategic decisions using the fuzzy PROMETHEE for IS outsourcing. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):13216–13222

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S-X, Wang J-Q, Wang T-L (2019) Cloud-based ERP system selection based on extended probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA method and Choquet integral operator. Comput Appl Math 38(2):88

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chou C-C (2003) The canonical representation of multiplication operation on triangular fuzzy numbers. Comput Math Appl 45(10–11):1601–1610

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cuong BC, Kreinovich V (2013) Picture fuzzy sets—a new concept for computational intelligence problems. In: 3rd world congress on information and communication technologies (WICT 2013). IEEE, pp 1–6

  • Gao F-J (2013) Possibility degree and comprehensive priority of interval numbers. Syst Eng Theory Pract 33(8):2033–2040

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu J-H, Yang Y, Zhang X-L, Chen X-H (2018) Similarity and entropy measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Int Trans Oper Res 25(3):857–886

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Zhang X, Yang Y, Liu Y, Chen X (2020) New doctors ranking system based on VIKOR method. Int Trans Oper Res 27(2):1236–1261

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106(4):620–630

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ji P, Zhang H-Y, Wang J-Q (2019) A fuzzy decision support model with sentiment analysis for items comparison in e-commerce: the case study of PConline.com. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 49(10):1993–2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang B, Wei D, Li Y, Deng Y (2012a) Decision making using Z-numbers under uncertain environment. J Comput Inf Syst 8(7):2807–2814

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang B, Wei D, Li Y, Deng Y (2012b) A method of converting Z-number to classical fuzzy number. J Inf Comput Sci 9(3):703–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang B, Chhipi-Shrestha G, Deng Y, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2018a) Stable strategies analysis based on the utility of Z-number in the evolutionary games. Appl Math Comput 324:202–217

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kang B, Deng Y, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2018b) Generating Z-number based on OWA weights using maximum entropy. Int J Intell Syst 33(8):1745–1755

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang B, Deng Y, Sadiq R (2018c) Total utility of Z-number. Appl Intell 48(3):703–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang B, Deng Y, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2019) A method of measuring uncertainty for Z-number. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(4):731–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang R, Wang J (2019) A linguistic intuitionistic cloud decision support model with sentiment analysis for product selection in E-commerce. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21(3):963–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng H-G, Wang J-Q (2017) Hesitant uncertain linguistic Z-numbers and their application in multi-criteria group decision-making problems. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19(5):1300–1316

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng H-G, Wang J-Q (2018a) A multicriteria group decision-making method based on the normal cloud model With Zadeh's Z-numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3246–3260

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng H-G, Wang J-Q (2018b) Outranking decision-making method with Z-number cognitive information. Cognit Comput 10(5):752–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng H-G, Shen K-W, He S-S, Zhang H-Y, Wang J-Q (2019a) Investment risk evaluation for new energy resources: an integrated decision support model based on regret theory and ELECTRE III. Energy Convers Manage 183:332–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng H-G, Wang X-K, Wang T-L, Wang J-Q (2019b) Multi-criteria game model based on the pairwise comparisons of strategies with Z-numbers. Appl Soft Comput 74:451–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng H-M, Wang X-K, Wang T-L, Liu Y-H, Wang J (2020a) A multi-criteria decision support framework for inland nuclear power plant site selection under Z-information: a case study in Hunan province of China. Mathematics 8(2):252

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J-J, Tian C, Zhang W-Y, Zhang S, Wang J-Q (2020b) An integrated multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainable supplier selection under picture fuzzy environment. Tech Econ Dev Econ. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao D, Shen K-W, Wang J-Q, Wang T-l (2019a) Multi-criteria PROMETHEE method based on possibility degree with Z-numbers under uncertain linguistic environment. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput 11(5):2187–2201

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiao D, Wang X-K, Wang J-Q, Chen K (2019b) Cross entropy for discrete Z-numbers and its application in multi-criteria decision-making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21(6):1786–1800

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid T, Faizi S, Xu Z, Zafar S (2018) ELECTRE-based outranking method for multi-criteria decision making using hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(1):78–92

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shen K-W, Wang J-Q (2018) Z-VIKOR method based on a new weighted comprehensive distance measure of Z-number and its application. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3232–3245

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen K-W, Wang X-K, Wang J-Q (2019a) Multi-criteria decision-making method based on smallest enclosing Circle in incompletely reliable information environment. Comput Ind Eng 130:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen K, Wang X, Qiao D, Wang J (2019b) Extended Z-MABAC method based on regret theory and directed distance for regional circular economy development program selection with Z-information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2923948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh P (2017) Distance and similarity measures for multiple-attribute decision making with dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Comput Appl Math 36(1):111–126

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F (2010) Neutrosophic logic—generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy logic. Extr Metall Nickel Cobalt Platin Group Metals 269(51):49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Song C, Wang J, Li J (2020) New framework for quality function deployment using linguistic Z-numbers. Mathematics 8(2):224

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Sotoudeh-Anvari A, Siadat A (2015) A multi-criteria group decision-making approach for facility location selection using PROMETHEE under a fuzzy environment. In: Kamiński B, Kersten GE, Szapiro T (eds) Outlooks and insights on group decision and negotiation: 15th international conference, GDN 2015, Warsaw, Poland, June 22–26, 2015, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 145–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian Z-P, Wang J, Wang J-Q, Chen X-H (2018) Multicriteria decision-making approach based on gray linguistic weighted Bonferroni mean operator. Int Trans Oper Res 25(5):1635–1658

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tian C, Peng J, Zhang W, Zhang S, Wang J (2020a) Tourism environmental impact assessment based on improved AHP and picture fuzzy PROMETHEE II methods. Technol Econ Dev Econ 26(2):355–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian Z-P, Nie R-X, Wang J-Q, Luo H, Li L (2020b) A prospect theory-based QUALIFLEX for uncertain linguistic Z-number multi-criteria decision-making with unknown weight information. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(2):1775–1787

    Google Scholar 

  • Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(6):529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Verma R, Merigó JM (2019) On generalized similarity measures for Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision-making. Int J Intell Syst 34(10):2556–2583

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma R, Sharma BD (2014) A new measure of inaccuracy with its application to multi-criteria decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(4):1811–1824

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Wang J-Q, Tian Z-P, Zhao D-Y (2018) A multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic multicriteria decision-making approach for logistics outsourcing with incomplete weight information. Int Trans Oper Res 25(3):831–856

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Wang J, Zhang H (2019) Distance-based multicriteria group decision-making approach with probabilistic linguistic term sets. Expert Syst 36(2):e12352

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Wang X, Peng J, Wang J (2020a) The differences in hotel selection among various types of travellers: a comparative analysis with a useful bounded rationality behavioural decision support model. Tour Manag 76:103961

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Zhang H-Y, Wang J-Q, Wu G-F (2020b) Picture fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making method to hotel building energy efficiency retrofit project selection. RAIRO Oper Res 54(1):211–229

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z-S (2001) Algorithm for priority of fuzzy complementary judgement matrix. J Syst Eng 16(4):311–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaakob AM, Gegov A (2016) Interactive TOPSIS based group decision making methodology using Z-numbers. Int J Comput Intell Syst 9(2):311–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2012a) On Z-valuations using Zadeh's Z-numbers. Int J Intell Syst 27(3):259–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2012b) On a view of Zadeh’s Z-numbers. In: Greco S, Bouchon-Meunier B, Coletti G, Fedrizzi M, Matarazzo B, Yager RR (eds) Advances in computational intelligence: 14th international conference on information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems, IPMU 2012, Catania, Italy, July 9–13, 2012, Proceedings, Part III. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 90–101

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Wang J-Q (2018) SMAA-based model for decision aiding using regret theory in discrete Z-number context. Appl Soft Comput 65:590–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1999) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100:9–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (2011) A note on Z-numbers. Inf Sci 181(14):2923–2932

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Dong Y, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale GDM with the individual concerns and satisfactions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(2):884–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Wang J-Q, Zhang H-Y (2019) Stochastic multicriteria decision-making approach based on SMAA-ELECTRE with extended gray numbers. Int Trans Oper Res 26(5):2032–2052

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to help improve the overall quality of this paper. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71871228).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanyang Luo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Communicated by Rosana Sueli da Motta Jafelice.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix I: Proof of the properties in Property 3

Appendix I: Proof of the properties in Property 3

Proof

  1. 1.

    According to Properties 1 and 2, \(0 \le L^{f} \left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) \le 1\) and \(0 \le L^{p} \left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) \le 1\) exists. In addition, \(L\left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) = \omega L^{f} \left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) + \left( {1 - \omega } \right)L^{p} \left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right)\). Therefore, \(0 \le L\left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) \le 1\) can be proven.

  2. 2.

    From Properties 1 and 2, \(L^{f} \left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) + L^{f} \left( {Z_{2} \succ Z_{1} } \right) = 1\) and \(L^{p} \left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) + L^{p} \left( {Z_{2} \succ Z_{1} } \right) = 1\) exist. Moreover, \(L\left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) = \omega L^{f} \left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) + \left( {1 - \omega } \right)L^{p} \left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right)\). Thus, \(L\left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) + L\left( {Z_{2} \succ Z_{1} } \right) = 1\) can be obtained.

  3. 3.

    Based on Definitions 7, 8, and 9, if \(Z_{1}\) and \(Z_{2}\) are the same, then both the likelihoods of fuzzy restriction and underlying probability distributions are the same between two Z-numbers. Therefore, \(L\left( {Z_{1} \succ Z_{2} } \right) = L\left( {Z_{2} \succ Z_{1} } \right) = 0.5\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, D., Wang, Yt., Wang, Jq. et al. Likelihood-based qualitative flexible approach to ranking of Z-numbers in decision problems. Comp. Appl. Math. 39, 134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01167-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01167-x

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation