Abstract
Between 1994 and 2017, 137,455 ha of agricultural land were afforested in Andalusia (Spain), using a great diversity of tree species, under the Common Agricultural Policy scheme. Quercus ilex and Pinus halepensis were the most used species. In view of the need to know the spatial distribution of survival according to the potential species habitat, the current survival was assessed under current and foreseeable future climate change scenarios, using ensemble species distribution models (SDMs). Predicted potential distributions together with 2009 survival data were used to predict the distribution of the survival rate of the two species. The set modelling approach gave very accurate results for the current potential distribution of Q. ilex (AUCtrain = 0.908, TSS = 0.647, Kappa = 0.647) and P. halepensis (AUCtrain = 0.983, TSS = 0869, Kappa = 0.868) and moderately accurate estimates of the distribution of the survival rate of Q. ilex and P. halepensis (RMSE = 0.23). It was found that 25–38% of the Q. ilex and P. halepensis plantations planted between 1993 and 2000 were established in the optimal area of occurrence (probability of occurrence > 70%), but only 12.3% (Q. ilex) and 22.9% (P. halepensis) presented simultaneously an acceptable survival rate (> 50%). In addition, the volume of the environmental space defined by Q. ilex decreased, while that defined by P. halepensis remained constant in future projections under climate change. The potential of SDMs to predict the survival rate distribution of Q. ilex and P. halepensis and to assess the future stability for each of these species has been confirmed. In the worst case, ~ 5% of Q. ilex and ~ 33% of P. halepensis of planted surface would withstand climate change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232
Anaya-Romero M, Muñoz-Rojas M, Ibáñez B, Marañón T (2016) Evaluation of forest ecosystem services in Mediterranean areas. A regional case study in South Spain. Ecosyst Serv 20:82–90
Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47
Araújo MB, Anderson RP, Márcia Barbosa A, Beale CM, Dormann CF, Early R, Garcia RA, Guisan A, Maiorano L, Naimi B, O’Hara RB, Zimmermann NE, Rahbek C (2019) Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci Adv 5:eaat4858
Benito Garzón M, Sánchez de Dios R, Sainz Ollero H (2008) Effects of climate change on the distribution of Iberian tree species. Appl Veg Sci 11:169–178
Blonder B (2018) Hypervolume concepts in niche- and trait-based ecology. Ecography 41:1441–1455
Booth TH (2018) Why understanding the pioneering and continuing contributions of BIOCLIM to species distribution modelling is important. Austral Ecol 43(8):852–860
Calle M, Urrea V, Boulesteix AL, Malats N (2011) AUC-RF: a new strategy for genomic profiling with random forest. Hum Hered 72:121–132
Ceacero CJ, Díaz-Hernández JL, del Campo AD, Navarro-Cerrillo RM (2020) Soil rock fragment is stronger driver of spatio-temporal soil water dynamics and efficiency of water use than cultural management in holm oak plantations. Soil Till Res 197:104495
Ceballos L (1966) Mapa forestal de España. Ministerio de Agricultura, Madrid
Costa Tenorio M, Morla Juaristi C, Sainz Ollero H (1998) Los Bosques Ibéricos. Una interpretación geobotánica. Geoplaneta, Barcelona
Duque-Lazo J, van Gils H, Groen TA, Navarro-Cerrillo RM (2016) Transferability of species distribution models: the case of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Southwest Spain and Southwest Australia. Ecol Model 320:62–70
Duque-Lazo J, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Ruíz-Gómez FJ (2018a) Assessment of the future stability of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) afforestation under climate change scenarios in Southwest Spain. For Ecol Manag 409:444–456
Duque-Lazo J, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, van Gils H, Groen TA (2018b) Forecasting oak decline caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi in Andalusia: identification of priority areas for intervention. For Ecol Manag 417:122–136
Elith J, Franklin J (2013) Species distribution modeling. In: Editor-in-Chief: Simon AL (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity (second edition). Academic Press, Waltham, pp 692–705
Fernández-Habas J, Fernández-Rebollo P, Casado MR, García Moreno AM, Abellanas B (2019) Spatio-temporal analysis of oak decline process in open woodlands: a case study in SW Spain. J Environ Manag 248:109308
Fonseca F, de Figueiredo T, Martins A (2011) Survival and early growth of mixed forest stands installed in a Mediterranean Region: effects of site preparation intensity. For Ecol Manag 262:1905–1912
Franklin J (2010) Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, New York
Gómez-Aparicio L, Valladares F, Zamora R (2006) Differential light responses of Mediterranean tree saplings: linking ecophysiology with regeneration niche in four co-occurring species. Tree Physiol 26:947–958
Gómez-Aparicio L, Pérez-Ramos IM, Mendoza I, Matías L, Quero JL, Castro J, Zamora R, Marañón T (2008) Oak seedling survival and growth along resource gradients in Mediterranean forests: implications for regeneration in current and future environmental scenarios. Oikos 117:1683–1699
Grossnickle SC (2012) Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New For 43(5–6):711–738
Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145
He Q, Bertness MD (2014) Extreme stresses, niches, and positive species interactions along stress gradients. Ecology 95:1437–1443
Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Elith J, Hijmans RJ (2017). dismo: Species distribution modeling. In: R package (version 1.1-4)
Jiménez MN, Fernández-Ondoño E, Ripoll MÁ, Castro-Rodríguez J, Huntsinger L, Navarro FB (2016) Stones and organic mulches improve the Quercus ilex L. afforestation success under mediterranean climatic conditions. Land Degrad Dev 27:357–365
Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Hortal J (2008) Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 14:885–890
Junta de Andalucía (2018) Red de Información Ambiental de Andalucía. (REDIAM). In: Consejería de Agricultura, P.y.M.A. (Ed.), Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Medio Ambiente. Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla
Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S, Kremer A, Barbati A, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Seidl R, Delzon S, Corona P, Kolström M, Lexer MJ, Marchetti M (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 259:698–709
López-Tirado J, Hidalgo PJ (2014) A high resolution predictive model for relict trees in the Mediterranean-mountain forests (Pinus sylvestris L., P. nigra Arnold and Abies pinsapo Boiss.) from the south of Spain: a reliable management tool for reforestation. For Ecol Manag 330:105–114
López-Tirado J, Hidalgo PJ (2016) Predictive modelling of climax oak trees in southern Spain: insights in a scenario of global change. Plant Ecol 217:451–463
López-Tirado J, Hidalgo PJ (2018) Predicting suitability of forest dynamics to future climatic conditions: the likely dominance of Holm oak [Quercus ilex subsp. ballota (Desf.) Samp.] and Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.). Ann For Sci 75:19
López-Tirado J, Vessella F, Schirone B, Hidalgo PJ (2018) Trends in evergreen oak suitability from assembled species distribution models: assessing climate change in south-western Europe. New For 49(4):471–487
MAGRAMA (2007) Tercer Inventario Forestal Nacional (IFN3). Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de España, Madrid
Martínez-Vilalta J, Lloret F, Breshears DD (2012) Drought-induced forest decline: causes, scope and implications. Biol Lett 8:689–691
Merow C, Smith MJ, Edwards TC, Guisan A, McMahon SM, Normand S, Thuiller W, Wüest RO, Zimmermann NE, Elith J (2014) What do we gain from simplicity versus complexity in species distribution models? Ecography 37:1267–1281
Navarro Cerrillo RM, Campo García AD, Cortina J (2006) Factores que afectan al éxito de una repoblación y su relación con la calidad de la planta. In: Cortina J, Peñuelas JL, Puértolas J, Vilagrosa A, Savé RC (eds) Calidad de planta forestal para la restauración en ambientes Mediterráneos. Estado actual de conocimientos. Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid
Navarro Cerrillo RM, Pemán J, del Campo A, Moreno J, Lara M, Díaz J, Pousa F, Piñón F (2009) Manual de especies para la forestación de tierras agrarias en Andalucía. Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca, Sevilla
Navarro Cerrillo RM, Clavero Rumbaó I, Lorenzo Vidaña A, Quero Pérez JL, Duque-Lazo J (2016) Integración de datos de inventario y modelos dehábitat para predecir la regeneración de especies leñosas mediterráneas en repoblaciones forestales. Ecosistemas 25:6–21
Navarro-Cerrillo RM, del Campo AD, Ceacero CJ, Quero JL, de Mena JH (2014) On the importance of topography, site quality, stock quality and planting date in a semiarid plantation: feasibility of using low-density LiDAR. Ecol Eng 67:25–38
Nicolas A, Gandullo JM (1972) Ecología de los pinares españoles: Pinus halepensis Mill. III. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias, Madrid
Oliet JA, Jacobs DF (2012) Restoring forests: advances in techniques and theory. New For 43:535–541
Oliet JA, Puértolas J, Planelles R, Jacobs DF (2013) Nutrient loading of forest tree seedlings to promote stress resistance and field performance: a Mediterranean perspective. New For. 44(5):649–669
Pecl GT, Araújo MB, Bell JD, BlanchardJ Bonebrake TC, Chen I, Clark TD, Colwell RK, Danielsen F, Evengård B, Falconi L, Ferrier S, Frusher S, Garcia RA, Griffis RB, Hobday AJ, Janion-Scheepers C, Jarzyna MA, Jennings S, Lenoir J, Linnetved HI, Martin VY, McCormack PC, McDonald J, Mitchell NJ, Mustonen T, Pandolfi JM, Pettorelli N, Popova E, Robinson SA, Scheffers BR, Shaw JD, Sorte C, Strugnell JM, Sunday JM, Tuanmu M, Vergés A, Villanueva C, Wernberg T, Wapstra E, Williams SE (2017) Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355:eaai9214
Pemán García J, Iriarte Goñi I, Lario Leza FJ (2017). La Restauración forestal de España. 75 años de una ilusión. Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Madrid, España
Potts JM, Elith J (2006) Comparing species abundance models. Ecol Model 199:153–163
Prévosto B, Bousquet-Mélou A, Ripert C, Fernandez C (2011) Effects of different site preparation treatments on species diversity, composition, and plant traits in Pinus halepensis woodlands. Plant Ecol 212:627–638
Querejeta JI, Barberá GG, Granados A, Castillo VM (2008) Afforestation method affects the isotopic composition of planted Pinus halepensis in a semiarid region of Spain. For Ecol Manag 254:56–64
Rey Benayas JM, Bullock JM (2012) Restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services on agricultural land. Ecosystems 15:883–899
Rey Benayas JM, Martins A, Nicolau JM, Schulz JJ (2007) Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2, p 14
Sánchez O, López E, Roig S, Vázquez A, Gandullo JM (2012) Las estaciones ecológicas actuales y potenciales de los encinares españoles peninsulares. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias, Madrid
Sánchez-Salguero R, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Swetnam TW, Zavala MA (2012) Is drought the main decline factor at the rear edge of Europe? The case of southern Iberian pine plantations. For Ecol Manag 271:158–169
Silvério E, Duque-Lazo J, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Pereña F, Palacios-Rodríguez G (2019) Resilience or vulnerability of the rear-edge distributions of pinus halepensis and pinus pinaster plantations versus that of natural populations, under climate-change scenarios. For Sci 66:1–13
Smith AL, Blanchard W, Blair DP, McBurney L, Banks SC, Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB (2016) The dynamic regeneration niche of a forest following a rare disturbance event. Diver Distrib 22:457–467
Thuiller W, Georges D, Engler R (2019). biomod2: Ensemble platform for species distribution modeling. In: R package version 3.3.7
Vadell E, de-Miguel S, Pemán J (2016) Large-scale reforestation and afforestation policy in Spain: a historical review of its underlying ecological, socioeconomic and political dynamics. Land Use Policy 55:37–48
van Gils H, Batsukh O, Rossiter D, Munthali W, Liberatoscioli E (2008) Forecasting the pattern and pace of Fagus forest expansion in Majella National Park, Italy. Appl Veget Sci 11:539–546
Vayreda J, Martinez-Vilalta J, Gracia M, Canadell JG, Retana J (2016) Anthropogenic-driven rapid shifts in tree distribution lead to increased dominance of broadleaf species. Global Change Biol 22:3984–3995
Villar-Salvador P, Puértolas J, Cuesta B, Penuelas JL, Uscola M, Heredia-Guerrero N, Rey Benayas JM (2012) Increase in size and nitrogen concentration enhances seedling survival in Mediterranean plantations. Insights from an ecophysiological conceptual model of plant survival. New For 43(5–6):755–770
Acknowledgements
The authors graciously thank the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Spain), for providing the necessary financial support through the ESPECTRAMED (CGL2017-86161-R) and ISOPINE (UCO-1265298) projects. The authors thank the Andalusia Department of Agriculture and Environment (in particular Fernando Piñón Castillo), which provided access to background field information. We are very grateful to Dr. David Walker, for the linguistic revision of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quinto, L., Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M., Palacios-Rodriguez, G. et al. The current situation and future perspectives of Quercus ilex and Pinus halepensis afforestation on agricultural land in Spain under climate change scenarios. New Forests 52, 145–166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09788-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09788-0