Skip to main content
Log in

Performance studies of MIMO based DCO-OFDM in underwater wireless optical communication systems

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research in underwater communication system is focused towards wireless networks in view of recent developments in wireless technology and increasing need for deep sea data mining. The underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) have more advantages for short-range wireless links due to very high bandwidth and data rate than acoustic communication. Although UWOC offers high capacity links at low latencies, they suffer from limited communication range due to various distinctive characteristics of underwater channel. A major degrading effect associated with the underwater channel is turbulence-induced fading. To mitigate this fading and to extend the viable communication range, spatial multipath diversity techniques can be adopted over UWOC links. The proposed work evaluates the performance of a multicarrier modulation scheme, i.e., MIMO based DC biased Optical Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (DCO-OFDM) for underwater wireless optical channel. The simulation of MIMO-DC biased optical OFDM technique employing spatial diversity in underwater optical communication is a novel approach towards the determination of an optimal modulation technique for underwater optical wireless channels. The performance is evaluated based on the various parameters such as Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio (SINR), Throughput and Bit Error Rate (BER). A simple experiment is conducted to demonstrate the BER performance assessment for different link distance of 0.45 m and 1.5 m with different transmitter and receiver configurations (SIMO and MIMO) for both clear water and coastal water using MIMO DCO OFDM technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lu H-H et al (2016) An 8 m/9.6 Gb/s underwater wireless optical communication system. IEEE Photonic S J 8(5):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simpson JA (2010) 5 Mb/s optical wireless communication with error correction coding for underwater sensor nodes. OCEANS IEEE 2010:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doniec M et al (2010) Aqua optical: a lightweight device for high-rate long-range underwater point-to-point communication. Mar Technol Soc J 44(4):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cossu G (2013) Experimental demonstration of high speed underwater visible light communications. In: Optical wireless communications, IWOW, 2013 2nd international workshop on, IEEE

  5. Wang P, Li C, Wang B, Xu Z (2016) Real-time 25mb/s data transmission for underwater optical wireless communication using a commercial blue LED and APD detection. In: Asia communications and photonics conference. Optical Society of America, pp AS2C-3

  6. Korotkova O, Farwell N, Shchepakina E (2012) Light scintillation in oceanic turbulence. Waves Random Complex 22(2):260–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Song Y, Lu W, Sun B, Hong Y, Qu F, Han J, Zhang W, Xu J (2017) Experimental demonstration of MIMO-OFDM underwater wireless optical communication. J Opt Commun

  8. Zhang M, Zhang Z (2014) An optimum DC-biasing for DCO-OFDM system. IEEE Commun Lett 18(8):1351–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dissanayake SD, Armstrong J (2013) Comparison of ACO-OFDM, DCO-OFDM and ADO-OFDM in IM/DD systems. J Light Wave Technol

  10. Wu N, Bar-Ness Y (2015) Lower bounds on the channel capacity of ASCO-OFDM and ADO-OFDM. In: 49th Annual conference on information sciences and systems (CISS)

  11. Kaushal H, Kaddoum G (2016) Underwater optical wireless communication. IEEE Access 4:2169–3536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He C, Wang TQ, Armstrong J (2015) Performance of optical receivers using photodetectors with different fields of view in a MIMO-ACO OFDM. J Lightwave Technol 33(23):4957–4967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qiao G, Babar Z, Ma L, Liu S, Wu J (2016) MIMO OFDM underwater acoustic communication systems—a review. Phys Commun 23:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bocus MJ, Doufexi A, Agrafiotis D (2016) Performance evaluation of filter bank multicarrier systems in an underwater acoustic channel. In: 2016 IEEE 27th annual IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications

  15. Elgala H, Mesleh R, Haas H, Pricope B (2007) OFDM visible light wireless communication based on white LEDs. In: Proceedings 64th IEEE vehicular technology conference, Dublin, Ireland

  16. Dimitrov S, Sinanovic S, Haas H (2012) Signal shaping and modulation for optical wireless communication. J Light Wave Technol 30(9):1319–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carruthers JB, Kahn JM (1996) Multiple-subcarrier modulation for non-directed wireless infrared communication. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 14(3):538–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dimitrov S, Haas H (2012) Information rate of OFDM-based optical wireless communication systems with nonlinear distortion. IEEE J Lightwave Technol 31(6):918–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaruwatanadilok S (2008) Underwater wireless optical communication channel modelling and performance evaluation using vector radiative transfer theory. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 26(9):1620–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gabriel C, Khalighi M, Bourennane S, Leon P, Rigaud V (2011) Channel modelling for underwater optical communication. In: Proceedings, IEEE GLOBECOM, pp 833–837

  21. Gabriel C, Khalighi M-A, Bourennane S, Leon P, Rigaud V (2013) Monte-Carlo-based channel characterization for underwater optical communication systems. J Opt Commun Netw 5(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jasman F, Green RJ (2013) Monte Carlo simulation for underwater optical wireless communications. In: Proceedings. IEEE second international workshop optical. wireless communication, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp 113–117

  23. Xu J, Kong M, Lin A, Song Y, Yu X, Qu F, Han J, Deng N (2016) OFDM-based broadband underwater wireless optical communication system using a compact blue LED. Opt Commun 369:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang H, Dong Y (2016) Impulse response modeling for general underwater wireless optical MIMO links. IEEE Commun Mag 54(2):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang S, Dong Y, Zhang X (2014) Impulse response modeling for underwater wireless optical communication links. IEEE Trans Commun 62(1):226–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jamali MV, Salehi JA, Akhoundi F (2016) Performance studies of underwater wireless optical communication systems with spatial diversity: MIMO scheme. IEEE Trans Commun 65(3):1176–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mangrio HB, Baqai A, Umrani FA, Hussain R (2018) Effects of Modulation Scheme on Experimental Setup of RGB LEDs Based Underwater Optical Communication. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shen C et al (2016) 20 m underwater wireless optical communication link with 1.5 Gb/s data rate. Opt Express 24(22):502–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Halafi A, Shihada B (2018) UHD video transmission over bidirectional underwater wireless optical communication. IEEE Photonics J 10(2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Hema.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hema, R., Sudha, S. & Aarthi, K. Performance studies of MIMO based DCO-OFDM in underwater wireless optical communication systems. J Mar Sci Technol 26, 97–107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00724-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00724-7

Keywords

Navigation