Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation research on water-entry impact force of an autonomous underwater helicopter

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autonomous Underwater Helicopter (AUH) is a novel dish-shaped multi-functional submersible vehicle in the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) family. Numerical study of launch and recovery system for AUVs from a research vessel is significant in the overall design. Single-arm crane and air-launch way are the important ways of launching AUVs with the high expertise and security. However, AUVs are still easily subject to a huge impact load which can cause the body damage, malfunction of electronic components, and other serious accidents when AUVs are launching into water. In this paper, unsteady, incompressible, two-phase flow with identified boundary conditions was modeled in the computational domain using Volume of Fluid (VOF) technology, and different overset-grid sizes were set and analyzed to ascertain the accuracy of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation first due to the setting of the grid which will directly affect the accuracy of the calculation results, especially the overset-grid convergence validation. Then, the change of water-entry impact force and velocity of AUH with different water-entry velocities and angles were calculated by CFD analysis software STAR-CCM + solver. The proper immersion angle of the AUH should be 75° under comprehensive analysis and comparison. Besides, the variations of pressure distribution of the AUH in the whole water-entry process were also obtained, which provides reference for the shape optimization in the future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamazaki T (2009) Status of development for deep-sea mineral resources. J Jpn Inst Energy 88(7):569–576

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leonard JJ, Bahr A (2010) Autonomous underwater vehicle navigation. Ocean Eng 35(3):663–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yi R, Hu Z, Lin Y, et al (2013) Maneuverability design and analysis of an autonomous underwater vehicle for deep-sea hydrothermal plume survey. Oceans 1–5

  4. Woolsey Craig A (2005) Review of marine control systems: guidance, navigation, and control of ships, rigs and underwater vehicles. J Guidance Control Dyn 28(3):574–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips AB, Turnock SR, Furlong M (2010) The use of computational fluid dynamics to aid cost-effective hydrodynamic design of autonomous underwater vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part 224(M4):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feng Z, Chen CW, Yu Z, Huang H, Su H, Leng JX, Chen Y (2018) Hydrodynamics performance analysis of underwater helicopter based on STAR-CCM+. 2018 OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans.

  7. Chen Q, Su R (2011) Analysis of launch and recovery UUV model for submarine. Ship Sci Technol 33(7):146–149

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang HL, Deng ZY, Luo YG (2012) Development actuality of submarine launch and recovery system. Ship Sci Technol 34(3):3–6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sarda EI, Dhanak MR (2017) A USV-based automated launch and recovery system for AUVs. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 42(1):37–55

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang H, Deng Z, Luo Y (2012) Development actuality of submarine launch and recovery system. SHIP Sci Technol 34(4):3–6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Shi X, Wang P (2008) Modeling and simulation of oblique water-entry of disk Ogive. Torpedo Technol 16(01):14–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Qiu HQ, Yuan XL, Wang YD, Liu CL (2013) Simulation on impact load and cavity shape in high speed vertical water entry for an axisymmetric body. Torpedo Technol 21(03):161–164

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shi Y, Pan G, Huang QG (2017) Water entry impact cushioning performance of mitigator for AUV. Oceans 2017-Aberdeen. IEEE, p 1–5

  14. Ma QP, He CT, Wang C, Wei YJ, Lu ZL, Sun J (2014) Experimental investigation on vertical water-entry cavity of sphere. Explos Shock Waves 34:174–180

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qi D, Feng J, Xu B et al (2016) Investigation of water entry impact forces on airborne-launched AUVs. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 10(1):475–486

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shan Wang C (2014) Guedes Soares, Numerical study on the water impact of 3D bodies by an explicit finite element method. Ocean Eng 78:P73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sodja J (2007) Turbulence models in CFD. University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henshaw WD, Schwendeman DW (2003) An adaptive numerical scheme for high-speed reactive flow on overlapping grids. J Comput Phys 191(2):420–447

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y-P, Ouyang C-Z, Jiang Q-B, Liang Bo (2015) Design and parametric optimization of thermal management of lithium-ion battery module with reciprocating air-flow. J Cent S Univ 22:10 (P3970–P3976)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nova Science Publishers (2009) Multiphase flow research. Nova Science Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lafmejani SS, Olesen AC, Kær SK (2017) VOF modelling of gas–liquid flow in PEM water electrolysis cell micro-channels. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(26):16333–16344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh RK et al (2018) Multiphase flow studies for microscale hydrodynamics in the structured packed column. Chem Eng J 353:949–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nouri NM, Zeinali M, Jahangardy Y (2016) AUV hull shape design based on desired pressure distribution. J Mar Sci Technol 21(2):203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sodja J (2007) Turbulence models in CFD. University of Ljubljana

  25. Sakthivel R, Vengadesan S, Bhattacharyya S K (2011) Application of non-linear k-e turbulence model in flow simulation over underwater axisymmetric hull at higher angle of attack. J Naval Archit Marine Engineering 8(2)

  26. Nematollahi A, Dadvand A, Dawoodian M (2015) An axisymmetric underwater vehicle-free surface interaction: A numerical study. Ocean Eng 96:205–214

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Hirt CW, Nichols BD (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39(1):201–225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Chow P, Cross M, Pericleous K (1996) A natural extension of the conventional finite volume method into polygonal unstructured meshes for CFD application. Appl Math Model 20(2):170–183

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the national key special research plan of the China Ministry of Education and the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Zhoushan Science and Technology and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences for their financial support of this research under the project Grant numbers: 2017YFC0306100, 51409230, 2018C81041, and XDA22000000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, CW., Wang, T., Feng, Z. et al. Simulation research on water-entry impact force of an autonomous underwater helicopter. J Mar Sci Technol 25, 1166–1181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00707-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00707-8

Keywords

Navigation