Skip to main content
Log in

A methodology to account for interface flexibility and crushing effects in multi-block masonry collapse mechanisms

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collapse of masonry structures under the influence of seismic action typically takes place via specific failure mechanisms, which have been well-documented. Assuming these mechanisms can be modelled as a kinematic chain, equations of motion can be derived and solved to predict dynamic rocking response. Previous derivations typically assume that the kinematic chain is comprised of rigid bodies with rigid interfaces, which are assumptions that can be both unrealistic and un-conservative. In this paper, rocking equations of motion are re-derived considering the presence of flexible interfaces and crushing effects. Specifically, new derivations are presented for single, two and multiple block mechanisms, while two different formulations for modelling non-rigid interfaces are also proposed. These formulations are compared, and the importance of interface flexibility is evaluated through comparison of the new models with previous formulations that assume purely rigid interfaces. The new equations of motion are also practically evaluated through comparison with advanced numerical modelling simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Como M, Di Carlo F, Coccia S (2019) Dynamic response of rocking cracked masonry walls. Meccanica 54:381–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-00949-w

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Costa AA (2012) Seismic assessment of the out-of-plane performance of traditional stone masonry walls. Ph.D. thesis, University of Porto

  3. Costa AA, Arêde A, Penna A, Costa A (2013) Free rocking response of a regular stone masonry wall with equivalent block approach: experimental and analytical evaluation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(15):2297–2319. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Ayala D, Speranza E (2002) An integrated procedure for the assessment of seismic vulnerability of historic buildings. In: Proceedings of the 12th european conference on earthquake engineering (12ECEE). London, UK

  5. DeJong MJ (2009) Seismic assessment strategies for masonry structures. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  6. DeJong MJ, Dimitrakopoulos EG (2014) Dynamically equivalent rocking structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(10):1543–1563. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ElGawady MA, Ma QT, Butterworth JW, Ingham JM (2011) Effects of interface material on the performance of free rocking blocks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40:375–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Housner GW (1963) The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 53(2):403–417

    Google Scholar 

  9. Itasca Consulting Group (2007) 3DEC—3 dimensional distinct element code

  10. Koh AS, Spanos PD, Roesset JM (1986) Harmonic rocking of rigid block on flexible foundation. J Eng Mech 112(11):1165–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipo B, de Felice G (2016) Smooth-rocking oscillator under natural accelerograms. In: Papadrakakis M, Papadopoulos V, Stefanou G, Plevris V (eds) ECCOMAS congress 2016: 7th European congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering. Crete Island, Greece

  12. Lipo B, de Felice G (2017) Seismic resilience of masonry walls rocking on elastic foundation. In: Proceedings of the 16th world conference on earthquake engineering (16WCEE). Santiago, Chile

  13. Makris N, Vassiliou MF (2013) Planar rocking response and stability analysis of an array of free-standing columns capped with a freely supported rigid beam. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(3):431–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mauro A, de Felice G, DeJong MJ (2015) The relative dynamic resilience of masonry collapse mechanisms. Eng Struct 85:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehrotra A, DeJong MJ (2018) The influence of interface geometry, stiffness and crushing on the dynamic response of masonry collapse mechanisms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47:2661–2681. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehrotra A, DeJong MJ (2018) A methodology to account for crushing effects during out-of-plane collapse of masonry. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions (SAHC2018). Cusco, Peru. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_141

  17. Mordant C, Denoel V, Degee H (2015) Rocking behaviour of simple unreinforced load-bearing masonry walls including soundproofing rubber layers. In: Papadrakakis M, Papadopoulos V, Plevris V (eds) 5th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering. Crete Island, Greece

  18. PCM-DPC MiBAC (2006) Model A-DC Scheda per il rilievo del danno ai beni culturali - Chiese

  19. Penna A, Galasco A (2013) A macro-element model for the nonlinear analysis of masonry members including second order effects. In: Papadrakakis M, Papadopoulos V, Plevris V (eds) 4th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering. Kos Island, Greece

  20. Robert McNeel & Associates (2014) Rhinoceros 5

  21. Shawa OA, de Felice G, Mauro A, Sorrentino L (2012) Out-of-plane seismic behaviour of rocking masonry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41:949–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sorrentino L, Masiani R, Griffith MC (2008) The vertical spanning strip wall as a coupled rocking rigid body assembly. Struct Eng Mech 29(4):433–453. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2008.29.4.433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spanos PD, Di Matteo A, Pirrotta A, Di Paola M (2017) Nonlinear rocking of rigid blocks on flexible foundation : analysis and experiments. Procedia Eng 199:284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Financial support for this research was provided by the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Trust in conjunction with the Cambridge Commonwealth, European and International Trust and the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjali Mehrotra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehrotra, A., DeJong, M.J. A methodology to account for interface flexibility and crushing effects in multi-block masonry collapse mechanisms. Meccanica 55, 1237–1261 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01161-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01161-x

Keywords

Navigation