Full length ArticleApplication of anammox within an integrated approach to sustainable food waste management and valorization
Introduction
Every year, approximately 1200 Mt (Mt = 106 metric tons) of the food produced worldwide are lost or wasted through the food supply chain, which causes significant social, environmental, and economic issues [1,2]. According to European waste statistics, approximately 245 Mt of municipal solid waste were generated in the EU-28 in 2016, out of which food waste (FW) accounted for 35% by weight [3]. Rather than being considered an environmental issue, FW may be seen as a potential source of material and energy which should be recovered within an eco-sustainable approach. The two-stage anaerobic digestion process (2sAD) aiming at the recovery of hydrogen (dark fermentation) and methane has proved to be a promising option, since it enhances overall energy recovery compared to conventional one-stage processes [4,5]. Moreover, the possibility of recovering energy as hydrogen and methane, rather than only methane, is of interest due to the positive environmental features of hydrogen as an energy carrier, especially if generated from renewable non-fossil sources [3].
However, maximization of energy recovery from FW by a 2sAD process must be accompanied by minimization of its potential environmental impacts, in order to promote an environmentally sound approach. Since FW consists mainly of carbohydrates, fats and proteins [6], the anaerobic digestion of such a substrate results in the transfer of nutrients from the solid to the liquid phase, for which the direct discharge into municipal sewers is not a viable option as it would unbalance the chemical oxygen demand/total Kjeldahl nitrogen/total phosphorus (COD/TKN/TP) ratio of municipal wastewater [7]. The use of the digested effluents in agriculture as organic fertilizer may also be limited by factors such as transport requirements, water content, or the presence of unwanted substances and pathogenic microorganisms [8].
The relatively low organic carbon to nitrogen ratio makes such effluents potentially suitable for treatment by completely autotrophic nitrogen removal processes, which combine partial nitritation (PN) and anaerobic ammonia oxidation (anammox). In the PN reactor, roughly 50–55% of influent ammonium should be converted into nitrite by ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB), so that the residual ammonium can be converted into dinitrogen gas in the anammox reactor by Planctomycetes (a distinct phylum in the Bacteria domain), using nitrite as electron acceptor [9]. PN/anammox represents a cost- and technically effective alternative to conventional biological treatment based on full nitrification and denitrification, as well as to chemical-physical processes, requiring less energy and fewer chemicals (no exogenous organic substrates such as methanol or glucose are required) [10,11]. Moreover, the PN/anammox footprint is low in terms of greenhouse gas emissions [12,13], which makes it an eco-sustainable option worthy of being investigated; compared with conventional wastewater treatment based on nitrification and denitrification, CO2 emissions may be reduced by up to 80%, and N2O is absent in anammox physiology (conversely, it is an intermediate in denitrification) [13].
Despite such promising features, limited work has been focused on the application of PN/anammox to the treatment of the liquid effluents originated by the one-stage anaerobic digestion of the municipal solid waste organic fraction (OFMSW) [7,14]: in one report, the possibility was successfully investigated of upgrading the Florence wastewater treatment plant by integrating the anaerobic co-digestion (waste activated sludge+OFMSW) with the completely autotrophic removal of nitrogen from the supernatant, using a nitritation membrane bioreactor and an anammox sequencing batch reactor [7]. The latter showed variable NH4+-N and NO2−-N removal rates, ranging from 1.3–47.1 mg N/L d and from 0.5–47.6 mg N/L d, respectively. Others [14] performed batch experiments to investigate the response of anammox biomass exposed to the liquid fraction of digested and co-digested OFMSW, using conductivity as an aggregate parameter to evaluate inhibition capacity: although the undiluted liquid fraction of digested OFMSW was found to have the strongest inhibitory capacity (anammox activity reduction of 73–89%), likely due to the high overall conductivity, anammox biomass was found to have a potential adaptation capability.
As for the anaerobic digestion of food waste in a two-stage system (2sAD-FW), so far only preliminary studies have been reported concerning the application of PN/anammox to the treatment of simulated (synthetic) 2sAD-FW wastewater [15,16]. In particular, anammox biomass was able to withstand the high nitrogen loading rates applied to the PN reactor (up to 1.5 g N/L d), showing high nitrogen removal efficiencies (NRE > 90%) and negligible nitrite discharge rates [16]. However, specific knowledge about anammox behavior with real 2sAD-FW wastewater is not available, so that an important gap has to be filled in view of possible process scale-up.
In this study, the liquid effluent produced by 2sAD-FW and treated in a PN unit was fed into a granular anammox sequencing batch reactor, in order to evaluate its applicability and achieve process optimization using real wastewater. An alternative process layout based on partial by-pass of the PN unit was tested in order to regulate the influent NO2/NH4 molar ratio without chemical (e.g. NH4Cl) additions, which would represent a significant cost at pilot/full scale. A novel approach to anammox sludge characterization was also implemented, based on the determination of biomass color as a potentially quick, simple and cost-effective indirect measure of process performance and biomass enrichment.
Section snippets
Reactor set-up and operation
The granular anammox reactor was the second unit of a two-step laboratory-scale treatment system based on partial nitritation and anammox. A brief description of the PN unit and a schematic representation of the whole PN-anammox system are provided in supplementary material (SM1). The anammox unit consisted of a 3 L sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with a working volume of 2.1 L, operated at controlled temperature (35 ± 0.5 °C) and pH (7.0 ± 0.1). In order to reduce start-up time, granular
Overall anammox performance
During Phase 1, the increasing share of PN-treated 2sAD-FW wastewater did not affect process performance in terms of nitrogen removal (Fig. 1): NRE and the NRR/NLR ratio averaged 90 ± 1% and 98 ± 1%, respectively, and effluent nitrite concentration was always negligible. The observed “NH4-removed/NO2-removed/NO3-produced” molar ratio was in good agreement with the stoichiometric range reported in literature for anammox metabolism [29,30] (Fig. 1c), indicating no significant competition for
Conclusion
The anammox process was proved to be a feasible and valuable option for the treatment of ammonium-rich liquid digestate produced by the 2sAD-FW process, in a two-step PN/anammox system. In view of process scale-up, the dosage of NH4Cl was avoided by adopting an alternative treatment scheme layout based on partial by-pass of the PN unit to regulate the NO2/NH4 molar ratio in the influent to the anammox reactor (Phase 3); no significant effects of competition between anammox and heterotrophic
Acknowledgments
This study was performed in the framework of the research project “Sistema integrato per la produzione di H2 e CH4 da rifiuti urbani e trattamento dei residui prodotti – Integrated system for the production of H2 and CH4 from municipal solid waste organic fractions, and treatment of liquid residues” funded by the Autonomous Region of Sardinia (Regional Law 7/2007), CRP-78685.
References (41)
- et al.
Anaerobic digestion of food waste–challenges and opportunities
Bioresour Technol
(2018) - et al.
Fermentative H2 production from food waste: parametric analysis of factor effects
Bioresour Technol
(2019) - et al.
Energy recovery from one- and two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste
Waste Manag
(2017) - et al.
Can two-stage instead of one-stage anaerobic digestion really increase energy recovery from biomass?
Appl Energy
(2014) - et al.
Improving the sustainability of organic waste management practices in the food-energy-water nexus: a comparative review of anaerobic digestion and composting
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev
(2018) - et al.
Microbiology and application of the anaerobic ammonium oxidation (’anammox’) process
Curr Opin Biotechnol
(2001) - et al.
The start-up of an anammox reactor as the second step for the treatment of ammonium rich refinery (IGCC) wastewater with high Corg/N ratio
Ecol Eng
(2017) - et al.
Successful application of nitritation/anammox towastewater with elevated organic carbon to ammonia ratios
Water Res
(2014) - et al.
Full-scale partial nitritation/anammox experiences - an application survey
Water Res
(2014) - et al.
Inhibition on anammox bacteria upon exposure to digestates from biogas plants treating the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and the role of conductivity
Waste Manag
(2017)
Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch reactor
Water Res
Color characterization of anammox granular sludge: chromogenic substance, microbial succession and state indication
Sci Total Environ
Physiological and kinetic characterization of a suspended cell anammox culture
Water Res
Biological nutrients removal via nitrite from the supernatant of anaerobic co-digestion using a pilot-scale sequencing batch reactor operating under transient conditions
Chem Eng J
The evolution of Anammox performance and granular sludge characteristics under the stress of phenol
Bioresour Technol
Two-step partial nitritation/Anammox process in granulation reactors: start-up operation and microbial characterization
J Environ Manage
Effects of mechanical stress on Anammox granules in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR)
J Biotechnol
Enhanced nitrogen removal from pharmaceutical wastewater using SBA-ANAMMOX process
Water Res
Startup of reactors for anoxic ammonium oxidation: experiences from the first full-scale anammox reactor in Rotterdam
Water Res
Global food losses and food waste
Cited by (4)
Organic carbon bioavailability: Is it a good driver to choose the best biological nitrogen removal process?
2021, Science of the Total EnvironmentA Review on the Challenges and Choices for Food Waste Valorization: Environmental and Economic Impacts
2023, ACS Environmental AuUnveiling the mechanism of various pretreatments on improving enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of the giant reed by chromatic analysis
2023, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery