Abstract
We revisit a classical result by Jacobi (J Reine Angew Math 17:68–82, 1837) on the local minimality, as critical points of the corresponding energy functional, of fixed-energy solutions of the Kepler equation joining two distinct points with the same distance from the origin. Our proof relies on the Morse index theorem, together with a characterization of the conjugate points as points of geodesic bifurcation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambrosetti, A., Coti-Zelati, V.: Periodic solutions of singular Lagrangian systems. In: Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications 10, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston (1993)
Bahri, A., Rabinowitz, P.H.: A minimax method for a class of Hamiltonian systems with singular potentials. J. Funct. Anal. 82, 412–428 (1989)
Barutello, V.L., Jadanza, R.D., Portaluri, A.: Morse index and linear stability of the Lagrangian circular orbit in a three-body-type problem via index theory. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 219, 387–444 (2016)
Barutello, V., Terracini, S., Verzini, G.: Entire parabolic trajectories as minimal phase transitions. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 49, 391–429 (2014)
Boscaggin, A., Dambrosio, W., Terracini, S.: Scattering parabolic solutions for the spatial \(N\)-centre problem. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 223, 1269–1306 (2017)
Chen, K.-C.: Existence and minimizing properties of retrograde orbits to the three-body problem with various choices of masses. Ann. Math. (2) 167, 325–348 (2008)
Chenciner, A., Montgomery, R.: A remarkable periodic solution of the three-body problem in the case of equal masses. Ann. Math. (2) 152, 881–901 (2000)
Ferrario, D.L., Terracini, S.: On the existence of collisionless equivariant minimizers for the classical n-body problem. Invent. Math. 155, 305–362 (2004)
Fusco, G., Gronchi, G.F., Negrini, P.: Platonic polyhedra, topological constraints and periodic solutions of the classical \(N\)-body problem. Invent. Math. 185, 283–332 (2011)
Geiges, H.: The Geometry of Celestial Mechanics. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
Gordon, W.B.: A minimizing property of Keplerian orbits. Am. J. Math. 99, 961–971 (1977)
Gutzwiller, M.C.: Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol. 1. Springer, New York (1990)
Hu, X., Sun, S.: Morse index and stability of elliptic Lagrangian solutions in the planar three-body problem. Adv. Math. (1) 223, 98–119 (2010)
Jacobi, C.G.J.: Zur Theorie der variations-Rechnung und der differential-Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 17, 68–82 (1837)
Kavle, H., Offin, D., Portaluri, A.: Keplerian orbits through the Conley–Zehnder index, arXiv:1908.00075v1
Klingenberg, W.P.A.: Riemannian geometry. Second edition, De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics 1, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin (1995)
Maderna, E., Venturelli, A.: Globally minimizing parabolic motions in the Newtonian \(N\)-body problem. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 194, 283–313 (2009)
Montgomery, R.: Minimizers for the Kepler problem, preprint
Ortega, R., Ureña, A.J.: Introducción a la Mecánica Celeste. Universidad de Granada, Granada (2010)
Piccione, P., Portaluri, A., Tausk, D.V.: Spectral flow, Maslov index and bifurcation of semi-Riemannian geodesics. Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 25, 121–149 (2004)
Portaluri, A., Waterstraat, N.: Yet another proof of the Morse index theorem. Expo. Math. 33, 378–386 (2015)
Soave, N., Terracini, S.: Symbolic dynamics for the \(N\)-centre problem at negative energies. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 32, 3245–3301 (2012)
Terracini, S., Venturelli, A.: Symmetric trajectories for the \(2N\)-body problem with equal masses. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 184, 465–493 (2007)
Todhunter, M.A.: Researches in the Calculus of Variation, Principally on the Theory of Discontinuous Solutions. Macmillan, Cambridge (1871)
Wintner, A.: Analytical foundation of Celestial Mechanics, Princeton Mathematical series, vol. 5, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)
Yu, G.: Simple choreographies of the planar Newtonian \(N\)-body problem. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 225, 901–935 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
In memory of Florin Diacu.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Work supported by the ERC Advanced Grant 2013 No. 339958 Complex Patterns for Strongly Interacting Dynamical Systems - COMPAT. Work written under the auspices of the Gruppo Nazionale per l’Analisi Matematica, la Probabilità e le loro Applicazioni (GNAMPA) of the Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica (INdAM). In particular, A.B. acknowledges the support of the INdAM-GNAMPA Project “Il modello di Born-Infeld per l’elettromagnetismo nonlineare: esistenza, regolarità e molteplicità di soluzioni”.
Appendix: A Brief Recap on Geodesics and their Morse Index
Appendix: A Brief Recap on Geodesics and their Morse Index
In this section, we collect some known facts about geodesics and conjugate points. We will work in the simplified setting when the manifold is an open set of the Euclidean space, endowed with a Riemannian metric conformal to the standard one. For a more general treatment, we refer to [16].
1.1 Definition and First Properties
Let M be an open subset of \(\mathbb {R}^N\); as such, M has a natural structure of differentiable manifold of dimension N. Given a smooth function \(W: M \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) satisfying \(W(x) > 0\) for every \(x \in M\), we can endow M with the Riemannian structure given by
where \(\langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle \) denotes the Euclidean product on \(\mathbb {R}^N\). Notice that smooth curves on M are nothing but curves with values in M which are smooth in the usual sense; however, the velocity and the length of a curve are influenced by the function W.
A geodesic on the Riemannian manifold \((M,g_W)\) is a smooth curve \(\gamma : I \rightarrow M\) (with \(I \subset \mathbb {R}\) an interval) solving the equation
where \(\nabla W\) is the gradient of the function W with respect to the standard Euclidean structure. By the standard theory of ODEs, for any \(p \in M\) and \(v \in \mathbb {R}^N\), there exists a unique (maximal) geodesic \(\gamma _{p,v}\) satisfying \(\gamma _{p,v}(0) = p\) and \({{\dot{\gamma }}}_{p,v}(0) = v\).
We collect in the next proposition some simple properties which can be readily obtained from this definition.
Proposition 4.1
The following facts hold true:
- (i)
Geodesics have constant velocity: namely, for any geodesic \(\gamma \), there exists \(c \in \mathbb {R}\) such that \(\vert \dot{\gamma }(s) \vert \sqrt{W(\gamma (s))} \equiv c\);
- (ii)
For every geodesic \(\gamma \) and for every \(a,b \in \mathbb {R}\) with \(a \ne 0\), the curve \({{\tilde{\gamma }}}(s) = \gamma (as + b)\) is a geodesic, as well;
- (iii)
(Rescaling Lemma) For any \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\) with \(\lambda \ne 0\), it holds that \(\gamma _{p,\lambda v}(s) = \gamma _{p,v}(\lambda s)\) for any \(s \in \mathbb {R}\) such that both sides of the equation are defined.
In view of this proposition, geodesics are often considered as geometric objects, rather than as parameterized curves. In some textbooks, curves which can be parameterized as geodesics are called pre-geodesics.
1.2 The Energy Functional and the Morse Index Theorem
Equation (18) can be meant as the Euler–Lagrange equation of the Lagrangian \(L(\gamma ,{{\dot{\gamma }}}) = \vert {{\dot{\gamma }}} \vert ^2 W(\gamma )\); thus, geodesics can be regarded as critical points of the functional \(E(\gamma ) = \int L(\gamma ,{{\dot{\gamma }}}) \,ds\). Below, we describe in more details this variational principle, by focusing on the case of geodesics joining two points \(p,q \in M\) (a similar discussion can be made when periodic boundary conditions are taken into account, leading to the so-called closed geodesics).
Let us consider the functional
defined on the Hilbert manifold \(\Omega _{p,q}\) of \(H^1\)-paths \(\gamma : [0,1] \rightarrow M\) satisfying \(\gamma (0) = p\) and \(\gamma (1) = q\). It is standard to verify that E is a smooth functional on \(\Omega _{p,q}\) with first Frechet differential given by
for any \(\xi \in H^1_0([0,1];\mathbb {R}^2)\). A well-known argument based on integration by parts yields:
Proposition 4.2
A curve \(\gamma : [0,1] \rightarrow M\) satisfying \(\gamma (0) = p\) and \(\gamma (1) = q\) is a geodesic if and only if it is a critical point of the functional E.
We are now in a position to define the crucial concept of this section. By Morse index\(\mu (\gamma )\) of a geodesic \(\gamma \) we mean its Morse index as a critical point of the functional E, that is, the dimension of the maximal subspace \(V \subset H^1_0([0,1];\mathbb {R}^2)\) such that \(d^2 E(\gamma )[\xi ,\xi ] < 0\) for any \(\xi \in V\). Since
for any \(\xi \in H^1_0([0,1];\mathbb {R}^2)\), functions \(\xi \) lying in the kernel of \(d^2 E(\gamma )\) are nothing but solutions of the linear equation
satisfying the boundary condition \(\xi (0) = \xi (1) = 0\).
The celebrated Morse index theorem asserts that the Morse index \(\mu (\gamma )\) equals the number of some special points along \(\gamma \), the so-called conjugate points. Precisely, we say that the point \(\gamma (s^*) = p_{s^*}\), with \(s^* \in \mathopen {]}0,1\mathclose {]}\), is conjugate to \(\gamma (0) = p\) along \(\gamma \) if the linear equation (19) admits nontrivial solutions \(\xi \) satisfying \(\xi (0) = \xi (s^*) = 0\). The multiplicity \(m(p_{s^*})\) of the conjugate point is, by definition, the dimension of the space of such solutions. Incidentally, notice that \(\gamma (1) = q\) is conjugate to \(\gamma (0)\) along \(\gamma \) if and only if the kernel of \(d^2 E(\gamma )\) is not trivial (that is, if and only if \(\gamma \) is a degenerate critical point of E).
With this in mind, the Morse index theorem reads as follows (see for instance [21] and the references therein).
Theorem 4.3
(Morse Index Theorem) Let \(\gamma : [0,1] \rightarrow M\) be a non-constant geodesic. Then the set of conjugate points along \(\gamma \) is finite and
Remark 4.4
The choice of parameterizing the geodesic \(\gamma \) on the interval [0, 1] is completely conventional: any other interval could be used, since geodesics are preserved by affine reparameterizations (recall Proposition 4.1). Of course, conjugate points and the Morse index do not depend on this choice.
1.3 Bifurcation of Geodesics
A key role in our arguments will be played by the notion of geodesic bifurcation, as introduced in the paper [20].
Definition 4.5
Let \(\gamma : [0,1] \rightarrow M\) be a non-constant geodesic. A point \(\gamma (s^*)\), with \(s^* \in \mathopen {]}0,1\mathclose {[}\), is a bifurcation point along \(\gamma \) if there exists a sequence \(\{s_n\}_n \subset [0,1]\) with \(s_n \rightarrow s^*\) and a sequence of geodesics \(\{\gamma _n\}_n\) (defined on [0, 1]), with \(\gamma _n \ne \gamma \), such that
- (i)
\(\gamma _n(0) = \gamma (0)\), for every n,
- (ii)
\(\gamma _n(s_n) = \gamma (s_n)\), for every n,
- (iii)
\({{\dot{\gamma }}}_n(0) \rightarrow {{\dot{\gamma }}}(0)\), for \(n \rightarrow +\infty \).
According to the discussion in [20, p. 122] together with [20, Corollary 5.6], the relationship between conjugate points and bifurcation points can be stated as follows.
Theorem 4.6
Let \(\gamma : [0,1] \rightarrow M\) be a non-constant geodesic. Then, a point \(\gamma (s^*)\), with \(s^* \in \mathopen {]}0,1\mathclose {[}\), is a bifurcation point if and only if it is conjugate to \(\gamma (0)\) along \(\gamma \).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barutello, V., Boscaggin, A. & Dambrosio, W. On the Minimality of Keplerian Arcs with Fixed Negative Energy. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 19, 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-020-00362-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-020-00362-9