Abstract
In social networks, the structural balance is a state of a group of individuals (nodes) with established mutual relationships (connection relationships) between them. It is easy to see that a social network can be described by a complex dynamical network model composed of the nodes subsystem (NS) and the connection relationships subsystem (CS), where the two subsystems are usually coupled with each other. It implies that the dynamic changes of nodes’ states may cause the structural balance in CS. However, few papers have discussed the relationship between the structural balance and the specific dynamic changes of the nodes’ states. This paper proposes a model of complex dynamical networks, and mainly focuses on the dynamic changes of states in NS which can lead to the structural balance in CS. It is proved that if each state in NS is doing a specific dynamic motion via the controller with the parameter adaptive law, then the CS can track a given structural balance matrix via the effective coupling and the structural balance can be achieved. Such a result can be regarded as an explanation of the relationship between the structural balance and the specific dynamic changes of the nodes’ states. Finally, the simulations verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Watts D J and Strogatz S H, Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks, Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440–442.
Strogatz S H, Exploring complex networks, Nature, 2001, 410: 268–276.
Wang X F and Chen G R, Complex networks: Small-world, scale-free and beyond, IEEE Circuits and System Magzine, 2003, 3(1): 6–20.
Ji Z J and Yu H S, A new perspective to graphical characterization of multi-agent controllability, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2017, 47(6): 1471–1483.
Liu X Z and Ji Z J, Controllability of multi-agent systems based on path and cycle graphs, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2018, 28(1): 296–309.
Tian L, Ji Z J, Hou T, et al., Bipartite consensus on coopetition networks with time-varying delays, IEEE Access, 2018, 6(1): 10169–10178.
Wang Y H, Fan Y Q, Wang Q Y, et al., Stabilization and synchronization of complex dynamical networks with similar nodes via decentralized controllers, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Regular Papers, 2012, 59(8): 1786–1795.
Duan Z S, Wang J Z, and Chen G R, Stability analysis and decentralized control of a class of complex dynamical networks, Automatica, 2008, 44(4): 1028–1035.
Zhang L L, Wang Y H, Wang Q R, et al., Synchronization for time-delayed coupling complex dynamical networks with different dimensional nodes via decentralized dynamical compensation controllers, Asian Journal of Control, 2015, 17(2): 664–674.
Liu X W, Li P, and Chen T P, Cluster synchronization for delayed complex networks via periodically intermittent pinning control, Neurocomputing, 2015, 162(25): 191–200.
Jin X Z, He T, Xia J W, et al., Adaptive general pinned synchronization of a class of disturbed complex networks, Computation Communication in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2019, 67: 658–669.
Wang Y W, Bian T, Xiao J W, et al., Global synchronization of complex dynamical networks through digital communication with limited data rate, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2015, 26(10): 2487–2499.
Sandell N R, Varaiya P, Athans M, et al, Survey of decentralized control methods for large scale systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1975, 23(2): 108–128.
Bartos M, Vida I, and Jonas P, Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2007, 8(1): 45–56.
Pagilla P R, Siraskar N B, and Dwivedula R V, Decentralized control of web processing lines, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2007, 15(1): 106–117.
Heider F, Attitudes and cognitive organization, Journal of Psychology, 1946, 21(1): 107–112.
Ilany A, Barocas A, Koren L, et al., Structural balance in the social networks of a wild mammal, Animal Behaviour, 2013, 85(6): 1397–1405.
Nakajima S, Sensory preconditioning, the Espinet effect, and Heider’s balance theory: Note on animal reasoning of event relations, Psychological Reports, 2005, 96(3): 1011–1014.
Marvel S A, Kleinberg J, Kleinberg R D, et al., Continuous-time model of structural balance, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(5): 1771–1776.
Antal T, Krapivsky P L, and Redner S, Social balance on networks: The dynamics of friendship and enmity, Physica D, 2006, 224(1–2): 130–136.
Pattison P and Robins G, Neighborhood-based models for social networks, Sociological Methodology, 2002, 32(1): 301–337.
Hassanibesheli F, Hedayatifar L, Gawroski P, et al., Gain and loss of esteem, direct reciprocity and Heider balance, Physica A, 2017, 468: 334–339.
Gawronski P, Krawczyk M J, and Kulakowski K, Emerging communities in networks — A flow of ties, Acta Physica Polonica B, 2015, 46: 911.
Altafini C, Dynamics of opinion forming in structurally balanced social networks, PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(6): e38135.
Antal T, Krapivsky P L, and Redner S, Dynamics of social balance on networks, Physical Review E, 2005, 72: 036121.
Kulakowski K, Gawronski P, and Gronek P, The Heider balance: A continuous approach, International Journal of Modern Physics C, 2005, 16(5): 707–716.
Wongkaew S, Caponigro M, Kulakowski K, et al., On the control of the Heider balance model, The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 2015, 224(17–18): 3325–3342.
Su H S, Rong Z H, Chen M Z Q, et al., Decentralized adaptive pinning control for cluster synchronization of complex dynamical networks, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2013, 43(1): 394–399.
Wang J L, Wu H N, Huang T, et al., Analysis and control of output synchronization in directed and undirected complex dynamical networks, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2018, 29(8): 3326–3338.
Song Q and Cao J D, On pinning synchronization of directed and undirected complex dynamical networks, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Regular Papers, 2010, 57(3): 672–680.
Barnett S, Matrix differential equations and Kronecker products, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 1973, 24(1): 1–5.
Traag V A, Van D P, and De L P, Dynamical models explaining social balance and evolution of cooperation, PLoS One, 2013, 8(4): e60063.
Hwang E J, Hyun C H, Kim E, et al., Fuzzy model based adaptive synchronization of uncertain chaotic systems: Robust tracking control approach, Physics Letters A, 2009, 373(22): 1935–1939.
Marvel S A, Strogatz S H, and Kleinberg J M, Energy landscape of social balance, Physical Review Letters, 2009, 103(19): 198701.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61673120, 61273219, the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China under Grant No. 20134420110003, the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission under Grant Nos. KJQN201801215, KJ1710244, KJ1710241, KJQN201801209, the Chongqing Basic and Advanced Technology Research Project under Grant No. cstc2018jcyjAX0202, and the Key Laboratory of Chongqing Municipal Institutions of Higher Education under Grant No. [2017]3.
This paper was recommended for publication by Editor JIA Yingmin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, Z., Wang, Y., Peng, Y. et al. Adaptive Control of the Structural Balance for a Class of Complex Dynamical Networks. J Syst Sci Complex 33, 725–742 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-8093-4
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-8093-4