Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of drought stress-responsive genes in rice (Oryza sativa) by meta-analysis of microarray data

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Meta-analysis provides a systematic access to the previously studied microarray datasets that can recognize several common signatures of stresses. Three different datasets of abiotic stresses on rice were used for meta-analysis. These microarray datasets were normalized to regulate data for technical variation, as opposed to biological differences between the samples. A t-test was performed to recognize the differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) between stressed and normal samples. Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed the functional distribution of DEGs in different stressed conditions. Further analysis was carried out using software RICE NET DB and divided into three different categories: biological process (homoiothermy and protein amino acid phosphorylation), cellular component (nucleus and membrane), and molecular function (zinc ion binding ad DNA binding). The study revealed that 5686 genes were constantly expressed differentially in Oryza sativa (2089 upregulated and 3597 downregulated). The lowest P value (P = 0.003756) among upregulated DEGs was observed for naringenin, 2-oxoglutrate 3-dioxygenase protein. The lowest P value (P = 0.002866816) among the downregulated DEGs was also recorded for retrotransposon protein. The network constructed from 48 genes revealed 10 hub genes that are connected with topological genes. These hub genes are stress responsive genes that may also be regarded as the marker genes for drought stress response. Our study reported a new set of hub genes (reference genes) that have potentially significant role in development of stress tolerant rice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abuqamar S., Luo H., Laluk K., Mickelbart M. V. and Mengiste T. 2009 Crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress responses in tomato is mediated by the AIM1 transcription factor. Plant J. 58, 347–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson N. J. and Urwin P. E. 2012 The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3523–3543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S., Ramegowda V., Kumar A. and Pereria A. 2016 Plant adaptation to drought stress. F1000Res, 5 (F1000 Faculty Rev) 1554.

  • Bostock R. M., Pye M. F. and Roubtsova T. V. 2014 Predisposition in plant disease: exploiting the nexus in abiotic and biotic stress perception and response. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 52, 517–549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chin C., Chen S., Wu H. H., Ho C. W., Ko M. T. and Lin C. Y. 2014 cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst. Biol. 8, S11.

  • Cramer G. R., Urano K., Delrot S., Pezzotti M. and Shinozaki K. 2011 Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol. 11, 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daves M. H., Hilsenbeck S. G., Lau C. C. and Man T. K. 2011 Meta-analysis of multiple microarray datasets reveals a common gene signature of metastasis in solid tumors. BMC Med. Genomics 4, 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbarbary R. A., Lucas B. A. and Maquat L. E. 2016 Retrotransposons as regulators of gene expression. Science 351, aac7247.

  • Fang F., Pan J., Xu L., Li G. and Wang J. 2015 Identification of potential transcriptomic markers in developing ankylosing spondylitis: a meta-analysis of gene expression profiles. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 1–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y. and Xiong L. 2015 General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 673–689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feichtinger J., Thallinger G., McFarlane R. and Larcombe L. 2012 Microarray meta-analysis: from data to expression to biological relationships. In Computational medicine (ed. Z. Trajanoski), pp. 59–77. Springer, Vienna.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hou D. L., Chen L., Liu B., Song L. N. and Fang T. 2014 Identification of common gene networks responsive to radiotherapy in human cancer cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 21, 542–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X., Bai X., Wang X. and Chu C. 2006 OsWRKY71, a rice transcription factor, is involved in rice defense response. J. Plant Physiol. 164, 969–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrid D. T., Cadenas R. N. and Montano A. P. 2012 GeneCodis3: a non-redundant and modular enrichment analysis tool for functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W478–W483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao X., Zhang H., Tian S., Chang X. and Jing R. 2010 TaSnRK2.4, an SNF1-type serine/threonine protein kinase of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), confers enhanced multistress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 683–696.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moyano T. C., Vidal E. A., Contreras-López O. and Gutiérrez R. A. 2015 Constructing simple biological networks for understanding complex high-throughput data in plants. In Plant functional genomics. methods in molecular biology (ed. J. Alonso and A. Stepanova), vol. 1284. Humana Press, New York.

  • Nahar S., Kalita J., Sahoo L. and Tanti B. 2016 Morphophysiological and molecular effects of drought stress in rice. Ann. Plant Sci. 1409–1416.

  • Narsai R., Devenish J., Castleden I., Narsai K., Xu L., Shou H. et al. 2013 Rice DB: an Oryza information portal linking annotation, subcellular location, function, expression, regulation, and evolutionary information for rice and Arabidopsis. Plant J. 76, 1057–1073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy A., Mondry A., Holmes C. C. and Altman D. G. 2008 Key issues in conducting a meta-analysis of gene expression microarray datasets. PLoS Med. 5, e184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramegowda V. and Kumar M. S. 2015 The interactive effects of simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses on plants: mechanistic understanding from drought and pathogen combination. J. Plant Physiol. 176, 47–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saraswat S., Yadav A. K., Sirohi P. and Singh N. K. 2017 Role of epigenetics in crop improvement: water and heat stress. J. Plant Biol. 60, 231–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaik R. and Ramakrishna W. 2013 Genes and co-expression modules common to drought and bacterial stress responses in Arabidopsis and rice. PLoS One 8, e77261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaik R. and Ramakrishna W. 2014 Machine learning approaches distinguish multiple stress conditions using stress-responsive genes and identify candidate genes for broad resistance in rice. Plant Physiol. 164, 481–495.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N. S., Wang J. T., Ramage D. et al. 2003 Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tenhaken R. 2014 Cell wall remodeling under abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 771.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tusher V. G., Tibshirani and Chu G. 2001 Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5116–5121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velazquez S. F., Guerra R. R. and Calderon L. S. 2011 Abiotic and biotic stress response crosstalk in plants. In Abiotic stress response in plants – physiological, biochemical and genetic perspectives (ed. S. Arun Kumar and B. Venkateswarlu), pp. 3–26. InTech Open Access Publisher.

  • Virdi A. S., Singh S. and Singh P. 2015 Abiotic stress responses in plants: roles of calmodulin-regulated proteins. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X., Cai X., Xu C., Wang Q. and Dai S. 2016 Drought-responsive mechanisms in plant leaves revealed by proteomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1706–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z., Chen Y., Fu Y., Yang Y., Zhang Y., Chen Y. and Li D. 2014 Meta-analysis of differentially expressed genes in osteosarcoma based on gene expression data. BMC Med. Genet. 15, 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You J. and Chan Z. 2015 ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C., Chen H. H., Tian F., Leach J. E. and He C. 2014 Differentially-expressed genes in rice infected by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae relative to a flagellin-deficient mutant reveal potential functions of flagellin in host–pathogen interactions. Rice 7, 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng H., Xu L., Singh A., Wang H., Du L. and Poovaiah B. W. 2015 Involvement of calmodulin and calmodulin-like proteins in plant responses to abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 600.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to the Director, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, for providing research lab and financial support for performing this experiment. The author is thankful to the Ministry of Human Resource and Development, Govt. of India, New Delhi, India for providing scholarship during this tenure. Authors also sincerely thank Mr Manish P. Singh, MNNIT Allahabad for his help in manuscript correction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nand K. Singh.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: H. A. Ranganath

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sirohi, P., Yadav, B.S., Afzal, S. et al. Identification of drought stress-responsive genes in rice (Oryza sativa) by meta-analysis of microarray data. J Genet 99, 35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-020-01195-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-020-01195-w

Keywords

Navigation