Skip to main content
Log in

The Geomagnetic Field Intensity in the Russian Plain in V–III Millennia B.C.

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—The archaeomagnetic study of ceramic material from Veksa III archaeological site (φ = 59°17′ N, λ = 40°10′ E) yield the data on the intensity of geomagnetic field in the V–III millennia B.C. in the Russian Plain. The combined results from the material of the Veksa III and Sakhtysh I sites (φ = 56°48′ N, λ = 40°33′ E) suggest that in the studied time interval, the intensity of the geomagnetic field mainly varied within 30 to 50 μT. The gradual changes in the intensity are superimposed by a variation with a characteristic time of approximately 1000 years. The results on the intensity of the geomagnetic field determined for the Russian Plain for the time interval V–III millennia B.C. add substantially to the magnetic field data during this time interval, which promotes better understanding of the variations in the ancient geomagnetic field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bol’shakov, A.S. and Shcherbakova, V.V., Thermomagnetic criterion for determining the domain tructure of ferromagnetics, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR,Fiz. Zemli, 1979, no. 2, pp. 38–47.

  2. Burakov, K.S. and Nachasova, I.E., The change in the intensity of the geomagnetic field in Georgia in the V–III millennia B.C., Geomagn. Aeron., 1988, no.6, pp. 1033–1035.

  3. Coe, R.S., Paleointensities of the Earth’s magnetic field determined from tertiary and quaternary rocks, J. Geophys. Res., 1967, vol. 72, pp. 3247–3262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coe, R.S., Gromme, S., and Mankinen, E.A., Geomagnetic paleointensity from radiocarbon-dated flows on Hawaii and the question of the Pacific nondipole low, J. Geophys. Res., 1978, vol. 83, no. B4, pp. 1740–1756.

  5. Gallet, Y., Molist, M., Genevey, A., Garcia, X.C., Thebault, E., Gomez, A., Le Goff, M., Robert, B., and Nachasova, I., New Late Neolithic (c. 7000–5000 BC) archeointensity data from Syria. Reconstructing 9000 years of archeomagnetic field intensity variations in the Middle East, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2015, vol. 238, pp. 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kovacheva, M., Summarized results of the archaeomagnetic investigations of the geomagnetic field variation for the last 8000 yr in south-eastern Europe, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 1980, vol. 61. pp. 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kovacheva, M., Boyadziev, Y., Kostadinova-Avramova, M., Jordanova, N., and Donadini, F., Updated archaeomagnetic data set of the past 8 millenia from the Sofia laboratory, Bulgaria, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 2009, vol. 10.https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002347

  8. Nachasova, I.E., Characteristics of variations in the intensity of the geomagnetic field according to archaeomagnetic data, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Phys.-Math.) Dissertation, IPE RAS, 1998.

  9. Nachasova, I.E. and Akimova, S.V., The geomagnetic field intensity variations in the Iberian Peninsula during the last Millennium, Izv.,Phys. Solid Earth, 2015, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 709–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nachasova, I.E., Burakov, K.S., and Pilipenko, O.V., Variations in the intensity of the geomagnetic field in Siberia during the last 13 000 years, Izv.,Phys. Solid Earth, 2015, vol. 51, no. 1. pp. 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nachasova, I.E., Pilipenko, O.V., Markov, G.P., Gribov, S.K., and Tsetlin, Yu.B., Geomagnetic field intensity during the Neolith in the Central East European Plain, Geomagn. Aeron., 2018, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 438–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagata, T., Arai, Y., and Momose, K., Secular variation of the geomagnetic total force during the last 5000 years, J. Geophys. Res., 1963, vol. 68, no. 18, pp. 5277–5281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nedomolkina, N.G., Veksa III settlement (Ust-Vologda III), in Traditsii v kontekste russkoy kul’tury (Traditions in the Context of Russian Culture), vol. 4, Cherepovets: CHGPI, 2000a, pp. 3–5.

  14. Nedomolkina, N.G., The multilayer settlement of Veksa, in Tverskoi arkheologicheskii sbornik (Tver Archaeological Paper Collection), series 4, vol. 1, Tver’: Tverskoi ob”edinennyi gos. muzei, 2000b, pp. 277–283.

  15. Nedomolkina, N.G., Neolithic complexes of Veksa and Veksa III sites of the Upper Sukhona basin and their chronology, in Problemy khronologii i etnokul’turnykh vzaimodeystviy v neolite Yevrazii (khronologiya neolita, osobennosti kul’tur i neolitizatsiya regionov, vzaimodeystviya neoliticheskikh kul’tur v Vostochnoy i Sredney Evrope) (Problems of Chronology and Ethnocultural Interactions in the Neolithic Eurasia (Neolithic Chronology, Features of Cultures and Neolithicization of Regions, Interaction of Neolithic Cultures in Eastern and Central Europe)), Timofeev, V.I. and Zaitseva, G.I., Eds., St. Petersburg: IIMK RAN, 2004, pp. 265–279.

  16. Nedomolkina, N. and Piezonka, H., The Upper Sukhona region in the Early and Middle Neolithic according to the results of radiocarbon dating (case study of Veksa I, Veksa III settlements), in Radiouglerodnaya khronologiya epokhi neolita Vostochnoy Evropy VII–III tysyacheletiya do n. e. (Radiocarbon Chronology of the Neolithic of Eastern Europe VII–III Millennia B.C.), Zaitseva, G.I., Lozovskaya, O.V., Vybornov, A.A., and Mazurkevich, A.N., Eds., Smolensk: Svitok, 2016, pp. 425–443.

  17. Paterson, G.A., Tauxe, L., Biggin, A.J., Shaar, R., and Jonestrask, L.C., Stand. Paleointensity Definitions, 2014, V. 1.0. https://earthref.org/PmagPy/SPD/DL/SPD_v1.0.pdf.

  18. Riisager, P. and Riisager, J., Detecting multidomain magnetic grains in Thellier palaeointensity experiments, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2001, vol. 125, pp. 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shcherbakov, V.P. and Shcherbakova, V.V., The paleomagnetic direction determination: implications of the domain structure of ferromagnetic grains in rocks, Izv.,Phys. Solid Earth, 2002, vol. 38, no. 5. pp. 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tema, E. and Kondopoulou, D., Secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field in the Balkan region during the last 8 millennia based on archaeomagnetic data, Geophys. J. Int., 2011, vol. 186, pp. 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05088x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tema, E., Gomez-Paccard, M., Kondopoulou, D., and Almar,Y., Intensity of the Earth’s magnetic field in Greece during the last five millennia: New data from Greek pottery, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2012, vol. 202–203, pp. 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thellier, E. and Thellier, O., Sur l’intensité du champ magnétique terrestre dans le passé historique et géologique, Ann. Geophys., 1959, vol. 15, pp. 285–378.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 16-05-00378) and carried out in partial fulfillment of state contract of IPE RAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to O. V. Pilipenko or N. G. Nedomolkina.

Additional information

Translated by M. Nazarenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nachasova, I.E., Pilipenko, O.V., Markov, G.P. et al. The Geomagnetic Field Intensity in the Russian Plain in V–III Millennia B.C.. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 56, 238–248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106935132002007X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106935132002007X

Keywords:

Navigation