Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of the DNA repair inhibitors, cytosine arabinoside and 3-aminobenzamide, on the frequency of radiation-induced micronuclei, nuclear buds, and nucleoplasmic bridges

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genes & Genomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Micronuclei (MN), nuclear bud (NBud), and nucleoplasmic bridge (NPB) are suggested as biomarkers for radiation exposure; however, they have not been extensively studied to understand the underlying mechanisms responsible for their formation.

Objectives

To (1) validate NBud and NPB within the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus (CBMN) assay as biomarkers for radiation exposure and (2) determine the effects of the DNA repair inhibitors, cytosine arabinoside (Ara C) and 3-aminobenzamide (3-AB) on radiation-induced MN, NBud, and NPB formation.

Methods

Human blood samples were irradiated with 0–3 Gy X-rays and subsequently treated with Ara C and 3-AB. CBMN and chromosome aberration assays were carried out to measure MN, NBud, and NPB and dicentric chromosomes, respectively.

Results

The frequency of radiation-induced MN, NBud, and NPB increased in a dose-dependent manner. The frequency of MN, NBud, and NPB was highly and positively correlated with the dicentric chromosome, a standard biomarker for biodosimetry (r > 0.98, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, Ara C increased the frequency of MN, NBud, and NPB, whereas 3-AB increased the frequency of MN and NPB, but not NBud. Further, the potentiating effect of Ara C on the frequency of MN, NBud, and NPB was greater than that of 3-AB.

Conclusion

Our results validate NBuds and NPBs as independent valuable markers of radiation exposure. Additionally, we suggest that different mechanisms are likely involved in the formation of NBuds and NPBs following X-irradiation; however, additional studies are warranted to better understand the contribution of distinct DNA repair pathways to the formation of radiation-induced damages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawala PK, Adhikari JS, Chaudhury NK (2010) Lymphocyte chromosomal aberration assay in radiation biodosimetry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2:197–201

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Allio T, Donner EM, Preston RJ (2000) A combination of the roles of p53 mutation and Ara C inhibition in the enhancement of bleomycin-induced chromatid aberrations in mouse and human cells. Mutat Res 447:227–237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonassi S, Fenech M, Lando C, Lin YP, Ceppi M, Chang WP, Holland N, Kirsch-Volders M, Zeiger E, Ban S et al (2001) HUman MicroNucleus project: international database comparison for results with the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay in human lymphocytes: I. Effect of laboratory protocol, scoring criteria, and host factors on the frequency of micronuclei. Environ Mol Mutagen 37:31–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonassi S, Norppa H, Ceppi M, Stromberg U, Vermeulen R, Znaor A, Cebulska-Wasilewsk A, Fabianova E, Fucic A, Gundy S et al (2008) Chromosomal aberration frequency in lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer: results from a pooled cohort study of 22 358 subjects in 11 countries. Carcinogenesis 29:1178–1183

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong HS, Seth I, Joiner MC, Tucker JD (2013) Relationships among micronuclei, nucleoplasmic bridges and nuclear buds within individual cells in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Mutagenesis 28:433–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chung HW, Kim SY, Cho YH, Kim TH, Jo CG, Ha SH (2002) Effects of 3-amino benzamide and cytosine arabinoside on the frequencies of dicentric and translocation in human lymphocyte induced by radiation. Environ Mutagens Carcinog 22:205–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Coşkun M, Cayır A, Coşkun M, Tok H (2013) Evaluation of background DNA damage in a Turkish population measured by means of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Mutat Res 757:23–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crott JW, Mashiyama ST, Ames BN, Fenech M (2001) The effect of folic acid deficiency and MTHFR C677T polymorphism on chromosome damage in human lymphocytes in vitro. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 10:1089–1096

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donmez-Altuntas H, Bitgen N (2012) Evaluation of the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in the general population in Turkey by use of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Mutat Res 748:1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S, Gupta ML (2014) Alleviation of radiation-induced genomic damage in human peripheral blood lymphocytes by active principles of Podophyllum hexandrum: an in vitro study using chromosomal and CBMN assay. Mutagenesis 29:139–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Zein RA, Schabath MB, Etzel CJ, Ms L, Franklin JD, Spitz MR (2006) Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay as a novel biomarker for lung cancer risk. Cancer Res 66:6449–6456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech M (2000) The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 455:81–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech M (2006) Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay evolves into a “cytome” assay of chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death. Mutat Res 600:58–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech M (2010) The lymphocyte cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay and its application in radiation biodosimetry. Health Phys 98:234–243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech M, Perepetskaya G, Mikhalevich L (1997) A more comprehensive application of the micronucleus technique for biomonitoring of genetic damage rates in human populations—experiences from the Chernobyl catastrophe. Environ Mol Mutagen 30:112–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech M, Bonassi S, Turner J, Lando C, Ceppi M, Chang WP, Holland N, Kirsch-Volders M, Zeiger E, Bigatti MP et al (2003) Intra- and inter—laboratory variation in scoring of micronuclei and nucleoplasmic bridges in binucleated human lymphocytes. Results of an international slide-scoring exercise by the HUMN project. Mutat Res 534:45–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech M, Kirsch-Volders M, Natarajan AT, Surralles J, Crott JW, Parry J, Norppa H, Eastmond DA, Tucker JD, Thomas P (2011) Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells. Mutagenesis 26:125–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gashi G, Mahovlić V, Manxhuka-Kerliu S, Podrimaj-Bytyqi A, Gashi L, Elezaj JR (2018) The association between micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridges, and nuclear buds frequency and the degree of uterine cervical lesions. Biomarkers 31:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Heartlein MW, Preston RJ (1985) The effect of 3-aminobenzamide on the frequency of X-ray or neutron-induced chromosome aberrations in cycling or non-cycling human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 148:91–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2001) Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment: a manual. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RD, Liu N, Jasin M (1999) Mammalian XRCC2 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Nature 401:397–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanda R (2000) Improvement of accuracy of chromosome aberration analysis for biological radiation dosimetry. J Radiat Res 41:1–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan MI, Limoli CL, Morgan WF (1997) Perpetuating radiation-induced chromosome instability. Radiat Oncol Investig 5:124–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley MR, Logsdon D, Fishel ML (2014) Targeting DNA repair pathways for cancer treatment: what's new? Future Oncol 10:1215–1237

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ladeira C, Viegas S, Carolino E, Prista J, Gomes MC, Brito M (2011) Genotoxicity biomarkers in occupational exposure to formaldehyde—the case of histopathology laboratories. Mutat Res 721:15–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Gu Y, Yu S, Li Y, Yang J, Jia G (2014) Assessing the suitability of 8-OHdG and micronuclei as genotoxic biomarkers in chromate-exposed workers: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 9:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Little JB (2000) Radiation carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 21:397–404

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mao Z, Bozzella M, Seluanov A, Gorbunova V (2008) Comparison of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in human cells. DNA Repair 7(10):1765–1771

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meenakshi C, Sivasubramanian K, Venkatraman B (2017) Nucleoplasmic bridges as a biomarker of DNA damage exposed to radon. Mutat Res 814:22–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan AT, Balajee AS, Boei JJWA, Chatterjee S, Darroudi F, Grigorova M, Noditi M, Oh HJ, Slijepcevic P, Vermeulen S (1994) Recent developments in the assessment of chromosomal damage. Int J Radiat Biol 66:615–623

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nefic H, Handzic I (2013) The effect of age, sex, and lifestyle factors on micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes of the Bosnian population. Mutat Res 753:1–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Obe G, Pfeiffer P, Savage JRK, Johannes C, Goedecke W, Jeppesen P, Natarajan AT, Martinez-Lopez W, Folle GA, Drets ME (2002) Chromosome aberrations: formation, identification and distribution. Mutat Res 504:19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston RJ (1980) DNA repair and chromosome aberrations: the effect of cytosine arabinoside on the frequency of chromosome aberration induced by radiation and chemicals. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 1:147–159

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puerto S, Surralles J, Ramirez MJ, Carbonell E, Creus A, Marcos R (1999) Analysis of bleomycin- and cytosine arabinoside-induced chromosome aberrations involving chromosome 1 ad 4 by painting FISH. Mutat Res 439:3–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieder CL, Palazzo RE (1992) Colcemid and the mitotic cycle. J Cell Sci 102:387–392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudat V, Bachmann N, Küpper JH, Weber KJ (2001) Overexpression of the DNA-binding domain of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibits rejoining of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks. Int J Radiat Biol 77:303–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satoh MS, Lindahl T (1992) Role of poly(ADP-ribose) formation in DNA repair. Nature 356:356–358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano L, Montero R (2001) Micronuclei and chromatid buds are the result of related genotoxic events. Environ Mol Mutagen 38:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu N, Itoh N, Utiyama H, Wahl GM (1998) Selective entrapment of extrachromosomally amplified DNA by nuclear budding and micronucleation during S phase. J Cell Biol 140:1307–1320

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu N, Shimura T, Tanaka T (2000) Selective elimination of acentric double minutes from cancer cells through the extrusion of micronuclei. Mutat Res 448:81–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • StÜrzbecher HW, Donzelmann B, Henning W, Knippschild U, Buchhop S (1996) p53 is linked directly to homologous recombination process via RAD51/RecA protein interaction. EMBO J 15:1992–2002

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Surralles J, Sebastian S, Natarajan AT (1997) Chromosomes with high gene density are preferentially repaired in human cells. Mutagenesis 12:437–442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takata M, Sasaki MS, Sonoda E, Morrison C, Hashimoto M, Utsumi H, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Shinohara A, Takeda S (1998) Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-rejoining pathways of DNA double strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J 17:5497–5508

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas P, Umegaki K, Fenech M (2003) Nucleoplasmic bridge are a sensitive measure of chromosome rearrangement in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Mutagenesis 18:187–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tian X-L, Zhao H, Cai T-J, Lu X, Chen D-Q, Li S, Liu Q-J (2016) Dose–effect relationships of nucleoplasmic bridges and complex nuclear anomalies in human peripheral lymphocytes exposed to Co γ-rays at a relatively low dose. Mutagenesis 31(4):425–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Duan H, Gao F, Li Y, Huang C, Niu Y, Gao W, Yu S, Zheng Y (2015) Increased micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge, and nuclear bud frequencies in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of diesel engine exhaust-exposed workers. Toxicol Sci 143:408–417

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Lu X, Li S, Chen DQ, Liu QJ (2014) Characteristics of nucleoplasmic bridges induced by 60Co γ-rays in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mutagenesis 29:49–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We specially thank Drs. Sung Whan Ha (Seoul National University College of Medicine) and Melisa Schelvan (University of Montana) for their expertise in radiation exposure and critical reading of this manuscript, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YHC, YJK, HWC and SYK: conceived and designed the experiments; YHC, YJK and SL: performed the experiments; SYK: analyzed the data; YHC, YJK, KJ, SK, and SYK: wrote and revised the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yoon Hee Cho or Su Young Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

YHC, YJK, SL, KJ, HWC, SK, and SYK declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, Y.H., Kim, Y.J., Lee, S. et al. Effects of the DNA repair inhibitors, cytosine arabinoside and 3-aminobenzamide, on the frequency of radiation-induced micronuclei, nuclear buds, and nucleoplasmic bridges. Genes Genom 42, 673–680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-020-00934-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-020-00934-8

Keywords

Navigation