Skip to main content
Log in

Model of uncertainty for the variability of water microbiological enumeration in a proficiency testing scheme

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data processing of microbial enumeration expressed as colony counts requires the use of specific statistical approaches due to the particular aspect of the analyte and the consideration of the variability related to the growth of microorganisms. A challenging matter in the organization of proficiency testing (PT) schemes for water microbiology is to provide representative, homogeneous and stable enough samples with the aim of assessing participants’ performance but also characterizing the accuracy of measurement. As a consequence, the proficiency testing design may help to make clear distinction between the different sources of variation and facilitate the subsequent error analysis associated with the analytical procedures of the participants. Besides, the statistical tools may be selected to provide explicit outcomes which enable the participants to interpret the data in line with other existing indicators such as those arising from validation studies or measurement uncertainty procedures in the laboratory quality assurance system. In this paper, the suitability of a Poisson–Gamma hierarchical generalized linear model is tested in order to evaluate the interlaboratory error, the batch homogeneity and the repeatability error from water microbiology PT. A probabilistic approach deriving from the negative binomial distribution is proposed for assessing the participating laboratories performance in terms of generalized z-score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niemelä SI (2003) Uncertainty of quantitative determination derived by cultivation of microorganisms. Centre for metrology and accreditation. MIKES Publication J4/2003, Helsinki Finland. ISBN 952-5209-76-8

  2. ISO 29201:2012. Water quality—the variability of test results and the uncertainty of measurement of microbiological enumeration methods. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  3. ISO 5725:1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 2. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  4. ISO 5725:1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 3. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  5. Tillett H, Lightfoot N (1995) Quality control in environmental microbiology compared with chemistry: What is homogeneous and what is random? Water Sci Technol 31(5):471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ISO 13843:2017. Water quality—requirements for establishing performance characteristics of quantitative microbiological methods. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  7. FD T90-465-1:2014. Protocol for estimating the measurement uncertainty associated with an analytical result for microbiological enumeration methods. Part 1: references, definitions and general information. Association Française de Normalisation, Saint-Denis

  8. Jarvis B (2016) Statistical aspects of the microbiological examination of foods. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. El-Shaarawi A, Esterby S, Dutka B (1981) Bacterial density in water determined by Poisson or negative binomial distributions. Appl Environ Microbiol 41(1):107–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (2004) Discrete multivariate distributions. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  12. FD T90-465-2 (2019) Protocol for estimating the measurement uncertainty associated with an analytical result for microbiological enumeration methods. Part 2: Enumeration techniques. Association Française de Normalisation, Saint-Denis

  13. ISO/IEC 17043:2010. Conformity assessment—general requirements for proficiency testing. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  14. ISO 13528:2015. Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  15. ISO 22117:2019. Microbiology of the food chain—specific requirements and guidance for proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  16. O’Hara RB, Kotze DJ (2010) Do not log-transform count data. Methods Ecol Evol 1:118–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marques FJ, Loingeville F (2016) Improved near-exact distributions for the product of independent generalized Gamma random variables. Comput Stat Data Anal 102:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Molinier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molinier, O., Guarini, P. Model of uncertainty for the variability of water microbiological enumeration in a proficiency testing scheme. Accred Qual Assur 25, 139–146 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-019-01420-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-019-01420-9

Keywords

Navigation