Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Influence of PCK-Based NOS Teaching on Pre-service Science Teachers’ NOS Views

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)–based nature of science (NOS) teaching on pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs) NOS views. The study is grounded by conceptual change and experiential learning theory. It is also framed by the teacher professional knowledge and skill (TPK&S) PCK model. This is an exploratory case study of PSTs’ developments during a 14-week course to teach about NOS. Each participant’s views of NOS and changes on these views were investigated as a multiple comparative case study. Thirty-nine PSTs participated. Multiple data collection includes open-ended questionnaires, interviews, classroom observations, lesson plans, and reflective essays. Questionnaire responses and interview transcriptions were analyzed using the NOS views continuum scale. The remaining data including lesson plans and reflective essays were analyzed using content analysis. According to the analyses, most of the PSTs started the course with naive views about the NOS aspects at the beginning of the study. After attending the PCK-based NOS instruction, almost all of the PSTs dramatically developed their understandings of NOS, and they maintained their informed views a year later. The results of show that PCK-based NOS teaching was very effective and successful for improving PSTs’ NOS understandings and maintaining these views in the long term. The findings have the potential to translate as practical advice for teachers, science educators, and future researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the source for our understandings about science: enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: factors mediating preservice elementary teachers views of nature of science. Science Education, 8, 785–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V., & Hanuscin, D. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J., & McDuffie, A. R. (2005). One course is not enough: pre-service elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Pongsanon, K., Park, M. A., Rogers, M. A. P., Carter, I., & Galindo, E. (2017). Exploring the use of lesson study to develop elementary preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching nature of science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 293–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: a project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 414–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Mulvey, B. K., & Maeng, J. L. (2016). Outcomes of nature of science instruction along a context continuum: preservice secondary science teachers’ conceptions and instructional intentions. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1151960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Van Driel, J. H. (2008). Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271–1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. (Ed.), Friedrichsen, P. (Ed.), Loughran, J. (Ed.). (2015). Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. New York: Routledge.

  • Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science Education, 15, 463–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2018). Teaching and learning about the nature of science. Science & Education, 27, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2012). Impact of a nature of science and science education course on teachers’ nature of science classroom practices. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research, concepts, and methodologies (pp. 247–266). New York: Springer.

  • Cofré, H., Vergara, C., Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., Santibáñez, D., Jiménez, J., & Yancovic, M. (2014). Improving Chilean In-service Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of Nature of Science Using Self-contained NOS and Content-Embedded Mini-Courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(7):759–783.

  • Cofre, H., Nunez, P., Santibanez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 3–5, 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00051-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, F., Chen, D., Tsai, C., & Chai, C. (2011). Students’ views of the nature of science: a critical review of research. Science Education, 95, 961–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Netherlands: Springer.

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735665.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). Making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanuscin, D. (2013). Critical incidents in the development of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science: a prospective elementary teacher’s journey. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 933–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanuscin, D., Lee, M., & Akerson, V. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P.W. (1992). Conceptual change in science teaching and teacher education. Paper presented at a meeting on “Research and Curriculum Development in Science Teaching,” under the aus-pices of the National Center for Educational Research, Documentation, and Assessment, Ministry for Education and Science, Madrid, Spain, June 1992.

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 999–1021). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Teaching NOS within a controversial topic: integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). NOS: past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education volume II (pp. 600–620). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). NOS in science education: an introduction. Science & Education, 7, 511–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). NOS as expressed in international science education standards documents: a qualitative consensus analysis. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), NOS in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, C. V. (2010). The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1137–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. S. (2017). Changing preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science: why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9.

  • Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. S. (2018). Preservice science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science and nature of scientific inquiry: A successful case study. National Association of Research in Science Teaching International Conference (NARST), Georgia, Atlanta, A.B.D.

  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2013; 2018). İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Primary education institutions’ science instruction program]. Ankara, Turkey: Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.

  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards. Accessed 21 October 2013.

  • Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. K. (2018). The inclusion of the nature of science in nine recent international science education standards documents. Science & Education, 27, 637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9993-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S. (2007). Beyond evolution: a thematic approach to teaching NOS in an undergraduate biology course. Proceedings of the international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA. April 15–18.

  • Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. (2008). What scientists say: scientists’ views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). A series of misrepresentations: a response to Allchin’s whole approach to assessing nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96(4), 685–692 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and training: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: a pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83, 493–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahbeh, N., & Abd- El- Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 425–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mathematics and Science Education Department, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey

    Günkut Mesci

Authors
  1. Günkut Mesci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Günkut Mesci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 4 An example of PCK-based explicit/reflective contextualized NOS activity
Full size table

Appendix 2

Table 5 Example of PCK-based NOS lesson plan
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mesci, G. The Influence of PCK-Based NOS Teaching on Pre-service Science Teachers’ NOS Views. Sci & Educ 29, 743–769 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00117-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00117-7

Search

Navigation