Skip to main content
Log in

Duct and blade design for small-scale floating tidal current turbine development and CFD-based analysis of power performance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes designs for blades and a water velocity amplification device for the development of a 5-kW duct-type floating tidal current turbine. In addition, it verifies the power performance by a CFD simulation. A BEM theory-based algorithm is used for iterative design and analysis to delay the onset of the chronic problem of cavitation in tidal current turbine blades. The HEEDS optimization software connected to CAE tools is applied to optimize the design of the duct shape, thereby improving the efficiency of the tidal current turbine. The performance of the designed turbine is verified using the CFD software STAR CCM+. A wave model is established to reflect the pressure variation in shallow water when analyzing the cavitation and power performance. The power and efficiency at the rated water velocity are 5 kW and 44 %, respectively. The results indicate that power can be stably controlled due to stalling under the high-flow-velocity condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C D :

Drag coefficient

C L :

Lift coefficient

C P :

Power coefficient

C P(min) :

Minimum pressure coefficient

D :

Rotor diameter [m]

P :

Static pressure at the point (Pa)

P o :

Local pressure (Pa)

P V :

Vapor pressure of the fluid (Pa)

R :

Rotor radius [m]

r :

Local radius [m]

V :

Velocity of fluid (m/s)

α:

Angle of attack [deg]

ρ:

Density of the fluid (kg/m3)

σ:

Cavitation Number

Ω:

Rotor speed [rpm]

References

  1. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21), Renewables 2016 Global Status Report (2016) 32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Renewable Energy Agency, Renewable Power Generation Costs in Remap: Road Map for a Renewable Energy Future 2030 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Energy Technologies Institute, Tidal Energy Insights into Tidal Stream Energy, Energy Technologies Institute (2015) 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Magagna, R. Monfardini and A. Uihlein, JRC Ocean Energy Status Report, European Commission Joint Research Centre (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tocardo Tidal Power, http://www.tocardo.com/projects/.

  6. P. Khunthongian and A. Janyalertadun, A study of diffuser angle effect on ducted water current turbine performance using CFD, Songklanakarin, J. Sci. Technol., 34 (1) (2012) 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Fleming and R. Willden, Analysis of bi-directional ducted tidal turbine performance, International Journal of Marine Energy, 16 (2016) 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Shives, Hydrodynamic modeling, optimization and performance assessment for ducted and non-ducted tidal turbines, Master’s Thesis, University of Victoria (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Allsop, C. Peyrard, P. Thies, E. Boulouguris and G. Harrison, Hydrodynamic analysis of a ducted, open centre tidal stream turbine using blade element momentum theory, Ocean Engineering, 141 (2017) 531–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Cecile, V. Marcel, G. Joao, L. Romain, G. Paul and A. Francois, Design and performance assessment of a tidal ducted turbine, Proceedings of the 3rd IAHR International Meeting of the Workgroup on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Brno, Czech Republic (2009) 571–581.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Carlton, Marine Propellers and Propulsion, Butterworth Heinemann, London (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. J. Schubel and R. J. Crossley, Wind turbine blade design, Energies, 5 (2012) 3425–3449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. N. Goundar and M. R. Ahmed, Design of a horizontal axis tidal current turbine, Applied Energy, 111 (2013) 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. S. Bir, M. J. Lawson and Y. Li, Structural design of a horizontal-axis tidal current turbine composite blade, Proceedings of the ASME 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (2011) 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. M. Somers, The S822 and S823 Airfoils, NREL (2005) 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lee, K. Lee and B. Kim, Aerodynamic optimal blade design and performance analysis of 3 MW wind turbine blade with AEP enhancement for low-wind-speed-sites, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. S. K. Belloni, R. H. J. Willden and G. T. Houlsby, An investigation of ducted and open-centre tidal turbines employing cfdembedded bem, Renew. Energy, 108 (2017) 622–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Red Cedar Technology, HEEDS (Hierarchical Evolutionary Engineering Design System) (2013) Available at: http://www.redcedartech.com/pdfs/SHERPA.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y. K. Lee, J. H. Shin, I. H. Park, S. Kim, K. Y. Lee and Y. S. Choi, Mixed-flow pump impeller-diffuser optimization method by using CFX and HEEDS, Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 39 (10) (2015) 831–842.

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Afgan, J. McNaughton, Srolfo, D. D. Apsley, T. Stallard and P. Stansby, Turbulent flow and loading on a tidal stream turbine by LES and RANS, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 43 (2013) 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. M. Creciun, The effects of blockage ratio and distance from a free surface on the performance of a hydrokinetic turbine, Theses and Dissertations, Lehigh University (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. T. Tran and D.-H. Kim, Fully coupled aero-hydrodynamic analysis of a semi-submersible FOWT using a dynamic fluid body interaction approach, Renew. Energy, 92 (2016) 244–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Bharath, J.-R. Nader, I. Penesis and G. Macfarlane, Nonlinear hydrodynamic effects of a generic spherical wave energy converter, J. Renew. Energy, 118 (2017) 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by “Development of Floating Tidal Power System for Bridge for Self-sufficient Energy of Bridge” and “Graduate Program for O&M Technology on Reliability and AEP Enhancement of On/Off-shore Wind Turbines” of KETEP (Grant Nos 20153030071550 and 20184030202200) granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE), Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bumsuk Kim.

Additional information

Recommended by Editor Yang Na

Heejeon Im is a Ph.D. candidate of the Multidisciplinary Graduate School Program for Wind Energy in Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea. He received his master’s degree (2018) from the Faculty of Wind Energy Engineering, Graduate School, Jeju National University. His research interests include aerodynamics, blade design, wind turbine, tidal turbine and passive flow control devices.

Taegyu Hwang is a director of Busan Headquarters of Korea Marine Equipment Research Institute, Busan, Korea. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Korea Maritime and Ocean University. His research interests include renewable energy system, hydro turbine and flow visualization.

Bumsuk Kim is an Associate Professor of the Faculty of Wind Energy Engineering, Graduate School of Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Korea Maritime and Ocean University (2005). His research interests include wind turbine system design, Integrated load analysis and operation and maintenance of offshore wind farm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Im, H., Hwang, T. & Kim, B. Duct and blade design for small-scale floating tidal current turbine development and CFD-based analysis of power performance. J Mech Sci Technol 34, 1591–1602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0321-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0321-2

Keywords

Navigation