Abstract
Free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) negatively impact wildlife worldwide. Yet despite being members of the order Carnivora, we have relatively little information on the role that dogs play in carnivore communities. To evaluate if activity patterns of wild carnivores are influenced by the activity of dogs and if the latter is influenced by the activity of pumas (Puma concolor), we placed camera traps in eight protected areas in São Paulo State and in six in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, from 2011 to 2017. We obtained 551 photo-captures of dogs in 20,524 trap nights in 11 of the 14 protected areas. Dogs were active primarily during the day and therefore overlapped mainly with diurnal carnivores, such as tayras (Eira barbara) and coatis (Nasua nasua). Mesocarnivore temporal activity did not appear affected by the activity of dogs, since the activity patterns of tayras, coatis, maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus), and ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) were similar (from 67 to 82% of overlap) in areas with and without dogs. Further, the activity of dogs was not influenced by puma activity; dog activity patterns in areas with pumas and without pumas overlapped by 84%, with minimal differences. While mesocarnivores might alter their spatial behavior to avoid overlap with dogs, it appears that dog use of protected areas does not result in shifts in the temporal activity of mesocarnivores. Further, we hypothesize that dogs that use protected areas are mostly provisioned by humans (owners), and therefore, their activity patterns may be more related to that of their owners than to the presence of native carnivore species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamec RE (1976) The interaction of hunger and preying in the domestic cat (Felis catus): an adaptive hierarchy? Behav Biol 18:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6773(76)92166-0
Baker PJ, Bentley AJ, Ansell RJ, Harris S (2005) Impact of predation by domestic cats Felis catus in an urban area. Mammal Rev 35:302–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00071.x
Berger J, Swenson JE, Persson IL (2001) Recolonizing carnivores and naïve prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. Science 291:1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1056466
Bianchi RDC, Olifiers N, Gompper ME, Mourão G (2016) Niche partitioning among mesocarnivores in a Brazilian wetland. PLoS One 11:e0162893. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162893
Blake JG, Mosquera D, Loiselle BA et al (2012) Temporal activity patterns of terrestrial mammals in lowland rainforest of Eastern Ecuador. Ecotropica 18:137–146
Braczkowski AR, O’Bryan CJ, Stringer MJ et al (2018) Leopards provide public health benefits in Mumbai, India. Front Ecol Environ 16:176–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1776
Butler JRA, Linnell JDC, Morrant D et al (2014) Dog eat dog, cat eat dog: social-ecological dimensions of dog predation by wild carnivores. In: Gompper ME (ed) Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxford University Press, pp 55–65
Campos CB, Esteves CF, Ferraz KMPMB et al (2007) Diet of free-ranging cats and dogs in a suburban and rural environment, south-eastern Brazil. J Zool 273:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00291.x
Castelló JR (2018) Canids of the world. Wolves, wild dogs, foxes, jackals, coyotes, and their relatives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 332
Clutton-Brock J (2017) Origins of the dog: the archaeological evidence. In: Serpell J (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behavior and interactions with people, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 15–29
Creel S (2001) Four factors modifying the effect of competition on carnivore population dynamics as illustrated by African wild dogs. Conserv Biol 15:271–274. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99534.x
Creel S, Christianson D (2008) Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol Evol 23:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.004
Creel S, Winnie J, Maxwell B, et al (2005) Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecology 86:3387–3397. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0032
Defler TR (1980) Notes on interactions between the tayra (Eira barbara) and the white-fronted capuchin. J Mammal 61:156
Doherty TS, Dickman CR, Glen AS et al (2017) The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates. Biol Conserv 210:56–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.007
Donadio, Buskirk (2006) Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in Carnivora. Am Nat 167(4):526–536. https://doi.org/10.2307/3844707
Dröge E, Creel S, Becker MS, M’soka J (2017) Spatial and temporal avoidance of risk within a large carnivore guild. Ecol Evol 7:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2616
Espartosa KD (2009) Mamíferos terrestres de maior porte e a invasão de cães domésticos em remanescentes de uma paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atlântica: avaliação da eficiência de métodos de amostragem e da importância de múltiplos fatores sobre a distribuição das espécies. Universidade de São Paulo
Farris ZJ, Gerber BD, Karpanty S et al (2015) When carnivores roam: temporal patterns and overlap among Madagascar’s native and exotic carnivores. J Zool 296:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12216
Frey S, Fisher JT, Burton AC, Volpe JP (2017) Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera-trap data: challenges and opportunities. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv 3:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.60
Gallagher AJ, Creel S, Wilson RP, Cooke SJ (2017) Energy Landscapes and the Landscape of Fear. Trends Ecol Evol 32:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.010
Gerber BD, Karpanty SM, Randrianantenaina J (2012) Activity patterns of carnivores in the rain forests of Madagascar: implications for species coexistence. J Mammal 93:667–676. https://doi.org/10.1644/11-MAMM-A-265.1
Gómez H, Wallace RB, Ayala G et al (2005) Dry season activity periods of some Amazonian mammals. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 40:91–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650520500129638
Gompper, ME (2014a) The dog-human-wildlfe interface: Assessing the scope of the problem. In: Gompper ME (ed) Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–54
Gompper ME (2014b) Introduction: outlining the ecological influences of a subsidized, domesticated predator. In: Gompper ME (ed) Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–8
Horn JA, Mateus-Pinilla N, Warner RE, Heske EJ (2011) Home range, habitat use, and activity patterns of free-roaming domestic cats. J Wildl Manag 75:1177–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.145
Hughes J, Macdonald DW (2013) A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biol Conserv 157:341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.005
Hughes J, MacDonald DW, Boitani L (2017) Roaming free in the rural idyll: dogs and their connections with wildlife. In: Serpell J (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behavior and interactions with people, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 377–392
Hut RA, Kronfeld-Schor N, van der Vinne V, De la Iglesia H (2012) In search of a temporal niche: Environmental factors. Prog Brain Res 199:281–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59427-3.00017-4
Jessup DA (2004) The welfare of feral cats and wildlife. J Am Vet Med Assoc 225(9):1377–1383
Johnson N, Mansfield KL, Marston DA, Wilson C, Goddard T, Selden D, Hemson G, Edea L, van Kesteren F, Shiferaw F, Stewart AE, Sillero-Zubiri C, Fooks AR (2010) A new outbreak of rabies in rare Ethiopian wolves (Canis simensis). Arch Virol 155:1175–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-010-0689-x
Kays RW, DeWan AA (2004) Ecological impact of inside/outside house cats around a suburban nature preserve. Anim Conserv 7:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943004001489
Kays R, Costello R, Forrester T et al (2015) Cats are rare where coyotes roam. J Mammal 96:981–987. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyv100
Kennedy M, Phillips BL, Legge S et al (2012) Do dingoes suppress the activity of feral cats in northern Australia? Austral Ecol 37:134–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02256.x
Kronfeld-Schor N, Visser ME, Salis L, van Gils JA (2017) Chronobiology of interspecific interactions in a changing world. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 372:201660248. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0248
Kronka FJN, Nalon MA, Matsukuma CK et al (2005) Inventário florestal da vegetação natural do Estado de São Paulo. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Instituto Florestal, Imprensa Oficial, São Paulo
Lacerda ACR, Tomas WM, Marinho-Filho J (2009) Domestic dogs as an edge effect in the Brasília National Park, Brazil: interactions with native mammals. Anim Conserv 12:477–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00277.x
Lessa I, Corrêa Seabra Guimarães T, de Godoy Bergallo H et al (2016) Domestic dogs in protected areas: a threat to Brazilian mammals? Nat Conserv 14:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2016.05.001
Mazzolli M (2009) Mountain lion Puma concolor attacks on a maned wolf Chrysocyon brachyurus and a domestic dog in a forestry system. Mastozoología Neotrop 16:465–470
Melo ACG, Durigan G (2011) Plano de manejo da Estação Ecológica de Santa Bárbara. Instituto Florestal/Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, São Paulo
Mendes AF, Mendes AF, Igari AT et al (2009) Plano de manejo do Parque Estadual de Vassununga. Governo do Estado de São Paulo, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Instituto Florestal, Fundação Florestal, São Paulo
Meredith M, Ridout M (2017) Overview of the overlap package. R Proj 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.09.005
Olifiers N, Bianchi RDC, Mourão GDM, Gompper ME (2009) Construction of arboreal nests by brown-nosed coatis, Nasua nasua (Carnivora: Procyonidae) in the Brazilian Pantanal. Zoologia 26:571–574. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702009000300023
Palomares, Caro (1999) Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Am Nat 153:492–508. https://doi.org/10.2307/2463664
Parsons AW, Bland C, Forrester T et al (2016) The ecological impact of humans and dogs on wildlife in protected areas in eastern North America. Biol Conserv 203:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.001
Paschoal AMO, Massara RL, Bailey LL et al (2016) Use of Atlantic Forest protected areas by free-ranging dogs: estimating abundance and persistence of use. Ecosphere 7:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1480
Phillips RB, Wiedenfeld DA, Snell HL (2012) Current status of alien vertebrates in the Galápagos Islands: invasion history, distribution, and potential impacts. Biol Invasions 14:461–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0090-z
Presley SJ (2000) Eira barbara. Mamm Species 636:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1410(2000)636<0001:eb>2.0.co;2
Ramesh T, Kalle R, Downs CT (2017) Staying safe from top predators: patterns of co-occurrence and inter-predator interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2271-y
Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 14:322–337. https://doi.org/10.1198/jabes.2009.08038
Ritchie EG, Dickman CR, Letnic M, Vanak AT (2014) Dogs as a predators and trophic regulators. In: Gompper ME (ed) Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 55–68
Sepúlveda M, Pelican K, Cross P, Eguren A, Singer R (2015) Fine-scale movements of rural free-ranging dogs in conservation areas in the temperate rainforest of the coastal range of southern Chile. Mamm Biol 80:290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.03.001
Serpell J (2017) From paragon to pariah: cross-cultural perspectives on attitudes to dogs. In: Serpell J (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behavior and interactions with people, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 300–316
Shida CN, Pivello VR (2002) Caracterização fisiográfica e de uso das terras da região de Luiz Antônio e Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, SP, com o uso de sensoriamento remoto e SIG. Investig Geográficas, Bol Del Inst Geogr 49:27–42
Silva KVKA, Kenup CF, Kreischer C et al (2018) Who let the dogs out? Occurrence, population size and daily activity of domestic dogs in an urban Atlantic Forest reserve. Perspect Ecol Conserv 16:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.09.001
Silva-Rodríguez EA, Sieving KE (2011) Influence of care of domestic carnivores on their predation on vertebrates. Conserv Biol 25:808–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01690.x
Silva-Rodríguez EA, Sieving KE (2012) Domestic dogs shape the landscape-scale distribution of a threatened forest ungulate. Biol Conserv 150:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.008
Srbek-Araujo AC, Chiarello AG (2007) Armadilhas fotográficas na amostragem de mamíferos: considerações metodológias e comparação de equipamentos. Rev Bras Zool 24:647–656. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752007000300016
Torres SG, Mansfield TM, Foley JE, Lupo T (1996) Mountain lion and human activity in California: testing speculations. Wildl Soc Bull 24:451–460
Vanak AT, Gompper ME (2009a) Dietary niche separation between sympatric free-ranging domestic dogs and Indian foxes in Central India. J Mammal 90:1058–1065. https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-107.1
Vanak AT, Gompper MEME (2009b) Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition. Mammal Rev 39:265–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2009.00148.x
Vanak AT, Gompper ME (2010) Interference competition at the landscape level the effect of free-ranging dogs on a native mesocarnivore. J Appl Ecol 47:1225–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01870.x
Vanak AT, Thaker M, Gompper ME (2009) Experimental examination of behavioural interactions between free-ranging wild and domestic canids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0845-z
Vanak AT, Dickman CR, Silva-Rodriguez EA et al (2014) Top-dogs and under-dogs: competition between dogs and sympatric carnivores. In: Gompper ME (ed) Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 69–93
Weston MA, Fitzsimons JA, Wescott G, Miller KK, Ekanayake KB, Schneider T (2014) Bark in the park: a review of domestic dogs in parks. Environ Manag 54:373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0311-1
Zapata-Ríos G, Branch LC (2016) Altered activity patterns and reduced abundance of native mammals in sites with feral dogs in the high Andes. Biol Conserv 193:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.016
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the trainees and Furnas do Bom Jesus State Park workers for their assistance with fieldwork. We are also grateful to São Paulo State University (Campus Jaboticabal) for logistic support and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development for graduate scholarships.
Funding
This study was funded by São Paulo Research Foundation (Proc. nº. 2013/18526-9; Internships Abroad scholarship Proc. nº. 2018/07886-6; undergraduate student scholarships Proc. n°. 2017/06060-6, 2017/03501-1, 2018/15793-0) and Rio de Janeiro Research Foundation (Proc. nº. E26/112.115/2013; Programa Jovens Talentos Processo Proc. nº. 23,038.009833/2012-56).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 117 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Cassia Bianchi, R., Olifiers, N., Riski, L.L. et al. Dog activity in protected areas: behavioral effects on mesocarnivores and the impacts of a top predator. Eur J Wildl Res 66, 36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-020-01376-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-020-01376-z