Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasonic device effectiveness in keeping rodents off the road

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finding achievable ways to reduce roads’ impacts on wildlife is a conservation priority. Road verges may be important refuges for small fauna, making them good hunting sites for predators. These make both prey and predators vulnerable to vehicle collisions. Thus, actions aiming to dissuade these animals from approaching roads are needed. Here we tested the effectiveness of ultrasonic devices to keep rodents away from the road verges. We hypothesised that exposing rodents to ultrasounds will cause them to stay away from the device and, consequently, from the road. We sampled rodents before and after the devices were switched on. Our results showed a reduction in animal activity after 10 days with the devices on. The next step is to analyse if this behaviour translates in a reduction of wildlife-vehicle collisions of rodents and their predators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Aflitto N, DeGomez T (2014) Sonic pest repellents. Coll Agric Life Sci:1–4

  • Bomford M, O’Brien PH (1990) Sonic deterrents in animal damage control: a review of device tests and effectiveness. Wildl Soc Bull 18:411–422

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo G, van der Ree R (2015) Use of reflectors and auditory deterrents to prevent wildlife-vehicle collisions. Handbook of road ecology 1st edn. R van der Ree, DJ Smith, C Grilo (eds) pp 213–218

  • Fox S, Potts JM, Pemberton D, Crosswell D (2018) Roadkill mitigation: trialing virtual fence devices on the west coast of Tasmania. Aust Mammal 41(2):205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev GZ, Koev K, Stoyanov V, Petrov V (2018) Electronic rat-control devices-solution or scam? Results of field trials and a summary of the literary data. Arhiv Veterinarske Med 11:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves J, Rowe F (1969) Responses of confined rodent populations to an ultrasound generator. J Wildl Manag 33:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilo C, Reto D, Filipe J et al (2014) Understanding the mechanisms behind road effects: linking occurrence with road mortality in owls. Anim Conserv 17:555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gouar P, Schekkerman H, van der Jeugd H et al (2011) Long-term trends in survival of a declining population: the case of the little owl (Athene noctua) in the Netherlands. Oecologia 166:369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclean DK (1974) The effects of ultrasound on the behaviour of commensal rodents with a discussion of its potential in management and control programs. Dissertation, Simon Fraser University

  • Martinig AR, McLaren AAD (2019) Vegetated highway medians as foraging habitat for small mammals. Wildl Soc Bull 43:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto-Correia T, Ribeiro N, Sá-Sousa P (2011) Introducing the montado, the cork and holm oak agroforestry system of Southern Portugal. Agrofor Syst 82:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portfors CV (2007) Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice. J Am Ass Lab Anim Sci 46:28–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/

  • Ruiz-Capillas P, Mata C, Malo JE (2013) Road verges are refuges for small mammal populations in extensively managed Mediterranean landscapes. Biol Conserv 158:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabino-Marques H, Mira A (2011) Living on the verge: are roads a more suitable refuge for small mammals than streams in Mediterranean pastureland? Ecol Res 26:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos SM, Carvalho F, Mira A (2011) How long do the dead survive on the road? Carcass persistence probability and implications for road-kill monitoring surveys. PLoS One 6(9)

  • Santos SM, Marques JT, Lourenço A et al (2015) Sampling effects on the identification of roadkill hotspots: implications for survey design. J Environ Manag 162:87–95

  • Shumake SA (1997) Electronic rodent repellent devices: a review of efficacy test protocols and regulatory actions. In: Mason JR (ed) Repellents in Wildlife Management, pp 253–270

  • Sprock CM, Howard WE, Jacob FC (1967) Sound as a deterrent to rats and mice. J Wildl Manag 31:729–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valitzski SA, D’Angelo GJ, Gallagher GR et al (2009) Deer responses to sounds from a vehicle-mounted sound-production system. Manag Conserv Note 73(7):1072–1076

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank colleagues T Pinto, LG Sousa, N Fernandes, E Ferreira, R Raimundo and P Lourenço. This work was funded by LIFE LINES LIFE14 NAT/PT/001081. NS is supported by a CEEC contract (CEECIND/02213/2017) from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia. DSG and HR were supported by research grants by LIFE LINES.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Sousa-Guedes.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Road Ecology

Guest Editor: Marcello D’Amico

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 630 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 663 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sousa-Guedes, D., Ribeiro, H., Vaz-Freire, M.T. et al. Ultrasonic device effectiveness in keeping rodents off the road. Eur J Wildl Res 66, 23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-020-1361-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-020-1361-8

Keywords

Navigation