Skip to main content
Log in

Modified Calibration Coefficients of Two-Port CPW Standards with Superstrate Effects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calibration standards are used for the calibration of a vector network analyzer to characterize the microwave components under test. For the direct characterization of coplanar waveguide components, two-port CPW open, short and line are proposed to complement the existing calibration techniques. The developed CPW standards are characterized in the frequency range of 10 MHz to 10 GHz. As these are planar structures, effects of small superstrates on the calibration coefficients of open and short are studied also. The CPW line has shown slight changes in impedance due to superstrates, whereas a few calibration coefficients of open and short standards showed dependence on superstrates. Similar observations are noted by improving the polynomial models of CPW open and short standards up to fifth and sixth order, respectively, which better matches for CPW standards. The reported results are helpful to estimate any change in the measurement uncertainty on using such calibration standards due to superstrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Wolff, Coplanar microwave integrated circuits, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley (2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Beilenhoff, H. Klingbeil, W. Heinrich and H. L. Hartnagel, Open and short circuits in Coplanar MMIC’s, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 41(9) (1993), 1534–1536.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H.-T. Lue and T.-Y. Tseng, Application of on-wafer TRL calibration on the measurement of microwave properties of Ba0.5Sr0.5TiO3 thin films, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Cont. 48(6) (2001) 1640–1647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M.-H. Mao, R.-B. Wu, C.-H. Chen and C.-H. Lin, Characterization of Coplanar waveguide open end capacitance-theory and experiment. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theo. Tech. 42(6) (1994) 1016–1024.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Leroux, J.-M. Belquin, R.D. Pollard, C.M. Snowden and M.J. Howes, The implementation of calibration on coplanar waveguide for on-wafer measurements at W-band, IEEE MTT-S Dig. 3 (1996) 1395–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.K. Walker and D.F. Williams, Compensation for geometrical variations in coplanar waveguide probe-tip calibration. IEEE Micro. Guid. Wave Lett. 7(4) (1997), 97–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Imparato, T. Weller and L. Dunleavy, On-wafer calibration using space-conservative (SOLT) standards, IEEE MTT-S Digest 4 (1999) 1643–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Rumiantsev, R. Doerner and S. Thies, Calibration standards verification procedure using the calibration comparison technique, in Proceedings of the 36th European microwave conference (EuMA), Manchester UK, pp. 489–491 (2006).

  9. A.O. Bechir and D. Vincent, Designing TRL standards for accurate measurements of 120° accesses CPW devices, MIKON 2016, Krakow (2016).

  10. K. Hamze, D. Pasquet, P. Descamps and E.D. Ledinghen, Theoretical comparison between calibration standards using straight and bended CPW’s, 13th international conference on advanced technologies, systems and services in telecommunications (TELSIKS), Nis, Serbia, Oct 18–20, pp. 150–153 (2017).

  11. T.D. Pham, D. Allal, F. Ziadé and E. Bergeault, Designing coupled coplanar waveguide standards for on-wafer mixed-mode S-parameter measurement, in 18th international congress of metrology, 07009 (2017).

  12. Understanding VNA Calibration, Part No 111410-00673A, Rev A, Anritsu Company, July 2012.

  13. Application Note 1287-1, Specifying Calibration Standards and Kits for Agilent Vector Network Analyzers, Agilent Technologies, Inc., August 31, 2009.

  14. Hiebel M, Fundamentals of vector network analysis. Rohde & Schwarz, Munich (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. U. Arz and K. Kuhlmann, Uncertainties in Coplanar waveguide and microstrip line standards for on-wafer thru-reflect-line calibrations, in 75th ARFTG microwave measurement conference, Anaheim, CA, pp. 1–5 (2010).

  16. M.J. Salter and N.M. Ridler, Measuring the capacitance coefficient of coaxial open-circuits with traceability to national standards, Microw. J., 49(10) (2006), 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.M. Pozar, Microwave engineering, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley 2012, pp. 430–436.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Zhang and T.Y. Hsiang, Extraction of Subterahertz transmission-line parameters of Coplanar waveguides, PIERs Online, 3(7) (2007) pp. 1102–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Patel and P.K. Tyagi, Optical effective mass of photon in single and bilayer graphene in 10 MHz–26.5 GHz frequency range, Carbon, 121 (2017) 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Patel and P.K. Tyagi, Single layer graphene possessing anomalous dispersion with exotic microwave transmission and dielectric properties, J. Alloys Comp. 706 (2017), 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Klingbeil and W. Heinrich, Calculation of CPW A.C. resistance and inductance using a quasi-static mode-matching approach, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theo. Tech., 42(6) (1994), 1004–1007.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. D.F. Williams and T.H. Miers, De-embedding Coplanar probes with planar distributed standards, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 36(12) (1988), 1876–1880.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. J.S. Kang, J.H. Kim and D.C. Kim, Phase analysis of coaxial short and open circuits, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 54(2) (2005), 701–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A.K. Geim and K.S. Novoselov, The rise of graphene, Nat. Mater.,6 (2007) 183–197.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J.L.Huynh, S. Tenney and K. Wong, Choosing an appropriate calibration method for vector network analysis, Agilent Measurement Journal, issue four, Agilent Technologies (2008) pp. 38–45.

  26. D. Rytting, Advances in microwave error correction techniques, in Proceedings of Hewlett–Packard RF and microwave measurement symposium and exhibition (1987) pp. 6201–6302.

  27. EA guidelines on the evaluation of vector network analyzers (VNA), Publication reference EUROMET/cg-12/v0.1, 2007.

  28. R. Collier and D. Skinner, Microwave Measurements, 3rd ed., IET Publication, Thiruvananthapuram (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Patel and P.S. Negi, Estimation of complex and linear uncertainities in S-parameter measurements for metrology applications, Int. J. Electromagn. Appl. 2(5) (2012), 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by University of Delhi under R & D Scheme 2015-16 (RC/2015/9677 dated 15/10/2015). Mr. Pulkit Sharma has helped in developing these standards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamlesh Patel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, K., Singh, P., Patel, S.M. et al. Modified Calibration Coefficients of Two-Port CPW Standards with Superstrate Effects. MAPAN 35, 87–96 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-019-00348-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-019-00348-2

Keywords

Navigation