Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Difficulties to identify global and local key biodiversity areas in diverse and isolated marine jurisdictions

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodiversity conservation requires efficient methods to be integrated into environmental management planning. The Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) approach has been recently developed for identifying sites of greatest conservation importance. They are regarded as priorities for management intervention and for identifying investment priorities. While the KBA approach has been extensively used to identify locations of high biodiversity significance in the terrestrial realm, this methodology is scarcely known by stakeholders in marine jurisdictions. Identification of a network of KBA sites should be regarded as a high priority in diverse and isolated areas, such as oceanic islands. In the Canary Islands (NE Atlantic Ocean), a number of KBA sites are here identified across the archipelago using irreplaceability and vulnerability criteria to safeguard populations of threatened marine species. If global standards associated with the IUCN Red List are considered, only nesting beaches and regular feeding grounds of sea turtles (Caretta caretta and Chelonia mydas) qualify as KBAs. However, this approach overlooks most of the biodiversity hotspots in the Canary archipelago that include representative ecosystems of volcanic islands (e.g. marine caves) or habitats with high conservation importance in terms of productivity, regional rarity and diversity (e.g. seagrass meadows and maërl seabeds), as well as presence of locally threatened species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldanondo N, González-González R, Gil-Rodríguez MC (2003) Acerca de Cystoseira tamariscifolia en Tenerife y La Palma (Islas Canarias). Rev Acad Canar Cienc 15(3):115–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambal R, Duya GR, Cruz MV, Coroza MA, Vergara OG, Silva SG, Molinyawe N, Tabaranza B (2012) Key biodiversity areas in the Philippines: priorities for conservation. J Thread Taxa 4:2788–2796

    Google Scholar 

  • Anadón-Irizarry V, Wege DC, Upgren A, Young R, Boom B, León YM, Arias Y, Koenig K, Morales AL, Burke W, Pérez-Leroux A, Levy C, Koenig S, Gape L, Moore P (2012) Sites for priority biodiversity conservation in the Caribbean Islands. Biodiversity Hotspot J Thread Taxa 4:2806–2844

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzellino A, Fossi MC, Gaspari S, Lanfredi C, Lauriano G, Marsili L, Panigada S, Podestà M (2014) An index based on the biodiversity of cetacean species to assess the environmental status of marine ecosystems. Mar Env Res 100:94–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Bas A, Jacob C, Hay J, Pioch S, Thorin S (2016) Improving marine biodiversity offsetting: a proposed methodology for better assessing losses and gains. J Env Manag 175:46–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass D, Anderson P, De Silva N (2011) Applying thresholds to identify key biodiversity areas for marine turtles in Melanesia. Anim Conserv 14:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancort-Villalba B, González-Henríquez MN, Haroun R, Soler E, Viera-Rodríguez MA (1995) Adiciones corológicas a la flora marina de Canarias. Bot Macaron 22:75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkett DA, Maggs CA, Dring MJ. (1998) Mäerl (volume V). An overview of dynamic and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs Scottish Association for Marine Science (UK Marine SACs Project), 116 pp.

  • Boersma PD, Parrish JK (1999) Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution. Ecol Econ 31:287–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack JA, Ault JS (1996) Management strategies to conserve marine biodiversity. Oceanography 9:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd C, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, Edgar GJ, de Fonseca GAB, Hawkins F, Hoffman M, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, van Dijk PP (2008) Scale and the conservation of threatened species. Conserv Lett 1:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Villa T, Sansón M, Afonso-Carrillo J (2004) Vegetative and reproductive morphology of Sargassum orotavicum sp. nov. (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) from the Canary Islands (eastern Atlantic Ocean). Bot Mar 47:471–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann OE, Gouveia L, Pérez JA, Gil-Rodríguez MC, Serrao EA (2010) The posible origin of Zostera noltii in the Canary Islands and guidelines for restoration. Mar Biol 157(9):2109–2115

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn DC, Ardron J, Bax N, Bernal P, Cleary J, Cresswell I, Donnelly B, Dunstan P, Gjerde K, Johnson D, Kaschner K, Lascelles B, Rice J, von Nordheim H, Wood L, Halpin PN (2014) The convention on biological Diversity's ecologically or biologically significant areas: origins, development, and current status. Mar Pol 49:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar GJ, Banks S, Bensted-Smith R, Calvopina M, Chiriboga A, Garske LE, Henderson S, Miller KA, Salazar S (2008) Conservation of threatened species in the Galapagos marine reserve through identification and protection of marine key biodiversity areas. Aquat Conserv 18:955–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Eken G, Bennun L, Brooks TM, Darwall W, Fishpool LDC, Foster MS, Knox D, Langhammer P, Matiku P, Radoford E, Salaman P, Sechrest W, Smith ML, Spector S, Tordoff A (2004) Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience 54:1110–1118

    Google Scholar 

  • Elahi R, O’Connor MI, Jarrett EK, Byrnes JEK, Dunic J, Eriksson BK, Hensel MJS, Kearns PJ (2015) Recent trends in local-scale marine biodiversity reflect community structure and human impacts. Curr Biol 25:1938–1943

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri F, Espino F, Herrera R, Moro L, Haroun R, Riera R, González-Henríquez N, Bergasa O, Monterroso O, Ruiz de la Rosa M, Tuya F (2015) Trends of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa (Magnoliophyta) in the Canary Islands: population changes in the last two decades. Sci Mar 79:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster J, Lake IR, Watkinson AR, Gill JA (2011) Marine biodiversity in the Caribbean UK overseas territories: perceived threats and constraints to environmental management. Mar Pol 35:647–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster et al (2012) The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard. J Thread Taxa 4:2733–2744

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach J (2008) Setting conservation priorities – a key biodiversity areas analysis for the Seychelles Islands. The Open Conserv Biol J 2:44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Lorenzo G, Brito A, Sancho A, Barquín J, Hernández CA, García-Braun JA (2002) Ecological characterization and fauna composition of the cave of los Cerebros (southeast of Tenerife). Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Flora and Fauna of Atlantic Islands, Cape Verde, 9-13 September

  • González-Lorenzo G, Mesa E, Pérez-Dionis G, Brito A, Galvan B, Barquín J (2015) Ineffective conservation threatens Patella candei, an endangered limpet endemic to the Macaronesian islands. Biol Conserv 192:428–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ, Byrnes JEK, Hungate BA, Matulich KL, Gonzalez A, Duffy JE, Gamfeldt L, O’Connor MI (2012) A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486:105–108

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2015) IUCN standard for the identification of key biodiversity areas, version 1.0. First edition. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 22 + iii pp.

  • Langhammer PF, et al. (2007) Identification and gap analysis of key biodiversity areas: targets for comprehensive protected area systems. IUCN best practice protected areas guidelines series n° 15, Gland: IUCN

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Donnelly M (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín JL (2009) Are the IUCN standard home-range thresholds for species a good indicator to prioritise conservation urgency in small islands? A case study in the Canary Islands (Spain). J Nat Conserv 17:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-García L, González-Lorenzo G, Brito-Izquierdo IT, Barquín-Diez J (2013) Use of topographic predictors for macrobenthic community mapping in the Marine Reserve of La Palma (Canary Islands, Spain). Ecol Model 263:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez A, González BC, Núñez J, Wilkens H, Oromí P, Iliffe TM, Worsaae K. (2016) Guide to the anchihaline ecosystems of los Jameos del Agua and Túnel de la Atlántida. Cabildo de Lanzarote, Área de Medio Ambiente, ISBN: 978-84-95938-92-3

  • Moro, L., et al. (2003). Lista de especies marinas de Canarias. Gobierno de Canarias. Consejería de Política Territorial y Medio Ambiente, Gesplan S.A.

  • Norse EA (1995) Maintaining the world’s marine biological diversity. Bull Mar Sci 57:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez J, Brito MC, Riera R, Docoito JR, Monterroso O (2003) Distribución actual de las poblaciones de Patella candei D’Orbigny, 1840 (Mollusca, Gastropoda) en las islas Canarias. Una especie en peligro de extinción Bol Inst Esp Ocean 19(1–4):371–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MNA (1992) Diversity of ocean life: an evaluative review. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C.

  • Pinedo S, Sansón M, Afonso-Carrillo J (1992) Algas marinas bentónicas de Puerto de La Cruz (antes Puerto Orotava), Tenerife (Islas Canarias). Vieraea 21:29–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Riera R, Becerro MA, Stuart-Smith R, Delgado JD, Edgar GJ (2014) Out of sight, out of mind: threats to the marine biodiversity of the Canary Islands (NE Atlantic Ocean). Mar Poll Bull 86:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumeu B, Pérez-Pérez JA, Hernández-Ferrer M, Gil-Rodríguez MC (2007) Caracterización genética de Zostera noltii (Zosteraceae, Magnoliophyta) en Lanzarote, islas Canarias. Vieraea 35:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR, Alcalá AC (1996) Do marine reserves export adult fish biomass? Evidence from Apo Island, Central Philippines. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 132:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan EV, Bridger D, Attrill MJ (2015) The ecosystem service value of living versus dead biogenic reef. Est Coast Shelf Sci 154:248–254

    Google Scholar 

  • de Silva N, Bass DK (2011) Nesting conservation priorities by geographic scale: preliminary lessons from the application of percent thresholds to the identification of key diversity areas for marine turtles in Melanesia. An Conserv 14:16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas HL, Macsharry B, Morgan L, Kingston N, Moffitt R, Stanwell-Smith D, Wood L (2014) Evaluating official marine protected area coverage for Aichi target 11: appraising the data and methods that define our progress. Aquat Conserv 24:8–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ticco PC (1995) The use of marine protected areas to preserve and enhance marine biological diversity. A case study approach. Coast Manag 23:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Tordoff AW, Baltzer MC, Fellowes JR, Pilgrim JD, Langhammer PF (2012) Key biodiversity areas in the indo-Burma hotspot: process, Progress and future directions. J Thread Taxa 4:2779–2787

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuya F, Hernández-Zerpa H, Espino F, Haroun RJ (2013) Drastic decadal decline of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa at gran Canaria (eastern Atlantic): interactions with the green algae Caulerpa prolifera. Aquat Bot 105:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuya F, Ribeiro-Leite L, Arto-Cuesta N, Coca J, Haroun R, Espino F (2014) Decadal changes in the structure of Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows: natural vs. human influences. Est Coast Shelf Sc 137:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • White AT (1986) Marine reserves: how effective as management strategies for Philippine, Indonesian and Malaysian coral reef environments. Ocean Manag 10:137–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm T, Sheppard CRC, Sheppard ALS, Gaymer CF, Parks J, Wagner D, Lewis N (2014) Large marine protected areas – advantages and challenges of going big. Aquat Conserv 24:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright A, Stacey N, Holland P (2006) The cooperative framework for ocean and coastal management in the Pacific Islands: effectiveness, constraints and future direction. Ocean Coast Manag 49:739–763

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To the Environmental Agency of the Canarian Government for the conservation efforts conducted throughout the last decades to preserve biodiversity hotspots in the Canary Islands. To the Ministry of Environment (MAGRAMA) to coordinate the current network of SACs in the Canary archipelago. To Prof. G. Edgar (IMAS, Australia) for providing insights and interchange of ideas on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Riera.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riera, R., Delgado, J.D., Moro, L. et al. Difficulties to identify global and local key biodiversity areas in diverse and isolated marine jurisdictions. J Coast Conserv 24, 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-020-00732-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-020-00732-0

Keywords

Navigation