Skip to main content
Log in

Towards Secure and Efficient Scientific Research Project Management Using Consortium Blockchain

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of the knowledge economy, science and technology play an increasingly crucial role in social development. Investment from the government and the enterprise in scientific research has increased significantly, and the number of scientific research projects has also shown an obvious upward trend. Due to the lack of a standardized and unified scientific research project management program, many projects are overdue or even failed, and project fund management is confused. Besides, output results are limited and the actual conversion rate is low. In this paper, we propose a scientific research project management system based on consortium blockchain. Firstly, the process of scientific research project management is standardized. According to this specification, we then design a scientific research project management system in line with consortium blockchain, the smart contract, and the IPFS system. By using these technologies, we have coped with two major problems in traditional scientific project management: breach of contract and confidentiality. The simulation results show that compared with the conventional scientific research project management, the scheme proposed in this paper can significantly enhance the efficiency and the success rate of the project, and reduce the time and manpower consumed in the process of project implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlemann, F., Arbi, F.E., Kaiser, M.G., Heck, A. (2013). A process framework for theoretically grounded prescriptive research in the project management field. International Journal of Project Management, 31 (1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.008. The International Network for Business and Management Journals (INBAM) 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali, M.S., Dolui, K., Antonelli, F. (2017). Iot data privacy via blockchains and ipfs. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on the internet of things (p. 14): ACM.

  3. Benet, J. (2014). Ipfs-content addressed, versioned, p2p file system. arXiv:https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.3561.

  4. Brito, I.P., Tropaldi, L., Carbonari, C.A., Velini, E.D. (2018). Hormetic effects of glyphosate on plants. Pest Management Science, 74(5), 1064–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., Kalyanaraman, V., et al. (2016). Blockchain technology: beyond bitcoin. Applied Innovation, 2(6-10), 71.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dai, P., Mahi, N., Earls, J., Norta, A. (2017). Smart-contract value-transfer protocols on a distributed mobile application platform. https://qtum.org/uploads/files/cf6d69348ca50dd985b60425ccf282f3.pdf p. 10.

  8. Eberle, A., Meyer, H., Rosen, D. (2011). A comparison of pmi and ipma approaches. Analysis to support the project management standard and certification system selection.

  9. Gao, F., Zhu, L., Shen, M., Sharif, K., Wan, Z., Ren, K. (2018). A blockchain-based privacy-preserving payment mechanism for vehicle-to-grid networks. IEEE Network, 32(6), 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, Y., & Liang, C. (2016). Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hahn, A., Singh, R., Liu, C.C., Chen, S. (2017). Smart contract-based campus demonstration of decentralized transactive energy auctions. In 2017 IEEE Power & energy society innovative smart grid technologies conference (ISGT) (pp. 1–5): IEEE.

  12. Hope, J. (2018). Issue secure digital credentials using technology behind bitcoin. The Successful Registrar, 17 (11), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hukkinen, T., Mattila, J., Ilomäki, J., Seppälä, T., et al. (2017). A blockchain application in energy. ETLA Reports, 71.

  14. Xu, J., Xue, K., Li, S., Tian, H., Hong, J., Hong, P., Yu, N. (2019). Healthchain: a blockchain-based privacy preserving scheme for large-scale health data. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5), 8770–8781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jamali, G., & Oveisi, M. (2016). A study on project management based on pmbok and prince2. Modern Applied Science, 10(6), 142–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jessup, C.B., Moore, S.C., Palozzi, G., Stefanski, P.A., Trisko, S.D., Wilkie, L.E. (2010). Method, system and program product for assessing a product development project employing a computer-implemented evaluation tool. US Patent 7,680,682.

  17. Jirgensons, M., & Kapenieks, J. (2018). Blockchain and the future of digital learning credential assessment and management. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen, M., Ma, B., Zhu, L., Mijumbi, R., Du, X., Hu, J. (2017). Cloud-based approximate constrained shortest distance queries over encrypted graphs with privacy protection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 13(4), 940–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matos, S., & Lopes, E. (2013). Prince2 or pmbok–a question of choice. Procedia Technology, 9, 787–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McCorry, P., Shahandashti, S.F., Hao, F. (2017). A smart contract for boardroom voting with maximum voter privacy. In International conference on financial cryptography and data security (pp. 357–375): Springer.

  21. Mir, F.A., & Pinnington, A.H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. (cited on pp. 15 and 87) (2017).

  23. Savelyev, A. (2017). Contract law 2.0:‘smart’contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law. Information & Communications Technology Law, 26(2), 116–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen, M., Deng, Y., Zhu, L., Du, X., Guizani, N. (2019). Privacy-preserving image retrieval for medical iot systems: a blockchain-based approach. IEEE Network, 33(5), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shen, M., Tang, X., Zhu, L., Du, X., Guizani, M. (2019). Privacy-preserving support vector machine training over blockchain-based encrypted iot data in smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

  26. Shen, M., Zhang, J., Zhu, L., Xu, K., Tang, X., Liu, H. (2019). Security svm training over vertically-partitioned datasets using consortium blockchain for vehicular social networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 1–10.

  27. Toljaga-Nikolić, D., Obradović, V., Mihić, M. (2011). Certification of project managers based on ipma and pmi models through conforming to iso 17024: 2003 1. Management (1820-0222) (59).

  28. Turk, ž, & Klinc, R. (2017). Potentials of blockchain technology for construction management. Procedia Engineering, 196, 638–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Guan, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhu, L., Wu, L., Yu, S. (2019). Effect: An efficient flexible privacy-preserving data aggregation scheme with authentication in smart grid. Science China Information Sciences, 62(3), 32103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guan, Z., Liu, X., Wu, L., Wu, J., Xu, R., Zhang, J., Li, Y. (2020). Cross-lingual multi-keyword rank search with semantic extension over encrypted data. Information Sciences, 514, 523–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Y., Kasahara, S., Shen, Y., Jiang, X., Wan, J. (2018). Smart contract-based access control for the internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2), 1594–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., Wang, H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: architecture, consensus, and future trends. In 2017 IEEE International congress on big data (BigData congress) (pp. 557–564): IEEE.

  33. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.N., Chen, X., Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu, L., Tang, X., Shen, M., Du, X., Guizani, M. (2018). Privacy-preserving ddos attack detection using cross-domain traffic in software defined networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 36(3), 628–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qiu, M., Sha, E.H.-M., Liu, M., Lin, M., Hua, S., Yang, L.T. (2008). Energy minimization with loop fusion and multi-functional-unit scheduling for multidimensional dsp. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 68(4), 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, J., Ming, Z., Qiu, M., Quan, G., Qin, X., Chen, T. (2011). Resource allocation robustness in multi-core embedded systems with inaccurate information. Journal of Systems Architecture, 57(9), 840–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shao, Z., Xue, C., Zhuge, Q., Qiu, M., Xiao, B., Sha, E.H.-M. (2006). Security protection and checking for embedded system integration against buffer overflow attacks via hardware/software. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 55(4), 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingfeng Meng.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, Q., Sun, R. Towards Secure and Efficient Scientific Research Project Management Using Consortium Blockchain. J Sign Process Syst 93, 323–332 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-020-01529-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-020-01529-y

Keywords

Navigation