Abstract
This paper considers the links between the city size and transformation of inherited socialist large housing estates within the process of post-socialist urban changes in Serbia. Based on the theoretical and contextual framework, we investigate the following: (1) whether there is a relationship between different city sizes and types, pace and intensity of large housing estates physical and functional transformations, and (2) which type(s) of transformation are dominant in different city size categories. To highlight the relationship, this research draws on the empirical evidence from cities which represent four city size categories in Serbia: Belgrade (capital city), Nis (second-tier city), Leskovac (third-tier city), and Bor (fourth-tier city). Research reveals that transformation of large housing estates is shaped by an unregulated urban environment, relaxed legal culture, and entrepreneurial attitudes of the local authorities to urban planning. Recognizing the power of specific local imperatives, the investigation indicates the interrelation between a certain city size and types and intensity of transformations—they are most diverse in the capital, while diversities decrease with the cities downsizing. Dominant transformation types also vary, reflecting the city categories and their economic power—those that require high/moderate investments and involve many actors dominate in the capital and the second-tier city, while the types based on small individual actions and investments dominate in the third and the fourth-tier city. This initial research aimed to create a platform for further investigation that will provide broader insights into this underrepresented issue and set the ground for urban regeneration strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Law on Territorial Organization of the Republic of Serbia (2007, 2016, 2018) recognizes the following territorial units: (1) municipalities, (2) cities, and (3) city of Belgrade, where the city is considered as “a territorial unit established by this law, which represents an economic, administrative, geographical and cultural centre of a wider area and has more than 100,000 inhabitants. Exceptionally, where there are particular economic, geographical or historical reasons, it may be established that a city and a territorial unit having a population of less than 100,000 are subject to all other criteria provided for by law” (Paragraph 17). Leskovac and Bor received status of the city based on this criterion.
References
Benkő, M., Balla, R., & Hory, G. (2018). Participatory place-making in the renewal of post-Communist large prefabricated housing estate: Újpalota case study, Budapest. Journal of Place Management and Development, 11(2), 223–241.
Bernt, M. (2009). Partners for demolition: The governance of urban renewal in East Germany’s shrinking cities. International Journal of Urban Regional Research, 33(3), 754–769.
Bodnar, J. (2001). Fin de Millenaire Budapest: Metamorphoses of urban life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Boren, T., & Gentile, M. (2007). Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler B, 89(2), 95–110.
Bouzarovski, S., Salukvadze, J., & Gentile, M. (2011). A socially resilient urban transition? The contested landscapes of apartment building extensions in two post-communist cities. Urban Studies, 48(13), 2689–2714.
Clapham, D., Hegedus, J., Kintrea, K., Tosics, I., & Kay, H. (Eds.). (1996). Housing privatisation in Eastern Europe. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Cox, E., & Longlands, S. (2016). City systems: The role of small and medium-sized towns and cities in growing the northern powerhouse. Spinningfields, Manchester: IPPR North.
Djukanovic, Z., & Zivkovic, J. (2017). BELGRADE: Belgrade in plural. In L. Pignatti & S. Gruosso (Eds.), Crossing sightlines/Traguardare L-Adriatico (pp. 130–140). Rome: AracneEditrice.
ESPON 1.4.1 Final Report. (2006). The Role of Small and Medium-Sized Towns (SMESTO). Wien, Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning: Oir, Nordregio, & NOMISMA.
Golubchikov, O., Badyina, A., & Makhrova, A. (2014). The hybrid spatialities of transition: Capitalism, legacy and uneven urban economic restructuring. Urban Studies, 51(4), 617–633.
Goodrick, D. (2014). Comparative case studies, methodological briefs: Impact evaluation 9. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
Gradska stambena agencija Nis (HACN). (2006). Stambeni profil grada Nisa [Housing Agency of the City of Nis—Housing Profile] Report. Nis: Grad Nis.
Gunko, M., Bogacheva, P., Medvedev, A., & Kashnitsky, I. (2018). Path-dependent development in mass housing in Moscow, Russia. In D. B. Hess, T. Tamaru, & M. van Hamm (Eds.), Housing estates in Europe—Poverty, ethnic segregation and policy challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.
Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hegedus, J., & Tosics, I. (1996). The disintegration of the East European housing model. In D. Clapham, J. Hegedus, K. Kintrea, I. Tosics, & H. Kay (Eds.), Housing privatization in eastern Europe (pp. 15–40). Westport: Greenwood Press.
Hess, D. B., & Tammaru, T. (Eds.). (2019). Housing estates in the Baltic countries: The legacy of central planning in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hess, D. B., Tammaru, T., & van Ham, M. (Eds.). (2018). Housing estates in Europe—poverty, ethnic segregation and policy challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hirt, S. (2009). Belgrade, Serbia. Cities, 26(5), 293–303.
Hirt, S. (2012). Iron curtains: Gates, suburbs and privatization of space in the post-socialist city. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kahrik, A., & Tammaru, T. (2010). Soviet prefabricated panel housing estates: Areas of continued social mix or decline? Case Tallinn. Housing Studies, 27(3), 201–219.
Kallus, R., & Law-Yone, H. (2000). What is a neighbourhood? The structure and function of an idea. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, 815–826.
Kovacz, Z., & Herfert, G. (2012). Development pathways of large housing estates in post-socialist cities: An international comparison. Housing Studies, 27(3), 324–342.
Lefebvre, H. (1974[1991]). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Mandic, S. (2001). Residential mobility versus ‘in-place’ adjustments in Slovenia: Viewpoint from a society ‘in transition’. Housing Studies, 16, 53–73.
Mandic, S. (2010). The changing role of housing assets in post-socialist countries. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 25(2), 213–226.
Marin, V., & Chelcea, L. (2018). Housing estate in Bucharest, Romania: A viable housing provider in Europe’s densest capital city. In D. B. Hess, T. Tamaru, & M. van Hamm (Eds.), Housing estates in Europe—poverty, ethnic segregation and policy challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.
Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2012). Planning institutions: Post-socialist home. In J. S. Smith (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of housing and home (pp. 202–208). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Petrovic, M. (2001). Post-socialist housing policy transformation in Yugoslavia and Belgrade. International Journal for Housing Policy, 1(2), 211–231.
Sailer-Fliege, U. (1999). Characteristics of post-socialist urban transformation in East Central Europe. Geo-Journal, 49, 7–16.
Simacek, P., Szczyrba, Z., Andrasko, I., & Kunv, J. (2015). Twenty-five years of humanising post-socialist housing estates. Geographica Polonica, 88(4), 649–668.
Smith, N. (1990). Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Soaita, A. M. (2012). Strategies for in situ home improvement in Romanian large housing estates. Housing Studies, 27(7), 1008–1030.
Struyk, R. (Ed.). (1996). Economic restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The case of housing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
Sýkora, L., & Bouzarovski, S. (2012). Multiple transformations: Conceptualizing the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49(1), 43–60.
Szafranska, E. (2014). Transformation of large housing estates in post-socialist city: The case of Lodz, Poland. Geographia Polonica, 87(1), 77–93.
Szelenyi, I. (1996). Cities under socialism and after. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, I. Szelenyi (Eds.), Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
Talen, E. (2019). Neighborhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Temelova, J., Novak, J., Ourednicek, M., & Puldova, P. (2011). Housing estates after socialism: Various Trajectories and inner differentiation. Urban Studies, 48(9), 1811–1834.
Teodorescu, D. (2018). The modern mahala: Making and living in Romania’s postsocialist slum. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 59(3), 436–461.
Tosics, I. (2004). Determinants and consequences of spatial change in Post-Socialist cities (Paper presented at the conference: Winds of Societal Change: Remaking Post-Communist Cities at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign).
Tsenkova, S. (2014). Planning trajectories in post-socialist cities: Patterns of divergence and change. Urban Research and Practice, 7(3), 278–301.
Usca, M. (2010). Urban activity spaces: The case of post-Soviet neighbourhood in Riga. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 129, 583–593.
Van Kempen, R., Dekker, K., Hall, S., & Tosics, I. (2005). Restructuring large housing estate in Europe—Restructuring and resistance inside the welfare industry. Bristol: Policy Press, University of Bristol.
Vasilevska, Lj, Milanovic, D., Nikolic, M., Vranic, P., & Milojkovic, A. (2015). “Garage capitalism” as a form and process of post-socialist urban changes: Its pace, intensity and structural characteristics. A case study of Nis, Serbia. Habitat International, 48, 149–158.
Vasilevska, Lj, Vranic, P., & Marinkovic, A. (2014). The effects of changes to the post-socialist urban planning framework on public open spaces in multi-story housing areas: A view from Nis, Serbia. Cities, 36, 83–92.
Vranic, P., Vasilevska, Lj, & Haas, T. (2016). Hybrid spatialities: Multi-storey extensions of socialist blocks of flats under post-socialist transition in Serbia, the case of Nis. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1261–1277.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA Sage Publications.
Zivkovic, J. (2014). Use-re-use: New Belgrade’s open spaces. In N. Cukovic-Ignjatovic & D. Ignjatovic (Eds.), Use-re-use: New Belgrade (pp. 53–56). Belgrade: University of Architecture Faculty of Belgrade.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vasilevska, L., Zivkovic, J., Vasilevska, M. et al. Revealing the relationship between city size and spatial transformation of large housing estates in post-socialist Serbia. J Hous and the Built Environ 35, 1099–1121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09734-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09734-8