Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Whose Justice is it Anyway? Mitigating the Tensions Between Food Security and Food Sovereignty

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the tensions between two disparate approaches to addressing hunger worldwide: Food security and food sovereignty. Food security generally focuses on ensuring that people have economic and physical access to safe and nutritious food, while food sovereignty (or food justice) movements prioritize the right of people and communities to determine their agricultural policies and food cultures. As food sovereignty movements grew out of critiques of food security initiatives, they are often framed as conflicting approaches within the wider literature. This paper explores this tension, arguing that food security is based on a particular model of justice, distributive justice, which limits the sovereignty and autonomy of communities as food producers and consumers. In contrast, food sovereignty movements view food security as a necessary part of food sovereignty, but ultimately insufficient for creating food sustainable communities and limiting wider harms. Rather than viewing food security and food sovereignty as in conflict, we argue that food sovereignty’s justice framework both encompasses and entails justice claims that guide food security projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note: this chapter draws on and expands some of the ideas in our short chapter (Murdock and Noll (2015)).

  2. Although it should be noted here that, as food sovereignty definitions arise out of local food movements, this definition could shift depending on the context and which specific movement we focus on. However, with this being said, La Via Campesina’s definition is often identified as one of the most widely accepted definitions of this term. With this being said, a common thread running through definitions of food sovereignty is that they place a wide-range of other issues above trade policies.

  3. The following analysis provides a general discussion of Indigenous methodologies and not is not meant to provide a detailed analysis of specific traditions, as this is beyond the scope of this paper. Specifically, the intention of this section is to begin a discussion, as this paper focuses on theoretical justice frameworks.

References

  • Ashley, J. M. (2016). Food security in the developing world. Cambridge: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H. (2014). Food sovereignty via the ‘peasant way’: A sceptical view. The Journal of Peasant Studies,41(6), 1031–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R., Saha, R., Mohai, P., & Wright, B. (2008). Toxic wastes and race at twenty: why race still matters after all of these years. Environmental Law,38(2), 371–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRITFC. (2012). Something fishy—but good—going on at CRITFC. Indiangiver (blog). November 14, 2012.

  • DeLind, L. B. (2011). Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agriculture and Human Values,28(2), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, A. (2008). The power of peasants: Reflections on the meanings of la vía Campesina. Journal of Rural Studies,24(2), 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2003). Trade reforms and food security: Conseptualizing the linkages. Rome: Foord and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age. New Left Review,1(212), 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S., & Patel, R. (2015). Food sovereignty as decolonization: Some contributions from indigenous movements to food system and development politics. Agriculture and Human Values,32(3), 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gryphon Publications. (1996). Heart of the people. Documentary.

  • Hoogeveen, D. (2015). Sub-Surface Property, Free-Entry Mineral Staking and Settler Colonialism in Canada. Antipode,47(1), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hormel, L., & Norgaard, K. (2009). Bring the Salmon Home! Karuk Challenges to Capitalist Incorporation|request PDF. Critical Sociology,35(3), 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyson, T. A. (2012). Civic agriculture: Reconnecting farm, food, and community. Paris: UPNE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. (1996). Food security: A post-modern perspective. Food Policy,21(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, A.P. (1995). Indigenous justice systems and tribal society. Judicature,79(3):126–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, A. (2011). Growing food and justice: Dismantling racism through sustainable food systems. In A. H. Alkon & J. Agyeman (Eds.), Cultivating food justice” race. Class, and sustainability (pp. 149–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, E., & Noll, S. (2015). Beyond access: Integrating food security and food sovereignty models for justice. In H. Rocklinsberg & P. Sandin (Eds.), Know your food: Food ethics and innovation. Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, S., & Werkheiser, I. (2017). Local food movements: Differing conceptions of food, people, and change. In A. Barnhill, T. Doggett, & M. Budolfson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of food ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert, M. P. (2009). Towards food sovereignty. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassi, M. (2017). Understanding food insecurity: Key features, indicators, and response design. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanbacher, W. D. (2010). The politics of food: The global conflict between food security and food sovereignty. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2011). Development as freedom. Fukuyama: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, T., Powell, B., Ickowitz, A., Foli, S., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Nasi, R., et al. (2013). Food security and nutrition: The role of forests. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Detroit Black Community Food Security Network. (2019). About us. DBCFSN. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from https://www.dbcfsn.org/about-us

  • Tuck, E., & Yang, W. K. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor|decolonization: Indigeneity, education & society. Decolonization: Ndigeneity, Education & Society,1(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of Human Rights. United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. Accessed Sept 2018.

  • United Nations. (1989). OHCHR|Convention on the rights of the Child. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx. Accessed Sept 2018.

  • Via Campesina. (2006). [Nyeleni] Declaration of Nyéléni. https://nyeleni.org/spip.php?article290

  • Wall, B. E. (2001). Navajo conceptions of justice in the Peacemaker Court. Journal of Social Philosophy,32(4), 532–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werkheiser, I., & Noll, S. (2014). From food justice to a tool of the Status quo: Three sub-movements within local food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,27, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, K. P. (2011). The recognition dimensions of environmental justice in indian country”. Environmental Justice,4(4), 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1988). Five faces of oppression. Philosophical Forum,19(4), 270.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha Noll.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noll, S., Murdock, E.G. Whose Justice is it Anyway? Mitigating the Tensions Between Food Security and Food Sovereignty. J Agric Environ Ethics 33, 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09809-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09809-9

Keywords

Navigation