Abstract
One often needs to estimate how fast an evolving state of a quantum system can depart from some target state or target subspace of a Hilbert space. Such estimates are known as quantum speed limits. We derive a quantum speed limit for a general time-dependent target subspace. When the target subspace is an instantaneous invariant subspace of a time-dependent Hamiltonian, the obtained quantum speed limit bounds the adiabatic fidelity, which is a figure of merit of quantum adiabaticity. We also compare two states evolving under two different Hamiltonians and derive a bound on the Loschmidt echo.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pfeifer, P., Fröhlich, J.: Generalized time-energy uncertainty relations and bounds on lifetimes of resonances. Rev. Mod. Phys. 67(4), 759 (1995)
Deffner, S., Campbell, S.: Quantum speed limits: From heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control. J. Phys. A Math Theor. 50(45), 453001 (2017)
Mandelstam, L., Tamm, I.G.: The uncertainty relation between energy and time in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. In: Selected papers, pp. 115–123. Springer (1991)
Kato, T.: On the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics. J. Physical Soc. Japan 5(6), 435–439 (1950)
Albash, T., Lidar, D.A.: Adiabatic quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018)
Boixo, S., Knill, E., Somma, R.D.: Eigenpath traversal by phase randomization. Quantum Inf. Comput. 9(9), 833–855 (2009)
Chiang, H.-T., Xu, G., Somma, R.D.: Improved bounds for eigenpath traversal. Phys. Rev. A 89(1), 012314 (2014)
Lychkovskiy, O., Gamayun, O., Cheianov, V: Quantum many-body adiabaticity, topological thouless pump and driven impurity in a one-dimensional quantum fluid. AIP Conf. Proc. 1936(1), 020024 (2018)
Gamayun, O., Lychkovskiy, O., Burovski, E., Malcomson, M., Cheianov, V.V., Zvonarev, M.B.: Impact of the injection protocol on an impurity’s stationary state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 220605 (2018)
Lychkovskiy, O., Gamayun, O., Cheianov, V.: Necessary and sufficient condition for quantum adiabaticity in a driven one-dimensional impurity-fluid system. Phys. Rev. B 98, 024307 (2018)
Pfeifer, P.: How fast can a quantum state change with time? Phys. Rev. Lett. 70(22), 3365 (1993)
Polkovnikov, A., Gritsev, V.: Breakdown of the adiabatic limit in low-dimensional gapless systems. Nat. Phys. 4(6), 477–481 (2008)
Altland, A., Gurarie, V.: Many body generalization of the Landau-Zener problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(6), 063602 (2008)
Bachmann, S., De Roeck, W., Fraas, M.: The adiabatic theorem for many-body quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 060201 (2017)
Lychkovskiy, O., Gamayun, O., Cheianov, V.: Time scale for adiabaticity breakdown in driven many-body systems and orthogonality catastrophe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(20), 200401 (2017)
Peres, A.: Stability of quantum motion in chaotic and regular systems. Phys. Rev. A 30(4), 1610 (1984)
Gorin, T., Prosen, T., Seligman, T.H., Žnidarič, M.: Dynamics of loschmidt echoes and fidelity decay. Phys. Rep. 435(2-5), 33–156 (2006)
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under the grant No 17-71-20158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Norm of a One–Dimensional Projector
Here we prove the equality
valid for any normalised vector ϕt. To this end we introduce a normalised vector \({\phi }_{t}^{\bot }=(\mathbb {I}-P_{{\phi }_{t}})\dot {\phi }_{t}/\|(\mathbb {I}-P_{{\phi }_{t}})\dot {\phi }_{t}\|\) which is orthogonal to ϕt, and expand \(\dot {\phi }_{t}\):
This implies
Due to the normalization condition 〈ϕt|ϕt〉 = 1 the first term and its complex conjugate cancel: \(\langle \dot {\phi }_{t}|{\phi }_{t}\rangle P_{{\phi }_{t}}+\langle {\phi }_{t}|\dot {\phi }_{t}\rangle P_{{\phi }_{t}}=\left (\frac {d}{dt}\langle {\phi }_{t}|{\phi }_{t}\rangle \right ) P_{{\phi }_{t}}=0\). Thus
Appendix B: Proof of the Bound (29)
Consider πt generated by some unitary Wt, \({\Pi }_{t}=W_{t} {\Pi }_{0} W_{t}^{\dag }\). This evolution can be described by a Schrödinger equation with a fictitious Hamiltonian \({\mathscr{H}}_{t}=i\dot {W}_{t}W_{t}^{\dag }\),
To derive this equation one should use the fact that \(W_{t}W_{t}^{\dag }=W_{t}^{\dag } W_{t}=1\) and, hence, \( \dot {W_{t}}W_{t}^{\dag }+W_{t} \dot {W_{t}}^{\dag }= \dot {W_{t}}^{\dag } W_{t}+W_{t}^{\dag } \dot {W_{t}}=0 \). Observe that
Since \(\dot {\Pi }_{t}\) is self-adjoint operator we can estimate its norm as
Further, since πt is a projector and ∥φ∥ = 1, we have \(\|(\mathbb {I}-{\Pi }_{t})\varphi \|=\sqrt {1-\|{\Pi }_{t}\varphi \|^{2}}\). Therefore
As \(\sup _{x\in [0,1]}\sqrt {x(1-x)}=1/2\) then
In view of (46) this proves the bound (29).
We note that the equality in (50) can be reached for \({\mathscr{H}}_{t}={\mathscr H}_{t}\equiv i[\dot {\Pi }_{t},{\Pi }_{t}]\) introduced in Section 3. Let us prove this fact. First, one verifies that \({\mathscr H}_{t}\) indeed generates πt via (45), see (12), and hence
On the other hand
and we get
analogously to (50). Inequalities (51) and (53) imply
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Il’in, N., Lychkovskiy, O. Quantum Speed Limits For Adiabatic Evolution, Loschmidt Echo and Beyond. Int J Theor Phys 60, 640–649 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04458-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04458-5