Abstract
We study scaling limits of deterministic Jacobi matrices, centered around a fixed point \(x_0\), and their connection to the scaling limits of the Christoffel–Darboux kernel at that point. We show that in the case when the orthogonal polynomials are bounded at \(x_0\), a subsequential limit always exists and can be expressed as a canonical system. We further show that under weak conditions on the associated measure, bulk universality of the CD kernel is equivalent to the existence of a limit of a particular explicit form.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arov, D.Z., Dym, H.: J-inner matrix functions, interpolation and inverse problems for canonical systems, I: foundations. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 29, 373–454 (1997)
Avila, A.: On the Kotani–Last and Schrödinger conjectures. J. Am. Math. Soc. 28, 579–616 (2015)
Avila, A., Last, Y., Simon, B.: Bulk universality and clock spacing of zeros for ergodic Jacobi matrices with a.c. spectrum. Anal. PDE 3, 81–108 (2010)
Breuer, J., Last, Y.: Stability of spectral types for Jacobi matrices under decaying random perturbations. J. Funct. Anal. 245, 249–283 (2007)
Breuer, J., Last, Y., Simon, B.: Stability of asymptotics of Christoffel–Darboux kernels. Commun. Math. Phys. 330, 1155–1178 (2014)
de Branges, L.: Hilbert Spaces of Entire Functions. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1968)
Deift, P.: Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann–Hilbert Approach, Courant Institute Lecture Notes, 3 New York University Press, New York (1999)
Dym, H.: An introduction to de Branges spaces of entire functions with applications to differential equations of the Sturm–Liouville type. Adv. Math. 5, 395–471 (1971)
Edelman, A., Sutton, B.D.: From random matrices to stochastic operators. J. Stat. Phys. 127, 1121–1165 (2007)
Erdös, P., Turán, P.: On interpolation. III. Interpolatory theory of polynomials. Ann. Math. 41, 510–553 (1940)
Findley, E.: Universality for regular measures satisfying Szegő’s condition. J. Approx. Theory 155, 136–154 (2008)
Freud, G.: Orthogonal Polynomials. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1971)
Hassi, S., De Snoo, H., Winkler, H.: Boundary-value problems for two-dimensional canonical systems. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 36, 445–479 (2000)
König, W.: Orthogonal polynomial ensembles in probability theory. Prob. Surv. 2, 385–447 (2005)
Krishnapur, M., Rider, B., Virág, B.: Universality of the stochastic Airy operator. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 69, 145–199 (2016)
Kritchevski, E., Valkó, B., Virág, B.: The scaling limit of the critical one-dimensional random Schröinger operator. Commun. Math. Phys. 314, 775–806 (2012)
Kuijlaars, A.B.J., Vanlessen, M.: Universality for eigenvalue correlations from the modified Jacobi unitary ensemble. Int. Math. Res. Not. 1575–1600 (2002)
Lagarias, J.C.: Hilbert Spaces of Entire Functions and Dirichlet L-Functions, Frontiers in Number Theory, physics, and Geometry. I, pp. 365–377. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Last, Y., Simon, B.: Fine structure of the zeros of orthogonal polynomials, IV. A priori bounds and clock behavior. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 61, 486–538 (2008)
Levin, E., Lubinsky, D.: Application of universality limits to zeros and reproducing kernels of orthogonal polynomials. J. Approx. Theory 150, 69–95 (2008)
Lubinsky, D.S.: Universality limits in the bulk for arbitrary measures on compact sets. J. Anal. Math. 106, 373–394 (2008)
Lubinsky, D.S.: A new approach to universality involving orthogonal polynomials. Ann. Math. 170, 915–939 (2009)
Lubinsky, D.S.: Some recent methods for establishing universality limits. J. Nonlinear Anal. 71, e2750–e2765 (2009)
Lubinsky, D.S.: Universality limits for random matrices and de Branges spaces of entire functions. J. Funct. Anal. 256, 3688–3729 (2009)
Lubinsky, D.S.: An update on local universality limits for correlation functions generated by unitary ensembles. SIGMA 12, 36 (2016)
Ramírez, J.A., Rider, B., Virág, B.: Beta ensembles, stochastic Airy spectrum, and a diffusion. J. Am. Math. Soc. 24, 919–944 (2011)
Remling, C.: Schrödinger operators and de Branges spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 196, 323–394 (2002)
Romanov, R.: Canonical systems and de Branges spaces. arXiv:1408.6022
Simon, B.: Bounded eigenfunctions and absolutely continuous spectra for one-dimensional Schrödinger operators. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 124, 3361–3369 (1996)
Simon, B.: Fine structure of the zeros of orthogonal polynomials: a review. In: Elaydi, S., et al. (eds.) Difference Equations, Special Functions and Orthogonal Polynomials, pp. 636–653. World Sci. Publ., Singapore (2007)
Simon, B.: Two extensions of Lubinsky’s universality theorem. J. Anal. Math. 105, 345–362 (2008)
Simon, B.: The Christoffel-Darboux kernel, in “Perspectives in PDE, Harmonic Analysis and Applications”, pp 295–335, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 79, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (2008)
Simon, B.: Szegő’s Theorem and its Descendants, M. B. Porter Lectures. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)
Totik, V.: Universality and fine zero spacing on general sets. Ark. Mat. 47, 361–391 (2009)
Valkó, B., Virág, B.: Continuum limits of random matrices and the Brownian carousel. Invent. Math. 177, 463–508 (2009)
Valkó, B., Virág, B.: The \(\sin _\beta \) operator. Invent. Math. 209, 275–327 (2017)
Virág, B.: Operator limits of random matrices. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Seoul, IV, 247-271 (2014)
Xu, S.X., Zhao, Y.Q., Zhou, J.R.: Universality for eigenvalue correlations from the unitary ensemble associated with a family of singular weights. J. Math. Phys. 52, 14 (2011)
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous referees for useful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Arno Kuijlaars.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supported in part by The Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 399/16) and by BSF 2014337.
6 Appendix: Canonical Systems, Jacobi Matrices, and the CD Kernel
6 Appendix: Canonical Systems, Jacobi Matrices, and the CD Kernel
Canonical systems generalize many second order difference and differential operators, with Schrödinger, Dirac, and Jacobi being particular cases. Furthermore, the correspondence between such systems and Hermite–Biehler functions (see below for a definition), established by de Branges [6], is a central result in the theory of de Branges spaces. Thus there is a huge literature on canonical systems, spanning spectral theory, harmonic analysis and number theory ([1, 6, 8, 13, 18, 27, 28] are only a few relevant references). The next several paragraphs contain only a quick review of some results that are directly relevant here (for details, see, e.g., [27]).
A canonical system is a family (indexed by \(z \in \mathbb {C}\)) of differential equations of the form
on some interval \(I=[0,L] \subseteq \mathbb {R}\), where \(\mathcal {J}=\left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 &{} -1 \\ 1 &{} 0 \end{array} \right) \) and H(t) is a \(2\times 2\) nonnegative definite matrix valued function such that the entries of H are integrable functions on I. By a change of variable (see, e.g., [27, Section 6] or [28]), we may also assume that \(H(t) \not \equiv 0\) on nonempty open sets.
In the case that H(t) is invertible almost everywhere, we may rewrite (6.1) as
i.e., as an eigenvalue equation for the operator \(H^{-1}(t)\mathcal {J}\frac{d}{dt}\) which is symmetric with respect to the inner product
Let \(\mathcal {H}_H\) be the Hilbert space of vector valued functions on I corresponding to this inner product. Choosing appropriate boundary conditions at 0 and L (e.g., \(f(0)=f(L)=\left( \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \)) defines a domain of self-adjointness for this operator. Moreover, even if H is not invertible a.e., as long as the boundary condition at 0 is not orthogonal to \(\text {Image}(H)(t)\) \(\forall t\in (0,\varepsilon )\) for some \(\varepsilon >0\) (and a similar condition is satisfied at L), it is possible to define a subspace of \(\mathcal {H}_H\) such that (6.1) is the eigenvalue equation for a self-adjoint operator defined on that subspace (see [28, Section 2]).
A solution to (6.1) is an absolutely continuous function, \(u: [0,L]\rightarrow \mathbb {C}^2\), that satisfies (6.1) a.e.
Let u(t, z) be a solution with initial value \(u(0)=\left( \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \). Then the function \(E_L(z)=u_1(L,z)+iu_2(L,z)\) is a Hermite–Biehler function; i.e., it has no zeros in the upper half plane \(\mathbb {C}^+=\left\{ z \mid \text {Im}z>0 \right\} \) and satisfies
Such functions are at the basis of the theory of de Branges spaces.
The de Branges space B(E)associated with a Hermite–Biehler function E is the set of all entire functions, f, such that both \(\frac{f}{E}\) and \(\frac{f^\sharp }{E}\) are in \(H^2(\mathbb {C}^+)\), where \(f^\sharp (z)=\overline{f(\overline{z})}\). It is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space with inner product given by
and reproducing kernel
It follows that every canonical system (6.1) gives rise to a de Branges space through the function \(E_L(z)\) associated with its solution as described above. In fact, in this particular case, it is not hard to show that the reproducing kernel is also given by
and by
In particular, for any fixed z, \(K_{E_L}(z,\zeta )\) is an entire function of \(\zeta \).
It turns out that this is not a particular example, but rather the general case: a fundamental result in the theory of de Branges spaces (see, e.g. [6, 27, 28]) says that every de Branges space is associated with a canonical system.
As shown in [24, Section 4], the CD kernel \(K_n(x,y)\) associated with a measure \(\mu \) is a reproducing kernel for a de Branges space as well. Indeed, let
Then the Christoffel–Darboux formula (2.9) says that
Now for any fixed \(w \in \mathbb {C}^+\), the function
is a Hermite–Biehler function. The corresponding de Branges space, \(B(E_{n,w})\), is the space of polynomials of degree \(<n\) and its reproducing kernel is
(as can be seen easily from (2.9)). Note that the definition in [24, Theorem 4.3] differs from ours by a factor of \(\sqrt{\pi }\); this is because we have an extra factor of \(\pi \) in the inner product defining B(E). As shown in Sect. 2 above, this de Branges space is naturally associated with the discrete canonical system (2.7) with \(x_0=0\).
It is an interesting fact that it is possible to also go in the other direction and associate a Jacobi matrix with any discrete canonical system satisfying the appropriate conditions. Let \(\{r_\ell \}_{\ell =0}^\infty \) and \(\{s_\ell \}_{\ell =0}^\infty \) be two real sequences satisfying
for some sequence of positive numbers \(\{a_\ell \}_{\ell =0}^\infty \) with \(a_0=1\). Consider the discrete canonical system
Then if \(\{u_\ell (x)\}\) is a solution satisfying \(u_0=\left( \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \), then
is the \(\ell \)’th orthonormal polynomial with respect to the Jacobi matrix whose off diagonal parameter sequence is the given sequence \(\{a_\ell \}_{\ell =1}^\infty \), and whose diagonal entries are
That this is true follows by a direct computation writing
and noting that \(\widehat{T}_\ell (0)\widehat{T}_{\ell -1}^{-1}(0)=S_\ell (0)\), from which one may compute the values of the Jacobi parameters. For a similar analysis in the continuum, associating canonical systems to one-dimensional Schrödinger operators, see [27, Section 8].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Breuer, J. Scaling Limits of Jacobi Matrices and the Christoffel–Darboux Kernel. Constr Approx 53, 349–379 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-019-09492-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-019-09492-z