Skip to main content
Log in

Scaling Limits of Jacobi Matrices and the Christoffel–Darboux Kernel

  • Published:
Constructive Approximation Aims and scope

Abstract

We study scaling limits of deterministic Jacobi matrices, centered around a fixed point \(x_0\), and their connection to the scaling limits of the Christoffel–Darboux kernel at that point. We show that in the case when the orthogonal polynomials are bounded at \(x_0\), a subsequential limit always exists and can be expressed as a canonical system. We further show that under weak conditions on the associated measure, bulk universality of the CD kernel is equivalent to the existence of a limit of a particular explicit form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arov, D.Z., Dym, H.: J-inner matrix functions, interpolation and inverse problems for canonical systems, I: foundations. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 29, 373–454 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Avila, A.: On the Kotani–Last and Schrödinger conjectures. J. Am. Math. Soc. 28, 579–616 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avila, A., Last, Y., Simon, B.: Bulk universality and clock spacing of zeros for ergodic Jacobi matrices with a.c. spectrum. Anal. PDE 3, 81–108 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Breuer, J., Last, Y.: Stability of spectral types for Jacobi matrices under decaying random perturbations. J. Funct. Anal. 245, 249–283 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Breuer, J., Last, Y., Simon, B.: Stability of asymptotics of Christoffel–Darboux kernels. Commun. Math. Phys. 330, 1155–1178 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. de Branges, L.: Hilbert Spaces of Entire Functions. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Deift, P.: Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann–Hilbert Approach, Courant Institute Lecture Notes, 3 New York University Press, New York (1999)

  8. Dym, H.: An introduction to de Branges spaces of entire functions with applications to differential equations of the Sturm–Liouville type. Adv. Math. 5, 395–471 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Edelman, A., Sutton, B.D.: From random matrices to stochastic operators. J. Stat. Phys. 127, 1121–1165 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Erdös, P., Turán, P.: On interpolation. III. Interpolatory theory of polynomials. Ann. Math. 41, 510–553 (1940)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Findley, E.: Universality for regular measures satisfying Szegő’s condition. J. Approx. Theory 155, 136–154 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Freud, G.: Orthogonal Polynomials. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1971)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hassi, S., De Snoo, H., Winkler, H.: Boundary-value problems for two-dimensional canonical systems. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 36, 445–479 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. König, W.: Orthogonal polynomial ensembles in probability theory. Prob. Surv. 2, 385–447 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishnapur, M., Rider, B., Virág, B.: Universality of the stochastic Airy operator. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 69, 145–199 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kritchevski, E., Valkó, B., Virág, B.: The scaling limit of the critical one-dimensional random Schröinger operator. Commun. Math. Phys. 314, 775–806 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuijlaars, A.B.J., Vanlessen, M.: Universality for eigenvalue correlations from the modified Jacobi unitary ensemble. Int. Math. Res. Not. 1575–1600 (2002)

  18. Lagarias, J.C.: Hilbert Spaces of Entire Functions and Dirichlet L-Functions, Frontiers in Number Theory, physics, and Geometry. I, pp. 365–377. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Last, Y., Simon, B.: Fine structure of the zeros of orthogonal polynomials, IV. A priori bounds and clock behavior. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 61, 486–538 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Levin, E., Lubinsky, D.: Application of universality limits to zeros and reproducing kernels of orthogonal polynomials. J. Approx. Theory 150, 69–95 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Lubinsky, D.S.: Universality limits in the bulk for arbitrary measures on compact sets. J. Anal. Math. 106, 373–394 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Lubinsky, D.S.: A new approach to universality involving orthogonal polynomials. Ann. Math. 170, 915–939 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Lubinsky, D.S.: Some recent methods for establishing universality limits. J. Nonlinear Anal. 71, e2750–e2765 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Lubinsky, D.S.: Universality limits for random matrices and de Branges spaces of entire functions. J. Funct. Anal. 256, 3688–3729 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Lubinsky, D.S.: An update on local universality limits for correlation functions generated by unitary ensembles. SIGMA 12, 36 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramírez, J.A., Rider, B., Virág, B.: Beta ensembles, stochastic Airy spectrum, and a diffusion. J. Am. Math. Soc. 24, 919–944 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Remling, C.: Schrödinger operators and de Branges spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 196, 323–394 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Romanov, R.: Canonical systems and de Branges spaces. arXiv:1408.6022

  29. Simon, B.: Bounded eigenfunctions and absolutely continuous spectra for one-dimensional Schrödinger operators. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 124, 3361–3369 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simon, B.: Fine structure of the zeros of orthogonal polynomials: a review. In: Elaydi, S., et al. (eds.) Difference Equations, Special Functions and Orthogonal Polynomials, pp. 636–653. World Sci. Publ., Singapore (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Simon, B.: Two extensions of Lubinsky’s universality theorem. J. Anal. Math. 105, 345–362 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Simon, B.: The Christoffel-Darboux kernel, in “Perspectives in PDE, Harmonic Analysis and Applications”, pp 295–335, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 79, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (2008)

  33. Simon, B.: Szegő’s Theorem and its Descendants, M. B. Porter Lectures. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Totik, V.: Universality and fine zero spacing on general sets. Ark. Mat. 47, 361–391 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Valkó, B., Virág, B.: Continuum limits of random matrices and the Brownian carousel. Invent. Math. 177, 463–508 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Valkó, B., Virág, B.: The \(\sin _\beta \) operator. Invent. Math. 209, 275–327 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Virág, B.: Operator limits of random matrices. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Seoul, IV, 247-271 (2014)

  38. Xu, S.X., Zhao, Y.Q., Zhou, J.R.: Universality for eigenvalue correlations from the unitary ensemble associated with a family of singular weights. J. Math. Phys. 52, 14 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous referees for useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Breuer.

Additional information

Communicated by Arno Kuijlaars.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supported in part by The Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 399/16) and by BSF 2014337.

6 Appendix: Canonical Systems, Jacobi Matrices, and the CD Kernel

6 Appendix: Canonical Systems, Jacobi Matrices, and the CD Kernel

Canonical systems generalize many second order difference and differential operators, with Schrödinger, Dirac, and Jacobi being particular cases. Furthermore, the correspondence between such systems and Hermite–Biehler functions (see below for a definition), established by de Branges [6], is a central result in the theory of de Branges spaces. Thus there is a huge literature on canonical systems, spanning spectral theory, harmonic analysis and number theory ([1, 6, 8, 13, 18, 27, 28] are only a few relevant references). The next several paragraphs contain only a quick review of some results that are directly relevant here (for details, see, e.g., [27]).

A canonical system is a family (indexed by \(z \in \mathbb {C}\)) of differential equations of the form

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal {J}u'(t)=z H(t)u(t) \end{aligned}$$
(6.1)

on some interval \(I=[0,L] \subseteq \mathbb {R}\), where \(\mathcal {J}=\left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 &{} -1 \\ 1 &{} 0 \end{array} \right) \) and H(t) is a \(2\times 2\) nonnegative definite matrix valued function such that the entries of H are integrable functions on I. By a change of variable (see, e.g., [27, Section 6] or [28]), we may also assume that \(H(t) \not \equiv 0\) on nonempty open sets.

In the case that H(t) is invertible almost everywhere, we may rewrite (6.1) as

$$\begin{aligned} H^{-1}(t)\mathcal {J} u'(t)=z u(t), \end{aligned}$$

i.e., as an eigenvalue equation for the operator \(H^{-1}(t)\mathcal {J}\frac{d}{dt}\) which is symmetric with respect to the inner product

$$\begin{aligned} \left( f,g \right) _H=\int _0^L \left( f(t),H(t) g(t)\right) _{\mathbb {C}^2}\text {d}t. \end{aligned}$$
(6.2)

Let \(\mathcal {H}_H\) be the Hilbert space of vector valued functions on I corresponding to this inner product. Choosing appropriate boundary conditions at 0 and L (e.g., \(f(0)=f(L)=\left( \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \)) defines a domain of self-adjointness for this operator. Moreover, even if H is not invertible a.e., as long as the boundary condition at 0 is not orthogonal to \(\text {Image}(H)(t)\) \(\forall t\in (0,\varepsilon )\) for some \(\varepsilon >0\) (and a similar condition is satisfied at L), it is possible to define a subspace of \(\mathcal {H}_H\) such that (6.1) is the eigenvalue equation for a self-adjoint operator defined on that subspace (see [28, Section 2]).

A solution to (6.1) is an absolutely continuous function, \(u: [0,L]\rightarrow \mathbb {C}^2\), that satisfies (6.1) a.e.

Let u(tz) be a solution with initial value \(u(0)=\left( \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \). Then the function \(E_L(z)=u_1(L,z)+iu_2(L,z)\) is a Hermite–Biehler function; i.e., it has no zeros in the upper half plane \(\mathbb {C}^+=\left\{ z \mid \text {Im}z>0 \right\} \) and satisfies

$$\begin{aligned} \left| E_L(z) \right| \ge \left| E_L(\overline{z}) \right| \text { for } z \in \mathbb {C}^+. \end{aligned}$$

Such functions are at the basis of the theory of de Branges spaces.

The de Branges space B(E)associated with a Hermite–Biehler function E is the set of all entire functions, f, such that both \(\frac{f}{E}\) and \(\frac{f^\sharp }{E}\) are in \(H^2(\mathbb {C}^+)\), where \(f^\sharp (z)=\overline{f(\overline{z})}\). It is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space with inner product given by

$$\begin{aligned} \left( f,g \right) _E=\frac{1}{\pi }\int _\mathbb {R} \overline{f(x)}g(x)\frac{\text {d}x}{|E(x)|^2} \end{aligned}$$

and reproducing kernel

$$\begin{aligned} K_E(z,\zeta )=\frac{\overline{E(z)}E(\zeta )-E(\overline{z})\overline{E(\overline{\zeta })}}{2i(\overline{z}-\zeta )}. \end{aligned}$$

It follows that every canonical system (6.1) gives rise to a de Branges space through the function \(E_L(z)\) associated with its solution as described above. In fact, in this particular case, it is not hard to show that the reproducing kernel is also given by

$$\begin{aligned} K_{E_L}(z,\zeta )=\frac{1}{\overline{z}-\zeta }\det \left( \begin{array}{cc} u_1(L,\overline{z}) &{} u_1(L,\zeta ) \\ u_2(L,\overline{z}) &{} u_2(L,\zeta ) \end{array} \right) \end{aligned}$$
(6.3)

and by

$$\begin{aligned} K_{E_L}(z,\zeta )=\left( u(\cdot ,z),u(\cdot ,\zeta ) \right) _H=\int _0^L \left( u(t,z),H(t) u(t,\zeta )\right) _{\mathbb {C}^2}\text {d}t. \end{aligned}$$
(6.4)

In particular, for any fixed z, \(K_{E_L}(z,\zeta )\) is an entire function of \(\zeta \).

It turns out that this is not a particular example, but rather the general case: a fundamental result in the theory of de Branges spaces (see, e.g. [6, 27, 28]) says that every de Branges space is associated with a canonical system.

As shown in [24, Section 4], the CD kernel \(K_n(x,y)\) associated with a measure \(\mu \) is a reproducing kernel for a de Branges space as well. Indeed, let

$$\begin{aligned} L_n(x,y)=(x-y)K_n(x,y). \end{aligned}$$

Then the Christoffel–Darboux formula (2.9) says that

$$\begin{aligned} L_n(x,y)=a_n\left( p_n(x)p_{n-1}(y)-p_n(y)p_{n-1}(x) \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(6.5)

Now for any fixed \(w \in \mathbb {C}^+\), the function

$$\begin{aligned} E_{n,w}(\cdot )=\sqrt{2}\frac{L_n(\overline{w},\cdot )}{\left| L_n(w,\overline{w}) \right| ^{1/2}} \end{aligned}$$

is a Hermite–Biehler function. The corresponding de Branges space, \(B(E_{n,w})\), is the space of polynomials of degree \(<n\) and its reproducing kernel is

$$\begin{aligned} K_{E_{n,w}}(z,\zeta )=K_n(\overline{z},\zeta ) \end{aligned}$$

(as can be seen easily from (2.9)). Note that the definition in [24, Theorem 4.3] differs from ours by a factor of \(\sqrt{\pi }\); this is because we have an extra factor of \(\pi \) in the inner product defining B(E). As shown in Sect. 2 above, this de Branges space is naturally associated with the discrete canonical system (2.7) with \(x_0=0\).

It is an interesting fact that it is possible to also go in the other direction and associate a Jacobi matrix with any discrete canonical system satisfying the appropriate conditions. Let \(\{r_\ell \}_{\ell =0}^\infty \) and \(\{s_\ell \}_{\ell =0}^\infty \) be two real sequences satisfying

$$\begin{aligned} s_\ell r_{\ell -1}-r_{\ell }s_{\ell -1}=\frac{1}{a_\ell } \end{aligned}$$

for some sequence of positive numbers \(\{a_\ell \}_{\ell =0}^\infty \) with \(a_0=1\). Consider the discrete canonical system

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&\mathcal {J}\left( \widehat{u}_{\ell +1}(x)-\widehat{u}_\ell (x)\right) \\&\quad =x\left( \begin{array}{cc} r_\ell ^2 &{} -s_\ell r_\ell \\ -s_\ell r_\ell &{} s_\ell ^2 \end{array} \right) \widehat{u}_\ell (x). \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

Then if \(\{u_\ell (x)\}\) is a solution satisfying \(u_0=\left( \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \), then

$$\begin{aligned} p_\ell (x)=r_\ell u_{\ell ,1}(x)-s_\ell u_{\ell ,2}(x) \end{aligned}$$

is the \(\ell \)’th orthonormal polynomial with respect to the Jacobi matrix whose off diagonal parameter sequence is the given sequence \(\{a_\ell \}_{\ell =1}^\infty \), and whose diagonal entries are

$$\begin{aligned} b_\ell =a_\ell a_{\ell -1}\left( r_\ell s_{\ell -2}-s_\ell r_{\ell -2} \right) . \end{aligned}$$

That this is true follows by a direct computation writing

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{T}_{\ell }(0)=\left( \begin{array}{cc} a_\ell r_\ell &{} -a_\ell s_\ell \\ r_{\ell -1} &{} -s_{\ell -1} \end{array} \right) \end{aligned}$$

and noting that \(\widehat{T}_\ell (0)\widehat{T}_{\ell -1}^{-1}(0)=S_\ell (0)\), from which one may compute the values of the Jacobi parameters. For a similar analysis in the continuum, associating canonical systems to one-dimensional Schrödinger operators, see [27, Section 8].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Breuer, J. Scaling Limits of Jacobi Matrices and the Christoffel–Darboux Kernel. Constr Approx 53, 349–379 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-019-09492-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-019-09492-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation