Skip to main content
Log in

PIMOL: The Finite Difference Method of Lines Based on the Precise Integration Method for an Arbitrary Irregular Domain

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to introduce a new semi-analytical method named precise integration method of lines (PIMOL), which is developed and used to solve the ordinary differential equation (ODE) systems based on the finite difference method of lines and the precise integration method. The irregular domain problem is mainly discussed in this paper. Three classical examples of Poisson’s equation problems are given, including one regular and two irregular domain examples. The PIMOL reduces a semi-discrete ODE problem to a linear algebraic matrix equation and does not require domain mapping for treating the irregular domain problem. Numerical results show that the PIMOL is a powerful method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liskovets A. The method of lines (review). English translation appeared in “Differential Equation”, 1965;1:1308–23.

  2. Meyer GH. An application of the method of lines to mutidimensional free boundary problems. J Inst Math Appl. 1977;20(3):317–29.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer GH. The method of line for Poisson’s equation with nonlinear or free boundary conditions. Numer Math. 1978;29:329–44.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer GH. The method of line and invariant imbedding for elliptic and parabolic free boundary problem. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1981;18(1):150–64.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Janac K. Hybrid solution of the Poisson equation. In: Vichnetsky R, editor. Advances in computer methods for partial differential equation; 1975. p. 154–8.

  6. Irobe M. Method of numerical analysis for three dimensional elastic problem. In: Proceedings of the 16th Japan national congress for applied mechanics. Central Scientific Publ.; 1968. p. 1–7.

  7. Gyekenyesi JP, Mendelson A. Three-dimensional elastic stress and displacement analysis of finite geometry solids containing cracks. Int J Fract. 1975;11(3):409–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Malik SN, Fu LS. Elastic–plastic response of an externally cracked cylinder analyzed by the method of lines. Eng Fract Mech. 1979;12(3):377–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu LS, Malik SN. The method lf lines applied to crack problems including the plasticity effect. Comput Struct. 1979;10(3):447–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendelson A, Alam J. The use of the method of lines in 3-D fracture mechanics analyses with applications to compact tension specimens. Int J Fract. 1983;22:105–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alam J, Mendelson A. Elastic–plastic stress analysis of CT specimens. Int J Fract. 1986;31:17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones DJ, South JC Jr, Klunker EB. On the numerical solution of elliptic partial differential equations by the method of lines. J Comput Phys. 1972;9(3):496–527.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Xanthis LS. The numerical method of lines (MOL) and ODE solvers can provide a new powerful computational fracture mechanics tool. In: International conference on computational mechanics, Tokyo Japan; 1986.

  14. Xanthis LS. A pseudo-ODE modeling trick for the direct method of lines computation of important fracture mechanics parameters. ACM SIGNUM Newsl. 1986;21(1–2):10–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan S. The finite element method of lines: theory and applications. Beijing: Science Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xanthis LS, Schwab C. The method of arbitrary lines. C R Acad Sci Paris. 1991;312(1):181–7.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan S. The finite element method of lines. J Numer Methods Comput Appl. 1992;13(4):252–60 (in Chinese).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhong WX. On precise integration method. J Comput Appl Math. 2004;163:59–78.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Moler CB, Van Loan CF. Nineteen dubious ways to compute exponential of a matrix. SIAM Rev. 1978;20:801–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhong WX, Zhu JP, Zhong XX. A precise time integration algorithm for nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of WCCM-3; 1994;(1). p. 12–7.

  21. Xu YJ. PIMOL: a new semi-analytical method based on the finite difference method of lines and the precise integration method. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-019-00151-1.

  22. Maple 17, Maplesoft, a division of Waterloo Maple Inc. 1981–2013.

  23. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN. Theory of elasticity. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongjun Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y. PIMOL: The Finite Difference Method of Lines Based on the Precise Integration Method for an Arbitrary Irregular Domain. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 33, 823–835 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-020-00165-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-020-00165-0

Keywords

Navigation