‘We need one more hour solely based on anatomy… Give us anatomy!’: Early-year learner perceptions of anatomy within an integrated & case-based learning osteopathy curriculum
Introduction
Traditional health science curricula are dominated by basic sciences in the early years of a program followed by clinical learning in later years [1,2]. Although such a structure is common and persists in some programs, this approach has been considered to have a number of limitations (e.g. teacher-directed, limited integration of knowledge with clinical work) [2] and curriculum change to address these limitations can be slow. The basic premise of a contemporary health science curriculum is that it should engage learners in contextual learning [2], that is putting the content being learnt into the context of their future work. A curriculum should also engage students as adult learners who are independent problem solvers, rather than encouraging memorization of swathes of biomedical science knowledge. The desired outcome of this contemporary health science curriculum is better integration of clinical and biomedical sciences in the clinical learning years [3,4]. Authors have advocated the use of integrated curricula [3], that is, clinical learning is combined with developing an understanding of the biomedical and social sciences [5]. The integrated curriculum aims to provide context for academic content, improve the learning environment [2], improve learner engagement and content retention.
Medical curricula designers have been drawn to integrated curricula to reduce “… teaching unnecessary detail in basic sciences, including gross anatomy, often to levels irrelevant to clinical practice” however these authors also note that “… the debate on this matter has been speculative or anecdotal, lacking reliable supporting data.” (p. 212) [6]. Removing “unnecessary detail” may reduce contact hours and student load, however the importance of basic sciences, including anatomy, is thought to be at risk with such changes [4,7]. With the introduction of integrated curricula and use of case-based or problem-based learning, anatomy teaching hours have reduced by up to 80% in Australian medical schools, a trend reflected worldwide [6].
Evidence of the effect of reduced anatomy education is often conflicting and tends to focus on problem-based learning (PBL) [8,9] rather than case-based learning (CBL), the focus of the current paper. Problem-based learning is widely used in health professions education. The premise of PBL is that the learner's work through a clinical case presentation as a group. The learner's raise their own questions, explore issues related to the case and attempt to resolve the case in what has been referred to as open enquiry [10]. There is often no preparation required on the part of the learner before participating in a PBL case, and no prior knowledge is required [11]. The educator has a minimal role in PBL, allowing the learners to guide their own discussions and learning, and highlighting aspects of the case for learners to pursue after the session. In contrast, the role of the educator in CBL is more structured – bringing the learners back to the key learning objectives for the case, guiding learners through the case and providing closure. This has been referred to as guided enquiry [10]. CBL also typically includes some pre-session preparation by the learner. Both PBL and CBL are used to develop learners' problem-solving and teamwork skills, in addition to facilitating independent learning, although the more structured CBL approach may be better suited to learners in the early years.
Research into the combination of integrated curriculum and CBL is emerging [12]. Klement, Paulsen [13] reported a 28% reduction in course contact hours yet a 9% increase in the average gross anatomy examination scores. Likewise, Parmar and Rathinam [14] implemented integrated and CBL anatomy sessions that resulted in significant improvements in the long-term knowledge retention and 93.8% of students reporting that this approach enhanced their ability to learn respiratory anatomy.
Much of the research regarding integrated curricula and CBL focuses on its efficacy at producing academic results in comparison to other teaching/learning methods. Of the studies exploring the student perception of integrated curricula, CBL or anatomy teaching many do so using quantitative methods [[14], [15], [16]]). However, this approach may not capture the personal nature of the student experience. A systematic review of CBL in health professional education identified the need for more qualitative research to better understand how CBL helps students learn [5]. Bergman, Prince [17] also identify the student voice as a significant area for evaluation of anatomy education. In response to these calls, the current research utilized a qualitative approach to investigate osteopathy student perceptions of the integrated curriculum and CBL in respect to learning anatomy in the first semester of a pre-professional program.
Section snippets
Methods
Ethics approval was granted by the Victoria University Human Research Ethics Committee (HRE15-160).
Results
Of the 117 students enrolled, 15 volunteered to participate, with 13 participating (11% of the cohort). All seven participants allocated to group 1 attended however, of the eight allocated to group 2 two withdrew resulting in six participants. The focus groups were conducted in weeks 7 and 8 of the participants' second semester of their osteopathy course. The duration of the focus groups were 58 min (group 1) and 49 min (group 2). The gender split for each focus group was approximately even
Discussion
Our work sought the opinion of first year osteopathy students undertaking their studies in an integrated curriculum, with a particular focus on their anatomy education. Previous iterations of the osteopathy curriculum had anatomy as a standalone unit, and the students participating in the current study were the first to undertake the integrated curriculum structure. This provided an interesting opportunity to explore early learners’ impressions of anatomy in this context.
Conclusion
Our work suggests that learners in an integrated curriculum can see the value of anatomy in their learning, and this was reinforced through the curriculum design and use of CBL as one of the principal educational delivery strategies. Several recommendations can be made to assist students’ transition into an integrated curriculum. The option of additional anatomy contact hours per week should be explored, if only in first semester as students consolidate their independent learning skills. This
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the Victoria University Human Research Ethics Committee.
Funding
No funding was received for the conduct of this study.
Declaration of competing interest
Brett Vaughan is a section editor for the International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. He was not involved in review or editorial decisions regarding this manuscript.
References (33)
- et al.
Problem-based learning: is anatomy a casualty?
Surgeon
(2005) - et al.
Anatomy in medical education: perceptions of undergraduate medical students
Ann. Anat.
(2013) - et al.
The development of diagnostic competence: a comparison between a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum
Acad Med
(1996) - et al.
Integrated medical curriculum: advantages and disadvantages
J. Med. Educ. Curricular Dev.
(2016) - et al.
Design considerations for an integrated, problem-based curriculum
Med. Sci. Educat.
(2016) - et al.
Predictors of confidence in anatomy knowledge for work as a junior doctor: a national survey of Australian medical students
BMC Med Educ
(2018) - et al.
The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23
Med Teach
(2012) - et al.
Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools
ANZ J Surg
(2010) - et al.
The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96
Med Teach
(2015) - et al.
Does problem‐based learning lead to deficiencies in basic science knowledge? An empirical case on anatomy
Med Educ
(2003)
Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions
Acad Med
Case based learning—a review of the literature: is there scope for this educational paradigm in prehospital education?
Emerg Med J
Case-based learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: a review of worldwide literature
J. Med. Educ. Curricular Dev.
Anatomy as the backbone of an integrated first year medical curriculum: design and implementation
Anat Sci Educ
Introduction of vertical integration and case‐based learning in anatomy for undergraduate physical therapy and occupational therapy students
Anat Sci Educ
Back to the future with hands-on science: students' perceptions of learning anatomy and physiology
J Nurs Educ
Cited by (5)
The extent and quality of evidence for osteopathic education: A scoping review
2023, International Journal of Osteopathic MedicineProfessional identity in osteopathy: A scoping review of peer-reviewed primary osteopathic research
2022, International Journal of Osteopathic MedicineCitation Excerpt :Further exploration of osteopathic socialisation may reveal impacts, both positive and negative, on students’ developing OPI. Moreover, research into student, faculty and institutional perspectives around influences on OPI [91,111] might indicate whether these align, informing ongoing debates about underlying “osteopathic principles”, objectives and practices within OEIs. Clarkson and Thomson's findings about stages of OPI development also suggest need to investigate OPI transitions, when and why these occur and how students attempt to navigate them.
Effectiveness of problem-based learning strategies compared to conventional anatomy teaching approaches
2024, Journal of the Pakistan Medical AssociationPersistence of changed attitudes among students in an integrated anatomy curriculum
2024, Anatomical Sciences EducationAnatomy knowledge retention in Australian osteopathic training: A comparative study
2021, European Journal of Anatomy