Elsevier

Palaeoworld

Volume 29, Issue 3, September 2020, Pages 636-647
Palaeoworld

Fluxes and isotopic composition of planktonic foraminifera off Hainan Island, northern South China Sea: Implications for paleoceanographic studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2019.07.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Planktonic foraminifera collected from a sediment trap deployed off Hainan in the northwestern South China Sea (SCS-NW) between July 2012 and April 2013 were studied to evaluate their seasonal variability and ecology as well as to infer the factors controlling their shell fluxes. The total planktonic foraminifera flux, as well as the fluxes of the dominant species (Globigerinoides ruber, Globigerinoides sacculifer and Neogloboquadrina dutertrei), showed three distinct maxima during SW-monsoon in August 2012, the SW-NE intermonsoon in October 2012 and the NE-monsoon in December 2012–February 2013. These periods were characterized by upwelling, aerosol fallout, and intense wind mixing, respectively, from which the foraminiferal assemblages benefitted, as indicated by the close correlation between wind speed, sea surface temperature (SST), chlorophyll a concentration (Chl-a), δ18O of G. ruber and the shell fluxes. The correlation also suggests that temperature and food availability might have been the primary drivers of the observed changes in foraminiferal abundance. The offset between the SST deduced from flux-weighted of G. ruber δ18O and annual mean SST is only ∼0.3 °C, much lower than ∼5.2 °C between the summer and winter temperature, indicating a balanced seasonality bias in the shell flux. The linear regression between the satellite-derived sea surface temperature and G. ruber δ18O reveals the strong potential of this species, at least in the studied region, as an ecological indicator for past oceanic environments.

Introduction

The most commonly used proxies in the study of paleoceanography include the planktonic foraminiferal assemblages, the stable oxygen and carbon isotopes as well as trace-element composition of their shells (Lea, 1999, Rohling and Cooke, 1999), and the composition of their shell-bound organic matter (King and Hare, 1972a, King and Hare, 1972b, Langer et al., 1993, Stathoplos and Tuross, 1994, Uhle et al., 1997). These are applied to generate quantitative estimates of ocean boundary conditions, such as the sea surface temperature (SST), salinity (SSS), and those of biotic response, including primary production and carbon flux.

These proxies from planktonic foraminifera are widely used in paleoceanographic studies, not only because of their assemblages that vary with marine environmental changes but also because of the ability of their shells to preserve useful information about the upper oceans in which they once lived. In the past decades, oceanic parameters have been established by the abundance of planktonic foraminifera, the stable oxygen and carbon isotope compositions of their shells for temperature, upwelling, nutrient enrichment, and productivity. However, these paleoceanographic signals present in the foraminiferal shell could be affected by physiological effects and create both “oxygen” and “carbon” isotope disequilibrium relative to the ambient seawater (Niebler et al., 1999).

Therefore, a good knowledge of ecology, life cycle, and shell calcification processes of the individual foraminiferal species is required for better interpretation of the fossil record (Niebler et al., 1999). For instance, Globigerinoides ruber is a mixed layer subtropical and tropical species, and a good recorder of near-surface temperature because of its low-slope response to a deepening isotherm (high insulation for the low temperature at depth compared to other species). This makes it a good species for surface water temperature reconstruction (Field, 2004, Tedesco et al., 2007, Wejnert et al., 2010).

Seasonal variation in the shell flux in the three seasonality modes described by Jonkers and Kučera (2015) could also serve as useful tools in the understanding and interpretation of shell-flux variability pattern, and their applicability in paleoceanographic reconstruction. For example, seasonal variation in shell flux in the warm water planktonic foraminiferal species (group A) was reported to be low within the optimal temperature range. In that case, species record average annual condition with only little offset, but outside their optimal temperature range, species concentrate a progressively large portion of their annual flux into a single peak in autumn. This often results in an increase in positive bias from mean annual conditions. Under both the cooling and warming trends, the species seasonality shifts toward an odd flux throughout the year, which will lead to underestimation of the actual changes in mean temperature (Jonkers and Kučera, 2015).

Recent publications on environmental investigations of the South China Sea (SCS) on the basis of planktonic foraminifera were largely focused on their seasonal and interannual variations in the central SCS (Chen et al., 2000, Chen et al., 2007), seasonal variability off Xisha Island (Liu et al., 2014, Xiang et al., 2015), variation in their flux and chemical properties in the southern basin (Wan et al., 2010), assemblage composition in plankton tows from the northern SCS (Lin and Hsieh, 2007), circulation and oxygenation of the glacial SCS (Li et al., 2017), in situ calibration of the Mg/Ca ratio in their shells (Huang et al., 2008), upper water-column structure and non-analog planktonic foraminiferal fauna in the glacial southern SCS (Steinke et al., 2008, Steinke et al., 2010).

The SCS is a highly dynamic monsoonal subregion characterized by a variety of processes that govern the fluxes of particulate matter to the deep sea. This includes massive riverine discharges of sediments and nutrients, upwelling, mesoscale eddies, dust fallout, and El Ninṏ-southern oscillation (ENSO) events (see Section 1.1). Therefore, because of this multiplicity, a quantitative understanding of the individual forcings controlling the distribution of planktonic foraminifera is required. The objective of this study is to improve our understanding of the ecology, seasonal variability, and possible factors mediating the shell fluxes of some observed planktonic foraminifera in the northern SCS.

The South China Sea (SCS), which is the largest marginal sea in the western tropical Pacific Ocean, has an area of about 3.5 million km2 and depths ranging from the shallowest coastal region to 5567 m, with an average depth of 1212 m (Morton and Blackmore, 2001). It is located within the East Asian Monsoon system with sea surface temperature (SST) and sea surface salinity (SSS) varying between <24 °C and >29 °C, and 34.2 psu and 33.6 psu, during winter and summer seasons respectively in the north (Fig. 1, Locarnini et al., 2013), except for its coastal areas. It is a typical well-stratified oligotrophic sea with depleted surface nutrients, thereby manifesting low primary production in the surface layer (Wong et al., 2007, Du et al., 2017).

The biogeochemistry of the SCS is responsive to multiscale physical forcings, such as intraseasonal upwelling and mesoscale eddies (Liu et al., 2002, Ning et al., 2004), the seasonally reversing monsoon, and the interannual ENSO events (Liu, H. et al., 2013). The effects may be recorded in changes in nutrient concentrations, Chl-a, primary production, and POC export. The seasonally varying hydrological characteristics of the SCS are complex (Fig. 1a). The East Asian monsoon (northeast monsoon in winter and southwest monsoon in summer) is the primary driver, resulting in a large basin-scale cyclonic upper layer circulation during winter and sub-basin-scale cyclonic and anticyclonic gyres during summer (Fig. 1a; Wyrtki, 1961).

Mixed layer depth (MLD), which is modulated by wind stress and solar radiation, exhibits pronounced seasonal variability in the northern SCS (Tseng et al., 2005). Because MLD in large part determines the nutrient supply to the upper waters, primary production in this region also exhibits strong seasonal variability. In summer, strong solar radiation stratifies upper ocean layers, resulting in a shallow MLD, nutrient limitation, and reduced primary production in most of the basin.

Off Hainan and along the coast southeastern Vietnam, however, the strong southwesterly winds generate upwelling during summer, thus enhancing primary production (Ning et al., 2004, Su and Pohlmann, 2009, Cai et al., 2015). In winter, in addition to the strengthened surface cooling, the monsoon enhanced wind mixing deepens the mixed layer, thus entraining nutrient-laden subsurface water to the surface (Zhang et al., 2019). This results in the enhanced surface water photosynthesis and higher concentrations of Chl-a (Tseng et al., 2005). Therefore, new primary production (NPP) in the SCS basin is typically uppermost in winter, when the greatest amount of nitrate is injected into the euphotic zone (Chen, 2005).

Intraseasonal events are also important. Cyclonic eddies (Tang et al., 1999, Wang et al., 2016, Zhang et al., 2019), typhoons (Liu, H. et al., 2013, Liu, K.K. et al., 2013) and internal waves (Pan et al., 2012) may all serve to upwell nutrient-rich deep water to the upper ocean, thereby stimulating the phytoplankton growth and increasing the primary production. Elevated primary production has also been observed in the northern SCS during aerosol (e.g., dust) deposition events (Wong et al., 2002, Zhang et al., 2019). These events directly load bio-nitrogen (N) from external sources into the SCS (Krishnamurthy et al., 2007, Kim et al., 2014, Zhang et al., 2019) while also supplying iron (Fe) to stimulate nitrogen fixation (Wong et al., 2002, Wong et al., 2007). The extent to which these processes and their seasonal, intraseasonal, and interannual variability impact the planktonic foraminifera shell fluxes and geochemistry is yet not fully understood.

Section snippets

Sampling and planktonic foraminiferal analysis

A time-series sediment trap (Mark VI) with a collection aperture area of 0.5 m2 and 21 collection cups were deployed at the water depth of 1000 m at 17.43 °N, 110.47 °E, off southwest Hainan in the northern South China Sea (Fig. 1a) from July 2012 to April 2013. The sediment trap is about 500 m above the seafloor; therefore, potential effects of reworked/re-suspension in our sediment sample is expected to be absent or very low. The trap was programmed to collect particulate matter at intervals of 15

Planktonic foraminiferal flux

The total planktonic foraminifera flux (TPFF) shows three distinct maxima during SW-monsoon in August 2012 (850 tests/m2/day), the SW-NE intermonsoon in October 2012 (1150 tests/m2/day) and the NE-monsoon in December 2012–February 2013 (545 tests/m2/day) (Fig. 2). The average flux for the sampling period is about 328 tests/m2/day.

Among the six key species analyzed, G. ruber accounts for 29%, Globigerinoides sacculifer for 51%, and Neogloboquadrina dutertrei for 14% of the TPFF. About 50–60% of

Discussion

In general, the peak foraminiferal flux periods with a time lag of about one collection interval coincide with the phases of the enhanced wind strength, low SST, and increases in Chl-a (Fig. 6). A recent study has reported the detailed variability of the major particle components (organic matter, biogenic opal, carbonate and lithogenic particles) of the same 2012–2013 time-series trap at SCS-NW and compared with remote sensing data (Zhang et al., 2019). The August high peak in the particle flux

Paleoceanographic implications of the shell flux seasonal variability

The planktonic foraminiferal fossil record is an important source of the physical and chemical information of the past oceans. Interpretation of foraminifera-based proxies for past environmental change is not a very straightforward task. It requires a proper understanding of the ecology of the species involved.

The shells flux export of planktonic foraminifera vary spatially and temporally (Bé, 1960, Bé and Tolderlund, 1971, Deuser et al., 1981). This variability could range from timescales of

Conclusions

The peaks of total planktonic foraminifera flux in August, October, January, and February in the northern SCS off the Hainan Island mirrored the regional high levels of Chl-a, high wind speed and relatively light δ18O observed in G. ruber tests. Conversely, total planktonic foraminifera flux was low in late November–early December 2012, when low Chl-a, low wind speed, and light δ18O were observed.

The seasonal flux variability of six common planktonic foraminiferal species observed at Site

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the State Key Research and Development Project of China (2016YFA0601101), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Science (XDB26000000), the National Program on Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction (GASI-03-01-03-03), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91128212, 91528304, and 41776073) and the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of the Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources (JT1501,

References (75)

  • K.K. Liu et al.

    Monsoon-forced chlorophyll distribution and primary production in the South China Sea: observations and a numerical study

    Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanography Research Papers

    (2002)
  • D.L. Mackas et al.

    Changing zooplankton seasonality in a changing ocean: comparing time series of zooplankton phenology

    Progress in Oceanography

    (2012)
  • M. Marchant et al.

    Seasonal and interannual variability in the flux of planktic foraminifera in the Humboldt Current System off central Chile (30°S)

    Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography

    (2004)
  • B. Morton et al.

    South China Sea

    Marine Pollution Bulletin

    (2001)
  • S. Steinke et al.

    Proxy dependence of the temporal pattern of deglacial warming in the tropical South China Sea: toward resolving seasonality

    Quaternary Science Reviews

    (2008)
  • K. Tedesco et al.

    The oxygen isotope composition of planktonic foraminifera from the Cariaco Basin, Venezuela; seasonal and interannual variations

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (2007)
  • M.E. Uhle et al.

    Sources of carbon and nitrogen in modern planktonic foraminifera: the role of algal symbionts as determined by bulk and compound specific stable isotope analyses

    Organic Geochemistry

    (1997)
  • K.E. Wejnert et al.

    The Oxygen isotope composition of planktonic foraminifera from the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California: seasonal, annual, and interspecies variability

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (2010)
  • G.T.F. Wong et al.

    Nutrient dynamics and N-anomaly at the SEATS station

    Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography

    (2007)
  • S. Žarić et al.

    Sensitivity of planktic foraminifera to sea surface temperature and export production as derived from sediment trap data

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (2005)
  • P. Anand et al.

    Calibration of Mg/Ca thermometry in planktonic foraminifera from a sediment trap time series

    Paleoceanography

    (2003)
  • A.W.H.

    Ecology of recent planktonic foraminifera — part 2, Bathymetric and seasonal distributions in the Sargasso Sea off Bermuda

    Micropaleontology

    (1960)
  • A.W.H.

    An ecological, zoogeographic and taxonomic review of recent planktonic foraminifera

  • A.W.H. et al.

    Ecology of planktonic foraminifera and biogeographic patterns of life and fossil assemblages in the Indian Ocean

    Micropaleontology

    (1977)
  • A.W.H. et al.

    Seasonal distribution of planktonic foraminifera in the western North Atlantic

    Micropaleontology

    (1971)
  • P. Cai et al.

    Role of particle stock and phytoplankton community structure in regulating particulate organic carbon export in a large marginal sea

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

    (2015)
  • D.A. Caron et al.

    Effects of variations in light intensity on life processes of the planktonic foraminifer Globigerinoides sacculifer in laboratory culture

    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

    (1982)
  • R.H. Chen et al.

    Seasonal variations of the planktonic foraminiferal flux in the central South China Sea

    Journal of Tongji University

    (2000)
  • R.H. Chen et al.

    Seasonal and annual variations of marine sinking particulate flux during 1993–1996 in the central South China Sea

    Acta Oceanologica Sinica

    (2007)
  • Y.L.L. Chen

    Spatial and seasonal variations of nitrate-based new production and primary production in the South China Sea

    Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers

    (2005)
  • W.G. Deuser et al.

    Seasonally abundant planktonic foraminifera of the Sargasso Sea: succession, deep-water fluxes, isotopic compositions, and paleoceanographic implications

    Journal of Foraminiferal Research

    (1989)
  • C.J. Du et al.

    Diapycnal fluxes of nutrients in an oligotrophic oceanic regime: the South China Sea

    Geophysical Research Letters

    (2017)
  • S. Epstein et al.

    Revised carbonate-water isotopic temperature scale

    Geological Society of America Bulletin

    (1953)
  • U. Fallet et al.

    Contrasting seasonal fluxes of planktonic foraminifera and impacts on paleothermometry in the Mozambique Channel upstream of the Agulhas Current

    Paleoceanography

    (2010)
  • D.B. Field

    Variability in vertical distributions of planktonic foraminifera in the California Current: relationships to vertical ocean structure

    Paleoceanography

    (2004)
  • I. Fraile et al.

    Predicting the global distribution of planktonic foraminifera using a dynamic ecosystem model

    Biogeosciences

    (2008)
  • C. Hemleben et al.

    Modern Planktonic Foraminifera

    (1989)
  • Cited by (2)

    • The influence of seasonal calcification depth change on the planktonic foraminiferal stable oxygen isotope signal

      2022, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because there was no relevant research in the SCS, we had to correct it using data from the Atlantic. Although there may be a small error due to the vital effect used, the ACD results we showed are the best and trustworthy since they match the results of plankton tow (Xie, 2006; Zhang et al., 2020) and sediment trap (Lin, 2014; Ladigbolu et al., 2020) investigations in the SCS. In terms of their further application to the estimation of the influence of foraminiferal depth change on the seasonal δ18O signal, it is actually independent of the absolute ACD values, and δ18Oeq of the surface water in the winter was used in calculation instead of disequilibrium values.

    • Calcification depths and temperatures of planktonic foraminifera off southwest Hainan Island and their paleoceanographic implications

      2020, Marine Micropaleontology
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, the relatively high values of the ∆δ18O observed from August 21–September 5 (summer) may suggest weaker mixing and more stratified upper waters (Tian et al., 2005). The above observations and hypotheses were corroborated by the prevailing relatively high wind speeds (Fig. 7) that overlaid the study area from late July to late August and September–October 2012 (Ladigbolu et al., 2019). The high thermal gradient values that characterized both ∆δ18O and ∆T [(N. dutertrei – G. ruber) and (N. dutertrei – G. sacculifer)] from early on November 4, 2012 to early on December 4, 2012, which were contrary to expectations for that period, may be an indication of wind speed attenuation and weak mixing between surface waters and subsurface deep waters during that time (Ladigbolu et al., 2019) (Fig. 7).

    View full text