Elsevier

Nonlinear Analysis

Volume 198, September 2020, 111885
Nonlinear Analysis

Global existence and asymptotic behaviour of solution for a damped nonlinear hyperbolic equation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2020.111885Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper we study the initial–boundary value problem for a damped nonlinear hyperbolic equation utt+Δ2u+αΔ2ut+Δf(Δu)=0,xΩ,t>0,u(x,0)=u0(x),ut(x,0)=u1(x),xΩ,u=0Δu=0,xΩ,t0, where ΩRn, n1 and α is a positive constant. Under some assumptions on f(s) and initial data, we prove the global existence of solution. Furthermore, we prove that the solution decays to zero exponentially.

Introduction

This paper considers the initial boundary value problem for a damped nonlinear hyperbolic equation utt+Δ2u+αΔ2ut+Δf(Δu)=0,xΩ,t>0u(x,0)=u0(x),ut(x,0)=u1(x),xΩ,u=0,Δu=0,xΩ,t0, where ΩRn is a bounded domain and α is a positive constant.

In the study of the vibration of 3-dimensional nonlinear damped hyperbolic equation, there arises the following equation (see [4, p. 329], an explicit example) utt+k14u+k24ut+2g(2u)=0,(x,t)Ω×(0,T),where Ω is a bounded domain in R3 with smooth boundary Ω, k1 and k2 are two positive physical constants. For the 2-dimensional model, Eq. (1.4) denotes the nonlinear damped membrane and for the 1-dimensional model Eq. (1.4) is the nonlinear beam equation (see [2], [3]). For the initial boundary value problem of one-dimensional version of Eq. (1.4) with a monotone function g, the existence and uniqueness of global weak solutions were established in [3]. Later, [2] obtained the same results as [3] under the relaxed assumption on the nonlinearity, i.e., g is a locally Lipschitz continuous function. Furthermore, Chen [6] extended the existence result of weak solutions in Ref. [2], [3] to classical solutions for the more smooth g, also the blowup of solution are proved in [6]. For the initial boundary value problem of multi-dimensional version of above equation (1.4), the existence and uniqueness of the weak solution was shown in [4] and the energy decay was given in [1] with the boundary condition u=0, uv=0, (x,t)Ω×(0,T), where v denotes the outer unit normal at Ω. And the corresponding well-posedness results for Cauchy problem were given in [5]. It is true that scholars have different points of interest for the same equation with different boundaries, however the existence and long-time behaviour of solutions have always been hot topics in the research of wave equation (see [7], [10]). Most recently, in [8] Chen et al. studied the following initial boundary value problem of multi-dimensional version of Eq. (1.4) utt+k1Δ2u+k2Δ2ut+Δg(Δu)=0,xΩ,t>0,u(x,0)=u0(x),ut(x,0)=u1(x),xΩ,u=0,Δu=0,xΩ,t0. But its boundary conditions are different from that in [4] and [1]. Under some assumptions on g(s) and initial data, they proved the local existence and global nonexistence of solution, and the global existence and asymptotic behaviour (as an important description of the long time dynamics as the global attractors [9]) of solution for problem (1.5) are still unsolved, which is the main purpose of the present paper.

Section snippets

Preliminaries

In this paper we study problem (1.1)–(1.3), where f(s) satisfies the assumptions (A)(i)fC1,inff(s)=c0>1andf(0)=0,(ii)|f(s)|k=1lAk|s|pk,Ak>0(1kl),1<p1<p2<<pln+2n2forn3;1<p1<p2<<pl<forn=1,2.We prove that if f(s) satisfies (A), then for any u0H3(Ω)H01(Ω), Δu0H01(Ω) and u1L2(Ω) problem (1.1)–(1.3) admits a global solution and when time t+ the solution decays to zero exponentially.

In this paper we denote Lp(Ω) by p, =2, (u,v)=Ωuvdx and the duality pairing between H1(Ω

Global existence of solution

In this section we prove the global existence of solution for problem (1.1)–(1.3), by the methods inspired by [11] and [13].

Theorem 3.1

Let f(s) satisfy (A). Then for any u0(x)H, u1(x)L2(Ω) problem (1.1)(1.3) admits a global solution uL(0,;H) with utL(0,;L2(Ω)) L2(0,;H2(Ω)H01(Ω)).

Proof

Let {wj(x)}j=1 be the eigenfunction system of problem Δw=λw, w|Ω=0. Construct the approximate solutions of problem (1.1)–(1.3) um(x,t)=j=1mgjm(t)wj(x),m=1,2,satisfying

umtt,ws+(Δum,Δws)+α(Δumt,Δws)+(f(Δum),Δws)=0

Asymptotic behaviour of solution

In this section we consider the asymptotic behaviour of solution for problem (1.1)–(1.3). We shall prove that as time t+ the solution given in Theorem 3.1 decays to zero exponentially.

Lemma 4.1

Let f(s) satisfy (i) in (A), {um} be the approximate solution of problem (1.1)(1.3) defined in the proof of Theorem 3.1. Then we have 12Δum2+ΩF(Δum)dxΔum2+ΩΔumf(Δum)dx.

Proof

Firstly we prove the inequality 12s2+F(s)s2+sf(s),sR.In fact, for f1(s)=f(s)k0s, k0=min{c0,0}, we have f1(s)0 and f1(0)=0, which

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their deep gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their careful and constructive suggestions that have improved this manuscript.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (2)

View full text