Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:35:30.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of land use changes on soil quality and species diversity in the Vindhyan dry tropical region of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2020

Rajani Srivastava*
Affiliation:
Environmental Science (Environmental Technology), Institute of Environment & Sustainable Development, RGSC, Banaras Hindu University, Mirzapur, 231001, India
Monalisha Mohapatra
Affiliation:
Environmental Science (Environmental Technology), Institute of Environment & Sustainable Development, RGSC, Banaras Hindu University, Mirzapur, 231001, India
Ashish Latare
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RGSC, Banaras Hindu University, Mirzapur, 231001, India
*
*Author for correspondence: Rajani Srivastava, Email: srivastava_252003@yahoo.com; rajani.srivastava25@gmail.com

Abstract

Conversion of forest land into different land use types is the primary cause of degradation of land resources, which in turn alters nutrient and carbon cycles, land productivity and diversity of species. There is scarcity of information about land-use changes (LUC) and their effect on relationship of soil quality and species diversity at landscape level in the Vindhyan dry tropical region. We evaluated the impact of land-use changes on soil physicochemical quality and the influence of these qualities on species diversity and organic matter accumulation. We also established the relationship between soil quality indicators and species diversity parameters. To examine impact of LUC, we did a detailed field survey and analysed selected soil quality indicators by standard methods. We examined species diversity parameters and established the relationship between soil quality and species diversity. We found that there is a marked decline in soil porosity, water-holding capacity and soil moisture due to LUC. Conversion from forest land (FL) to savanna land (SL) resulted in soil organic carbon decreasing by ∼40–50%. The decrease was more pronounced in cultivated land (CL) and degraded land (DL) (65–70% and 83–85%, respectively). In the case of total N, maximum decrease in total N of 83–87% was noted in DL as compared with FL. The poor soil quality indicators in degraded and agricultural land can be explained by the interaction between the soil organic carbon and nitrogen loss with diversity loss. This study recommends that for management/restoration of land resources, planning strategies should consider the current landscape structure, with land-use planning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature cited

Ali, S, Begum, F, Hayat, R and Bohannan, BJM (2017) Variation in soil organic carbon stock in different land uses and altitudes in Bagrot Valey, Northern Karakoram. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-S P, 551561.Google Scholar
Borrelli, P, Robinson, DA, Fleischer, LR, Lugato, E, Ballabio, C, Alewell, C, Meusburger, K, Modugno, S, Schütt, B, Ferro, V, Bagarello, V, Oost, KV, Montanarella, L and Panagos, P (2018) An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communication 8, 113.Google Scholar
Bustamante, MMC, Roitman, I, Aide, TM, Alencar, A, Anderson, LO, Aragao, LAO, Asner, GP, Arlow, BJ, Berenguer, E, Chambers, J, Costa, M, Fanin, T, Ferreira, L, Ferreira, J, Keller, M, Magnusson, WE, Morales-Barquero, L, Morton, D, Ometto, JPHB, Palace, M, Peres, C, Silverio, D, Trumbore, S and Vieira, IMACG (2016) Toward an integrated monitoring framework to assess the effects of tropical forest degradation and recovery on carbon stocks and biodiversity. Global Change Biology 22, 92109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cates, AM, Ruark, MD, Hedtcke, JL and Posner, JL (2016) Long-term tillage, rotation and perennialization effects on particulate and aggregate soil organic matter. Soil & Tillage Research 155, 371380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catovsky, S, Bradford, MA and Hector, A (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity: implication for carbon storage. Oikos 97, 443448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaturvedi, RK and Raghubanshi, AS (2011) Plant Functional Traits in a Tropical Deciduous Forest: An Analysis. Berlin: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Fahrig, L (2017) Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 48, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FSI, Forest Survey of India (2017) Forest cover. In State of Forest Report. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, pp. 2425.Google Scholar
Galley, RE (2014) Ecology of tropical rain forests. In Monson, RK (ed.), Ecology and the Environment. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 247272.Google Scholar
Gaston, KL (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405, 220227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillaume, T, Damris, M and Kuzyakov, Y (2015) Losses of soil carbon by converting tropical forest to plantations: erosion and decomposition estimated by δ (13) C. Global Change Biology 21, 35483560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilser, C (2006) Effect of forage cropping treatment on soil structure and relationship with fracta dimensions. Geoderma 131, 3344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersak, V (2004) Vegetation succession and soil gradients on inland sand dunes. Journal of Ekologia (Bratislava) 23, 2439.Google Scholar
Jackson, ML (1958) Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jafari, M (2006) Reclamation of Arid Lands, 1st edn. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.Google Scholar
Lambers, JHR, Harpole, WS, Tilman, D, Knops, J and Reich, PB (2004) Mechanisms responsible for the positive diversity-productivity relationship in Minnesota grasslands. Ecological Letters 7, 661668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambin, EF, Geist, HJ and Lepers, E (2003) Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review on Environmental Resources 28, 205241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemenih, M, Karltun, E and Olsson, M (2005) Assessing soil chemical and physical property responses to deforestation and subsequent cultivation in smallholders farming system in Ethiopia. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 105, 373386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manpoong, C and Tripathi, SK (2019) Soil properties under different land use systems of Mizoram, North East India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 11, 121125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalef, DR (1958) Information theory in ecology. General Systems 3, 3671.Google Scholar
Maurya, B, Singh, V, Dhyanib, P and Kashyap, S (2014) Impact of altitudes on soil characteristics and enzymatic activities in the forest and fallow lands of Almora District of Central Himalaya. Octa Journal of Environmental Research 2, 19.Google Scholar
Mortelliti, A, Amori, G, Capizzi, D, Cervone, C, Fagiani, S, Pollini, B and Boitani, L (2011) Independent effects of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and structural connectivity on the distribution of two arboreal rodents. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 153162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osakwe, UC and Igwe, CA (2013) Conversion of forests to arable land and its effect on soil physical properties in Enugu State South Eastern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology 26, 3340.Google Scholar
Ouyang, XJ, Zhou, GY, Wei, SG, Huang, ZL, Li, J and Zhang, D (2007) Soil organic carbon and nitrogen mineralization along a forest successional gradient in Southern China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 18, 16881694.Google ScholarPubMed
Pielou, E (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology 13, 131144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, CS (1966) Soil and Plant Analysis. Bombay: Hans Publishers.Google Scholar
Reidsma, P, Tekelenburg, T, Van Den Berg, M and Alkemade, R (2006) Impacts of land-use change on biodiversity: an assessment of agricultural biodiversity in the European Union. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114, 86102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawat, JS and Kumar, M (2015) Monitoring land use/cover change using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Hawalbagh block, district Almora, Uttarakhand, India. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing & Space Sciences 18, 7784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagar, R, Raghubanshi, AS and Singh, JS (2003) Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in dry tropical forest region of India. Forest Ecology and Management 186, 6171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, CE and Weaver, W (1963) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Singh, MK, Astley, H, Smith, P and Ghoshal, N (2015) Soil CO2-C flux and carbon storage in the dry tropics: impact of land-use change involving bioenergy crop plantation. Biomass and Bioenergy 83, 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, MK, Singh, S and Ghoshal, N (2017) Impact of land use change on soil aggregate dynamics in the dry tropics. Restoration Ecology 25(6), 962971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S, Mishra, R, Singh, A, Ghoshal, N and Singh, KP (2009) Soil physicochemical properties in a grassland and agroecosystem receiving varying organic inputs. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73, 15301538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, R and Singh, KP (2002) Variations in soil organic C and total N storage due to cultivation practices in the Gangetic Plain, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 28, 193199.Google Scholar
Szoboszlay, M, Dohrmann, AB, Poeplau, C, Don, A and Tebbe, CC (2017) Impact of land-use change and soil organic carbon quality on microbial diversity in soils across Europe. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 93. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilman, D, Fargione, J, Wolff, B, D’Antonio, C, Dobson, A, Howarth, R, Schindler, D, Schlesinger, WH, Simberloff, D and Swackhamer, D (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292, 281284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walkley, A and Black, IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, WL, Abernethy, VJ, Murphy, KJ, Adam, A, McCracken, DI, Downie, IS, Foster, GN, Furness, RW, Waterhouse, A and Ribera, I (2003) Prediction of plant diversity response to land-use change on Scottish agricultural land. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 94, 249263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolde Yohannes, A, Cotter, M, Kelboro, G and Dessalegn, W (2018) Land use and land cover changes and their effects on the landscape of Abaya-Chamo Basin, Southern Ethiopia. Land 7(2), 117.Google Scholar
Zare, S, Jafari, M, Tavili, A, Abbasi, H and Rostampour, M (2011) Relationship between environmental factors and plant distribution in arid and semiarid area (case study: Shahriyar rangelands, Iran). American Eurasian Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Science 10, 97105.Google Scholar